Marijuana Link To Lower IQ is Disputed
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Marijuana Link To Lower IQ is Disputed');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

Marijuana Link To Lower IQ is Disputed
Posted by CN Staff on January 15, 2013 at 09:48:34 PT
By Malcolm Ritter, Associated Press
Source: Associated Press
New York -- A new analysis is challenging a report that suggests regular marijuana smoking during the teen years can lead to a long-term drop in IQ. The author of the new paper says pot might not have anything to do with the mental decline seen in the original study, and that other factors may be to blame. The original study included more than 1,000 people who'd been born in the town of Dunedin, New Zealand. Their IQ was tested at ages 13 and 38, and they were asked about marijuana use periodically between those ages.
Participants who said they were dependent on pot by age 18 showed a drop in IQ score between ages 13 and 38, according to researchers at Duke University and elsewhere. Their report, which got wide attention last August, suggested pot is harmful to the adolescent brain. Not so fast, says the new analysis, published online Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Ole Rogeberg of the Ragnar Frisch Center for Economic Research in Oslo, says the IQ trend might have emerged from differences among the study participants in socioeconomic factors like income, education and occupation. He based his paper on a computer simulation. Drawing on results of earlier research, It traced the potential effects of those socioeconomic factors on IQ. He found patterns that looked just like what the Duke study found for smoking marijuana. In an interview, Rogeberg said he's not claiming that his alternative explanation is definitely right, just that the methods and evidence in the original study aren't enough to rule it out. He suggested further analyses the researchers could do with their data. The Duke scientists, who learned of Rogeberg's paper late last week, say they conducted new statistical tests that ruled out his explanation. Rogeberg says they need to do still more work to truly rule it out. Experts unconnected to the two papers said the Rogeberg paper doesn't overturn the original study. It "raises some interesting points and possibilities," but provides "speculation" rather than new data based on real people, said Dr. Duncan Clark, who studies alcohol and drug use in adolescents at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, said observational studies of people like the Duke work can't definitively demonstrate that marijuana causes irreversible effects on the brain. In an email, she said Rogeberg's paper "looks sound" but doesn't prove that his alternative explanation is correct either. Online: Journal: Source: Associated Press (Wire)Author: Malcolm Ritter, Associated PressPublished:  January 15, 2013Copyright: 2013 The Associated PressCannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #1 posted by observer on January 15, 2013 at 11:29:12 PT
Jail-Potheads-At-All-Costs Crowd Won't Hear This
re: "The Duke scientists, who learned of Rogeberg's paper late last week, say they conducted new statistical tests that ruled out his explanation."Yeah, the Duke scientists (realizing where they get their paychecks, who controls their audits, and with the untimely unexplained demise of other scientists who go against the regime and party line fresh in their little STMs), the scientists and experts measuring those statistics specifically (their expert careers, their professional incomes, their abilities to get funding from the US Govt, their future prospects to publish etc), then decided more (infinite) research is definitely necessary, to support any conclusions which do not supporting arresting and jailing people for pot.On the other hand, any scientific conclusions that pot is bad, any possible hint of a thread of a shadow of a possibility that cannabis may, could, or might be harmful, is given immediate priority and the "results" thereof are shouted far and wide. This is where the Mighty Wurlitzer pipes up and the Mockingbird Press crows throughout the land: "Marijuana causes IQ to fall!", proclaimed triumphant prohibitionists. "Cannabis causes Insanity!", prohibitionist courtesan authorities quickly declared as indisputable, rock-solid fact. Any hints that the police state and drug war camp followers might have been justified all along for their killing, stealing and destroying using pot as an excuse - i.e. that the "latest research" now "proves" pot is bad - is welcome news indeed. Mark my words, the prohibitionist propagandists will, as always, pretend the "Pot Drops IQ" fear-based meme is proved and ignore all evidence to the contrary. Anything, oh, anything, to keep jailing people for pot.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment