NORML's News Bulletin May 18, 2000

NORML's News Bulletin May 18, 2000
Posted by FoM on May 19, 2000 at 09:16:39 PT
NORML's Weekly News Update
Source: NORML
Gov. Keating Denies Foster's Parole, Frees Two Violent Offenders:Oklahoma City, OK: Gov. Frank Keating (R) today freed two violent offenders who were serving respectively, a life sentence and a 50-year sentence, but for a second time, denied parole for medical marijuana patient Will Foster, despite the state parole board's unanimous recommendation to release him.
Foster, who was denied parole by the governor in January 1999, has served four years of a 20-year sentence for cultivating marijuana in a 25 square foot underground shelter, which he grew to alleviate the pain of rheumatoid arthritis. He was initially given a 93-year sentence, but that sentence was reduced by an appeals court that found the original sentence to be excessive.   "It looks as if my case has become more political than I ever imagined," Foster said about the governor's decision. "He hasn't broken my spirit though."   Foster said he is up for parole again in August.   "It's simple," said Allen St. Pierre, NORML Foundation Executive Director. "Will Foster should be paroled and immediately returned to the care of his family. Gov. Keating has always fancied himself a drug warrior, but what kind of message is he trying to send by paroling violent criminals while keeping Mr. Foster in prison -- despite the parole board's unanimous recommendation to release him, not once but twice. If Gov. Keating is really a player on George W. BushÕs presidential team, he should consider acting like a 'compassionate conservative.'"   NORML strongly urges concerned citizens from across the country to contact the governor and demand parole for Will Foster. Contact Gov. Frank Keating at the following address: State Capitol Building, Room 212 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 Phone: (405) 521-2342 Fax: (405) 521-3353 Email: governor For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Foundation Executive Director at (202) 483-8751.The Story of Will Foster Changes His Stance On Medical Marijuana Again, and Again:   Cudahy, CA: Last week, Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore flip-flopped from earlier campaign statements about medicinal marijuana, stating he now sees "no reliable evidence" of its utility in relieving pain.   Gore, speaking to high school students in California, stated, "Right now, the science does not show me or the experts whose judgement I trust that it is the proper medication for pain and that there are not better alternatives available in every situation."   This statement is a reversal from the position Gore took while campaigning in New Hampshire last December. Gore then stated that his late sister was prescribed marijuana in 1984 as treatment for her cancer chemotherapy, but that it did not work for her. He added, "If it had worked for her, I think she should have had the ability to get her pain relieved that way." Gore also stated that doctors "ought to have the option" to prescribe marijuana to seriously ill patients.   Today, though, Gore engaged in what Washington Post columnist Judy Mann has described as "pandering for the presidency," as he "clarified" his position yet a third time. He told HIV/AIDS medical journal and internet guide Numedx: that "I believe that if the research validates it, under very limited, highly regulated circumstances, when a doctor has decided that this is the only available therapy, we may have to consider the possibility that marijuana be prescribed for pain management with strict supervision."   "It appears the vice president doesn't know what his position is towards the medical use of marijuana," said Keith Stroup, NORML Executive Director. "First he supports it, then he doesn't. It suggests he is willing to say whatever he thinks his audience wants to hear, to get himself elected."   Republican candidate Gov. George W. Bush addressed the medical marijuana issue last October when he said he did not personally support the medical use of marijuana, but felt the decision of whether to legalize medical marijuana should be left to the states.   For more information, please contact Keith Stroup, NORML Executive Director at (202) 483-5500. Gore Is Pandering Away the Presidency Evolution Of A Position Reverses Stance on Medical Marijuana Questions Medical Marijuana Supports 'Flexibility' on Medical Marijuana Patients Entitled To Raise Medical Use As Fundamental Right:   San Francisco, CA: A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled that U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer was in error when he previously dismissed counterclaims seeking injunctive and declaratory relief filed by patients who had obtained their marijuana from medical cannabis cooperatives. The underlying action was brought by the United States to enjoin several cannabis cooperatives in northern Californian from distributing marijuana to patients who qualified under Prop. 215. Several patients had intervened in an attempt to stop the federal government from closing the cooperatives.   In seeking the injunction, the patients had argued that the right to receive medication to relieve pain and suffering is a "fundamental right," which therefore could only be enjoined by the federal government if they could demonstrate a "compelling state interest." In issuing this latest ruling, the appellate court vacated the district court's order and remanded the case for consideration "in light of our prior opinion."   In that ruling, the same three-judge panel vacated another order entered by Judge Breyer that had held the medical cannabis dispensaries could not raise a medical necessity defense to the governmentÕs civil suit. The Court of Appeals ruled that the medical necessity defense does exist in federal law and ordered the trial judge to reconsider his ruling in light of that holding.   "The Ninth Circuit, in this unpublished decision, has said that Judge Breyer should at least consider the 'fundamental right' argument, rather than dismissing it out of hand," said Robert Raich, Esq. "Obviously this would certainly be an additional argument that we should now use before Judge Breyer in our future pleadings."   For more information, please contact Keith Stroup, NORML Executive Director at (202) 483-5500, or Robert Raich, Esq., at (510) 338-0700.SF Ready to Issue ID Card For Medicinal Pot Users Circuit Rules in Favor of Pot Users - Cal Law Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative Medical Marijuana Archives:'s News Bulletin May 18, 2000 CannabisNews Articles & Archives On NORML:
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #4 posted by dddd on May 21, 2000 at 07:19:16 PT
DankHank is right.This is an outrage. It reminds me of the locking up of the quadrapalegic in Georgia recently."We do not seem very agitated by this gross misapplication of "justice.""I must agree.It is really sickening to realize that gross injustices such as this,have become so common,that people are somewhat numb to them.I think people tend to not get involved,until it affects their own lives.If your friend,or brother,or Mom gets locked up,,then you start to realize what's going on here. "Livid" is a good word for for how I feel too.I'm gonna write some letters....thanx Dankhank....dddd 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by Kanabys on May 20, 2000 at 13:16:26 PT
Who to free???
Pilate asked, "Who do you want freed? A thief and murderer or someone who I find has done no crime?"Do things ever change??????
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by Dankhank on May 20, 2000 at 10:20:37 PT:
Governor of Hate
This is the miost hateful thing that this Governor has done. There is now a link on my index page to send the governor an e-mail.We do not seem very agitated by this gross misapplication of "justice."I am livid. For this man to say to the state of OK that violent felons are in theory "less dangerous" than a medical marijuana user beggars an explanation.We must get angry, and write the man responsible.
Hemp n Stuff
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by Dan Hillman on May 19, 2000 at 19:03:54 PT
King Keating
Keating demonstrated that in order to be considered for the Veep spot on Bush's ticket he had to violate the constitutional provision against cruel and unusual punishment.  Imprison someone for 20 years (93 at first) because they grew their own medicine and harmed no one?  Why, doing so would appear to qualify one for KING OF THE UNIVERSE status. Which is what drug warriors think they are.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment

Name: Optional Password: 
Comment: [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]
Link URL: 
Link Title: