DrugSense Weekly May 5, 2000 #148

DrugSense Weekly May 5, 2000 #148
Posted by FoM on May 05, 2000 at 16:49:15 PT
Colombia: A War Without End? By Sanho Tree
Source: DrugSense
Drugs today are cheaper and more available than ever before. Will escalating a failed drug control policy produce a different result? Our drug czar, General Barry McCaffrey, seems to think so. In January, General McCaffrey unveiled the administration's aid package for Colombia.
Our militarized drug strategy overwhelmingly emphasizes drug eradication, interdiction and law enforcement when studies show that these are the least effective means of reducing illicit drug use. A landmark study of cocaine markets by the conservative RAND Corporation found that, dollar for dollar, providing treatment to cocaine users is 10 times more effective than drug interdiction schemes and 23 times more cost effective than eradicating coca at its source. According to the General Accounting Office, Colombian officials "seized a record amount of coca products in 1998 almost 57 metric tons and had also destroyed 185 cocaine laboratories... [However] there has not been a net reduction in processing or exporting refined cocaine from Colombia or in cocaine availability within the United States." After $625 million in US counter narcotics assistance to Colombia between 199098, Colombia actually surpassed Peru and Bolivia to become the world's largest coca producer.If decreasing drug use is the ultimate goal, why aren't we putting more resources into domestic demand reduction where each dollar spent is 23 times more effective than eradication? General McCaffrey's drug control budget is simply upside down two thirds of the budget still focuses on law enforcement and "supply reduction" while one third is expected to cover drug treatment, education and prevention.Our drug czar has staked his reputation on a futile "supply reduction" strategy, and now we are militarizing the entire region in a last ditch attempt to salvage a failed policy. Colombia's conflict is driven by social, political, and economic forces sending guns and helicopters will not remedy poverty and hunger. The region is in desperate need of a mini Marshall Plan, but General McCaffrey's response is to send them Desert Storm. We can help Colombia address issues of poverty and inequality, but not by sending them more weapons.In order to justify more than a billion dollars in military aid, our drug warriors are now invoking the specter of a leftist insurgency that has been making advances in the four decade old Colombian civil war. Although all parties in the Colombian conflict have been involved in drug trafficking, General McCaffrey is promoting only the "narcoguerilla" as the bogeyman. He told reporters last July that it is "silly at this point" to try to differentiate between antidrug efforts and the war against insurgent groups. Compare that statement with what McCaffrey told reporters two years before: "Let there be no doubt: We are not taking part in counter guerrilla operations." Thanks to mission creep, our counter narcotics policy has now drawn us into the Colombian civil war.The potential for a Vietnam style quagmire in Colombia is alarming. Once again, there is no definition of "victory", no clear articulation of objectives, and no exit strategy. Are we aiming for a 20%, 50% or 100% reduction in drug production? Or are we trying to push the guerrillas south of the equator or are we trying to "degrade" their military capability? Or will the war end when US drug use completely disappears?There is no capital city to occupy, no enemy flag to seize, and no geographic high ground to capture. How many Colombians are we prepared to sacrifice for such undefined objectives? Americans have a right to know what goals we must achieve before we can declare success and go home. This military assistance is the first in a series of blank checks in a war that has no endgame.General Charles Wilhelm, the head of US military forces in Latin America, told Congress the Colombian military must gain some battlefield victories in order to bargain with the rebels from a position of strength. Isn't this the kind of fuzzy, flexible objective that kept us in the Vietnam quagmire? And, if the Colombian military begins to win some victories, the hawks may abandon peace negotiations completely in the illusory hope of defeating the rebels. Do our elected representatives think it ethical for the US to escalate the vicious civil war in Colombia, risking the lives of peasants and indigenous people caught in the crossfire, to stop Americans from buying drugs? If so, they need a reality check. How can we eliminate drugs from the Andes when we can't even keep them out of our own prisons?It is simply wishful thinking and political scapegoating to believe poor countries such as Colombia and Mexico can remedy the US demand for illicit drugs. Until we provide adequate resources for drug treatment, rehabilitation and prevention, the US will continue to consume billions of dollars worth of drugs and impoverished peasants will continue to grow them. If the drug war was evaluated like most other federal programs, we would have tried different strategies long ago. But our current policy seems to follow its own unique logic. A decline in drug use becomes evidence that we should invest more money and resources in the National Drug Control Strategy because it is working. A rise in drug use becomes proof that we are not doing enough to fight drugs, and must redouble our efforts and funding.Under this unsustainable dynamic, funding and incarceration rates can only rachet upward. Our so called War on Drugs has become an unending war against our own citizens and against our neighbors in this hemisphere. It is time to consider alternative policies that reduce the harm caused by drug abuse as well as reduce the harm caused by the drug war itself.Reprinted from the Razor Wire a publication of the November Coalition the link to read all of DrugSense Weekly's Update News:DrugSense Weekly May 5, 2000 #148 MapInc. & DrugSense Articles & Archives:
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #3 posted by Suspect Stereotype on May 06, 2000 at 10:13:08 PT
The Irony of it All
In the surrealistic way that one's mind wanders when contemplating the imminent destruction of one's species, it occurs to me that irony is a living entity, a satiristic fairy that actively seeks out those individuals who foist their twisted world view on others, sprinkles them with "magic contortionist dust", and then shoves that persons foot firmly into their mouth.Barry McCzar wants to change the public view about the WoD, so he encourages us to think of drug use as a cancer. A cancer that must be eliminated if the "body" is to survive.That scenario would make McCzar a physician that is trying to save a dying patient. Someone's PR guy deserves a cookie for that one.The truth is that the many-faceted tragedy of the Drug War is the cancer that is eating away at the lives of those in this country and the rest of the world. That means Barry and his cohorts are quack butchers that are ripping out the heart of the future in a feverish attempt to find the right "squishy thing" to remove.Sadly, the rest of the world is looking to us, the so-called "sovereign citizens" of the United States, to stop this madness because we're the only ones who can. However, the first acts of the Dr./Warrior was a frontal lombotomy and to remove our vocal cords. Probably because all that screaming made it hard to concentrate.So as the world desolves into a fungus-based sludge that is all that's left of out eco-system, and biblical-scale famine and pestilence ravage the earth. It is somehow fitting that the drug warriors foot will also be his last meal.Apprehensively Yours,SS
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by dddd on May 06, 2000 at 01:01:05 PT
How much longer
To pick up on Professor Nemos' last line"So, how much longer are we going to permit the adult equivalent of "savant" children run our drug policies?" This is the main part of our problem.The country at large,the citizens,are unable to have any say in who we "permit" to be given the title of "Czar".In a true democratic society,anyone with the influence,and power of a "czar",would be on a ballot.Any of the constitution shredding mandates,like forfiture,and mandatory minimums,would be put up to a public vote. Of course,this would be countered with,"You should elect the right people to represent your views in government."This would be true in the ideal true democratic system,that was honest,and not dominated by money,and all of the well masked forms it takes. I regret having to say it again,but I'm afraid the monster is pretty much out of the cage,and out of control,and nearly unstopable. The "Will of the People",is almost an irrelevant term in these strange days.....dddd 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by kaptinemo on May 05, 2000 at 18:39:18 PT:
Squeezing a balloon
Ever watch a little kid playing with a balloon? Especially one that's partially inflated? They squeeze on one end, and it bulges at the other. Squeeze both ends, and it bulges in the middle.Most children of average intelligence quickly tire of this and leave the balloon for more rewarding or challenging pursuits. Why? Because they learn all they need to know about the dynamics of balloon squeezing within seconds of beginning. Namely, that they can't do much more than squeeze and watch it bulge. That's it. It's a no-brainer.But unfortunately, what if said child had been shortchanged by Nature in the gray-matters department? What if such an unfortunate simply couldn't make the necessary leap of understanding between cause and effect? It is conceivable that such a sad individual might spend hours, days, months, years, even decades, squeezing that tired old balloon, hoping that something different would happen besides the predictable-as-always bulge.I think you see where this is going. McCaffrey and Company have been behaving as that poor dimwitted child, viciously squeezing the DrugWar balloon in the vain hope that someday the balloon *won't* bulge. In the same spirit of the child who makes homemade wings and leaps from the roof, they refuse to recognize that reality doesn't care one whit about their ideology; Gravity rules, and rules harshly when you disregard it. So does Economics.So, how much longer are we going to permit the adult equivalent of "savant" children run our drug policies? 
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: