Medical Marijuana Trade Shaken by Crackdown
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Medical Marijuana Trade Shaken by Crackdown');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

Medical Marijuana Trade Shaken by Crackdown
Posted by CN Staff on November 23, 2011 at 18:53:40 PT
By Erik Eckholm 
Source: New York Times 
Ukiah, Calif. -- An intensifying federal crackdown on growers and sellers of state-authorized medical marijuana has badly shaken the billion-dollar industry, which has sprung up in California since voters approved medical use of the drug in 1996, and has highlighted the stark contradiction between federal and state policies. Federal law classifies the possession and sale of marijuana as a serious crime and does not grant exceptions for medical use, so the programs adopted here, in 15 other states and in the District of Columbia exist in an odd legal limbo.
While federal agencies have long targeted Californians who blatantly reap illegal profits in the name of medicine, or who smuggle marijuana across state lines, the Justice Department said in 2009 that it would not normally pursue groups providing marijuana to sick patients, in accordance with state laws. But in the last several weeks, federal prosecutors have raided or threatened to seize the property of scores of growers and dispensaries in California that, in some cases, are regarded by local officials as law-abiding models. At the same time, the Internal Revenue Service has levied large, disputed tax charges against the state’s largest dispensary, threatening its ability to continue. In a hint of the simmering federal-state tensions, Kamala D. Harris, the attorney general of California, described in pointed terms the Oct. 7 announcement by four United States attorneys of their tough new campaign against many dispensaries, which they called commercial operations that violate the intent of California law as well as federal statutes. “It was a unilateral federal action, and it has only increased uncertainty about how Californians can legitimately comply with state law,” Ms. Harris said in an interview. Since federal authorities do not recognize that marijuana can serve medical ends, she said, “they are ill equipped to be the decision makers as to which providers are violating the law.” But Ms. Harris also described the state’s regulations governing medical marijuana as “vague and chaotic,” and she is working with legislators for more consistency and stronger controls. The growing federal pressure, industry leaders say, could force the dismantling of some of the cooperatives that provide marijuana to more than 750,000 Californians who have obtained doctor “recommendations” to treat everything from cancer-related nausea to pain and anxiety. Within a few years, hundreds of collectives, large and small, have deeply embedded themselves in the state, paying more than $100 million in sales taxes, joining local chambers of commerce and better business bureaus, even appearing on “adopt-a-highway” signs. Here in Mendocino County, which gladly cooperates with federal agents against the rampant criminal cultivation of marijuana, officials devised a permit and monthly monitoring system for small-scale growers supplying patient groups. The sheriff said this had eased his burdens and prevented diversion to the black market, and he praised the Northstone Organics Collective, run by Matthew Cohen, for scrupulous adherence to the rules. But at 6 a.m. on Oct. 13, federal Drug Enforcement Administration agents with assault rifles and chainsaws raided Mr. Cohen’s property in the oak-covered hills north of Ukiah, cutting down the 99 hefty plants, 6 to 12 feet tall, that were meant to provide marijuana for 1,700 members. “The federal and state laws exist in parallel universes,” said Thomas D. Allman, the Mendocino County sheriff, in his office in Ukiah. He is as tough as anyone on the illegal marijuana trade, he said, but “growing and using medical marijuana is a right of a California citizen.” Now, he said, the 94 collectives that receive permits and plant tags from his office are frightened. In Oakland, the state’s largest dispensary, Harborside Health Center, sells marijuana and derived products to more than 600 people a day, charging from $25 to $60 per one-eighth of an ounce, with a limit of two ounces per patient per week. Steve DeAngelo, the executive director, described that as “the maximum amount that a medical patient could legitimately consume in a week.” Registered with the state as a not-for-profit cooperative, Harborside has 95,000 patient-members and 120 employees, takes in $22 million a year and is one of Oakland’s top 10 taxpayers, Mr. DeAngelo said. In October, the Internal Revenue Service notified the center that it considered it a criminal drug trafficking organization and said it could not deduct its rent, salaries, counseling and other operations as business expenses. It billed the center for $2.5 million in back taxes, which would destroy the company, said Mr. DeAngelo, who plans to fight the decision in court. “We’re clearly breaking federal law every day, but we are faithfully following the laws of California and Oakland,” Mr. DeAngelo said. The Supreme Court has ruled that federal criminal law can prevail, but Mr. DeAngelo and others question the Justice Department’s priorities. “Why is the federal government targeting legitimate, regulated enterprises?” he asked. “Is it better for patients to buy from a clean, safe store or from street dealers?” Medical marijuana advocates accuse the Obama administration of going back on earlier promises not to go after groups abiding by local laws. But federal justice officials say the real change is the proliferation of large, commercial enterprises, not their guidelines. “A lot of the medical marijuana stores that claim to be nonprofit are making lots of money,” Benjamin B. Wagner, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of California, in Sacramento, said in an interview. He added that prosecutors were skeptical about the medical needs of many buyers. “We’ve found in California that anybody can get a medical recommendation,” he said. Since late September, in their broadest crackdown yet, federal prosecutors have sent letters to more than 100 registered dispensaries or their landlords throughout the state, warning that their property may be confiscated and that they could face prison if they do not shut down. At the Oct. 7 news conference, André Birotte Jr., the chief federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, said that one strip mall in Orange County had eight stores selling marijuana. “This is not what the California voters intended or authorized,” he said. Some of the dispensaries threatened by the federal government have shut down or are being evicted by fearful landlords. Even many marijuana advocates agree that state laws governing medical marijuana are inadequate, largely leaving it to local officials to set rules for growing and selling that vary wildly by county. It is also an open secret that a share of doctor-approved buyers do not have plausible medical needs. On Ocean Front Walk at Venice Beach, for example, touts compete to lure people into shabby clinics with names like “Medical Kush Doctor,” promising medical recommendations for $45. “Why don’t they go after the bad actors?” asked Mr. Cohen, the Mendocino County grower. “I’m a strong advocate of tighter regulations.” State Senator Mark Leno, a Democrat from San Francisco, is now working with Attorney General Harris to devise a state law that would establish more uniform and stringent rules for medical marijuana. But he condemned what he called the federal authorities’ “heavy-handed interventions.” Even if the state tightens controls and pares back the industry, the central clash, between the federal war on drugs and California’s desire to offer medical marijuana, will remain. Ms. Harris said she hoped that if the state improved oversight, federal officials would find other priorities. “I’m a career prosecutor,” she said, “and I know that everyone has a lot of obligations and limited resources.” Ian Lovett contributed reporting from Los Angeles. Source: New York Times (NY)Author: Erik Eckholm Published: November 23, 2011 Copyright: 2011 The New York Times CompanyContact: letters nytimes.comWebsite:  Medical Marijuana Archives
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #3 posted by Oleg the Tumor on November 24, 2011 at 10:11:39 PT:
From the original legalese, this translates as: (expletive deleted), in other words, judges hate to be presented with crap that should have been resolved by legislation before it reaches court, where there are real winners and losers.As Nature abhors a vacuum, so do honest judges detest cases where the Fearmonger/Alchemists turn Lead into Political Gold. 
The Government's "position" on Cannabis has been in "ODD LEGAL LIMBO" since the Nixon administration!Heah come de judge!... Heah come de judge! . . .    
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by afterburner on November 24, 2011 at 09:40:57 PT
Hide & Seek
"Federal law classifies the possession and sale of marijuana as a serious crime and does not grant exceptions for medical use, so the programs adopted here, in 15 other states and in the District of Columbia exist in an odd legal limbo."This is bogus. The UN Single Convention Treaty, which the United States engineered and signed, *does* allow medical use of controlled substances, including cannabis. Just as the U.S. federal government uses the excuse that they cannot legalize cannabis because of the UN Single Convention Treaty, they are also bound by the UN Single Convention Treaty's allowance for medical use. Even the U.S. federal government's much vaunted schedule 1 status was meant to be provisional when the UN Single Convention Treaty scheduled cannabis until more was know about cannabis medical effects.The U.S. federal government cannot selectively hide behind the UN Single Convention Treaty and at the same time reject some of its provisions. It's all or nothing. Nothing is the correct choice for the future. The hands of the U.S. federal government do not need to be tied by this UN Single Convention Treaty. The U.S. federal government can notify the UN that they, the U.S. federal government, are withdrawing from the UN Single Convention Treaty. The mechanism for withdrawal of signatory nations is written into the UN Single Convention Treaty! That would free the U.S. federal government to follow it's own path with respect to and for medical cannabis & it's patients and health-care providers. That would free the U.S. federal government to allow and respect sacramental cannabis & it's devotees and ministers. That would free the U.S. federal government to allow and respect even recreational cannabis & it's farmers, salespeople and customers.  Free country. Free cannabis!
UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by Oleg the Tumor on November 24, 2011 at 05:36:56 PT:
Somewhere this Thanksgiving there is a judge…
Wondering what to make of the government's position on cannabis. I feel bad for this guy (in a comic sort of way)
eventually, he will have to rule for the plaintiff or for the defendant in the estoppel case before him and he can't win either way.The situation reminds me of the judge in the old movie "Miracle on 34th St.", who must rule that a man claiming to be Kris Kringle, really is who he says he is, or commit him to a mental institution. With an election coming up, he is an a no-win situation.If the judge in the present day case rules for the plaintiff, the patients who seek legal access to marijuana, expect a huge flap from everyone with an ax to grind or a financial interest in keeping marijuana illegal – Law Enforcement facing budget cuts, etc.If he rules for the defendant, The Government, and upholds all of their recent actions in closing marijuana dispensaries, a much huger flap is the likely result, with righteous indignation, civil protests, and ballot initiatives sprouting up everywhere as Americans see their liberties whittled away, including the right to grow their own hemp, just as General Washington requested.Upon further review (as the football ref says) initiatives like the one underway in Washington state that does not allow the individual to grow their own are not much help.
Big Pharma in the guise of Big Cannabis is a real threat in the years to come.So good luck judge, whoever and wherever you are. I'm sure the case will not stop with you anyway it goes – this one will end up before the Supreme Court, again.
In the meantime, keep looking through the travel brochures…
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment