DOA: Adios, Juan

DOA: Adios, Juan
Posted by FoM on October 03, 2000 at 07:03:50 PT
By Joel Miller, Managing Editor WND
Source: WorldNetDaily
Many people won't shed a single tear for Juan Mendoza Fernandez. After all, when the police stormed the 60-year-old's house last Thursday night, they came away with almost a pound of meth, an ounce of cocaine and a tad more than 5 grams of marijuana. "They are pumping the drugs into the city of Irving (Texas)," said one officer of Fernandez and other members of the family, "and we are going to do everything possible to stop it." 
Including introducing Juan to the hereafter. As the Sept. 30 Dallas Morning News tells it, while Juan and his 64-year-old wife, Josefina, were watching Spanish-language TV near midnight Sept. 28, they heard an explosion, which they assumed had something to do with a drive-by shooting. They should be so lucky. Actually, it was a grenade, tossed by police at the front of the house to lure residents away from the back -- a dangerous place from which to flush folks during a drug raid. "Open the door!" yelled men from the outside, said Juan's 11-year-old granddaughter who was startled from sleep by the ruckus. "They were screaming and banging on the door," Josefina told a reporter in Spanish, "we thought they wanted to come in and kill us." Juan bolted to the rear of the house to protect his frightened granddaughter, according to the accounts of Josefina and the girl, huddling over her to shield her from gunfire. Once police had entered the house, officers detained Josefina in the living room and headed to the rear of the house where they confronted Juan and the granddaughter. Police say that Juan leveled a large-caliber handgun at them -- an action which was answered by gunfire. According to the police account, the lead officer fired at Juan, who fell but continued to point the firearm. The lead officer and a second officer shot Juan again. "When he turned around, they shot him," said the granddaughter while hugging her mother the day following the raid. "Then they got down and shot him, I think, four more times." The family contends that at the time of the raid Juan was unarmed, a claim that, for purposes of justifying the shooting, may be relevant to some but is, in some sense, of little concern. Even if Juan were armed, as police claim, few people could blame him for it. "We didn't know it was the police," said Josefina, thinking the men banging on the door were robbers. According to family members, neither Juan nor his wife are fluent in English (Josefina speaks none at all), and -- even though officers announced themselves and wore clothing identifying them as police -- the couple did not understand what was going on. These sorts of raids "are a bad idea at early hours or late at night," said Timothy Lynch, director of the Cato Institute's Project on Criminal Justice. Given the time of day, "People are startled, which increases the chances of misunderstanding and violence." While "startled" might be a tame word -- "terrified" might work better -- that is especially true if the suspects speak little or no English and have a child in the house. Of course, if police are correct in charging that Juan was selling drugs, no doubt he brought this danger upon himself and his family, as such risk would be known to anyone dealing in illicit drugs. The question is, does that justify the raid? A narcotics team surveilled the Fernandez home before Juan arrived at about 11:20 p.m. Why, someone might ask, couldn't they have arrested him upon arrival -- where family members wouldn't be placed in danger -- and served the search warrants after neutralizing Juan? Instead of this or some similar tactic, they busted into the house, a high-risk situation for all involved, and literally neutralized Juan. While some will no doubt respond by saying Juan was a drug dealer and knew the risks of the trade, Lynch counters by saying, "Even with someone who is a drug dealer or user, caught up in the raid, we have higher expectations of how the police conduct themselves in these situations." The fact that the granddaughter was present should have been enough of a "yield" sign for officers to pull back and try it another day. What if she had been wounded or killed in the gunfight? The family of 11-year-old Alberto Sepulveda of Modesto, Calif., can well attest to this danger. A Modesto SWAT officer shot Alberto dead during a Sept. 13 raid targeting his father; the case is currently under investigation by the state attorney general. "With a nighttime raid at that hour and with this language barrier, it just sounds like an awful operation from the word 'go,'" observed Lynch, adding that "Most people will recognize certain circumstances where no-knock raids are necessary ... but it is the government that has to justify this sort of military-style raid; it is not the homeowner." Why were police gung-ho with a wife and child in the house, especially considering the language problem? Didn't they know about the child and the language barrier? If not, why? What ever happened to proper investigation before conducting an operation as dangerous as a drug raid? And why a raid that night at all; couldn't police have waited for a better, lower-risk opportunity? Was nabbing one old man -- who, if guilty, wasn't even a big-time dealer -- really worth endangering his family, the officers involved and eventually killing the suspect? None of this is to say that Juan Mendoza Fernandez was an innocent man - just a wrongfully slain man. The police, no doubt, could have put the raid off till better circumstances existed, or conducted his arrest in a different manner. Instead, they forced a confrontation that shoved Juan in to the position of defending his property and family from armed men he most likely did not even know were police. Were the officers involved justified in killing Juan; if he was armed as the police claim, yes. But police shoulder some responsibility for forcing the confrontation in the first place. As bad and dangerous as drugs may be, police are proving more and more every day that the measures used to stamp them out are worse by far. If you have any stories or information about drug-war victims, feel free to forward them to Joel Miller. Editor's note: This column marks the beginning of an occasional series, 'Death on Arrival,' documenting lethal abuses in America's war on drugs. Joel MillerManaging EditorWorldNetDaily Publishinghttp://www.WND.comSource: WorldNetDaily (US Web)NewsHawk: Joel MillerPublished: October 3, 2000Author: Joel Miller: jmiller worldnetdaily.comCopyright: 2000,, Inc.Contact: letters worldnetdaily.comAddress: PO Box 409, Cave Junction, OR 97523-0409Fax: (541) 597-1700Website: Articles By Joel Miller:
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #1 posted by observer on October 03, 2000 at 17:51:04 PT
As bad and dangerous as drugs may be, police are proving more and more every day that the measures used to stamp them out are worse by far.Yes. The cure of prohibition is worse than the so-called disease ... As always, excellent work by Joel Miller!
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: