cannabisnews.com: Ohio Sues City Over Marijuana Ordinance
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Ohio Sues City Over Marijuana Ordinance');
 url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/28/thread28694.shtml');
 site = new Array(5);
 site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
 return false;
}






Ohio Sues City Over Marijuana Ordinance
Posted by CN Staff on October 07, 2015 at 07:22:40 PT
By Ryan Dunn, Blade Staff Writer
Source: Toledo Blade
Ohio -- The Ohio Attorney General’s Office filed suit Tuesday against the city of Toledo, asking a judge to declare invalid several key sections of the city’s new “Sensible Marihuana Ordinance.”The legal challenge in Lucas County Common Pleas Court claims several portions of the voter-approved Toledo law, including restricting fines and incarceration for marijuana possession, contradict Ohio law.
Lucas County Prosecutor Julia Bates and Sheriff John Tharp joined Attorney General Mike DeWine in the lawsuit.Click here to read the lawsuit filed by Mr. DeWine: http://drugsense.org/url/KVoHMzlnVoters last month approved a measure reducing penalties in Toledo Municipal Code for all marijuana-related crimes to no fines or jail time. They also supported stopping city police from reporting the convictions to state authorities.Although it is unfortunate to oppose the will of a majority of voters, significant portions of this law are “clearly unconstitutional,” Mr. DeWine said. He announced the legal action during a news conference at One Government Center.Mr. DeWine discussed a seizure last month by the Ohio Highway Patrol in Lucas County that found 226 pounds of marijuana. If the motorists had been charged through this Toledo ordinance, neither would be incarcerated or fined.“Such a scenario is completely unacceptable, and it violates the Ohio Constitution,” Mr. DeWine said.Mr. DeWine said this lawsuit does not seek to dismiss the entire measure, but the portions that contradict state law. Ohio’s constitution allows cities to adopt and enforce local regulations if they do not conflict with the state, according to the complaint.Police are empowered to arrest suspects in their municipality found breaking state law, the lawsuit states.“Municipal drug ordinances are police power regulations, and drug statutes duly enacted by the state of Ohio are laws of general application throughout the state,” the suit states.The lawsuit specifically names a “gag rule” in the ordinance that says city police and the law director may not report for prosecution under state law any marijuana or hashish offense to an authority besides the law director.The prosecution would be left pursuing a misdemeanor case in Toledo Municipal Court under a law claiming to abolish incarceration, fines, and probation.“The city of Toledo is not empowered to establish or amend Ohio felony law. And municipal authorities are not authorized to prosecute felony offenses under state law,” according to the suit.When asked during the news conference why Mr. DeWine’s office did not intervene prior to the vote, he said that he did not believe “anyone was aware of everything that was in there.”City officials were not surprised by the lawsuit. Adam Loukx, Toledo law director, said there were concerns about its potential contradictions with state law, but he will defend the voters’ choice.“It’s only appropriate a court would be the one to decide that,” Mr. Loukx said.Mr. Loukx said he recently obtained a copy of the lawsuit and could not yet say what would remain of the law if Mr. Dewine is successful.Sean Nestor, campaign manager for the Sensible Marihuana initiative that promoted the ballot measure, said the group expected a legal challenge. When they were crafting the ordinance, organizers studied other successful decriminalization measures in Ohio and Michigan, he said.“We used laws that had survived court challenges,” he said.Mr. Nestor said his group is ready to work with city officials to defend the measure in court.While the case remains pending, Mr. Loukx said a Toledo police officer who finds a resident possessing marijuana could cite the suspect under Ohio Revised Code. The officer also might be permitted to charge under Toledo Municipal Code as well, Mr. Loukx said.“At this point, a lot of it will be in the discretion of the officer,” he said.The case was assigned to Judge Dean Mandros. Mr. DeWine has requested an expedited decision.Source: Toledo Blade, The (OH) Author: Ryan Dunn, Blade Staff WriterPublished: October, 6, 2015Copyright: 2015 The Blade Contact: letters theblade.com Website: http://www.toledoblade.com/URL: http://drugsense.org/url/px4rAYRkCannabisNews -- Cannabis Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 
     
     
     
     




Comment #4 posted by kaptinemo on October 08, 2015 at 09:14:42 PT:
Time to define who the 'stakeholders' are.
And public servants are not stakeholders but employees. Employees who seek to become masters of those who pay them.And they need to be reminded of that at every turn. Ohioans have been given a golden opportunity to remind some uppity employees who holds their pink slips.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by The GCW on October 07, 2015 at 21:59:41 PT
Screw Your neighbor as long as You can buddy.
Becausescum time is desperately running out.And how will You screw Your fellow humans after cannabis prohibition ends?-0-All of You cannabis prohibitionists will be left without a life with all it's implications.-for You have been requested to love one another.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by Vincent on October 07, 2015 at 09:28:18 PT:
Sore losers
One thing about so-called "conservatives" (spelled with a lower-case "c" on purpose)-- they truly believe that they are still the majority in this country. They truly believed that the people of Toledo would vote against this measure, that's why they campaigned against it strongly. However, when the people voted FOR decriminalization, they wouldn't accept it, and now are trying to undo it. I laughed when I read that Mike "fire and brimstone" DeWine felt "bad" about opposing the will of the voter! Who the hell does he think he is fooling?!!! He is enjoying this power trip, as all bible-bangers do!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on October 07, 2015 at 08:28:31 PT
will take a while...
the piggies' heads are thick, it will take a while to get through to them.yes, 200 pounds of cannabis, no penalties. That's right! Just like a truckload of 2,000 pounds of vodka goes through without penalties, a truckload of tobacco, you got it! no penalties. Welcome to the future. Get a life. Go parasitize someone else to make your living.
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment