cannabisnews.com: Board of Elections Allows MJ Legalization Effort
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Board of Elections Allows MJ Legalization Effort');
 url=encodeURIComponent('http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/27/thread27937.shtml');
 site = new Array(5);
 site[0]='http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[1]='http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit.php?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[2]='http://digg.com/submit?topic=political_opinion&media=video&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[3]='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 site[4]='http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&noui&jump=close&url='+url+'&title='+tit;
 window.open(site[num],'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=620,height=500');
 return false;
}






Board of Elections Allows MJ Legalization Effort
Posted by CN Staff on March 11, 2014 at 14:58:08 PT
By Aaron C. Davis
Source: Washington Post 
Washington, D.C. -- Voters in the nationís capital could decide if they want to follow Colorado and Washington state in legalizing marijuana under a measure cleared by the D.C. Board of Elections on Tuesday. The decision sets aside warnings by the cityís attorney general, who said that if the proposal passed, it would put D.C. law at odds with federal law. The boardís decision allows a band of activists to begin gathering the 25,000 signatures needed to qualify the measure for the November ballot.
If the signatures are collected and the ballot measure passed, it could allow people 21 and older to possess as much as two ounces of marijuana for personal use and to grow up to three marijuana plants at home. The vote could also thrust the issue before Congress, which can block a city law by approving a joint resolution that is signed by the president. But Congress has done so only three times in 35 years.Adam Eidinger, a leading activist for the initiative, has said he is confident his group can collect the signatures needed. He said Tuesday he was excited by the boardís decision.Eidinger had hoped to station signature-gatherers outside polling places when the cityís primary election is held April 1. But the elections board has 20 days to settle on the language for the measure, so it is uncertain whether the petition effort can start that soon.If the measure does qualify for the fall ballot, it has a strong chance to pass, according to a recent Washington Post poll.Support for legalization has expanded dramatically in the District. Residents who were split evenly on the issue four years ago are now in favor of allowing the drug for personal use by a ratio of almost 2 to 1. Washingtonians of every age, race and ethnicity ó teenagers and seniors, blacks and whites ó registered double-digit increases in support. Overall, 63 percent are in favor. The elections board decision is the second major step in two weeks toward loosening the cityís marijuana laws.Citing the goals of social justice and reducing racial disparity in marijuana arrests, the D.C. Council voted last week to decriminalize pot by imposing civil fines rather than jail time for most offenses. Under that measure, possessing marijuana and smoking it in oneís home would no longer be criminal offenses, but would be punishable by a civil fine of $25. Smoking in public would be a misdemeanor equal to toting an open container of alcohol. D.C. Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan last month urged the elections board not to go any further and to reject the proposed ballot initiative. He warned that legalization would put at least one aspect of D.C. law into conflict with U.S. drug laws. But the elections board said in a statement Tuesday: ďA ballot initiative is considered a proper subject if it does not appropriate funds, violate the Home Rule Charter, negate a Budget Act, or violate the Human Rights Act. In approving or rejecting a ballot initiative, the Board may only consider whether the measure meets these requirements.Ē Nathan warned that under federal law, the city would still have to evict residents of public housing who are convicted of marijuana possession, even if D.C. law no longer considered possession a crime. Thatís a tension, however, that the city is already grappling with under the decriminalization measure, which Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) said he intends to sign.Eidinger appeared to have won over elections board members by arguing at a hearing last month that as written, the ballot measure would allow landlords the right to set terms of lease agreements, including prohibitions against possessing marijuana.Many questions remain about how the measure would work in practice. The ballot measure would legalize possession of marijuana, for example, but not its sale, which would remain a crime.Eidinger said the measure was crafted to minimize differences between D.C. and federal law to encourage the board to approve it for the ballot. He said that if it passes, he would encourage the D.C. Council to rewrite it and make it more practical to implement, including legalizing the sale and taxation of the drug.Even some advocates, however, question whether the timing is right to push for full legalization in the District. They say legalizing the drug on the streets surrounding Congress and the very agencies charged with enforcing federal anti-drug laws would be too blatant a conflict and raise the likelihood that Congress would interfere.As it is, once signed by the mayor, the D.C. Council bill to decriminalize marijuana must sit before a congressional panel for 60 days before becoming law. So far, there is little evidence that Congress would organize to block the measure.It also remains unclear how overlapping local and federal jurisdictions would affect enforcement of decriminalization, particularly in national parks. Someone could still be arrested, for instance, for possession on the Mall.Source: Washington Post (DC) Author: Aaron C. DavisPublished: March 11, 2014Copyright: 2014 Washington Post CompanyContact: letters washpost.com Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ URL: http://drugsense.org/url/LJEHmZ5lCannabisNews  -- Cannabis Archiveshttp://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 
     
     
     
     




Comment #8 posted by Oleg the Tumor on March 12, 2014 at 11:23:20 PT:
runruff - when you run for President . . .
remember The Firesign Theatre's candidate, Pappoon!His platform: "He's the only one running who is not insane!"Ask your competition if they are willing to proove that they are not insane. Good luck trying. I gave up trying to proove that thespoof.com is a fraud and a black ops messaging service. But it is and has been since June of 2001. 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #7 posted by Universer on March 12, 2014 at 11:04:44 PT
WSJ Poll Shows People With a Clue
Wall Street Journal poll indicates that people believe cannabis less harmful than alcohol, tobacco and sugar.They're right. (Although sometimes a good toke can lead to sugar ... but thankfully that wasn't polled for.)From http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/WSJNBCpoll03052014.pdfHART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES / PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIESStudy #14133 -- page 22March 2014NBC News / Wall Street Journal Survey1000 respondents (300 via cellphone)48% male, 52% femaleQ25: Which of the following substances would you say is the MOST harmful to a personís overall health (RANDOMIZE) (IF ALL, THEN ASK:) Now, if you had to choose just one, which substance would you say is the MOST harmful?THIS TABLE HAS BEEN RANKED BY HIGHEST PERCENTAGETobacco ................ 49.Alcohol ................ 24.Sugar .................. 15.Marijuana .............. 8.All (VOL) .............. 3.None are harmful (VOL) . -.Not sure ............... 1.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by Universer on March 12, 2014 at 10:59:15 PT
D.C. Free
Not to be overlooked: I was in D.C. last night just, partaking in Marijuana Policy Project's open house at their new office space on Champlain Street. I was fortunate to meet Rob Kampia among others, and from those meetings I garnered interest from MPP in my offer of free professional writing services (blogposts, letters to editors, etc.).Dana Rohrerbacher (R-Calif.) was there to speak, opening his remarks with the words "It's about freedom." Later, we all gathered 'round to watch Dr. Sanjay rip the prohibitionists a new one.Good time was had by all.Maybe an even better time will be had if/when D.C.'s famously liberal voters get a chance to cast a vote in favor of personal freedom.Let's see Congress mess with that. They don't, and it's free in D.C. They do, and they do us activists a very high-profile favor by showing themselves to be the anti-democractic authoritarian asswipes they are.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by Universer on March 12, 2014 at 10:50:52 PT
Runruff
Not since Hunter S. Thompson has such a small office been blessed by such a big candidate. Go get 'em.Run tuff.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by Hope on March 12, 2014 at 09:12:50 PT
Comment 1 Runruff
That's wonderful! I so hope you win! 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by The GCW on March 12, 2014 at 08:49:40 PT
runruff,
Great news.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by FoM on March 12, 2014 at 06:18:12 PT
runruff
Go for it!!!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by runruff on March 12, 2014 at 06:15:52 PT
Your not going to believe this!
You're just not going to believe this!Yesterday I went down to the county courthouse turned in all my paperwork and paid my filing fees. I am an official candidate for County Commissioner of Josephine County Oregon.This is for the pre-election in May to see who will run in November.I'm going for it!This year the county,next term,congress? And why not? There are no bigger idiots in congress than me! lolRemember Steven the Irishman in Braveheart?Amish remarks, "So you are a madman?"Steven laughing, replies, "So, I've come to the right place then?"
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment