cannabisnews.com: The Most Important Movie Of The Year 





The Most Important Movie Of The Year 
Posted by FoM on March 25, 2001 at 10:03:13 PT
By Jeffrey A. Miron
Source: Union-Tribune
Hollywood movies are not widely noted for their educational value. But in a searing depiction of drug trafficking and the war on drugs, the movie "Traffic" teaches much about the folly of drug prohibition. Even if "Traffic" does not win the Oscar for Best Picture of the Year, it deserves the title Most Important Picture of the Year. 
Lesson 1: Prohibition, not drug consumption, causes the violence often attributed to drugs. "Traffic's" rival Mexican drug organizations resort to cold-blooded murder because unlike ordinary business firms they have no legal, nonviolent means to resolve disputes. In the United States, the murder rate skyrocketed during alcohol prohibition but fell once prohibition ended. Statistical research suggests that eliminating drug prohibition in the United States today would reduce the murder rate by 50 percent. Lesson 2: Prohibition fosters corruption. Although many American and Mexican law-enforcement officers are beyond reproach, financial temptation will weaken some officers' and politicians' resolve to play by the rules. Drug money corrupts, as police scandals in Los Angeles, New Orleans and Washington, D.C., show only too well. The situation is even worse in developing countries where wages are much lower than in the United States and the threat of violence against honest judges and politicians is frighteningly real. Lesson 3: Prohibition enriches criminals at the expense of society generally. In "Traffic," honest Mexican and American cops can afford only modest lifestyles, but fictional drug kingpin Carlos Ayala lives in a plush seaside mansion near San Diego. No hardworking American would object if he earned this lifestyle through honest work, but prohibition increases the wages of sin. Lesson 4: Prohibition promotes violence and corruption in drug-producing countries while ensuring the viability of political insurgents, who sell protective services to traffickers. Notwithstanding Mexican President Vicente Fox's recent trial balloon announcement that we would enjoy less violence and corruption if drugs were legalized, the specter of international condemnation renders this possibility academic. Lesson 5: Prohibition exacerbates racial conflict, since enforcement inevitably targets minorities even when drug use and trafficking pervade all elements of society. As one sassy teen in "Traffic" says, law-enforcement comes down more heavily on the politically and socially disenfranchised, and the drugs they use. Mid-Term Exam: What are some evils of prohibition beyond those highlighted in "Traffic?" Answer: Prohibition diverts police resources from deterring other kinds of crime. If we ended the war on drugs, we could devote many more police, prosecutors, judges and jailers to the apprehension, conviction and incarceration of criminals who commit violent crimes against body and property. Prohibition causes overdoses and accidental poisonings because quality control is poor in underground markets. Prohibition prevents the use of marijuana as medicine, although more potent drugs like cocaine and morphine can be legally prescribed. Prohibition increases the spread of AIDS by discouraging the legal sale of clean needles. Prohibition destroys respect for the law because, despite Draconian enforcement, drug law violations are rampant, leading many to believe that compliance with the law is for suckers. And prohibition costs tens of billions of dollars each year for police, prisons and the like. Final Exam: What should be done? Answer: Make drugs legal again. Before 1914, when federal law first criminalized drugs, many persons used drugs, and some suffered ill effects. But this was a problem mainly for users, their families and their doctors, not a social problem of immense proportions. If drugs were re-legalized, there would still be problems related to drug use, and use would probably increase. But in a free society individuals get to make their own choices, good or bad. And the reduced violence and corruption, along with the other benefits of legalization, would accrue to all elements of society, drug using or not. No one -- especially not those involved in law enforcement or drug policy -- believes we can "win" the war on drugs. Even with state-of-the art technology, a U.S. drug enforcement officer at the Mexican border tells "Traffic's" American drug czar, played by actor Michael Douglas, that their resources don't come close to those of the Mexican drug lords. "Traffic's" important achievement has been to popularize truths about the war on drugs that many in Washington know, but few have the courage to acknowledge. Miron is professor of economics at Boston University; research fellow at The Independent Institute, a public policy research institute focusing on government reform; and president of Bastiat Institute in Wellesley, Mass., a research institute exploring the libertarian perspective on public policy. Note: Miron is professor of economics at Boston University; research fellow at The Independent Institute, a public policy research institute focusing on government reform; and president of Bastiat Institute in Wellesley, Mass., a research institute exploring the libertarian perspective on public policy. Source: San Diego Union Tribune (CA) Author: Jeffrey A. Miron Published: March 25, 2001Copyright: 2001 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. Address: PO Box 120191, San Diego, CA, 92112-0191 Fax: (619) 293-1440 Contact: letters uniontrib.com Website: http://www.uniontrib.com/Forum: http://www.uniontrib.com/cgi-bin/WebX Related Articles & Web Site:Traffic Official Web Site http://www.traffic-movie.com/Mexicans Give 'Traffic' Thumbs Down http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9146.shtml'Traffic' has D.C. All Abuzz http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9135.shtmlThe Reality Behind the Movie Traffic - Nightlinehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread9131.shtmlCannabisNews Articles - Traffichttp://cannabisnews.com/thcgi/search.pl?K=traffic 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #8 posted by J.R. Bob Dobbs on March 26, 2001 at 05:27:15 PT
Four!
  Don't forget Best Editing!!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #7 posted by FoM on March 25, 2001 at 23:15:50 PT
4 Ocars I Just Heard
Hi Imprint, I think that Michael Douglas wasn't nominated because he played the Drug Czar. Maybe that isn't why but it could have contributed to it. No one, at least people I know, likes the Drug Czar! LOL! When Dylan was finished playing I wished he could have gone on longer. I thought it was so different and good.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by Imprint on March 25, 2001 at 22:59:16 PT:
Three Oscars!
I agree, Bob Dylan's song was very cool; what a mustache though. What ever Sting performed was horrible. I also would have liked Traffic to win best picture (bummer).  Folks that haven’t seen it would be more motivated to go after a best picture win. But thee wins is very good. This will keep awareness up. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by FoM on March 25, 2001 at 22:06:17 PT
Traffic Won Three Oscars
Thought I'd post what they won. I wish it would have been for Best Picture but this will do! I really liked Bob Dylans song and he won! I never heard it before and I really liked it.Director: Steven Soderbergh, "Traffic." Supporting Actor: Benicio Del Toro, "Traffic." Screenplay Adaptation: Stephen Gaghan, "Traffic." 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by FoM on March 25, 2001 at 18:11:52 PT
They won Best Supporting Actor!
Yes! Very Cool! Just had to say it! 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by dddd on March 25, 2001 at 17:00:51 PT
well put DankHank
...now just watch,,,Traffic wont even be mentioned ....I'm not even gonnawatch...something like "Chocolat",will end up taking most important picture,and I'd have to buy a new TV.I got alot bricks left over from Nightline...dddd
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by Dankhank on March 25, 2001 at 15:37:14 PT:
Traffic
the text of my comment when I was given an opportunity to tell Foxnews and viewers why I think "Traffic" should get the Oscar:"The Drug War is the single most destructive act our government has ever inflicted upon it's own people, and President Bush has appointed a virulent man as Attorney General with his own drug scandals lurking in some perceptive publications.""This movie makes people talk."
HEMP n STUFF
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by Imprint on March 25, 2001 at 14:25:37 PT:
I hope to see more articles like this!
This article is clear and to the point. I know I’m dreaming but I sure hope our President gets a chance to read it. Further, Mexico’s President Fox just might be an important figure in drug reform for the US. Great job San Diego Union Tribune! I sure want to see more articles like this one from our nation’s newspapers.
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment


Name: Optional Password: 
E-Mail: 
Subject: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: