Injecting Big Brother

Injecting Big Brother
Posted by FoM on July 11, 2000 at 17:52:35 PT
New Vaccines May Drug-Proof Kids
Source: The Village Voice
The war on drugs may soon be over, but not because of legalization, stiffer penalties, or a truce between cartels and prohibitionists. This uneasy peace would come at the hands of pharmaceutical companies and biotech labs, which are about to unleash the ultimate weapon: the antidrug vaccine. One anti-cocaine vaccine, already shown to be safe for humans, prevents people who snort coke from getting high. 
Researchers are also testing vaccines for nicotine. And results look promising for the eradication of PCP abuse and methamphetamine addiction. The National Institute on Drug Abuse has funded much of the development cost—approximately $4.5 million since 1996. "Just as medications have been developed for other chronic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, and cancer," writes NIDA in its five-year strategic plan, "drug addiction is a disease that also merits medication for its treatment." Looking at social ills through a medical lens is not a new phenomenon. By studying disorders from alcoholism and compulsive gambling to attention deficit disorder and depression, scientists have discovered not only genetic factors responsible for so-called abnormal behavior, but also the way such behavior affects the brain's neural map. According to Dr. Frank Vocci, director of NIDA's Treatment Research and Development division, the antidrug vaccines can provide a powerful weapon against substance addiction, especially when combined with therapy and psychiatric medicine. And vaccines, which unleash an onslaught of drug-busting antibodies, can do what traditional treatment can't. "If a patient is in an emergency room with high methamphetamine levels and experiencing a cardiovascular crisis," says Vocci, "antibodies would bind the drug up and cause the individual to excrete it." In other words, an injection of antibodies could reduce the specter of death by overdose to a bad '70s flashback. Though scientists have long used vaccines to trick the immune system into thwarting lethal diseases, the antidrug vaccines are a new breed, designed to attack pleasure-inducing chemicals that the brain craves. Some of these new vaccines use antibodies that bind to the illegal drug, render it inactive, and then leave the bloodstream. Others remain potent for years. This is the type of vaccine that purged the Western world of polio and smallpox—and may put a choke hold on civil liberties. The human affinity for altering perception reaches far back in the evolutionary chain. If antidrug vaccines become widely available, parents will be able to decide whether their kids will be able to get high—even as adults, even recreationally. And governments could target certain communities for vaccination. "Who is going to get it?" asks Dr. Peter Cohen, an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, who has written on the legal implications of the vaccines. "Those who have a history of cocaine abuse? Those who may be statistically likely to become addicts? Or do you vaccinate everybody?" Cohen argues everyone should get the shots, but so far the only human tests have been done on addicts. In one experiment by Yale University this spring, researchers vaccinated 34 former cocaine abusers living in a residential treatment facility. That vaccine, called TA-CD, generates antibodies that grab onto the upper as soon as it enters the bloodstream, preventing the drug from bumrushing the brain. The new vaccines have limitations. Namely, addicts could still get high if they did enough lines. Enter Dr. Donald Landry, associate professor of medicine at Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons, who's researching so-called catalytic antibodies. With a load of them in your bloodstream, you'd have to snort a lot of coke to feel any effect. So much so thatfinancial limitations (you'd have to spend a ton of money) and physical needs (you'd have to stop and breathe) would kick in. "Everyone attempting to quit cocaine can use the catalytic antibody," Landry says. But if you can't get high from cocaine, you can get drunk on alcohol or stoned on pot. Substance-abuse counselors say a vaccine alone won't solve the problem of drug abuse, and shouldn't end up replacing more expensive—and extensive—treatments that deal with the factors that lead to addiction. "We're not going to run out of new and inventive things that are going to make people high, but that doesn't mean a vaccine won't help for some people," says Peter Kerr, a spokesman for the New York branch of Phoenix House, who compares the use of antidrug vaccines to relying on the synthetic opiate methadone to treat heroin addicts. "The primary emphasis is relieving symptoms. Counseling is an ancillary factor." Unlike methadone, which is used to fight debilitating withdrawal symptoms, or Anabuse, which causes an alcoholic to become violently ill upon drinking, some vaccines can last a lifetime. There's no turning back. And if the choice of a child is in the hands of a parent, or that of a prisoner in the hands of the government, then involuntary vaccinations become the result. "It's hard to justify vaccinating a million children when only a small percentage are at risk, even in an area where cocaine use is endemic," says Landry. The vaccines also raise questions of privacy. "Once you're vaccinated, you have antibodies in your blood that would show up in a drug test," saysCohen. "The least controversial solution is universal vaccination: You wouldn't be stigmatizing any one group." Yet mass vaccinations have always been controversial. "That's treating people like cattle," says Joe Lehman, a spokesman for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. Lehman believes that there would be pressure to get an antidrug vaccine, especially when it comes to insurance companies (who might offer special premiums to the vaccinated) or employers (who in the age of mandatory drug testing have obvious motives). Though mass, forced vaccinations may be unlikely, a scenario in which individuals feel pressured to get the vaccine is no less chilling in its implications. Civil libertarians, on both the left and right ends of the political spectrum, aren't the only ones concerned over universal vaccination. Critics of childhood vaccinations—alternative medicine advocates, concerned parents—are growing in number. The National Vaccine Information Center promotes parental awareness about vaccination risks and the right to refuse shots. Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the center, is outraged by the idea of antidrug vaccines. "To add a vaccine to the mix that doesn't fit into early-childhood diseases seems amazing," she says. "That we can get a vaccine to solve every social problem is short-term thinking." By Carla SpartosTell us what you think?E-mail: editor Direct Link To Article: Published July 12 - July 18, 2000Copyright © 2000 Village Voice Media, Inc.Related Articles:Immunized Against Addiction May Block the Cocaine High an Antibody Gobble Up Cocaine Cravings?
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #6 posted by AhWell on July 12, 2000 at 11:47:13 PT
Let's see.....
....They want to inject me with chemicals so as to alter my thinking and feelings, if only by default.Sounds like drug abuse to me!I pity our children and the world we've created for them.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #5 posted by fuk on July 12, 2000 at 11:32:14 PT
What war on drugs?????
looks to me that the so called war on drugs is a joke! first off the goverment seems to being losing a battle they'll never win! so they should give up! first off i see the harm of many of these drugs, and i understand this. But i have found that marijuana is much safer then alcohol. i also believe its society that portrays marijuana as such an "evil" thing, maybe people should realize its not a bad thing.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by FoM on July 12, 2000 at 08:38:30 PT
Reminds me of Clockwork Orange
Kanabys I also thought of a movie when I was posting this article. Clockwork Orange. That movie made me feel really sick when I went and saw it in the 70s. The controlling of people's behavior with drugs is the part that came to mind.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by Kanabys on July 12, 2000 at 07:25:49 PT
Like the movies...
This is the new version of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers".Except it's the govt instead of aliens; oh, wait a sec, they're one in the same.......
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by Dan B on July 12, 2000 at 00:35:10 PT:
Maybe this will wake some people up to the WoD.
"The least controversial solution is universal vaccination: You wouldn't be stigmatizing any one group."If there is one issue that should cause the American people to understand the sinister nature of the drug war, this has to be it. They are actuall advocating vaccinating everybody, which means, of course, forced vaccinations. How will this play out?People will have to begin recognizing that the freedom to control their own bodies is at stake with regard to the war on drugs. That is, this measure is so blatant, how could people miss it? It is the deliberate, systematic removal of normal bodily reactions to drugs--many of which are quite beneficial, and most of which are currently used for what even the narcs would consider legitimate purposes, such as medical procedures. To illustrate my point, have you ever been given morphine in the hospital? Or have you ever heard someone say, "It's not that it removed the pain, it just made it so I didn't care about it anymore"? This is because morphine makes one high, and morphine is, like heroin, a derivative of opium. What happens when one is vaccinated against the effects of heroin? The individual no longer feels the high, rendering the drug ineffective. And it stands to reason that if heroin is rendered ineffective, drugs derived from the same source as heroin wil also be rendered ineffective. Thus, possibly for the remainder of their lives, people who are vaccinated will no longer be able to use one of the most effective accepted treatments for chronic pain and pain due to major surgery.And of course, some prophecy-oriented Christians will undoubtedly refuse any such universal measures, fearing that the vaccinations might be "the mark of the Beast."So, even non drug-users will have reason to avoid these vaccinations. What, then, will happen once people begin to recognize that the government is coming after their bodies? They will do anything they can to protect their bodies from this invasion. The result? At best, isolated incidents of violence. More likely, the result will be an internal war that will make the current war on some drugs look like a spitting contest.Perhaps the threat of these vaccinations can be another avenue through which we can alert people to the dangers of the war on drugs with regard to personal freedoms. If people begin to understand that the war on drugs affects them even if they are not drug users, maybe they will begin to join us in our efforts to stop this madness.By the way--an encouraging statistic I heard on the late, late news yesterday: 64% of voters between the ages of 18 and 21 believe that the country needs a third party. This could very well be our new base of libertarian thinkers (not necessarily libertarian party-line, but at least concerned with the cause of personal liberty). These new voters are not fooled by the Republicrats, even though most of them have been fed the bi-party line six hours a day for at least the past 12 years. Seems most young people are more intelligent than the gov gives then credit for.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by dddd on July 11, 2000 at 18:13:09 PT
 It's gonna be interesting to see what they charge for these strange anti-drug snake-oils.It'll probably make the drugs they are supposed to "cure",look cheap....dddd
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: