Does a Catch-22 Keep MJ Labeled a Dangerous Drug?
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Does a Catch-22 Keep MJ Labeled a Dangerous Drug?');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

Does a Catch-22 Keep MJ Labeled a Dangerous Drug?
Posted by CN Staff on January 24, 2013 at 13:41:12 PT
By Ted Hesson
Washington, D.C. -- The federal government will continue to rank marijuana as one of the most dangerous drugs after an appeals court on Tuesday rejected an effort to change the classification. The ruling keeps marijuana in the same pool as drugs like heroin and LSD, which the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) say have a "high potential for abuse" and "no currently accepted medical use." 
The Los Angeles Times quoted one of the appeals court judges about the decision: Judge Harry Edwards, writing for the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, said the judges did not dispute that "marijuana could have some medical benefits." Instead, he said, they were not willing to overrule the DEA because they had not seen large "well-controlled studies" that proved the medical value of marijuana. Marijuana's classification as a Schedule I drug -- the most serious designation -- means that there are more restrictions for conducting research into its potential medical benefits. Proponents of medical and recreational marijuana say that the restrictions make it hard for researchers to perform the types of studies that would convince the DEA to move the drug into a less serious category. Tamar Todd, senior staff attorney for the Drug Policy Alliance, spoke to The Daily Chronic, a pro-cannabis website, about the hurdles: "We're stuck in a Catch-22 – the DEA is saying that marijuana needs FDA approval to be removed from Schedule I, but at the same time they are obstructing that very research," she said. "While there is a plethora of scientific evidence establishing marijuana's safety and efficacy, the specific clinical trials necessary to gain FDA approval have long been obstructed by the federal government itself." Rusty Payne, a spokesperson for the DEA, says that there are "many" ongoing studies looking into the medical value of marijuana, but said he could not specify the exact number. In any case, studies need to be approved by the agency, something that activists like Todd think is a conflict of interest. "The scheduling is made within the context of a law enforcement agency and that law enforcement agency has an interest in keeping drugs illegal and maintaining the status quo," she said. The DEA isn't the only body with the power to reclassify marijuana. Congress could amend the Controlled Substances Act, which designated pot as one of the most dangerous drugs in 1970. A change to the law would affect the way the DEA treats the drug, Payne said: "If it's signed into law, it's law and that's what we would enforce." As it stands, the DEA devotes substantial resources to combating marijuana sales. Pound-for-pound, cannabis makes up the vast majority of drug seizures by the agency, accounting for 94 percent of captured drugs in 2011. Payne says that the DEA doesn't use the drug rankings to determine what drugs to go after, but concedes that the majority of the agency's counternarcotics operations deal with drugs classified in the top two tiers of dangerous drugs, including cocaine, heroin, methamphetamines and marijuana. "We go after drug trafficking organizations," Payne said. "Any drug trafficking organizations are involved in multi-drugs." A reclassification of marijuana could have a major impact on the way the drug is used in the U.S. Drugs ranked as less dangerous by the DEA, like Xanax or cough syrup, can be distributed with a prescription or over the counter. Marijuana legalization advocates would like to see pot classified in the same way, but they say the system is created in a way that makes it difficult for the drug to move away from the Schedule I category, and that the DEA has an interest in keeping that way. Kris Hermes, a spokesperson for Americans for Safe Access, the pro-legalization group that brought the suit against the DEA, said the burden is on the agency to change the situation. "They are the ones that grant or deny petitions to reschedule," he said. "So it is ultimately up to the DEA." Source: (U.S. Web)Author: Ted HessonPublished: January 24, 2013Copyright: 2013 ABC News Internet VenturesWebsite: Medical Marijuana Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #3 posted by schmeff on January 24, 2013 at 15:59:35 PT
Cannabis is the Lifeblood
...on which DEA parasites feed."the DEA devotes substantial resources to combating marijuana sales. Pound-for-pound, cannabis makes up the vast majority of drug seizures by the agency, accounting for 94 percent of captured drugs in 2011."Think how long it's been since we fell through the looking glass and Tricky Dick Nixon birthed the DEA. Up is down and down is up and all ways are the way the DEA sways. If cannabis has "no currently accepted medical use", then it can't be called a drug. There don't seem to be any other plants on the DEA's boogyman list that have "no currently accepted medical use." Cannabis is Schedule 1: most baddest, scariest, mo-fo dangerous bad ju-ju substances the DEA don't want you to mess with. "High potential for abuse." It's especially bad for cannabis abusers because it's invisible. You have to conduct a highly sensitive blood test to determine if a person used cannabis. (Use/abuse, up/down...all the same in Schedule 1.) Cannabis abuse won't damage your health or harm you, making is doubly insidious. IT'S THE SILENT NON-KILLER! However, cannabis use can weaken your freedoms and leave you susceptible to DEA parasites. There are no good outcomes at that point.In the Land of Make Believe, using the kind herb is a make believe crime, and the DEA will suck our souls to feed itself. They are the masters and we are the matrix. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by colin42 on January 24, 2013 at 15:53:13 PT
Mr. Payne of the DEA, huh? I can just imagine prosecutor Payne from Phoenix Wright, doing his head tap and laughing "hee hee, medical marijuana? Ridiculous!" We need a good, finger pointing defense attorney to put him in his place. :)
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by FoM on January 24, 2013 at 15:51:18 PT
Tom Tancredo Says He’ll Smoke Marijuana
January 24, 2013Former congressman Tom Tancredo says he’ll honor a bet to smoke marijuana. 
In a video to promote Colorado’s Amendment 64, which legalized the personal use of marijuana in the state, Tancredo reportedly pledged to smoke pot if the measure passed. Tancredo, a self-professed non-marijuana-smoker, supported the measure.URL:
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment