cannabisnews.com: Governor Vetoes Repeal of Medical Marijuana Law
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Governor Vetoes Repeal of Medical Marijuana Law');
 url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/26/thread26463.shtml');
 site = new Array(5);
 site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
 return false;
}






Governor Vetoes Repeal of Medical Marijuana Law
Posted by CN Staff on April 13, 2011 at 14:14:03 PT
By Stephen Dockery,  Associated Press 
Source: Associated Press
Helena, Mont. -- Gov. Brian Schweitzer vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have repealed Montana's voter-approved medical marijuana law, saying it would have gone against the will of the people.That left House and Senate conferees one last gasp at coming up with a compromise proposal to tighten regulation of the booming industry with eight working days left in the session.
Of the 15 states and the District of Columbia that have medical marijuana laws, almost all have struggled with how to adequately regulate a drug that the federal government deems dangerous and addictive but said it would not prosecute as long as users follow state law.But the Montana Legislature took the unusual step last week of passing a bill sponsored by House Speaker Mike Milburn, R-Cascade, to completely overturn the 2004 ballot initiative that was approved by Montana voters.Milburn and other Republican legislative leaders say the drug cannot be regulated safely because the drug attracts criminal gangs and addicts the state's youth.Schweitzer announced his veto of the repeal bill on the Capitol steps along with 16 others he called "frivolous, unconstitutional or in direct contradiction to the expressed will of the people of Montana."Schweitzer said he agreed the medical marijuana law was written broadly with unanticipated results, but that had to be balanced with the medical needs of Montanans."I believe the proper resolution of this unanticipated outcome is not outright repeal, but amendment to serve the original intent," he said.Many Democrats and a few Republicans have said the marijuana industry needs to be regulated, not done away with, and that there is a legitimate need for people to have access to the drug.Leaders from both parties say something needs to be done to rein in the state's sprawling medical marijuana industry that now has over 28,000 legal marijuana users.A measure to overhaul the medical marijuana industry by ratcheting up restrictions on the drug was sent to a committee of senators and republicans Wednesday to determine the final version of the bill.It may be this Legislature's last chance of acting on the issue with the end of the session drawing near.Senate Bill 423, carried by Senate Majority Leader Jeff Essmann, R-Billings, had a tumultuous passage through the Legislature. The last minute regulation bill was amended and rewritten several times and in the end, the Senate and House passed two entirely different versions of the proposal.The committee of lawmakers from both chambers will meet over the next few days to try and hash out the differences between the measures.Source: Associated Press (Wire)Author: Stephen Dockery,  Associated Press Published: April 13, 2011Copyright: 2011 The Associated PressCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 
     
     
     
     




Comment #5 posted by devohawk on April 14, 2011 at 02:10:51 PT
deja vu all over again
A flash back to 2003, Sarstock, and the summer of legalization tour. http://cannabisnews.com/news/16/thread16326.shtmlAfter it is legal will Canada demand the Marc be released? 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by Totalrod2 on April 14, 2011 at 01:33:10 PT
Wow
So much good news in one day! I don't know if I can take it. :-)
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by John Tyler on April 13, 2011 at 20:33:43 PT
July 11 2011
The judge’s ruling was on 4/12/2011 so 90 days later would make it 7/11/2011. Can Parliament get themselves together by then?
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by John Tyler on April 13, 2011 at 20:26:43 PT
90 days
I suspect that the 90 day time limit indicated the comment #1 will be difficult for the Canadian Parliament to achieve as elections have been called in the early part of May and the politicians will most likely be off campaigning. After the elections they will have to get all reorganized again so it will probably take some more time before they can focus on some type of legal response. 90 days will run out real soon.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by HempWorld on April 13, 2011 at 17:27:31 PT
What a governor Brian Schweitzer! Kudos!
Meanwhile in Canada:
Judge declares criminalization of marijuana unconstitutional
By Sarah Boesveld, Postmedia News April 13, 2011 Ontario is one step closer to the legalization of marijuana after the Ontario Superior Court struck down key parts of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that prohibit the possession and production of pot.
 
The court declared the rules that govern medical marijuana access and the prohibitions laid out in Sections 4 and 7 of the act "constitutionally invalid and of no force and effect" Monday, paving the way for legalization. If the government does not respond within 90 days with a successful delay or re-regulation of marijuana, the drug will be legal to possess and produce in Ontario.Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Judge+declares+criminalization+marijuana+unconstitutional/4605941/story.html#ixzz1JS7URg2x
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment