Marijuana Vote Has Allies on Both Sides

Marijuana Vote Has Allies on Both Sides
Posted by CN Staff on September 25, 2008 at 16:01:51 PT
By John Laidler, Globe Correspondent
Source: Boston Globe
Boston, MA --  Georgetown lawyer Steven Epstein supports the November state ballot question on decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana, seeing use of the drug as a matter of personal liberty."We formed the government to protect the individual in the exercise of their rights, amongst which is life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," Epstein said, adding that people should be free to exercise those rights as long as they do not harm others.
But Chelsea Police Chief Brian Kyes strongly opposes the ballot proposal, viewing it as a step backward in the fight against drug abuse."It definitely sends the wrong message to kids," he said."By decriminalizing this offense right now and making it basically the equivalent of a traffic violation, you are sending the message that it's OK, that it's not so bad."As the decriminalization measure, Ballot Question 2, begins to stir debate around the state, voices on both sides are being sounded in this region.The measure would replace the state's criminal penalties for possession of an ounce or less of marijuana with civil penalties enforced through citations.Offenders would be subject to forfeiture of the drug and a $100 fine - for those under 18, the $100 fine would be contingent on their completing within a year a drug awareness program with a community service component. Otherwise, the fine could increase to as high as $1,000.The offense would not be listed on the individual's Criminal Record Information System (CORI) record."People should vote yes on Question Two because it's a simple, commonplace reform based on successful laws from 11 other states," said Whitney A. Taylor, campaign manager for the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy, the ballot group advocating a "yes" vote."We waste $30 million a year in police resources enforcing the current marijuana possession laws."Taylor said her committee neither promotes nor condones marijuana use. Endorsers of the question range from the American Civil Liberties Union to lawyers, professors, police officers, and marijuana legal reform groups."Marijuana remains illegal under Question 2," she said, arguing that the measure actually provides for more certain consequences for offenders under age 18.While first-time offenders are rarely sentenced to jail, Taylor said inclusion of their arrest on their CORI report can "create huge barriers to getting a job, finding housing, and getting school loans."Epstein, who as a lawyer has represented many clients charged with marijuana possession, said offenders are "labeled criminals for doing something that over half of us have done at least once in our lifetimes," a label that "follows you around" because of the CORI listing. He also said that enforcement of the existing law is arbitrary.A founder and spokesman for Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition, Epstein noted that advisory questions calling for decriminalizing marijuana have passed in all 31 legislative districts where they have been on the ballot.But Middlesex District Attorney Gerard Leone said the ballot measure "derails all the good and hard work we've done on behalf of kids and communities. . . . All the question does is provide another mind-altering substance on the menu of options for our kids to use. . . . It's a virtual certainty that if Question 2 passes, there will be an increase in marijuana use and it will happen amongst our kids."Leone and his fellow district attorneys are members of the Coalition for Safe Streets, a group opposing the question that also includes police chiefs, local officials, and clergy members."We know it's a gateway drug, and we know kids who use marijuana use it in combination with alcohol or other drugs, and step up to other, more potent drugs," Leone said."We also know the strain of marijuana on the streets is now nine or 10 times more potent than it was a decade ago."Essex lawyer Jonathan W. Blodgett agreed that Question 2 "absolutely sends the wrong message, particularly to young people.""The question people have to ask is, who benefits from decriminalization. Do we really want kids smoking marijuana? . . . We are all promoting healthy choices in our lives today. This is just a major step back," said Blodgett."If this passes, we will see more car accidents and more industrial accidents because people will have absolutely no incentive not to smoke marijuana."Blodgett also said the measure will not reduce police and court costs, noting that in most cases, marijuana possession charges are brought together with more serious offenses.Also opposed to the ballot question is Amy Harris, clinical director of Chelsea ASAP, an outpatient substance abuse clinic in Chelsea, and coordinator of the Chelsea Mobilization for Change, a coalition that works on substance abuse prevention.Harris said decriminalization would lead to greater availability of marijuana in the form of "blunts, the cigar-sized marijuana cigarettes now prevalent among young people.She said such heavy consumption of the drug puts youth at risk for cancer and psychological damage. Decriminalization would also have the effect of "sanctioning the drug so youths can emulate what the adults are doing," she said.But Ann Allen, a medical technician from Salem, supports Question 2, calling the proposal "long overdue.""It's just very logical," she said, noting that it would eliminate the CORI records that now burden offenders, and save money for taxpayers.Allen said she was introduced to the cause of easing marijuana laws when a friend with cancer - who has since died - had to risk legal sanctions to obtain marijuana to relieve chemotherapy symptoms."She felt uncomfortable doing it illegally, like every other person I know that has smoked marijuana as a responsible adult," she said.Source: Boston Globe (MA)Author:  John Laidler, Globe CorrespondentPublished: September 25, 2008 Copyright: 2008 Globe Newspaper CompanyContact: letter globe.comWebsite: Articles & Web Site:MassCann of Initiative Deny Legalization Goal Blunt Object - Boston Phoenix 'Question' About It
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #3 posted by Vincent on October 06, 2008 at 11:37:43 PT:
Same tired old excuses
  The opponents of Massachusetts Ballot question 2 are using the same old, tired reasons that they (and their kind) have been using for years and it still sounds like bull. They say that it will lead to outright legalization of herb--that sounds like a winner to me! They say it will lead to increased use of pot by young people--nothing wrong with that! I started smoking herb at age 14 and I turned out fine.
  And, finally this old canard (you like that word, "canard"?), that the pot grown today is much stronger than the stuff grown in the 1970s--that is pure BULL! Back in the early to middle 70s, the reefer was of a much higher
quality and I could feel it! One day, when I have more time, I'll write down the proof. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by ekim on September 25, 2008 at 19:24:55 PT
will someone who has lived in Ann Arbor MI chimein
please.what has it been now --- 37 years now -- a ticket for small amount of cannabis in Ann Arbor MI.the same Ann Arbor that has been chosen cool city -- and earned the rating in the top ten family cool city in the NationI hope that the Cheif of Police of Ann Arbor will be asked if the Chief Brian Kyes has anything to fear about a cannabis ticket law and how it has saved the city - Jail space- court space- leo space-- good effect of law not giving the person a permanet crimal record. and how many hundreds of thousands of tickets have been issued from the city police of Ann Arbor since 1972
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by HempWorld on September 25, 2008 at 16:55:46 PT
Lies, lies, lies ...
Annual US Deaths (Year 200):Tobacco 435,000 
Poor Diet and Physical Inactivity 365,000 
Alcohol  85,000 
Microbial Agents 75,000 
Toxic Agents 55,000 
2nd Hand Cigarette Smoke  38,053 
Adverse Reactions to Prescription Drugs  32,000 
Suicide 30,622 
Incidents Involving Firearms 29,000 
Motor Vehicle Crashes 26,347 
Homicide 20,308 
Sexual Behaviors 20,000 
All Illicit Drug Use, Direct and Indirect 17,000 
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs  5,600 
Aspirin 2,029 
Caffeine 511 
Water 15 
Marijuana 0 When policies and laws are based on propaganda instead of science, special interests are rewarded at the expense of we the people.
On a mission from God!
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment