cannabisnews.com: Drug-War Casualties Drug-War Casualties Posted by FoM on June 05, 2000 at 20:02:28 PT By Dan Mindus, NR editorial intern Source: National Review A new bill reads like a primer on drug-war excess.The provisions of the First and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution may soon join those of the Second, Fifth and Tenth as the “neglected rights.” They are about to become civilian casualties of the war on drugs. The Methamphetamine Anti-Proliferation Act, passed unanimously by the Senate and now awaiting what will likely be swift approval in the House, is intended “to provide for the punishment of methamphetamine laboratory operators, provide additional resources to combat methamphetamine production, trafficking, and abuse in the United States, and” — the ominous part — “for other purposes.” Those other purposes include significant jail time for merely talking about drugs. Three years for “posting,” “publicizing,” or even “linking to” certain types of information, including “indirect advertising,” whatever that means. Ten years for teaching or demonstrating use. One can only imagine the effect of applying the bill retroactively: These ten-year stints in jail would have been far more common than tours in Vietnam. And, if you believe the rhetoric of the bill's supporters, that's perfectly appropriate, for drugs are as evil as Communism and as dangerous as the Vietcong. Republican Congressman Chris Cannon, the sponsor of the House bill, dispatched aide Chris MacKay to argue that “anything we can do to win the war on drugs is worth doing.” ANYTHING?Conservatives may disagree about the best way to deal with drug abuse, but they should all be wary of any crusade that sacrifices our system of laws and rights in pursuit of any overarching social goal. It is hardly conservative to blithely trample over traditional constitutional guarantees in a quest for material equality, smog reduction, or even a drug-free society — an ideal that cannot escape charges of utopianism, for this planet has never seen such a thing. Consider one section of the bill, entitled, "CRIMINAL PROHIBITION ON DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO THE MANUFACTURE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES." It reads: It shall be unlawful for any person to teach or demonstrate the manufacture of a controlled substance, or to distribute by any means information pertaining to, in whole or in part, the manufacture or use of a controlled substance, with the intent that the teaching, demonstration, or information be used for, or in furtherance of, an activity that constitutes a Federal crime. Vague, yet restrictive, intended to punish words rather than actions, and most certainly punitive — this section of the bill reads like a primer on drug-war excess. As do the provisions permitting law-enforcement officials to search your home or office without what are now court-guaranteed safeguards. No longer will you be entitled to a timely inventory of items seized. And no longer will you be entitled to ever learn that a raid took place, if only intangible items were taken. For example, federal agents could break into your home when you are away, copy the addresses of every website that you've visited in the last six months, and leave without ever informing you what happened. Thus you (and your lawyer) would have no opportunity to challenge the raid in court. Congress may be the court of public opinion, and the public's wishes are clear on this matter. But the Constitution acts as a higher court, and we can hope that, when the time comes, at least the third branch of government will fulfill its duty. June 5, 2000National Review 215 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10016 Related Articles:Drug War a Failure http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5963.shtmlReject Meth Bill http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5957.shtmlPress Release Could Be Illegal Under New Drug Lawhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5873.shtmlDrug-Crazy http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5850.shtmlThe Anti-Meth Billhttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread5844.shtml Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help Comment #4 posted by dddd on June 07, 2000 at 08:14:19 PT Thank You CongressmanSuet I know what you mean about depressing sites,but I think you are probably a contrary person like me,,and you have mastered depression suppression.Quite frankly,I think things are f#*ked!.........but one of my favorite sayings for depression control,and keeping a positive spin on things is;;;;;;;;"Things could be way more f#%ked...................peace..dddd [ Post Comment ] Comment #3 posted by CongressmanSuet on June 06, 2000 at 14:24:12 PT: Thanks dddd, just what I needed... another, depressing site to hit everyday! Only kidding, this is great stuff, and if only 1/10th of it is true, we are indeed in for a stormy sea ahead.... [ Post Comment ] Comment #2 posted by CD1 on June 06, 2000 at 10:18:36 PT Constitution The Constitiution, once thought of as the most significant historical document since the bible, is slowly losing its value. It will not be long until it is not worth the paper it is written on. What amazes me is how our congressmen can argue so vehemently for every man, woman, and child, to have his own personal assault weapon, all in the name of the second amendment, but want to eradicate the other nine amendments of the Bill of Rights. CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMEN. Tell them you are tired of your freedoms being trampled on. [ Post Comment ] Comment #1 posted by dddd on June 06, 2000 at 01:45:47 PT fright Is this getting scary enough?If not,take a look at some of theses articles...ddddhttp://prorev.com/fastnews.htm [ Post Comment ] Post Comment Name: Optional Password: E-Mail: Subject: Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message] Link URL: Link Title: