cannabisnews.com: Yes To Marijuana Ballot Measures 
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Yes To Marijuana Ballot Measures ');
 url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/28/thread28297.shtml');
 site = new Array(5);
 site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
 return false;
}






Yes To Marijuana Ballot Measures 
Posted by CN Staff on October 06, 2014 at 06:08:16 PT
New York Times Editorial
Source: New York Times
USA -- The decision by California voters in 1996 to legalize medical marijuana produced a wave of similar initiatives around the country. Less than two decades later, over half the states allow at least limited medical use. Now it looks as though recreational use of the drug may follow the same path.In 2012, Washington State and Colorado legalized recreational marijuana. This November, voters in Alaska, Oregon and the District of Columbia will decide whether to do the same ó effectively disregarding the misguided federal ban on a drug that is far less dangerous than alcohol. Decades of arresting people for buying, selling and using marijuana have hurt more than helped society, and minority communities have been disproportionately affected by the harsh criminal penalties of prohibition.
Alaska, Oregon and the District of Columbia already allow medical marijuana, taking the next step makes good sense. There are some differences in their proposed initiatives, but they are all worthy of passage.ALASKA: Ballot Measure 2 would make the use and purchase of marijuana legal for those 21 and older, create a marijuana control board and tax the drug at $50 per ounce wholesale. It is already legal for Alaskans to possess small amounts of marijuana in their homes, and surveys indicate that 18 percent of Alaskans smoke marijuana. Ballot Measure 2 would mean that Alaskans could buy it from a store instead of resorting to the black market.OREGON: Measure 91 would also set a minimum age of 21. It would give the Oregon Liquor Control Commission the power to regulate marijuana as it does alcohol, and would direct it to review tax rates regularly. The tax ó initially set at $35 per ounce for flowers and $10 per ounce for leaves ó should allow for prices low enough to compete with street dealers. Since it is already extremely easy for adults in Oregon to obtain medical marijuana cards (almost 65,000 Oregonians have one), recreational legalization will not be a big change. As The Oregonian editorialized in August, the measure would ďbe worth supporting for reasons of honesty and convenience alone.ĒDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: Initiative 71 would repeal all criminal and civil penalties for personal possession of marijuana and allow limited, private cultivation of the drug. People 21 and older could grow up to six plants at home and give away up to one ounce. Because the District of Columbia Home Rule Act does not allow a tax to be imposed by referendum, Initiative 71 would not set up a mechanism for regulating retail sales of the drug.Opponents of legalization warn that states are embarking on a risky experiment. But the sky over Colorado has not fallen, and prohibition has proved to be a complete failure. Itís time to bring the marijuana market out into the open and end the injustice of arrests and convictions that have devastated communities.Careful regulation of the drug could very well make it safer to consume, and proper taxation could bring in new revenue for states. This year, from January through June, Colorado collected about $18.9 million.Ideally, the federal government would repeal the ban on marijuana, so states could set their own policies without worrying about the possibility of a crackdown on citizens violating federal law. Even though a majority of Americans favor legalization, Congress shows no sign of budging. So itís better for the states to take the lead than to wait for an epiphany on Capitol Hill that may never come.A version of this editorial appears in print on October 6, 2014, on page A22 of the New York edition with the headline: Yes to Marijuana Ballot Measures. Source: New York Times (NY)Published: October 6, 2014Copyright: 2014 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite: http://www.nytimes.com/URL: http://drugsense.org/url/Yopvl2JbCannabisNews  -- Cannabis Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 
     
     
     
     




Comment #5 posted by Hope on October 07, 2014 at 20:48:28 PT
I like this. Truth in print. Mainstream. 
"The sky over Colorado has not fallen, and prohibition has proved to be a complete failure. Itís time to bring the marijuana market out into the open and end the injustice of arrests and convictions that have devastated communities."
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by Hope on October 07, 2014 at 20:24:22 PT
And this article....
They understand it. Someone. Finally. I hope and pray we win them all.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by Hope on October 07, 2014 at 20:22:11 PT
Paul Armentano has a really good article
at Alternet: Eric Holder Was the First Attorney General to Hint That Itís Time For the Government to Stop Lying About Marijuanahttp://www.alternet.org/drugs/eric-holder-was-first-attorney-general-hint-its-time-government-stop-lying-about-marijuana
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by observer on October 07, 2014 at 18:30:40 PT
Even the NYT!
Wow... Even the New York Times editorial board has seen the light on pot prohibition, and that's great. May the voters of Florida, Oregon, Alaska, and D.C. heed that advice and vote back some of the freedoms all Americans once shared. Now, I know: if you're in the "law" enforcement community in those places, you're thinking: Hey! That's most of what the state, local and federal police do here, is game the system using pot as excuse to fleece taxpayers and take dopers' cars and land, for law enforcement. I got that. Of course, they never quite put it in a follow-the-money way like that. No, when law enforcement wants to feather their beds, they always pump up the fears of what might happen to your kids (if you don't hand over the loot to them). Protection rackets are old as the hills, it would seem, but when the biggest gang does it holding the ritually shaped Shiny Metal of Authority, more people fall for it. 
http://drugnewsbot.org
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by The GCW on October 06, 2014 at 09:08:28 PT
Cannabis prohibition is a violation to citizens.
"the misguided federal ban on a drug that is far less dangerous than alcohol"That sums it up. Even further, cannabis is a plant, not a "drug."-0-"minority communities have been disproportionately affected by the harsh criminal penalties of prohibition"A reasonable citizen may conclude the U.S. federal government wants to treat minorities unfairly. Especially considering that even at the very slow pace the federal government moves, they've had plenty of years to fix that injustice.At this point in time for the fed's to not remedy the discredited prohibition of cannabis is unquestionably a violation to U.S. citizens.
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment