Cannabis News Protecting Patients Access to Medical Marijuana
  Puff Daddies
Posted by CN Staff on September 10, 2009 at 20:06:46 PT
By Daniel Engber 
Source: Slate Magazine 

cannabis USA -- At the time, Mom's question caught me by surprise: "Have you ever tried marijuana?" she asked, sloshing her coffee around in a mug as we stood together in the kitchen. My mind went blank. Could this be the fabled "drug talk" that parents are supposed to give to their teenage children? If so, why was I getting it at 30?

It turned out my mother was less interested in my drug use than her own. When I told her I'd smoked pot in college, and a bunch of times since, she took the news in stride. The thing was, she and my father were hoping to score some weed. Did I know anybody?

A little context: My parents paid for my college education. They put me up for a semester of graduate school. They sat through three school plays and one flute recital; they came to my art opening; they bought me a skateboard. But given the chance to pay them back—in part, at least—for so many years of support and encouragement, I failed to deliver so much as a dime bag.

"You didn't say no," my mother recalled the other day, "but you didn't say yes. It was clear that you were very hesitant about this." After a moment, she added: "You didn't give off positive vibrations."

OK, so I never hooked up my parents. But in the weeks and months that followed, I discovered that many of my contemporaries—people in their late 20s or early 30s—had experienced something similar. Soon I'd heard dozens of stories about retired moms and pops returning to the marijuana habits of their youth. There were solicitations made over family dinners, intergenerational drug deals worked out over holiday weekends—the anecdotes were easy enough to find. Would I come across any data to support this trend?

In fact, a statistical trace of what I've taken to calling the "puff daddy" movement emerged a few years ago, when researchers at the National Institutes of Health compared national drug surveys conducted over two-year periods beginning in 1991 and 2001. Their analysis, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that the percentage of people who say they smoked marijuana in the past year had remained fairly stable over the 10-year stretch. (That is to say, it ended where it started.) But they found a very different pattern among those between the ages of 45 and 64: As my parents' generation matured, the number of smokers in that group had nearly tripled.

The baby boomer drug uptick turns up again in the recent data. According to the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, almost 6 percent of all adults between the ages of 50 and 59 reported smoking marijuana in the past year. That's up from about 3 percent five years earlier. Meanwhile, the number of recent users over the age of 50 has climbed to 2.65 million people nationwide (and we can assume the real prevalence is somewhat higher, since these figures are based on self-reported drug use). Here's something to think about: There are about as many boomers using cannabis today as there are high-school students doing the same.

Still, it's not easy to get an accurate picture of who these puffing oldsters are and how their drug habits have evolved over the last few decades. (It's also not clear to what extent the legalization of medical marijuana has been a factor.) In August, researchers at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration published a detailed look (PDF) at patterns of drug use among the boomers. Most appear to have used marijuana continually throughout their lives, but a sizable portion were classified as "resumers"—those who recently emerged from a long hiatus in smoking dope. Sure enough, almost all the puff daddies and pot mommas I've encountered fall into this latter category: After years of abstinence, they've just recently started to rifle through junk drawers for vintage roach clips and rolling papers.

Barbara, a 61-year-old mother of two from Belmont, Mass., began using drugs in her post-college years. She was living in Europe and following the Hippie Trail through Turkey, Pakistan, and Afghanistan in 1971 and '72—a period during which she smoked hash every single day. Then she came back to the United States, got married, and started a family.

Over the next 20 years, Barbara says she tried marijuana only a handful of times, with friends. "I was a soccer mom," she explains. "I wasn't into smoking at all. I didn't think about it, and I didn't miss it."

The habit came back after she separated from her husband in the 1990s. These days it's more about the living room than the magic bus: "I like to smoke at home and just relax," she says. "Sometimes I'll get on my treadmill; sometimes I'll get out my guitar; sometimes I'll just watch Desperate Housewives and giggle."

Barbara's story gibes with the conventional wisdom on how drug and alcohol use develops across the lifespan. Getting married and having kids tend to be associated with reductions in drug use, while divorce and retirement often come with increased dosages.

Whatever the cause, empty-nesters seem to be enjoying marijuana now more than ever. That doesn't mean they're comfortable with the public face of marijuana use: As a rule, the people interviewed for this article did not want to share even their first names—some cited the potential for legal trouble; others worried about what their friends might think. As for the experience of smoking itself, none reported any paranoia or anxiety whatsoever. In fact, most said they find a calm and serenity in marijuana that was lacking in their youth.

For a 57-year-old retired schoolteacher in southeastern Ohio, smoking has become an evening ritual with her husband. She'd given up a weekly habit in 1975, only to be reintroduced by her son 25 years later. (First they shared a joint to celebrate his engagement; then he helped her fashion a beer can into a rudimentary bong.) Now she and her husband enjoy a few puffs as they watch the sunset through the kitchen window. "It's really a treasured part of our day, just calming down from whatever, chewing over what was going on," she says.

The high never makes her feel self-conscious or uncomfortable, as it did when she smoked at parties in the old days. "My mind is a lot more peaceful than it was when I was younger," she says. "We're not trying to buy a place, we're not trying to get enough money to live on, we're not raising a family. … It's just very mellow."

Where does she get her marijuana currently? She has a friend "who knows somebody" with a top-notch source. "It's a designer variety. Acapulco gold."

The mind-boggling array of highly potent cannabis strains can be intimidating for some boomers. "Pot's different now," says a divorced, 54-year-old counselor in Philadelphia, who remembers an awkward evening spent with her son and a pan of brownies. "One hit and you're gonzo. I figured that out after a few behavior mishaps."

Back in the early 1970s, an everyday habit had made her deeply depressed, and she ended up quitting at the suggestion of her therapist. ("It was like I could see the sky again," she says.) Later she spent some time as a drug and alcohol counselor, helping college students who were smoking too much. But her recent experiences with marijuana have been very positive, once she got used to the modern varieties.

The puff daddies and pot mommas do have some reservations about smoking, but these tend to be health-related. Barbara, the ex-soccer-mom from Belmont, is afraid of a product tainted by biotechnology. "I am like a Whole Foods profile," she says. "I want organic meat; I want fish that comes in from dayboats; I only drink distilled water. … What I smoke today, I know who grows it, and I know it's not a genetically engineered superstrain." Others fear gaining weight from too many bouts of the munchies or bad interactions between marijuana and prescription meds.

The clinical evidence suggests that the greatest danger faced by boomers who use cannabis is heart disease. Getting high can increase your heart rate by about 40 beats per minute and cause unusual blood pressure fluctuations, which may in turn temporarily boost the odds of a heart attack. In 2001, a team of researchers from the Harvard Medical School found that smoking marijuana causes a transient, fivefold increase in risk. (Exercise, sexual activity, and bouts of anger can cause similar short-term risks.)

A 2008 paper published in the American Heart Journal takes these findings a step further: Although its sample sizes were small, the study found that marijuana users were significantly more likely to die, from cardiovascular distress or other problems, than those who didn't use illegal drugs.

According to the paper's first author, Kenneth J. Mukamal, marijuana appears relatively safe when looked at across the general population. But it may be risky for certain subgroups, like those with incipient heart problems.

Then again, there may be some good reasons to keep smoking. In August, researchers at the University of Edinburgh published evidence that the drug might help prevent osteoporosis among the elderly. Cannabis can also be used to treat nausea and unintentional weight loss, and it may (or may not) have some salutary effect on older patients with glaucoma or Parkinson's disease. Advocates for the medical use of marijuana cite many other potential applications.

I called Dr. Mukamal to find out whether he thought cannabis was good or bad for old people. He didn't seem too impressed by its age-defying effects. "People of heart-attack age are smoking marijuana. Frankly, I think those folks should be concerned about it."

My parents didn't seem perturbed by this doctor's warning. Nor were they put off by my cautionary tale about the 65-year-old grandma who'd recently been caught with 33 pounds of premium marijuana in the trunk of her car. I tried to nag them, but they were pretty mellow about the whole thing.

Note: More Americans over age 50 are smoking marijuana than ever before. Are my parents among them?

Daniel Engber is a senior editor at Slate.

Source: Slate Magazine (US Web)
Author: Daniel Engber
Published: September 10, 2009
Copyright: 2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC
Contact: letters@slate.com
Website: http://www.slate.com/
URL: http://www.slate.com/id/2227962/

CannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help    Share on Facebook Share on stumbleupon digg it Share on reddit Share on del.icio.us

 
Comment #14 posted by Hope on September 13, 2009 at 08:56:02 PT
Passive Agressive.
Maybe I'm too sensitive. God knows I've been told I am.

But I'm sick of this name calling. Whether they think they're being openly unkind or just cute and funny.

That's "Kicking" the wounds already made, it seems to me.

They mean it to hurt and mock. So why am I being "overly sensitive" to recognize that?

I can't see this article as anything but more kicks against the already open wounds people have had to suffer and are suffering in the name of the illegality of cannabis.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by GeoChemist on September 12, 2009 at 05:07:07 PT
Studies
Gang, although each section of a scientific study is important, the most telling part of a scientific study is the methods section. When reading a study, first and foremost the study shoud be divided into sections, as a gross generalization, those sections should be grouped akin to the following: intoduction, intentions/purpose, methods (longest part, "meat" of the study), findings, and conclusion. This is a minimum a study should include, If any sources are used, those too must be evaluated. The most legitimate studies are peer-reviewed AFTER the reviewing scientists/organizations are evaluated for biases.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by FoM on September 11, 2009 at 16:58:53 PT
Question Authority
My husband's EKG was fine too.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #11 posted by FoM on September 11, 2009 at 16:57:08 PT
The Heart
My husband had low cholesterol so he was never on medicine until he had his heart attack on the treadmill at the VA Hosptial. He had 90 plus blockage in the widow maker artery and the others were blocked very bad too. How can we ever know if our hearts are ok? My husband was 58 when he needed stents and his brother was 56 when he needed multiple bypass surgery. His brother never drank or smoked and doesn't have a weight problem. My husband is not overweight in my opinion either. The processed food we eat because that is what most people can afford is the big culprit not cannabis.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #10 posted by Question Authority on September 11, 2009 at 16:42:15 PT
The Heart?
I'm over 50 and I've been smoking cannabis for 32 years.

My doctor and his EKG machine say my heart is fine.

Next myth please....

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on September 11, 2009 at 15:32:01 PT
dongenero
You still a youngin! Wait until you see the big 60 Plus! LOL!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by dongenero on September 11, 2009 at 14:53:33 PT
comment #4 duzt
Indeed! As a near 50 something, I agree. Children of the 60's are coming back around to their roots. Becoming centered again, often discovering a sense of self that was lost. In FoM's words, it's a beautiful thing.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by dongenero on September 11, 2009 at 14:45:28 PT
Storm Crow
Your list is wonderful. The value and importance of your compilation to truth and honesty in this issue is incalculable. Thank you.

I appreciate the work it took to create and the ongoing work it takes to maintain.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on September 11, 2009 at 13:05:34 PT
Storm Crow
Thank you so much for all you do and continue to do.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on September 11, 2009 at 13:01:29 PT
duzt
It is a beautiful thing.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by duzt on September 11, 2009 at 12:49:28 PT
50-60 crowd
My aunts husband is a CFO for a major corporation and when she went through cancer, I gave her a 1/4lb. or so to help her through. It turned out that she didn't want it, but every time I came over, he had one rolled for us and would want to go outside for a smoke. Seeing as how they are both very conservative Repubs I was a bit surprised, but now every time I go over, he still has one rolled and she always sneaks out and has a puff with us. The folks that grew up in the 60's are coming back around to their roots and trying to get off the pills, it's a beautiful thing.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Storm Crow on September 11, 2009 at 12:36:46 PT
They got their studies, I got mine!
Cannabinoid Offers Cardioprotection http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6818&wtm_format=print

Heavy Cannabis Use Not Independently Associated With Cardiovascular Risks http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6972

Cannabinoids prevented the development of heart failure in animal study http://www.cannabis-med.org/english/bulletin/ww_en_db_cannabis_artikel.php?id=145#2

Cannabis use not associated with risk factors for diseases of heart and circulation http://www.cannabis-med.org/english/bulletin/ww_en_db_cannabis_artikel.php?id=225#2

THC protects heart cells in the case of lowered oxygen supply http://www.cannabis-med.org/english/bulletin/ww_en_db_cannabis_artikel.php?id=212#1

Medical marijuana: study shows that THC slows atherosclerosis http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2005/04/medical_marijua.html

Cardiovascular Effects of Cannabis http://www.idmu.co.uk/canncardio.htm

For your copy of "Granny Storm Crow's list- July 2009", which contains these studies and more, send an email to i.wantgrannyslist(at)yahoo.ca and we will send you one absolutely free!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on September 11, 2009 at 09:47:19 PT
museman
The way I look at the heart issue is boomers have put a lot of miles on their heart and any number of things could cause a heart attack like shoveling snow in the winter.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by museman on September 11, 2009 at 09:12:31 PT
pretty good article, except for this;
"The clinical evidence suggests that the greatest danger faced by boomers who use cannabis is heart disease. Getting high can increase your heart rate by about 40 beats per minute and cause unusual blood pressure fluctuations, which may in turn temporarily boost the odds of a heart attack. In 2001, a team of researchers from the Harvard Medical School found that smoking marijuana causes a transient, fivefold increase in risk. (Exercise, sexual activity, and bouts of anger can cause similar short-term risks.) "

While I am not a credited physician, I am trained in the healing arts, which brings along with it some necessity of anatomy and basic human systems. A few years ago I was diagnosed with high blood pressure, and all of the medications I was being given had terrible side effects. So I began to test exercise, and some other activities.

I discovered through several repetitive tests, that smoking cannabis increases your blood pressure for about 5-10 minutes -during the inhalation process, but within that time after smoking, the pressure actually drops to normal levels.

This 'clinical study' is as suspect as any paid for by a prohibitionist government, and even though they are part right, they deliberately omit information that renders their little 'studies' insignificant and irrelevant.

This is a clear case of 'believing what you're told' without bothering to find out for yourself. As long as people accept the dictates of so-called 'authorities' they can pretty much just make things up as they go. Sound familiar?

FREE CANNABIS FOREVER

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on September 10, 2009 at 20:06:46