MJ Legalization Ballot Measure Favored By Majority
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('MJ Legalization Ballot Measure Favored By Majority');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

MJ Legalization Ballot Measure Favored By Majority
Posted by CN Staff on September 17, 2012 at 14:03:06 PT
By Matt Ferner
Source: Huffington Post
Colorado -- A recently published poll from The Denver Post has good news for pot legalization advocates. According to the survey, a majority of Colorado voters are in favor of Amendment 64, a November ballot measure that seeks to legalize and regulate marijuana like alcohol for adult use. Of the 615 likely Colorado voters surveyed by The Denver Post, 51 percent are in favor of the measure, while only 40 percent are opposed.
Read the entire poll, exact question wording and results here at The Denver Post.:'s Amendment 64 does appear to be popular among voters. Earlier this month, Public Policy Polling surveyed 1,000 likely voters and found that 47 percent would vote in support of Amendment 64, while only 38 percent would vote against the ballot measure.That percentage was the exact same that PPP had found one month prior during a similar survey.The largest percentage in favor of legalization in Colorado ever polled came from Rasmussen, back in June, which found 61 percent of likely Colorado voters in favor of legalizing marijuana if it is regulated the way that alcohol and cigarettes are currently regulated.According to a report by the Colorado Center on Law & Policy, the passage of Amendment 64 could be a boon for the state economy. Marijuana legalization would produce hundreds of new jobs, raise millions for the construction of Colorado public schools and raise around $60 million annually in combined savings and revenue for Colorado's budget, the report says.It's not just pot advocates that are in favor of legalization. The NAACP recently backed pot legalization measures in Oregon and Colorado not because the group necessarily favors marijuana use, but because members say current marijuana laws lead to a disproportionately high number of people of color being incarcerated or otherwise negatively affected. "Marijuana prohibition policy does more harm to our communities than good," said Rosemary Harris Lytle in a statement, president of the NAACP-Colorado-Montana-Wyoming State Conference. "That is why we have endorsed Amendment 64 which presents a more effective and socially responsible approach to how Colorado addresses the adult use of marijuana."The NAACP provided this data in a press statement about marijuana arrests in Colorado:African-Americans made up roughly 4% of the population in Colorado in 2010, but they accounted for about 9% of marijuana possession arrests and 22% of arrests for marijuana sales and cultivation. The numbers in Denver are particularly staggering. According to a report prepared by the Denver Police Department for the the city's Marijuana Policy Review Panel, African-Americans accounted for more than 31.5% percent of arrests for private adult marijuana possession, despite making up less than 11% of the city's population.Politically, the measure has received support from both Democrats and Republicans in Colorado, as well as more than 100 professors from around the nation. However, just last week Gov. John Hickenlooper came out in opposition to Amendment 64, saying in a statement:Colorado is known for many great things –- marijuana should not be one of them. Amendment 64 has the potential to increase the number of children using drugs and would detract from efforts to make Colorado the healthiest state in the nation. It sends the wrong message to kids that drugs are OK.To which Mason Tvert, co-director of the Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol -- the organization behind Amendment 64 -- responded with strong words for the Governor. "Governor Hickenlooper's statement today ranks as one of the most hypocritical statements in the history of politics," Tvert said. "After building a personal fortune by selling alcohol to Coloradans, he is now basing his opposition to this measure on concerns about the health of his citizens and the message being sent to children. We certainly hope he is aware that alcohol actually kills people. Marijuana use does not. The public health costs of alcohol use overall are approximately eight times greater per person than those associated with marijuana. And alcohol use is associated with violent crime. Marijuana use is not."Hickenlooper's statement that Amendment 64 has the "potential to increase the number of children using drugs" is debatable at best. A recent study from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention shows that marijuana use among Colorado minors is going down, while it is simultaneously going up nationally. The drop in usage by Colorado teens as seen in the CDC data -- a drop below the national average -- coincides with the same period that the medical marijuana industry developed in the state, between 2009 and 2011. Marijuana legalization advocates point to the data as sign that regulation is helping reduce marijuana use amongst minors. Mason Tvert, co-director of the Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol, told The Huffington Post "that even the partial regulation of marijuana can make it harder for young people to get their hands on marijuana. By regulating all marijuana sales, we can further reduce teen access and use."And a 2011 study from economists at University of Colorado Denver and Montana State University may backs that claim up. "Medical Marijuana Laws, Traffic Fatalities, and Alcohol Consumption" by Daniel I. Rees, from UCD, and D. Mark Anderson, from MSU looked at state level data from the more than a dozen states that had passed medical marijuana laws at the time of the study. Rees and Anderson found that there was no evidence of an increase in marijuana usage among minors in the states surveyed.Amendment 64 will appear on Colorado's ballot in November, but the state voting guide -- the so-called "blue book" -- will not include the three main arguments in favor of legalization after the Colorado Legislative Council deleted the text, in apparent confusion, and would not restore the text to the voter guide. The three deleted arguments "For" are as follows:• Marijuana is objectively less harmful than alcohol. • The consequences of a marijuana offense are too severe. • Law enforcement resources would be better spent on more serious crimes.The campaign says that the "Arguments For" Amendment 64 section of of the blue book is now just 208 words following the deletion, whereas the "Arguments Against" section is approximately 366 words -- meaning "Against" has nearly 75 percent more words than the "For" section. "The blue book is supposed to be fair and balanced, and it's safe to say this is quite lopsided and, thus, unfair," the campaign said in a statement.Source: Huffington Post (NY)Author: Matt FernerPublished: September 17, 2012Copyright: 2012, LLC Contact: scoop huffingtonpost.comWebsite:  -- Cannabis Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #5 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on September 18, 2012 at 18:03:54 PT
'Your Voice, Your Vote:'
Legalizing marijuana in Wash. 502 debate.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by Christen-Mitchell on September 18, 2012 at 13:32:30 PT:
- Not even the cops are against 64 as much as most Dispensaries - One Bud Maiden said that she didn't think everyone should have access - Cops and Capitalists Against Choice - Amazing 
- Our Greener Future
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by Hope on September 18, 2012 at 10:25:12 PT
“Illicit drug use is a form of domestic terrorism to some extent,” Says Massachusetts Police Chief
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by Hope on September 18, 2012 at 09:32:04 PT
I so hope
our people get themselves out there and vote for these initiatives.Do it!It's important. The life you save with this vote may be your own, or the life or future of someone you love.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by The GCW on September 18, 2012 at 07:01:06 PT
Take it to the booth.
I believe every survey and poll I've seen show 64, to legalize and regulate cannabis like alcohol is ahead of the prohibitionists. Same thing with the Washington election question. I'm guessing it's the same in Oregon.Citizens are getting it. Cannabis prohibition is a proven loss. Ending cannabis prohibition and extermination is a win win win situation for the United States of America and it will help shape a better world.The whole concept of punishing responsible adult humans for using the God-given plant is vulgar.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment