Legalization? Now for The Hard Question

function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Legalization? Now for The Hard Question');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

  Legalization? Now for The Hard Question

Posted by CN Staff on May 16, 2009 at 05:39:38 PT
By Michael Winerip 
Source: New York Times 

USA -- Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, has been advocating for legalization of marijuana for 20 years and says he’s seen more progress in the last four months than in the previous two decades. “It’s starting to cascade,” he said. “Our model is the gay rights movement and their recent string of successes with gay marriage.”
Mr. Nadelmann is a smart guy; he has a law degree and a doctorate from Harvard. He so impressed George Soros that the billionaire investor became the biggest financial backer for Mr. Nadelmann’s advocacy. The Drug Policy Alliance has 45 staff members in seven offices nationwide working for legalization.In the 25 years since Nancy Reagan advocated just saying no, Mr. Nadelmann has seen a progression through four public stages out of the five he believes are needed to achieve legalization.Stage 1. Bill Clinton: I smoked but I did not inhale.Stage 2. Al Gore: I smoked, it was wrong, I regret it, shame on me.Stage 3. Michael Bloomberg (asked if he’d tried pot): “You bet I did and I enjoyed it.”Stage 4. Barack Obama: “I inhaled frequently — that was the point!”Stage 5. Public Figure to Come: Yes, I smoke the occasional joint.“We need to drop the ‘d’ from ‘smoked,’ ” Mr. Nadelmann said, “and move from past to present.”For many reasons, the advocates are feeling hopeful. The Obama administration has reversed a Bush policy of prosecuting medical marijuana use, which is now legal in 13 states; a recent Field poll in California showed for the first time that a majority of registered voters in that state favors legalizing and taxing pot; Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has opposed legalization, now says he’d like to see a study done.National polls also show growing support — an ABC/Washington Post poll last month found that 46 percent of Americans favored legalizing small amounts of pot for personal use; when the poll last asked the question, in 1997, 22 percent supported legalization.Every strategy for achieving legalization pins its hopes on the generation that first embraced pot en masse — baby boomers — gradually displacing older voters with no experience using the drug. The ABC poll found that 45 percent of boomers favored legalization, versus 30 percent of adults 65 and older.Mr. Nadelmann, a boomer himself at 52, says the biggest difference since the last legalization push, in the late 1970s, is the drug savvy of parents now versus then. “In the ’70s, that older generation of parents didn’t know the difference between marijuana and heroin,” Mr. Nadelmann said. “This generation of boomer parents has a high familiarity with marijuana. An awful lot tried it, liked it; the vast number never went on to cocaine or heroin or even had a problem with marijuana.”That would be me. The 20-something me used marijuana in moderation, did not fall victim to reefer madness, did not go on to harder drugs, believed it to be a drug superior to alcohol in many respects, enjoyed it like the mayor, and inhaled like the president.The 20-something me preferred alcohol when socializing in large groups but pot for coupling.The 20-something me smoked a joint, then went to the Central Square Cinema in Cambridge, Mass., and howled at the 1936 anti-drug documentary “Reefer Madness,” which showed how pot-smoking could lead to hard drugs, murder, suicide, rape and the inevitable descent into insanity. (Afterward, the 20-something me had major munchies and hurried to Elsie’s restaurant for the enormous roast beef sandwich special.)The 20-something me believes marijuana could be legalized, regulated and taxed like alcohol, providing much needed revenue.But the 50-something me, the parent of three boys and a girl, ages 14 to 21, is not so sure. The 50-something me — who hasn’t smoked in more than 20 years — knows stories in our little suburb about classmates of my kids smoking pot in middle school, using heroin in college, going into rehab, relapsing, trying again. The 50-something me has seen the eyes of those boomer parents — good people — seen the weariness and fear, and thought, “There but for the grace of God. ...”Recently I read David Sheff’s best seller, “Beautiful Boy,” about his son Nic’s addiction to methamphetamines, the boy’s myriad rounds of rehab and repeated heartbreaking relapses. And while the problem drug in our house is legal (our boys went through numerous rounds of painful, nerve-racking alcohol-related groundings during high school), I was surprised by how much Mr. Sheff’s book moved and frightened me as a parent.He reminded me of me. Now 52, Mr. Sheff stopped smoking pot more than 20 years ago, about the time his first was born. He’s a work-at-home dad who’s put his children at the center of his life. He and his wife have raised three kids who sound funny and terrific. He seems to have a sense of balance and moderation.And so I was stopped cold when I got to the part in the book where he talks about marijuana being addictive and leading to hard drugs.He sounded like “Reefer Madness.”“I know what you mean,” he told me in a telephone conversation. “Back then, I discounted all the warnings about pot being the gateway drug and rolled my eyes at the propaganda.”“Of course, everyone who smokes pot doesn’t go on to heroin or other drugs,” he said. “But everyone who does abuse heroin starts with pot. How do we navigate that?” His son Nic started smoking at 12, though the father didn’t know it. Studies have shown the earlier kids start, the more likely they are to develop serious drug problems, so Mr. Sheff believes anything that can be done to delay using improves the odds.He has mixed feelings about legalization. He believes drug abuse should be treated as a health problem, not a criminal one. “But I worry we’re sending a message I don’t agree with, that marijuana is harmless.” He said he hopes his two younger children, Jasper, 15, and Daisy, 12, never smoke.Mr. Nadelmann, the advocate, says making pot illegal hasn’t worked any better than Prohibition. He says, while it’s easier for teenagers to get their hands on alcohol than pot, it’s easier for them to buy pot than alcohol. My sons agreed with this. As one said, “Dad, there are kids at the high school whose job is to sell you pot.”As to concern voiced by law enforcement officials that today’s pot is far stronger than the drug smoked in the 1970s, Mr. Nadelmann maintains that if marijuana were legalized, the potency could be regulated the way it’s done for alcohol.Mr. Nadelmann has done thousands of interviews, and he knows drug policy so well it’s hard to keep up with him. Only twice during our conversation did he hesitate. I asked if he smokes.“Off the record?” he said.I said I’d like his on-the-record answer.“I smoke marijuana occasionally,” he said, in the privacy of his home. “But I don’t travel with it. I can’t afford to put myself at risk.”I asked if his daughter, now 20, had seen him smoke when she was growing up. “She grew up seeing adults she knew and respected smoke the occasional joint, and saw they didn’t change,” he said.So much is changing: our first African-American president; our worst economic collapse in 80 years; five states legalizing gay marriage. Is legalizing marijuana next? It may make sense. It may happen. But with so many boomers, including our president, now parents raising children, I’m not so sure.Note: Yes man Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance sees “progress” in pot laws.Source: New York Times (NY)Author: Michael WineripPublished: May 17, 2009 Copyright: 2009 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite: Articles: The 'War on Drugs' is Over Drug Czar is Right, End The War on Drugs

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help    

Comment #8 posted by afterburner on May 19, 2009 at 22:14:22 PT
Vincent #6
Rush - Free Will, Free Will
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by Vincent on May 16, 2009 at 22:15:08 PT:

The 50-something me

This observation by the author of this article is interesting and understandable...and yet, difficult for me to understand. Being in the same age range as the writer and David Scheff, I can relate to their life experiences which, in turn, inform their opinion. My life experiences however, are different. I didn't stop smoking 20 years ago, I continue to this day. I never, ever believed that herb smoking was wrong. I never lost sight of this struggle. I never believed the enemy's lies.      As the writer says, we all had a good time in the 1970s, laughing at the squares, at the hypocrisy. Ahhhh...the Seventies. A wonderful era! We had a good thing going. But, as the Reagan era began, many of our generation turned against herb, due to the propaganda campaign driven by the Republicans. And the Democrats...? They were the "Weak-fish" as always. The biggest mistake they made was to allow the Republicans to frame the issue. Once that happened, the animals won.      Now, I sympathize with Mr. Sheff on his troubles. I grew up in the South Bronx so I've seen many people fall into traps. Very sad. However, it depends on the person. God puts all kinds of temptations in front of us. But, he also gave us a free will. You can indulge in some of those temptations in moderation, without letting it consume you. Some people will always fail--they'll drink to excess, smoke 4 packs of cigarettes a day, go to Vegas and gamble with their last dollar, get married on Sunday and cheat on their spouse by Thursday--BUT MOST PEOPLE DON'T. Most folks live within moderation, they don't srew up. I'm like that. So why should we be punished.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by Celaya on May 16, 2009 at 16:05:25 PT

The New York Crimes
So, this is how the great flagship "news" journal, the NYT, objectively treats this issue emerging big-time in the public consciousness.....Spend most of the article hysterically expounding the LONG-DISPROVEN gateway myth. --- Then they don't air even one voice in refutation of it. To add insult to injury, they pull the old prohibitionist hide-behind-the-children routine.It seems they go even lower by grouping having a Black President with other 'undesireable' things, like the crashing economy, gay marriage and legal marijuana.I wouldn't even wrap my fish in this garbage.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by George Servantes on May 16, 2009 at 13:30:05 PT

You are right but what we have is government trying to raise our kids.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by AdaptBones on May 16, 2009 at 09:42:02 PT:

FoM I think you are absolutly correct. Moderation and involvement is the key to it all. So many parents today spout these arguments and then sit their kids in front of the tv for hours on end while they go do whatever. THAT is not being a parent. If people would talk with their kids, be involved with their lives, and raise them like they were kids becoming adults then I don't think we would have so many fears and concerns about "protecting the children". Blessed be everyone.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by FoM on May 16, 2009 at 08:58:46 PT

A Way To Look At This
When people have children they often decide no I don't want my children to do what I did and that is a very natural emotion. Punishing adults for what other people fear concerning their children isn't right. Someday the children will become adults and will pick some substance to do most times. Of all of the substances cannabis is the least harmful. There is an expression that goes like this.Give them enough rope to hang themselves and pray they don't. When we become adults we decide our course in life so think about it when you want to protect your children by locking up adults. Keep kids busy in sports. Be a part of their life. Know your own children and let adults be free to be adults.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by Sam Adams on May 16, 2009 at 08:13:23 PT

no mention of jail or 800,000 arrests or police. I guess they don't exist in the NY Times' consciousness. Police, arrests and jail are only things that happen to the underclasses.No mention of prohibtion-induced violence either. Or the current budget crisis.Just the big question: Does Ethan Nadelman get high? So critical to future of the country.
[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment