With Marijuana Legalized, a City Says Not So Fast
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('With Marijuana Legalized, a City Says Not So Fast');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

With Marijuana Legalized, a City Says Not So Fast
Posted by CN Staff on June 12, 2014 at 07:21:30 PT
By Kirk Johnson
Source: New York Times
Seattle -- The first retail shops selling legal recreational marijuana in Washington State are preparing to open next month. Cash registers are standing by, and the first crops are almost ready for harvesting. But not every part of the state is joining the party.The state attorney general, in a nonbinding legal opinion, has said local governments can regulate marijuana under the statute legalizing its recreational use, and at least 10 cities and counties in Washington have gone even further, banning marijuana businesses outright. An additional 69 municipalities, and 12 counties, have voted for moratoriums on such businesses, according to the Municipal Research and Services Center, a nonprofit group in Seattle that works with local governments on multiple issues.
Now, a lawsuit brought by a man who was denied a license to sell marijuana in Wenatchee in central Washington’s apple-growing country is challenging the rights of local governments to ban marijuana businesses — and also raising the possibility that the state’s marijuana law will come under sharp legal scrutiny.The plaintiff, Shaun Preder, has been told by the city that he will not get a local business license to sell marijuana because the drug remains illegal under federal law — and that all Wenatchee businesses must comply with federal law.Mr. Preder, who runs an office furniture store in Woodinville, near Seattle, said he spent about $12,000 in rent for a 3,000 square-foot shop in Wenatchee that he had hoped to open for marijuana sales. But uncertainty about a license has kept him from spending more to get the place ready.Wenatchee’s City Council is scheduled to meet on Thursday to decide whether to respond to the suit, which was filed in Chelan County Superior Court. A resolve to fight — especially if the city takes the position that federal law pre-empts state law — could ultimately take the suit to the United States Supreme Court, where the conflicts between federal and state laws on marijuana have never been addressed, legal experts said.Washington’s marijuana law could be affirmed by the courts, or struck down. And what unfolds in Wenatchee, a city of about 33,000 that was closely divided from the start about the wisdom of legal marijuana — with a narrow majority in the county supporting it in 2012 — could set the stage. Backers of legalization say it is a fight they are eager for, asserting that the statute will be affirmed.“We need clarity,” said Alison Holcomb, the criminal justice director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington State and primary author of the Initiative 502 statute.Ms. Holcomb said the A.C.L.U. would seek to intervene in the case only if Wenatchee specifically claims federal protection for its position. “The federal pre-emption issue hasn’t been resolved,” she said.But a will to fight is not the only consideration. Wenatchee’s mayor, Frank Kuntz, who does not have a vote on the seven-member City Council, has said the city cannot afford hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal bills.Mr. Kuntz urged the Council last fall to drop the word federal from the licensing code, and to grant the marijuana licenses that might be pending, but the Council affirmed the language instead by a 4-to-3 vote.Mr. Preder’s lawyer, Hilary Bricken, said that no matter what the Council decides on Thursday, her client has already been harmed by Wenatchee’s actions because the Washington State Liquor Control Board, which regulates recreational marijuana, said it would proceed first in license applications in places where the local authorities are not trying to bar the door. She said she would seek an emergency court order holding the city’s ban in abeyance if the suit goes forward.Another legal expert who studies marijuana law said that uncertainty, at least for now, is the only certainty — in Washington and any other state considering legalization.“As long as marijuana remains illegal under federal law, you will have a certain amount of grayness in the system,” said Douglas A. Berman, a law professor at Ohio State University and editor of the online legal forum, Marijuana Law, Policy and Reform.Professor Berman said the strains of a system without uniformity — legal under one legal code, illegal under another — echo the cracks that emerged near the end of alcohol prohibition, when some states in the 1920s began to back off enforcement of the Volstead Act banning alcohol even as federal enforcement continued.In marijuana regulation and enforcement, he added, “Unintended legal consequences are inevitable because it’s a territory we’re still kind of ambivalent about as a nation.”Mr. Preder, 34, who said he has never been involved in the marijuana business before, said he has also never been invited in by the city to talk about his plans. But he rented a space bigger than most proposed marijuana shops around the state, which he said average about 2,000 square feet, because he believes that Wenatchee’s market will be strong.“Plenty of room to grow,” he said.A version of this article appears in print on June 12, 2014, on page A21 of the New York edition with the headline: With Marijuana Legalized, a City in Washington State Says, ‘Not So Fast’. Source: New York Times (NY)Author: Kirk JohnsonPublished: June 12, 2014Copyright: 2014 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite:   -- Cannabis Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on June 12, 2014 at 08:00:10 PT
lawmakers whining
yes, they slammed the DEA verbally, but will they actually do anything? If the Senate doesn't confirm the House vote then we're back to square one:>>>Lawmakers slam DEA for targeting Mass. doctors>>>The US Drug Enforcement Administration's push to get Massachusetts doctors out of the medical marijuana business drew the ire of members of Congress Wednesday, with one California lawmaker accusing the agency of creating an "atmosphere of fear" among physicians.US Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican, was commenting on the agency's ultimatum to Massachusetts physicians to sever all ties to marijuana companies or relinquish their federal licenses to prescribe certain medications. He called the action short-sighted during a conference call with national news organizations.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment