cannabisnews.com: D.C. Council Bill Proposes 5 MMJ Dispensaries function share_this(num) { tit=encodeURIComponent('D.C. Council Bill Proposes 5 MMJ Dispensaries'); url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/25/thread25343.shtml'); site = new Array(5); site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit; site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit; site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit; site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit; site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit; window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500'); return false; } D.C. Council Bill Proposes 5 MMJ Dispensaries Posted by CN Staff on January 19, 2010 at 11:05:31 PT By Tim Craig, Washington Post Staff Writer Source: Washington Post Washington, D.C. -- The District would have up to five medical marijuana dispensaries where seriously ill patients could go to obtain the drug from a licensed vendor under a bill proposed Tuesday by D.C. Council member David A. Catania.Catania's proposal, which was co-sponsored by nine of 13 council members, is designed to implement a 1998 voter-approved initiative that called for the legalization of medical marijuana in the District. After Initiative 59 was approved with 69 percent of the vote, the then-GOP-controlled Congress blocked it from being implemented. But the Democratic-controlled Congress removed those restrictions last month.Under Catania's proposal, the District would have what he calls "a closed system to regulate the cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana.""What I wanted to make sure we don't do is take something that is evidence-based and scientifically proven for medicine and turn that into a system where there is an opportunity for mischief," said Catania (I-At Large).The legislation, which has been referred to both the Health and Public Safety and Judiciary committees, would allow the dispensaries to distribute up to a month's supply of marijuana to either to patients or their registered caregivers. Although patients would have to pay for the drug, the legislation requires providers to supply low-income patients with marijuana at a reduced price.Once implemented, the District would be the 15th location in the nation to permit medical marijuana. On Monday, his last day in office, New Jersey Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed the law legalizing medical marijuana in that state."We have seen an increasing number of states that have moved in the direction of permitting medical marijuana, so we are moving forward," said council member Phil Mendelson (D-At Large), chairman of the Committee on Public Safety and the Judiciary.Catania's measure calls for the mayor's office and the Department of Health to set most of the regulations for how the city's medical marijuana policy would work. The Health Department, for example, will have to establish a list of medical conditions that can qualify a patient for a doctor's prescription to obtain the drug.The administration would also be charged with determining what companies get licensed to grow and distribute the marijuana. One unanswered question is where the marijuana would be grown.Catania said it would most likely have to be grown somewhere in the District to avoid local drug laws in neighboring Maryland and Virginia.Catania's amendment states a dispensary cannot be located within 1,000 feet of a school or youth center. It also prohibits felons and individuals with drug convictions from owning or working in a dispensary."Moving forward, this legislation will enable the District to implement an effective and responsible medical marijuana program that will be a model for other states," Catania said.Source: Washington Post (DC)Author: Tim Craig, Washington Post Staff Writer Published: Tuesday, January 19, 2010Copyright: 2010 Washington Post Contact: letters washpost.com Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ URL: http://drugsense.org/url/fFB5AeOnCannabisNews Medical Marijuana Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/medical.shtml Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help Comment #7 posted by Sam Adams on January 19, 2010 at 22:14:08 PT what is going on? >>>The bill is intended to implement the 1998 initiate approved by D.C. voters to allow the use of marijuana for medical treatment.Why do we need a bill to implement an initiative? Just implement it! I wouldn't be surprised if there's no areas in all of DC that are 1,000 feet from a park or school, most large cities are like that.this bill looks like it could be an attempt to gut the law - does it still allow patient growing??? [ Post Comment ] Comment #6 posted by Hope on January 19, 2010 at 21:36:25 PT Sorry... Wrong thread. [ Post Comment ] Comment #5 posted by Hope on January 19, 2010 at 21:35:46 PT The GCW Thank you! [ Post Comment ] Comment #4 posted by FoM on January 19, 2010 at 18:14:50 PT AP: D.C. Council Proposes Medical Marijuana Bill January 19, 2010 Washington, D.C. - (AP) -- The D.C. City Council has introduced a bill that would legalize medical marijuana.The bill was proposed Tuesday by Council member David Catania, and was co-sponsored by nine of the 13 members.The bill is intended to implement the 1998 initiate approved by D.C. voters to allow the use of marijuana for medical treatment.The legislation would permit dispensaries to distribute up to a month's supply of marijuana to patients or their registered caregivers.The measure calls for the mayor's office and the Department of Health to establish most of the regulations for how the policy would work.Copyright: 2010 The Associated Presshttp://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&sid=1867988 [ Post Comment ] Comment #3 posted by Hope on January 19, 2010 at 13:16:00 PT Ezrydn Prohibit any prohibitionists, in general, too. In their clamor to keep prohibition of cannabis intact, they can keep that part of their beloved prohibition if they wish. They can prohibit themselves from ever using it or growing it, medicinally or recreationally. [ Post Comment ] Comment #2 posted by ezrydn on January 19, 2010 at 12:59:35 PT DC MMJ Law Provision They ought to put in a provision that "Federal Employees cannot partake of this program!" After all, it's against the law for them. Isn't that what all these state prohibs keep telling us? "It's against Federal Law?" Well? [ Post Comment ] Comment #1 posted by FoM on January 19, 2010 at 11:07:45 PT Let's Get It Done I'm ready for this to happen. [ Post Comment ] Post Comment