Drug Czar's Filthy Lucre 

Drug Czar's Filthy Lucre 
Posted by FoM on September 28, 2000 at 08:23:37 PT
By Joel Miller
Source: WorldNetDaily
There you are, smalltime storeowner, operating the till, when a man with a dog walks in. He steps to the counter and asks for a pack of Camels. Pulling a box down from the overhead rack, you ring it up and open the cash drawer to exchange his $10 bill for cigarettes and change. Then, the dog barks. Oddly enough, the man's expression takes on a serious look as he waves the $5 you gave him under his dog's nose. 
More barking. Your peculiar customer then informs you that he is an off-duty narcotics officer and his drug-sniffing dog detected dope on your dough; could he please see the cash drawer? Confused, you think for a moment about protesting, but -- not wanting to run afoul of the law -- you comply. The dog smells drugs all over the drawer, and the officer concludes that the money is tainted, seizing your cash drawer based upon the suspicion that the money must have been used in connection with illegal drug trafficking. Unbelievable? The first time I had ever heard such an account was from a 1992 lecture given by Cato Institute Executive Vice President David Boaz at Laissez Faire Books in San Francisco, Calif. The particular account he presented was nearly identical to the one I just fabricated. Turns out, nabbing dope-tainted money isn't too uncommon. One of the earliest of such cases happened back in the early 1980s when police followed a pair of Mexican nationals to Atlanta, Ga., banks. As Sacramento Bee reporter Michael G. Wagner recounts the story for a Nov. 16, 1994, article, the two were arrested after buying nearly $10,000 worth of cashier's checks -- just under the amount requiring IRS notification -- and were "charged with conspiring to defraud the government in a narcotics operation." Prosecutors used money seized from the suspects' transactions to prove their dastardly deed; the cash tested positive for cocaine residue. Big deal, said their attorney, who bought a bundle of shredded money and had it checked. The tests revealed that money, purchased from U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, was tainted, too. Establishing guilt based on a standard that would indict your local Fed banker if his vaults were checked didn't seem like a great idea, and the judge ordered the pair's money returned. Just last April, Broward County, Fla., sheriff's deputies nabbed almost $1,600 from one Rosendo Louis, who was suspected of trespassing on the lot of an unoccupied house. After searching Louis, drug-sniffing dogs red-flagged Louis' money -- mostly small bills -- for narcotics taint. The cops grabbed the cash -- to no avail. Just this month, according to the Miami Herald, Circuit Judge Robert Lance Andrews ordered the police to give back the cash. "It is conceivable," ruled Andrews, "that anyone in South Florida who was carrying U.S. currency would 'alert' a narcotics-sniffing dog." To help make his point, Andrews referenced a 1985 Miami Herald story that related the results of a test involving $20 bills taken from various community leaders and checked for traces of drugs. Residues were found on the bills belonging to, among others: Jeb Bush The Archbishop of Miami And then-Dade County State Attorney Janet Reno "Overall," says Miami forensic toxicologist Dr. Jay Pupko, "the money in the general circulation has been contaminated by microgram levels of cocaine." Not only do drug users sometimes roll up bills like straws and use them to snort lines of cocaine, but, as Pupko believes, most of the money is tainted initially by drug dealers counting stacks of bills. The taint, however, spreads quickly, as Pupko adds that even bank tellers spread the residue when sorting and tallying cash. Cashiers and pushers shouldn't feel too bad about it, though. There's plenty of blame to go around -- including the Federal Reserve itself. Testing suspicions that drug-tainted money spreads quicker than either gospel or gossip in a Midwest church, Wagner reports that in 1985, DEA chemists examined money-processing machines at a U.S. District Federal Reserve Bank, "where vast amounts of currency is routinely sorted." The results? "In random samples of $50 and $100 bills, a third to a half of all the samples collected had cocaine," according to one DEA chemist, who added that "it appeared that hot money was contaminating the (machine) belts, which then contaminated fresh money." In a test that positively resolved a 1994 case for the defendant, Pupko and fellow toxicologist Dr. William Lee Hearn collected currency from all corners of the country, including Austin, Los Angeles, Miami, Milwaukee, New York, Pittsburgh and Seattle, even going abroad to grab U.S. bills circulating in London. All but four of the bills were tainted -- 131 out of 135. "Basically, the DEA is conceding that this is a problem," said Pupko, "that most of the money is contaminated." Not that the authorities mind overly much about the taint. Filthy lucre is still lucre to them; they'll seize it just the same. In 1999, Broward County, Fla., seized $1 million that the government has since put to use paying for various anti-drug, crime-prevention and education programs. According to the Amarillo Globe-News, on Sept. 17 Texas police seized more than $2.5 million found in the back of a tractor-trailer stopped in the Panhandle. Of course, the truck driver disavowed any connection to the cash, and, with no one stepping forward to claim it, the cash will likely be split 70-30 between the state and Parmer County. Two-point-five million dollars -- who can argue with that? Judge Andrews, perhaps. "Appellate courts are moving in the direction I'm moving," said Andrews in his Louis ruling, "I think (law enforcement agencies) are abusing forfeiture statutes. ... There is a lot of money involved." Too much money, and the law is far too arbitrary if police only have to prove that your cash might be tainted to pinch it -- never mind that the greenbacks in their own wallets are likely tainted as well. Thankfully, with the many precedents of confiscated money being returned when the charge is based solely on drug taint, police may not get to keep the cash. But, I'm afraid, that doesn't stop them from trying. Direct link to: Drug Czar's Filthy Lucre jmiller worldnetdaily.comJoel Miller is Managing Editor of WorldNetDaily Publishing. Source: WorldNetDaily (US Web)Web Posted: September 28, 2000Author: Joel MillerCopyright: 2000,, Inc.Contact: letters worldnetdaily.comAddress: PO Box 409, Cave Junction, OR 97523-0409Fax: (541) 597-1700Website: Articles:Straight Dope: Lookout for Big Narc Dope: Dispatches From the Drug War Lord Giveth, The Police Taketh Away Articles - Joel Miller 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #2 posted by observer on September 28, 2000 at 15:11:27 PT
Joel Miller for President!
He's doing a great job with this series. The pro-prison crowd isn't attempting to refute any of it... I think his WND articles are having an impact. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by max on September 28, 2000 at 11:31:01 PT:
heil mcaffery
just another example of how that nazi prick czar mcaffery is OUT OF CONTROL
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: