cannabisnews.com: Medical Marijuana Prognosis Looks Good function share_this(num) { tit=encodeURIComponent('Medical Marijuana Prognosis Looks Good'); url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/26/thread26888.shtml'); site = new Array(5); site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit; site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit; site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit; site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit; site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit; window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500'); return false; } Medical Marijuana Prognosis Looks Good Posted by CN Staff on March 18, 2012 at 06:51:10 PT By Matt Simon, Guest Commentary Source: Nashua Telegraph New Hampshire -- Nearly three years have passed since House and Senate lawmakers first approved a medical marijuana bill to protect patients with debilitating illnesses in New Hampshire. That bill fell just short of becoming law in 2009, when an effort to override Gov. John Lynch’s veto passed the House but failed by only two votes in the Senate. When the 2010 election resulted in Republican supermajorities in both chambers of the General Court, many felt this issue would be placed on hold for two years. On the contrary, last year the GOP-dominated House showed it wasn’t at all afraid to pass medical marijuana, voting to approve the measure in a 221-96 landslide. Last year’s bill reached a stalemate in the Senate, when senators voted to table the bill rather than casting an up-or-down vote, but this year patients and their advocates are feeling more optimistic than ever about their chances. Their new bill features three Republican senators as sponsors. So what objections remain? First, the attorney general’s office points out that marijuana remains illegal under federal law and says the program could lead to interventions in New Hampshire by federal agents. Second, it observes that, in a few states, badly implemented medical marijuana laws have led to undesirable outcomes. When considering the merits of these objections, New Hampshire legislators should focus on two very useful counterexamples: Vermont and Maine. Vermont and Maine have been protecting medical marijuana patients from arrest since 2004 and 1999, respectively. There have been no federal raids on patients or caregivers in either state, and the laws continue to enjoy strong public support. After years of allowing patients and their caregivers to grow their own marijuana, both states recently approved the addition of state-regulated dispensaries to improve patients’ access. Have these reforms led to increased rates of recreational marijuana use and teen use in Maine and Vermont? According to government surveys, they have not. In fact, the federal government’s own data shows that teens and adults use marijuana at a nearly identical rate in all three states. Unfortunately, the U.S. attorney for New Hampshire has indicated that dispensaries here would not necessarily be safe from federal prosecution. Thus, Granite State lawmakers appear to be left with two policy options: they can continue leaving desperate patients to fend for themselves on the black market, or they can acknowledge their plight and permit them to simply take care of themselves. SB 409 would protect patients from arrest and give them a way to access marijuana safely, legally and unobtrusively. A 2008 Mason-Dixon poll showed 71 percent of New Hampshire voters agree, with only 21 percent opposed. Will 2012 be the year that public opinion finally translates into public policy? Matt Simon, of Goffstown, is a legislative analyst for the Marijuana Policy Project of Washington, D.C.Source: Nashua Telegraph, The (Nashua, NH)Author: Matt Simon, Guest Commentary Published: March 18, 2012Copyright: 2012 Telegraph Publishing CompanyContact: letters nashuatelegraph.comWebsite: http://www.nashuatelegraph.comURL: http://drugsense.org/url/SPmD7XQ4CannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help Comment #4 posted by museman on March 19, 2012 at 09:39:52 PT GCW #3 "How do you tell if someone is too stoned to drive?"They are asleep.LEGALIZE FREEDOM [ Post Comment ] Comment #3 posted by The GCW on March 18, 2012 at 17:29:51 PT If you can walk the line... US CO: New wrinkle in pot debate: stoned driving Webpage: http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20120318/NEWS/120319803/1078&ParentProfile=1055 Pubdate: 18 Mar. 2012 Source: Summit Daily News (CO)DENVER — Angeline Chilton says she can't drive unless she smokes pot.The suburban Denver woman says she'd never get behind the wheel right after smoking, but she does use medical marijuana twice a day to ease tremors caused by multiple sclerosis that previously left her homebound. “I don't drink and drive, and I don't smoke and drive,” she said. “But my body is completely saturated with THC.”Her case underscores a problem that no one's sure how to solve: How do you tell if someone is too stoned to drive?States that allow medical marijuana have grappled with determining impairment levels for years. And voters in Colorado and Washington state will decide this fall whether to legalize the drug for recreational use, bringing a new urgency to the issue.A Denver marijuana advocate says officials are scrambling for limits in part because more drivers acknowledge using the *drug.Cont.(I wish the advocate used the word plant instead of "drug") [ Post Comment ] Comment #2 posted by Hope on March 18, 2012 at 16:33:41 PT Prohibitionist conspirators that conspire to cripple up and slow down new laws concerning medical marijuana are just so cruel and tacky.Sick people get their hopes up and they just pull the rug out from under them over and over like they are having some sort of fun game out of teasing them... then knocking them down.It's so wrong. [ Post Comment ] Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on March 18, 2012 at 11:43:11 PT Nice job Matt! Didn't Governor Lynch insist that patient growing be taken out last year, and then he vetoed the bill anyway? Don't bargain with this guy, patients need the right to grow medicine for themselves, period. [ Post Comment ] Post Comment