Young Make Drugs Part of Everyday Life 

Young Make Drugs Part of Everyday Life 
Posted by CN Staff on November 24, 2002 at 18:24:08 PT
By James Meikle, Health Correspondent
Source: Guardian Unlimited
Britain's twentysomethings have defined their own "sensible" drug-taking culture and incorporated a regular use of illegal substances into a work hard/play hard lifestyle, according to research. Far from "maturing out" of adolescent binge drinking and occasional drug taking, these young people are helping to make recreational drug use part of everyday life.
They are also challenging assumptions that drug users are unemployed and unemployable people who could only fund their habit through crime. Howard Parker and a research team at Manchester University have monitored hundreds of young people in north-west England since they were aged 13 or 14. The team warned yesterday that the government's drug strategy must incorporate tobacco and, especially, alcohol use, and embrace the "realities" of how people actually behaved. "In the absence of any public health messages for young adults into their lifestyles, hard-soft drug distinctions are becoming increasingly blurred. "At 18, nearly all this group said they would never touch cocaine because it was addictive. Yet by 23 , more than a quarter of them have used cocaine powder." This research coincides with a seperate survey which found that increasing numbers of teenagers are using cannabis. The proportion of 14- and 15-year-old boys who said they had tried the drug jumped from 19% in 1999, to 29% in 2001, according to research by the schools health education unit. Cannabis, which is being downgraded from a Class B to a Class C drug, was the only illegal drug not considered to be "always unsafe" by older children, the unit found. Researchers said that the response of 22- to 23-year-olds indicated few signs of moderation since they were 18. At 18, 82% were weekly drinkers; most went drinking several times a week. This profile was almost identical five years later. Binge drinking remained endemic. At 18, 63% of the sample had tried an illegal drug. By 23, this had risen to 76%. Professor Parker, director of Manchester University's social policy applied research centre, said: "Even now, more than half remain drug active with 30% being regular drug users (having tried at least one drug in the last month), primarily of cannabis, followed by ecstasy and now cocaine replacing amphetamine and LSD use." As he and fellow researchers reported in the journal Sociology: "Thus far, their drug involvement is only plateauing and at a high rate. It is only with their increasing tendency to become cannabis users despite previous, more florid, drug repertoires, that these users are showing signs of moderation." The young people said their parents, too, were far more "realistic" and tolerant of cannabis use than they were a few years ago. Prof Parker explained yesterday: "What has changed is the way their substance abuse is managed. "Subjects reported they now exercised more self-discipline and control over their drug use and binge drinking, by restricting it far more to weekends. "The sample see their substance use as de-stressing - chilling out activity, whereby intoxicated weekends and going out to 'get out of it' is the antidote to the working week." Access to drugs was straightforward, according to the article in Sociology. Educated, employed, and otherwise conforming young people had informal drugs distribution methods whereby friends and friends of friends "sorted" the matter, distancing them from "real" dealers. Their choice of drugs, beyond cannabis, was partly determined by the need to get up for work on weekdays. Thus cocaine powder, which, for most, had short-term effects, was replacing LSD and amphetamines. There were other limits on "sensible" consumption. Both drug users and abstainers were less comfortable with friends who regularly took class A drugs such as cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, and LSD. "What the Class A stimulant users have done is pose a very knotty political dilemma. "As primarily educated, employed young citizens with otherwise conforming profiles, they challenge the 'war on drugs' discourse which prefers to link drug use with crime and personal tragedy and utilises this discourse as a reason for not calling a truce." Note: Employed users challenge idea of 'losers' funding habit by crime.Special Report: Drugs in Britain:,2759,178206,00.html Source: Guardian Unlimited, The (UK)Author: James Meikle, Health CorrespondentPublished: Monday, November 25, 2002Copyright: 2002 Guardian Newspapers LimitedContact: letters Articles & Web Site:Drugs Uncovered: Observer Special Wisdom - Guardian Unlimited Britain's Drug Habit To Be Adult About Drugs
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #5 posted by John Tyler on November 24, 2002 at 20:52:38 PT
Still good people
"As primarily educated, employed young citizens with otherwise conforming profiles, they challenge the 'war on drugs' discourse which prefers to link drug use with crime and personal tragedy and utilises this discourse as a reason for not calling a truce." Educated, hard working, good people can, and do use drugs, and are still educated, hard working and good. This one quote shows the lie of the Drug War propaganda 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by afterburner on November 24, 2002 at 19:25:49 PT:
US Snooping, Canadian Snooping.
The US is not the only country restricting freedoms and rights in the name of 9/11, fighting terrorism.Privacy under attack: Watchdog downGet it while it's hot!
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by goneposthole on November 24, 2002 at 19:11:39 PT
Morally bankrupt
The only thing that is morally bankrupt about all of this reefer madness is the US Government.May it reach the deepest depths of hell.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by FoM on November 24, 2002 at 18:52:31 PT
I just wanted to say hello and tell you I read your comment when you asked about Robin but I don't know what she is doing or how she is doing. Maybe someone can email her and find out. I'd sure like to know that she is ok.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by p4me on November 24, 2002 at 18:41:24 PT
There sure is a big difference in the media
A person kind of loses faith in the American way when you see the difference so clearly the voices of reason coming from Canadian and British journalist. They talk reality and the US talks of make-believe. Its treason to reason. Where is a title with the words "cannabis prohibition". Some day a journalist is going to to use those two words.Until I see it in a Cnew title I will have to promote the discusion of cannabis prohibition by talking about prohibition. Quit talking about pot. Everybody knows about pot. It is time to macro, "Cannabis Prohibionn.Prohibition kills. Prohibion corrupts. Cannabis Prohibtion has to end. Hang them all.1
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment