Drug War Is Much Like Prohibition 

Drug War Is Much Like Prohibition 
Posted by FoM on December 12, 2000 at 21:52:27 PT
By Thom Marshall
Source: Houston Chronicle 
Comparisons of the current drug war to the Prohibition era of alcohol often surface in the ongoing debate and discussion of criminal-justice system issues. Don Williams of Pearland, however, supports the drug war and is not convinced that most references to Prohibition are based on accurate information. "Oftentimes," he wrote in an e-mail, " `common wisdom' is more common than wise." 
He said, "More people drink now than before Prohibition. In fact, if you check you will find that alcohol use increased dramatically right after Prohibition." He went so far as to state his belief that "during Prohibition alcohol consumption was actually quite uncommon. Yes, money was made, and corruption in some cities was a problem. However, the Untouchables stuff we all remember on TV was really mostly a popular stereotype." I called on Ethan Nadelmann to join in the debate. He is executive director of the New York-based Lindesmith Center -- Drug Policy Foundation, a nonprofit with 24,000 supporters who favor alternatives to current U.S. drug policy. The organization focuses on public education, promoting research and debate on drug-policy issues. Health Woes of Illegal Booze:Nadelmann, formerly an assistant professor of politics and public affairs at Princeton, has done considerable research on Prohibition and how it compares with the drug war. He said that alcohol use in the U.S. declined between 1916 and 1922, for a variety of reasons, including World War I and the boycotting of German breweries. And then, between 1922 and the end of Prohibition in 1933, alcohol use went up. It was impossible to compile any official figures during Prohibition because there was no way of keeping tabs on alcohol being illegally produced or smuggled and illegally sold and consumed. But Nadelmann said judging from hospital records of people admitted for various reasons related to drinking, alcohol consumption rose steadily from 1922 to 1933. It's true that people didn't drink as much beer. But that was because beer wasn't as profitable to the dealers. It's also probable that many people who drank only a little bit gave it up rather than break the law. But any impact they may have had on per capita intake would have been misleading since problem drinkers could easily continue buying booze, which flowed freely from illegal speak-easies and bootleggers. Nadelmann said the violence from crime organizations battling to control the sale of illegal booze was real. He said that illegal markets breed such violence because of the violent criminals they attract and because those participants in the illegal trade have no traditional legal means -- like courts -- to resolve disputes. Another serious health problem resulting from Prohibition, one that was more widespread and claimed more victims than the gang warfare, was bad hooch. Since there was no way to control the quality or safety of illegal liquor, people too often drank stuff that poisoned them, blinded them or left them crippled. Popularity Comparisons:While Williams and others fear that legalization or decriminalization of drugs would lead to an increase in use, Nadelmann said there is good reason to believe the currently illicit substances would not become as popular as alcohol and tobacco. He said that some reasons people like alcoholic beverages are because they quench thirst, go well with food, please the palate, promote appetite and sociability. Tobacco is especially addictive but also possesses such subtle psychoactive effects that its use can be integrated with many other activities. He said that none of the illegal drugs currently popular in the United States shares these attributes, and they are not likely to acquire them if legalized. Also, none of them can compete with the special place in American culture and history that is occupied by alcohol -- a place from which even Prohibition was unable to dislodge it. Another reason Prohibition failed was that it made criminals of too many people. People who otherwise were law-abiding chose to ignore Prohibition laws and deal with those criminals who sold the illegal refreshments. Likewise, there is widespread defiance of drug laws, Nadelmann said. Tens of millions of people are using illegal drugs. That is a large portion of the population who are likely to harbor or develop feelings of hostility and suspicion about laws in general and those who enforce them. So Nadelmann sees many valid reasons to compare Prohibition to the drug war. Thom Marshall's e-mail address is: thom.marshall Source: Houston Chronicle (TX)Author: Thom MarshallPublished: December 12, 2000Copyright: 2000 Houston ChronicleAddress: Viewpoints Editor, P.O. Box 4260 Houston, Texas 77210-4260Fax: (713) 220-3575Contact: viewpoints chron.comWebsite: Articles & Web Site:TLC - DPF War Reform: a Crumbling Wall Front Lines of The Drug War Articles - Thom Marshall
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #2 posted by dddd on December 13, 2000 at 01:44:37 PT
 A good article,considering it's from a major newspaper...."It was impossible to compile any official figures during Prohibition because there was no way of keeping tabs on alcohol being illegally produced or smuggled and illegally sold and consumed."..... And the same thing is true today.It really fries me to hear all the "statistics",that are strewn about concerning drugs,and drug abuse.Just like alcohol then,drugs are, illegally produced or smuggled and illegally sold and consumed.....dddd
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by mungojelly on December 13, 2000 at 01:05:33 PT:
face to face with the facts
Increasingly drug warriors are going to be put face to face with the facts. They are going to have respectable journalists asking them, in a straight tone, "isn't this drug prohibition the same as the LAST failed drug prohibition in America?" What are they going to say? How will they draw a distinction? The voice of the drug war is clear: there MUST be a distinction. So they will search for one, and if one is not available, they will invent one. Perhaps alcohol prohibition DID work, they will say. Perhaps it DIDN'T create rampant corruption and violence. Or perhaps the laws of supply and demand have changed dramatically since those days. Perhaps it is human nature that has changed. Don't underestimate the lengths they will go to in order to justify prohibition -- to the media and to their own consciences. The strangest thing has started to happen when drug war supporters are questioned about the fact that so many people are sent to jail for nonviolent drug offenses: THEY DENY THAT PEOPLE ARE BEING SENT TO JAIL. Have you noticed this? When asked why so many cocaine and heroin addicts are put in jail, their response is that cocaine and heroin addicts are NOT put in jail. When you put statistics under their nose, they say things like "these people were drug dealers who plea bargained." It will be easy to be angered by the sheer ignorance which we will increasingly be flowing from the mouths of the antis, as they are finally forced to explain their irrational policies. But I believe that what we are seeing is not an entire culture of people who are willing to lie to maintain the status quo (though there are certainly liars among them) but a simple genuine ignorance. We need to educate. 
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: