cannabisnews.com: Marijuana Laws Pose Dilemma for Republicans
function share_this(num) {
tit=encodeURIComponent('Marijuana Laws Pose Dilemma for Republicans ');
url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/28/thread28581.shtml');
site = new Array(5);
site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
return false;
}
Marijuana Laws Pose Dilemma for Republicans
Posted by CN Staff on May 09, 2015 at 19:03:17 PT
By Kurtis Lee
Source: Los Angeles Times
Washington, D.C. -- New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's response in a recent radio interview to a question about legal marijuana was in keeping with his tough-on-crime persona.A former prosecutor and potential presidential candidate, Christie has long been a staunch opponent of pot, at one time lambasting tax revenue generated from the sale of legal recreational marijuana as "blood money."
"I will crack down and not permit it," he told radio host Hugh Hewitt, who had asked whether legal marijuana sales in Colorado and Washington state should be allowed. "Marijuana is an illegal drug under federal law. And the states should not be permitted to sell it and profit from it."Opposition to marijuana use plays well with conservatives, which is the core voter base in the primary. Yet that stance is not popular with the larger electorate. - David Kopel, an associate policy analyst at the Cato Institute who has researched drug policyChristie's comments put him on the conservative end of the divide over marijuana among both declared and likely Republican candidates for president, one that goes far beyond whether they've ever inhaled. Each of the current and prospective members of the GOP field opposes full legalization of marijuana, although they differ somewhat on medicinal use.But if the candidates are hewing to the views of Republican voters on the question of legalization, they are running against the tide of opinion in the country overall, a conundrum the party faces on a host of social issues, including same-sex marriage.In a recent Pew Research Center survey, 53% of Americans polled said they supported legalizing marijuana, compared with 44% who were opposed. The political divide was stark. Only 39% of Republicans favored legalization, compared with 59% of Democrats and 58% of independents.Still, there was some nuance among Republicans: When asked whether the federal government should enforce its anti-pot laws in states that allowed marijuana use, 54% said it should not, while 43% said the government should enforce federal marijuana laws.That result points to one of the central dilemmas confronting the party's voters and candidates on the issue of marijuana: They favor a weaker federal government and giving more power to the states in general, but when it comes to pot, a substantial bloc of the party wants the federal government to rein in the states."This whole idea of legalized marijuana is twofold for Republicans," said David Kopel, an associate policy analyst at the Cato Institute who has researched drug policy. "Opposition to marijuana use plays well with conservatives, which is the core voter base in the primary. Yet that stance is not popular with the larger electorate."And, he said, the idea of "state's rights and limiting the reach of the federal government" is crucial to Republican voters — and thus to candidates seeking support.In the range of Republican views, Christie's opposition to state decision-making and medicinal use of marijuana are the most conservative.Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Ted Cruz of Texas have said they oppose marijuana legalization — either medicinal or recreational — but agree that it's up to the states to decide.Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker shares the same view on marijuana, though last year he signed a bill that allows cannabinoid oil to be used to treat children who suffer from seizures.Cruz has cited as a cautionary example the swing state of Colorado, which legalized recreational marijuana sales in 2012."If we see in Colorado teen drug use skyrocketing dramatically, I suspect the citizens of other states are going to be a lot slower to make that change if we see in the laboratory of democracy, gosh, this policy is really hurting people," Cruz said in an interview with a local reporter in March. Several surveys taken since legal marijuana sales took effect in Colorado more than a year ago have shown no increase in use by teens.Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who has tapped himself as "a different kind of Republican," is on the permissive end of the spectrum among the GOP field.Paul has sought to ease penalties for drug convictions and supports medicinal marijuana, though he has not supported legalizing marijuana for recreational use. (His father, Republican former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, has been a vocal supporter of legalizing marijuana and has worked in Congress to end federal regulations that make it illegal.)In February, Sen. Paul, who has gone on record as having smoked marijuana in the past, called Bush a "hypocrite" for opposing medicinal marijuana use despite having smoked pot himself. (Cruz also acknowledges having smoked pot.)"If you got MS in Florida, Jeb Bush voted to put you in jail if you go to a local drug store and get medical marijuana," Paul said in an interview with Yahoo. "Yet he was doing it for recreational purposes and it's a different standard for him, because he was from a very wealthy family going to a wealthy school and he got off scot-free."Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Democratic front-runner, has not commented recently on marijuana legalization. In a July radio interview, she said more studies were needed to "see what kind of results we get, both from medical marijuana and from recreational marijuana, before we make any far-reaching conclusions." During her first White House run in 2008, Clinton was opposed to legalization.Marijuana legality remains a potent issue in key electoral states, which guarantees that the candidates will be drawn into the debate.Colorado is at the center of a lawsuit filed with the Supreme Court by Nebraska and Oklahoma — two conservative heartland states — which alleges legal marijuana is flowing across state borders and burdening their communities. The Supreme Court has not decided whether it will hear the case.Laura Carno, a Republican strategist in Colorado, said the argument to keep the federal government from infringing on state's rights resonates with Republicans and unaffiliated voters, which are a key voting bloc in her presidential swing state."There's an independent spirit in the West, and in Colorado this is a new experiment," Carno said. "But it doesn't matter if the candidates are for or against marijuana. The bigger, more important question is we don't want Washington telling us what to do. If that's your platform as a candidate, it's not going to play well. So on marijuana, and issues like healthcare, it's a safe bet for these candidates to leave these decisions up to the states."Floyd Ciruli, a Denver-based nonpartisan pollster who has surveyed voters on the issue for several years, said the idea of medicinal marijuana is not up for debate in Colorado, even among Republicans."It's been around since the early 2000s and is here with little or no dispute," he said. "Even with legal marijuana, the recreational sorts, the idea among Democrats and certainly many Republicans is this 'live and let live' attitude."In Florida, which votes early in the primary season and joins Colorado as a swing state in the general election, state Sen. Jeff Brandes, a Republican, was a sponsor of recently defeated legislation that would have allowed marijuana to be used for medicinal purposes.A 2014 Florida ballot measure that would have allowed medicinal use prompted a multimillion-dollar blizzard of TV ads. Voters favored it by a 58%-42% margin, but state law required 60% for passage. Bush and Rubio opposed the measure."Science shows people can benefit, especially someone dying of a terminal illness like Lou Gehrig's disease," Brandes said, noting that Bush and Rubio were wise to propose leaving the issue to the states. "It's an alternative form of medicine and should be an option."Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)Author: Kurtis LeePublished: May 9, 2015Copyright: 2015 Los Angeles TimesContact: letters latimes.comWebsite: http://www.latimes.com/URL: http://drugsense.org/url/1AzrSQaWCannabisNews -- Cannabis Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help
Comment #7 posted by Sam Adams on May 11, 2015 at 08:59:14 PT
majority rule
I saw a great show on CNN the other night, I think it was called "High Profits". it's about a young couple trying to run an MJ business in Breckinridge, CO.Some business owners (real estate) went crazy when they tried to operate as a legal MJ business on the main drag. However, they had a debate within the city council and a couple of the business owners had a great line - they said look, the town voted for this with a solid majority. We need to stop the denial and own this, not try to zone it out of town. The town has 100+ active liquor licenses, and wants to have zero cannabis licenses? It's a great show, check it out if you see it. They usually run it after Sanjay Gupta's "Weed" series.
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #6 posted by kaptinemo on May 11, 2015 at 05:11:36 PT:
Re-legalization is a political litmus test
Want a quick and dirty means of determining if a pol is progressive enough to be worth your time? This is it. It will save America a lot of time determining if that pol is actually smart and savvy - and understands what pissing off over half the electorate who wants cannabis legal again could mean to his/her political career.This is a point that needs to be made over and over again, as was done with the word 'prohibition' in the LTE campaigns. Make this point about how we are in the majority now, and how a pol feels on cannabis re-legalization is a big determinant on other issues of importance. And while you're at it, you can also remind them that the stick they used to poke us with these past 40 years changed hands when support for re-legalization went past 50%. That stick is ours now. What we do with it is up to us, not them. And given how many of us have lost so terribly much, courtesy of being poked with that stick, well, you can let them know there's plenty of us sharpening that stick to a needle point, perfect for puncturing political careers.Whether we use that stick the way so many of us want to is the only choice they get to make, anymore. I repeat: we don't need to debate them, anymore. We don't need to beg, plead, etc. WE ARE THE MAJORITY, NOW. It's time they understand just what that means politically as well as socially.
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #5 posted by Vincent on May 10, 2015 at 16:01:40 PT:
Christie
Frankly, I never supported this blowhard, and I always suspected that he is IGNORANT about the topic of Marijuana, as he is ignorant about a lot of issues. Same thing with Rudy "Obama isn't like us" Giuliani...I always knew that he was against Marijuana use, but how much against it he was, I didn't know.Giuliani isn't like me.
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #4 posted by Hope on May 10, 2015 at 15:23:57 PT
He's seriously out of touch with reality.
He's got a really bad case of reefer madness, there's no doubt. But how in the world did he come up with the idea that taxes from unprohibited cannabis is "Blood money". Oh my gosh. Prohibition has been the cause of probably every drop of blood ever shed in connection with cannabis. It's the prohibition, Governor Christie. It's because of prohibition. But I know. You are blinded to that truth."A former prosecutor and potential presidential candidate, Christie has long been a staunch opponent of pot, at one time lambasting tax revenue generated from the sale of legal recreational marijuana as "blood money."
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #3 posted by Sam Adams on May 10, 2015 at 09:04:42 PT
more political distractions
from the senseless, primitive brutality of the "war on drugs". Yes, we must keep destroying out cities, towns, and families with brutal militarism because Chris Cristie is in a political struggle with the Cato institute!that's such a great reason to perpetuate this society-destroying atrocity and send a police state to rule over our de-industrialized, decaying cities.Did you know there are 25,000 abandoned buildings within Philadelphia city limits? We sent all jobs over to China and India.But polling says the Repubs and Dems disagree! Oh woe, what can we do? Those pollsters just make things so darn complicated! Let's have the police take down another 800,000 people until Chris Christie can figure things out!
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #2 posted by John Tyler on May 10, 2015 at 07:43:35 PT
Hillary don’t be coy
Hillary don’t be coy on this issue. The poll numbers are on our side and they will only increase. The Rupubs are fumbling this one. If you can’t come out and say it at least do something positive. Get your picture taken with Willie Nelson, or have him at a campaign appearance, or visit a pot shop in Denver to find out what this is all about. Have joint conference with your campaign staff. Say it is something that really needs to be considered at the highest level. The people want to support you. Support us in return.
[ Post Comment ]
Comment #1 posted by MikeEEEEE on May 10, 2015 at 07:33:14 PT
Monkey's Wrench
New laws aimed at freedom really puts a wrench in Republicon prohibitionist policies. Will they adjust their spin machine?
[ Post Comment ]
Post Comment