A Christmas Carol

A Christmas Carol
Posted by FoM on December 23, 2000 at 08:05:59 PT
By Anthony Lewis
Source: New York Times
Not many Americans will recognize the names of Dorothy Gaines and Kemba Smith on the list of people whose federal prison sentences President Clinton has just commuted. But they should be known because their stories challenge our vision of justice.Ms. Gaines, a 42-year-old widow with three children, was serving a sentence of 19 years and 7 months. Her trouble stemmed from the fact that she had a boyfriend, Terrell Hines, who became a driver for a drug gang.
In 1993 state prosecutors in Alabama, where they lived, charged them both with drug conspiracy. But they dropped the charges against Ms. Gaines, evidently for lack of evidence that she had done anything significant. A year later federal prosecutors went after Ms. Gaines. The witnesses against her were drug dealers who had pleaded guilty to running a large- scale crack operation. Their only testimony tying Ms. Gaines to a specific act was that she once delivered three small packets of crack to street sellers. The government's case was really that she tolerated what her boyfriend and his cohorts did. Federal drug laws carry savage mandatory minimum sentences. The only way to serve less time is to help prosecutors get someone else. In this case the someone else was Dorothy Gaines. By testifying against her, the real villains got sentences as low as 5 years, while she got nearly 20. Ms. Gaines served nearly six years in prison before the president ordered her freed, and that devastated her family. Her oldest child, Natasha, had to drop out of college to take care of the others; she is now seriously ill. Two younger children, Chara and Phillip, went into declines in school and suffered from depression. Phillip sent President Clinton a letter that is painful to read. "It's very hard," he said, "growing up without a mom or a dad." Families of imprisoned women are always likely to suffer. What makes this and similar drug cases stand out is the inequity of the sentences.Ironically, one supposed reason for the mandatory minimum sentences imposed by Congress was to make them more equal. In fact they have led to gross disparities. Big drug dealers have a perverse incentive to point the finger at others who are marginally involved, if at all. And mandatory sentences are so grotesquely harsh that some prosecutors and judges get around them by taking pleas to less serious offenses. That was not done for Ms. Gaines. Kemba Smith was a middle-class college student when she fell in with an older man who turned out to be a drug dealer. He abused her, violently, but she clung to him and took part in his crimes.A doctor testified at her trial that she was a classic victim of battered woman's syndrome, unable to break from her abuser. But Federal District Judge Richard B. Kellam said, "I think there isn't a soul alive that can understand how any woman or girl would permit some man to beat on her and then continue to live with him and to love him." He sentenced her to 24 years and 6 months in prison. Both of those women were lucky in the devoted lawyers who took up their cause. George Kendall of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund worked for years to set Ms. Smith free. A. Hugh Scott, Gregg Shapiro and others at the Boston law firm of Choate, Hall & Stewart spent hundreds of hours on Ms. Gaines's case.Dorothy Gaines and Kemba Smith are examples of the human realities that can exist behind the slogans of the War on Drugs. The so-called kingpins who prey on society deserve condign punishment. But would a civilized system of justice  a sane system  impose sentences of 20 years and more on women who were victims as much as perpetrators? Federal prisons are full of low- level, nonviolent drug offenders. A coalition of clergy asked President Clinton to commute all their sentences. In freeing Ms. Gaines and Ms. Smith he made a start, small but meaningful.The real challenge is for Congress to repeal the mandatory minimum provisions of the drug laws so judges can use the more flexible but still stiff sentencing guidelines. That will be difficult because members of Congress are afraid of being called soft on crime. But some day a president will have the courage to tell us how that harsh rigidity distorts our law.Source: New York Times (NY)Author: Anthony Lewis, New York Times ColumnistPublished: December 23, 2000Copyright: 2000 The New York Times CompanyAddress: 229 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036Fax: (212) 556-3622Contact: letters nytimes.comWebsite: Articles & Web Site:Families Against Mandatory Minimums Gaines Wins Her Freedom Smith Granted The Gift Of Freedom
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #1 posted by FoM on December 23, 2000 at 09:22:19 PT
Merry Christmas Friends!
Merry Christmas Everyone! The news will be slow over the next few days so I thought this would be a nice time to post my little Christmas page. The midi song doesn't work if you use Netscape but it should with Internet Explorer. Here is the Yule Log if you like Classical Christmas Music. This link is on the page too.I need to go shopping! Nothing like last minute right? LOL!The Yule Log've come a long way this last year! But I say this, We've come a long way but we can't get weary now. The holidays hopefully will be a time to reflect and plan for the New Year and what our hopes and dreams are.Merry Christmas, Stick & FoM!
Merry Christmas from Stick & FoM!
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: