One Year of Legal Pot Sales
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('One Year of Legal Pot Sales');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

One Year of Legal Pot Sales
Posted by CN Staff on December 28, 2018 at 17:08:33 PT
By Patrick McGreevy
Source: Los Angeles Times
California -- When Californians voted in 2016 to allow the sale of recreational marijuana, advocates of the move envisioned thousands of pot shops and cannabis farms obtaining state licenses, making the drug easily available to all adults within a short drive.But as the first year of licensed sales comes to a close, California’s legal market hasn’t performed as state officials and the cannabis industry had hoped. Retailers and growers say they’ve been stunted by complex regulations, high taxes and decisions by most cities to ban cannabis shops. At the same time, many residents are going to city halls and courts to fight pot businesses they see as nuisances, and police chiefs are raising concerns about crime triggered by the marijuana trade.
Gov.-elect Gavin Newsom, who played a large role in the legalization of cannabis, will inherit the numerous challenges when he takes office in January as legislators hope to send him a raft of bills next year to provide banking for the pot industry, ease the tax burden on retailers and crack down on sales to minors.“The cannabis industry is being choked by California’s penchant for over-regulation,” said Dale Gieringer, director of California NORML, a pro-legalization group. “It’s impossible to solve all of the problems without a drastic rewrite of the law, which is not in the cards for the foreseeable future.”After voters legalized marijuana two years ago under Proposition 64, state officials estimated in there would be as many as 6,000 cannabis shops licensed in the first few years. But the state Bureau of Cannabis Control has issued just 547 temporary and annual licenses to marijuana retail stores and dispensaries. Some 1,790 stores and dispensaries were paying taxes on medicinal pot sales before licenses were required starting Jan. 1.State officials also predicted that legal cannabis would eventually bring in up to $1 billion in revenue a year. But with many cities banning pot sales, tax revenue is falling far short of estimates. Based on taxes collected since Jan. 1, the state is expected to bring in $471 million in revenue this fiscal year — much less than the $630 million projected in Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget.“I think we all wish we could license more businesses, but our system is based on dual licensing and local control,” said Alex Traverso, a spokesman for the state Bureau of Cannabis Control, referring to the requirement that cannabis businesses get permission from the state and the city in which they want to operate.Less than 20% of cities in California — 89 of 482 — allow retail shops to sell cannabis for recreational use, according to the California Cannabis Industry Assn. Cities that allow cannabis sales include Los Angeles, Oakland, San Francisco and San Diego.Eighty-two of Los Angeles County’s 88 cities prohibit retail sales of recreational marijuana, according to Alexa Halloran, an attorney specializing in cannabis law for the firm Solomon, Saltsman & Jamieson. Pot shops are not allowed in cities including Burbank, Manhattan Beach, Alhambra, Beverly Hills, Inglewood, Compton, Redondo Beach, El Monte, Rancho Palos Verdes and Calabasas.“While some cities have jumped in headfirst, we've taken a deliberate approach,” said Manhattan Beach Mayor Steve Napolitano, “to see how things shake out elsewhere before further consideration. I think that's proven to be the smart approach.”Voters have also been reluctant to allow cannabis stores in their communities.Of the 64 California cities and counties that voted on cannabis ballot measures in the November midterm election, eight banned the sale of cannabis or turned down taxation measures, seven allowed sales and 49 approved taxes on pot businesses, said Hilary Bricken, an attorney who represents the industry. Among them, voters in Malibu approved pot shops while Simi Valley residents voted for an advisory measure against allowing retail sales.Javier Montes, owner of Wilmington pot store Delta-9 THC, says he is struggling to compete with a large illicit market unburdened by the taxes he pays as a licensed business.“Because we are up against high taxes and the proliferation of illegal shops, it is difficult right now,” Montes said. “We expected lines out of our doors, but unfortunately the underground market was already conducting commercial cannabis activity and are continuing to do so.”Montes, who received his city and state licenses in January, says his business faces a 15% state excise tax, a 10% recreational marijuana tax by the city of Los Angeles and 9.5% in sales tax by the county and state — a markup of more than 34%.He says there isn’t enough enforcement against illegal operators, and the hard times have caused him to cut the number of employees at his shop in half this year from 24 to 12.“It’s very hard whenever I have to lay people off, because they are like a family to me,” said Montes, who is vice president of the United Cannabis Business Assn., which represents firms including the about 170 cannabis retailers licensed by the city of Los Angeles.Sky Siegel, who operates a cannabis business in Studio City, said he recently gave up trying to open another store in Santa Monica because of its restrictions on such businesses.“It turns into this ‘Hunger Games’ to try to get a license,” said Siegel, who is general manager of Perennial Holistic Wellness Center, which has a dozen employees in Studio City and also operates a delivery service.He says his firm is up against thousands of unlicensed delivery services going into cities where storefronts are banned.“To me, it doesn’t make sense” that many cities have prohibited shops, he said. “Banning does nothing. It’s already there. Why not turn this into a legitimized business, which is what the people want.”California has also issued fewer cultivation licenses than expected in the first year of legalization, with about 2,160 growers registered with the state; an estimated 50,000 commercial cannabis cultivation operations existed before Proposition 64, according to the California Growers Assn. Some have given up growing pot, but many others are continuing to operate illegally.The trade group hoped to see at least 5,000 commercial growers licensed in the first year, said Hezekiah Allen, the group’s former executive director who is now chairman of Emerald Grown, a cooperative of 130 licensed cultivators.“We are lagging far behind,” Allen said. “It’s woefully inadequate. Most of the people in California who are buying cannabis are still buying it from the unregulated market. There just isn’t a reason for most growers to make the transition.”Assemblyman Jim Wood (D-Healdsburg), who has crafted cannabis regulations, said the licensing system had not yet lived up to its promise.“The state licensing process this past year has been a painful one,” said Wood, adding that the complex rules are particularly difficult for small businesses. “I recognize that this has been a significant undertaking for the state, and you combine that with the cannabis industry learning how to navigate the process — it’s been difficult for them both.”The legalization of recreational pot has also created tension in areas of the state where cannabis growers are operating close to residents.Jesse Jones said he moved his family to Petaluma from Marin County six months ago so his three children could enjoy more open space, but he is now fighting a proposal for a cannabis farm to operate a few hundred feet from his home, in part because of safety issues.“You are going to have what is still a [Schedule 1] narcotic being produced in line of sight of my kids’ trampoline, on a shared road that was never intended for this type of commercial operation,” said Jones, an energy industry executive.Sanjay Bagai, a former investment banker who lives with his family next door to a new cannabis farm in Sonoma County, is a leader of a residents group called Save Our Sonoma Neighborhoods, which has obtained a preliminary court ruling against one cannabis-growing operation.Bagai said his group was “not anti-cannabis” but added that pot cultivation “is not something that fits into our neighborhood here.”“The smell is horrific,” he said of the marijuana plants. “It’s like rotting flesh. And the traffic is insane.”Quality-of-life complaints have also surfaced in neighborhoods where cannabis sellers have set up shop.Van Nuys Neighborhood Council President George Thomas said he had received about a dozen complaints in the last year from residents living near pot stores who were concerned about loitering, the smell of marijuana smoke and other issues. Thomas, who is the publisher of the Van Nuys News Press and is an LAPD volunteer, passes complaints on to police officers.“If they are not in compliance,” Thomas said, “if they are within a thousand feet of a school or church, we are totally against them and we are happy to work with the neighborhood prosecutor in the city attorney’s office to shut them down.”At the same time, he said, the neighborhood council has worked with licensed cannabis stores to get them involved in improving the community and has asked the Los Angeles City Council to devote some of the tax revenue from Van Nuys shops to solving local problems, including homelessness and crime.Meanwhile, despite concerns from law enforcement, the state is finalizing a proposal to allow deliveries throughout California — including in cities that ban retail stores. The new rule by Lori Ajax, chief of the state Bureau of Cannabis Control, is expected to be implemented in January.Ajax says she believes that as the system is refined and is shown to operate successfully in some cities, other local governments will allow retail pot sales. But opponents of pot legalization, including Kevin Sabet, president of Smart Approaches to Marijuana, are happy that most cities are saying “no” to selling the drug.“The residents of Compton and these other cities have seen the ills that come with allowing marijuana in the door,” Sabet said, “including skyrocketing drugged driving; the promise, then failure of social justice; and the targeting of children through the use of colorful and deceptive candies, gummies and sodas.”Even in cities that allow cannabis sales, businesses face big hurdles.The various taxes and fees could drive up the cost of legal cannabis in parts of California by 45%, according to the global credit ratings firm Fitch Ratings.There is less of a tax burden in Oregon, where voters legalized recreational pot in 2014, and state and local taxes are capped at 20%. With nearly a tenth of the population of California, that state has more licensed cannabis shops — 601. On a per capita basis, Alaska has also approved more pot shop licenses than California, — 94 so far. The state imposes a tax on cultivation, but there is no retail excise tax on pot.Assemblyman Rob Bonta (D-Alameda) tried and failed this year to push for a temporary reduction in California’s pot taxes to help the industry get on its feet.“It’s a work in progress,” Bonta said of the current regulatory system. “We knew we weren’t going to get it exactly right on Day 1, and so we’re always looking for ways to achieve the original intentions and goal.”Bonta said he may revisit the taxation issue in 2019 and is exploring the idea of having the state do more to get cities to approve businesses, possibly by providing advisory guidelines for local legalization that address cities’ concerns.California cannabis businesses, like their counterparts in Colorado and Oregon, also face costs to test marijuana for harmful chemicals.“The testing costs are excessive — $500 to $1,000 per batch, and most crops involve multiple batches,” said Gieringer, the director of California NORML. “No other agricultural product is required to undergo such costly or sensitive tests.”Another problem hampering the legal market is a lack of banking for cannabis businesses. Federally regulated banks are reluctant to handle cash from pot, which remains an illegal drug under federal law.“Banking continues to be an issue in terms of creating a real public safety problem with significant amounts of cash being moved for transactions,” said Bonta, who co-wrote a bill this year that would have created a state-sanctioned bank to handle money from pot sellers. It failed to pass after legislative analysts said the proposal faced “significant obstacles,” including no protection from federal law enforcement.Industry leaders and activists said they knew it would be a slow process to establish a strong legal market, noting other states with legal pot, including Colorado, Washington and Oregon, also faced growing pains and problems along the way.But Ajax, the state pot czar, says her agency has had a productive first year, issuing initial licenses, refining the rules and stepping up action against unlicensed operations, including partnering with the Los Angeles Police Department to seize $2 million worth of marijuana products from an unlicensed shop in Sylmar in October.“I am optimistic about the coming year, where our focus will be primarily on getting more businesses licensed and increasing enforcement efforts on the illegal market,” Ajax said. Patrick McGreevy covers the California Legislature out of the Sacramento bureau. Since joining the Los Angeles Times in 1998, he has worked in the City Hall and San Fernando Valley bureaus, writing about subjects including Valley secession, LAPD reform and city government during the administrations of Mayors Richard Riordan, James Hahn and Antonio Villaraigosa. He is a native of San Diego and a graduate of San Jose State University.Newshawk: Sam AdamsSource: Los Angeles Times (CA) Author: Patrick McGreevyPublished: December 27, 2018Copyright: 2018 Los Angeles TimesContact: letters latimes.comWebsite: -- Cannabis Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #18 posted by Hope on January 09, 2019 at 07:38:32 PT
Stossel: Legal Weed So FarDire warnings about legal marijuana have not come to pass.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #17 posted by Hope on January 07, 2019 at 22:23:43 PT
John Tyler
Wouldn't it be fine? Coffee shops and restaurants. The kind you can linger in. That sounds so good!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #16 posted by John Tyler on January 07, 2019 at 16:14:15 PT
I would love it. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #15 posted by Hope on January 07, 2019 at 09:09:05 PT
John Tyler . Join me in a cup of coffee?
"Members of Paris's famed Club des Hashischins regularly gathered to drink a special blend of strong coffee, hashish, nutmeg, cloves, cinnamon, pistachio, orange juice, cantharides, sugar, and butter."Just thinking of it makes me smile. What peace!Bullet-Proof Coffee time: 85 minutes... so not instant!)
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #14 posted by Hope on January 07, 2019 at 08:51:45 PT
John Tyler. It will happen.
I hope I live to see or enjoy it. We know that decent people in legal states are working on it right now. In my mind's eye, I can see it happening soon, but I can clearly see the obstacle, too. The ugly, hard faces of the hardcore prohibitionists. I think they are not good, decent people. They desire and plot the downfall of those they hate for no rational or logical reason. The prohibitionists aren't what they once were as far as power and the harm they can do, but they are still stirring, writhing, and roiling all over each other in a nasty wad of hate, like maggots in a piece of bad fruit. Coffee houses or cafes would be great. If you ever watch Bong Apetit, you would agree that restaurants and cafes specializing in cannabis cookery would be nice. It will happen, and is already, underground, I'm sure, but it will happen and I'm pretty sure, with good management, the type establishments we are thinking of will be valuable assets to any neighborhood. Ah. The pantry they often show on Bong Apetit. There's a picture of it here: Bong Appetit With Abdullah Saeed joseph/bong-appetit-with-abdullah-saeed
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #13 posted by John Tyler on January 07, 2019 at 07:17:08 PT
Venues needed
It would be wonderful if there were venues, indoors or outdoors, where like-minded people could gather to be entertained, enjoy each other’s company, and enjoy their favorite leafy product. People used to do this years ago. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #12 posted by Hope on January 04, 2019 at 10:54:04 PT
Years ago
I remember reading about a dispensary that had a poster of Bob Marley on the wall in the front room. Oh my! Prohibitionists were livid. You'd think they had put up a portrait of Hitler or some kind of antichrist! 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #11 posted by Hope on January 03, 2019 at 07:40:02 PT
John Tyler
You mentioned before the cold atmosphere of modern dispensaries. I've thought about it quite a bit. I think it's because they don't want people lingering or being too comfortable. They want them in and out, I believe. And that's because of the government and the prohibitionists, too. They don't want it to be comfortable or appealing... and the dispensary people don't want to give them something to complain and stir up idiotic and overblown fears about. Prohibitionists, government or not, are dangerous, as you know, if they find something to get agitated about. Anything to get agitated about! And they are certainly watching for anything at all they can get stirred up about. A Grateful Dead or Bob Marley poster could get them agitated. Do dispensaries even sell accessories like you find at a head shop? Head shops are appealing places to look around and make impulse purchases as well. Dispensaries may be forced to discourage that or just afraid to. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #10 posted by afterburner on January 02, 2019 at 12:12:11 PT
On Other Hand - Emerald Triangle & Craft Cannabis
Dec 31, 2018,4:56 pm.
California's Premier Cannabis Festival Concludes 2018 With A Promise For 2019.
Andre Bourque, Contributor.
I provide insight and advice on cannabis and blockchain.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #9 posted by FoM on January 01, 2019 at 20:17:23 PT
John Tyler
Happy New Year! The progress is amazing. Onward and upward we go!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #8 posted by John Tyler on January 01, 2019 at 16:50:51 PT
retail outlets
These are the kinds of retail cannabis outlets I would like to see opening up around the country.
Cool and funky with a mellow vibe. I hope you all have a great New Year. Just keep on keeping on.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #7 posted by FoM on January 01, 2019 at 16:32:10 PT
Afterburner and Hope
I am so looking forward to 2019. It has been a very hard to deal with 2 years under Trump but maybe this year we will show his true colors to everyone. Maybe even those who think Trump is great will see him for what he is. I will be watching the news more then ever after the Democrats are sworn in. We might really be able to drain the swamp! LOL! 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #6 posted by afterburner on January 01, 2019 at 11:32:54 PT
Happy New Year, Time for more Scratching Forward
And only two more days until the Dems take over the House. Control of Government funding. The GOP used their takeover in 2010 to deny funding to the Obama administration. Now, the elephants are on the receiving end. It should be interesting to watch the Trump administration squirm.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #5 posted by Hope on January 01, 2019 at 10:57:10 PT
Lol! Hempworld Comment !
Get started! That's what we do! Rail against the injustice of it all! Tell 'em what you think!Happy New Year!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by Hope on January 01, 2019 at 10:23:05 PT
Happy New Year, my friends!
We've had a pretty amazing year. No doubt. But maybe 2019 will be an even better year. I'm counting on it!Prohibitionists are still trying to control everyone else's choices. They need to back down! Happy New Year to us in all we do and especially in our effort to return freedom to make use of the whole plant cannabis in the USA! 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by FoM on January 01, 2019 at 05:34:42 PT
Happy New Year 2019. I am happy Elizabeth Warren is jumping in and I hope for many more to join her. We sure need a big change in direction and it will be very interesting to see.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by The GCW on December 31, 2018 at 15:09:23 PT
Way off but right in there,
One Year -more.Happy new Year, Ya'll!I've been pleased with a lot about Liz. and I saw this and feel strongly about sharing it.Elizabeth Warren Launches Exploratory Committee for President don't care much for politics and politicians and the overdoingit, so I hope C'Newsers put up with Me posting this... -to give us hope for the 1st day of it just ahead of Us.I love You guys.Happy New Years,The GCW
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by HempWorld on December 30, 2018 at 09:26:05 PT
OMG, yes, this article sums it up!
Don't get me started.I've stated here on this platform that the CA rules are draconian and a drag-net. That is how Newsome and his ilk have designed it, because he also thinks pot smoke is a nuisance... etc. etc.Yes, people loiter because they want a place to smoke and socialize! etc. etc. Take a trip to Amsterdam! That would help!All self-fulfilling paranoia and old-holdovers in all the city councils, not in my backyard, syndrome. Based on their own ideas of fiction!I could go on! And... Taxes down! Black market up! (drag-net) this was all planned! When you read the license requirements, it is very plain and obvious. Police state 2.0!
Marijuana Stores?
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment