cannabisnews.com: Medical Marijuana Bill Wins OK





Medical Marijuana Bill Wins OK
Posted by CN Staff on June 02, 2007 at 06:08:49 PT
By Brian Lockhart, Staff Writer
Source: Stamford Advocate
Hartford -- The state Senate, in a 23-13 bipartisan vote, last night approved a bill to legalize the medical use of marijuana to relieve the suffering of patients with debilitating conditions such as cancer or AIDS.The legislation, approved May 23 by the House, 89-58, heads to Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell for her signature.
If the legislation becomes law, Connecticut will become the 13th state to allow the palliative use of marijuana despite the federal prohibition against it."She'll read it thoroughly and think it over," Rell spokesman Adam Liegeot said.A 2004 University of Connecticut poll showed 83 percent of respondents backed allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana in such cases.State Sen. Andrew McDonald, D-Stamford, introduced the legislation on the Senate floor. But the four other senators from southwestern Connecticut - Bob Duff, D-Norwalk; Judith Freedman, R-Westport; John McKinney, R-Fairfield; and William Nickerson, R-Greenwich - opposed the bill.The legislation passed last night would allow a doctor to certify an adult patient's use of marijuana after determining he or she has a debilitating condition and could potentially benefit from marijuana. Patients and their primary caregivers would then register with the state Department of Consumer Protection.The patient and the primary caregiver would be limited to growing no more than four plants, each having a maximum height of 4 feet, in an indoor secure facility."It's rare we have an opportunity to pass legislation that will have an extraordinary effect on the well-being of those who are the sickest amongst us," McDonald said in introducing the bill.But Nickerson said it was not wise for state legislators to make decisions best left to the Federal Drug Administration."They are legally authorized, medically equipped and have decades of experience," Nickerson said.McKinney said although it is a "proven medical fact" marijuana use can prove damaging, its medical benefits are less conclusive.He also was concerned that the plants grown for medical purposes would not be destroyed afterward and would contribute to the drug trade."And that marijuana then goes back out onto the street, maybe into the hands of some kids," McKinney said. "(The bill) is very well-intended, but I think there's a lot of room for error here."Freedman introduced a few amendments that would either provide additional restrictions or call for further study of the bill.But even if any of her amendments were adopted, she said she still would vote against the bill.Freedman also had a message for the ill residents who may have been watching the debate."We hear your pain. We feel your pain," she said. "But there has to be a way to make it subside with legal means."Duff did not participate in the debate, but afterward said the bill is flawed because anyone who takes advantage of the legislation would be breaking the law."You cannot, legally, get the first seed . . . under federal law. Your doctor can't give you the first seed. You can't mail order the seed, legally," Duff said. "Our country abides by the rule of law, so therefore this is not a bill we really should be debating in the legislature."McDonald said afterward: "It would still be illegal under federal law, although I can't point to one case in the country where the federal government has arrested somebody for purchasing marijuana seeds for medicinal purposes."He said the bill could be challenged in federal court."But now we're going to have 13 states," he said. "I'm pretty certain we're close to a tipping point where the FDA will be forced into a position of funding studies they've consistently refused to undertake." Source: Stamford Advocate, The (CT)Author: Brian Lockhart, Staff WriterPublished: June 2, 2007Copyright: 2007 Southern Connecticut Newspaper, Inc.Contact: letters.advocate scni.comWebsite: http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/Related Articles:Cannabis Measure Passes Senatehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread23029.shtmlMarijuana Bill Wins Final Approval in Legislaturehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread23026.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #7 posted by goneposthole on June 03, 2007 at 07:28:26 PT
medical pot
I have smoked cannabis for 37 years now. The only place to find it these days is from the kids. They know where it is and are the only source that I know to obtain some.The kids get it into their hands because they want it.If it killed people like Merck's Vioxx, nobody would want the stuff. It is a desired commodity like bread or beer.It will not change. People young and old will continue to use cannabis, no matter what. That's just the way things are.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by Had Enough on June 03, 2007 at 06:26:34 PT
Destroyed Minds
“He also was concerned that the plants grown for medical purposes would not be destroyed afterward and would contribute to the drug trade.”Destroyed afterward? What would be left to destroy???After being smoked or vaporized???Destroyed??? What???This mans soul is destroyed, can somebody please help him???
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by Had Enough on June 03, 2007 at 06:18:40 PT
Ok Dr. Senators MDs
“McKinney said although it is a "proven medical fact" marijuana use can prove damaging, its medical benefits are less conclusive.”Ok Dr. Senators MDs, show us the “proven facts”.DEA & FDA make sure that its “medical benefits” remain less conclusive, and mouthpieces perpetuate the lies.“He also was concerned that the plants grown for medical purposes would not be destroyed afterward and would contribute to the drug trade.”I don’t think there is anything to worry about that now, come on, lets get real. Excess weed, I don’t think that will ever happen.The prohibitionist’s spiels don’t quite work as much as they would want them to. Times are changing, but the lies remain the same, however less people are biting on their stuff.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by OverwhelmSam on June 03, 2007 at 04:55:53 PT
Great News!
Now, let's get to work on decriminalization. No adult should be arrested for possession of an ounce or less of pot for personal use. It should be a ticketable offense equitable to the level of nusance caused by the possession.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by mai_bong_city on June 02, 2007 at 09:27:58 PT
and with this....
also came news of gonzo sending out new 'crime task forces' to six more cities....
i am happy for connecticut's sick, but the feds now will have a new state to target - believe me.
when are we going to get the federal law changed? no sick person is safe growing their own, no caregiver is safe growing to help the sick.....
insanity.
but yay, conn.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by potpal on June 02, 2007 at 08:34:50 PT
dis and dat
decades of experience ... in lying about cannabis"We hear your pain. We feel your pain," but don't care about your painhas to be a way to make it subside with legal means ... you are a legislator, make it legislate, make it legalMeet the Prohibitionists:Bob Duff, D-Norwalk; Judith Freedman, R-Westport; John McKinney, R-Fairfield; and William Nickerson, R-GreenwichWho do they represent?
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by John Tyler on June 02, 2007 at 07:32:51 PT
one state at a time
This is great news. We will get there one state at a time. One thing struck me though, with 83% of the Conn. public for medical cannabis why would any politician be against it? This kind of support is beyond a mandate; it is support of landslide proportions. It is obvious the public understands cannabis much better than the politicians. They understand it and they want it. When this passes this will make it 25% of the states with some type of medical cannabis legislation.
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment