Rift Between Marijuana Legalization Groups
function share_this(num) {
 tit=encodeURIComponent('Rift Between Marijuana Legalization Groups');
 site = new Array(5);
 return false;

Rift Between Marijuana Legalization Groups
Posted by CN Staff on May 23, 2011 at 16:39:35 PT
By Gene Davis, DDN Staff Writer
Source: Denver Daily News
Colorado -- Rifts between two different groups pushing for the legalization of marijuana in Colorado continued to grow last week after one coalition went ahead with a so-called “conservative” attempt to legalize marijuana in 2012.Legalize 2012, one of activist groups plotting a legalization ballot initiative, on Friday blasted another coalition for filing eight different versions of a legalization initiative that they say “appeals to law enforcement.”
Laura Kriho, a driving force behind Legalize 2012, was particularly upset with members of the coalition that includes the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), Safer Alternative for Enjoyable Recreation (SAFER), and Sensible Colorado for filing their initiative with the Secretary of State without giving them much time to review the initiative’s language. “I’m not sure why they did this without telling anybody,” said a statement from Kriho. “Even the legislature gave us more notice to comment on their proposed legislation than they did. It really shows their bad faith.”However, Mason Tvert of SAFER said Legalize 2012 was shown the language of the initiative about a week before they filed it. Tvert said they asked Kriho and Legalize 2012 for any suggestions and feedback on the language but did not receive any.“Rather than provide any suggestions, they spent a week complaining,” he said. Tvert said the coalition submitted eight different versions of the legalization initiative to see what language would pass the Title Setting Review Board, which has to approve an initiative before it can go on the ballot. All of the versions have the same basic idea legalize marijuana use and possession of up to an ounce for people over the age of 21 though they differ when it comes to issues like taxes and earmarking.Legalize 2012 is against the initiative’s one-ounce limit because they believe it could create confusion since possession of two ounces or less of marijuana is currently considered a “petty offense.” The group also worries that the one-ounce limit would require the Department of Revenue to convert their Patient and Medicine Tracking Database and Surveillance System to a “massive database” for marijuana users so authorities could track how much marijuana is bought and sold. Legalize 2012 also opposes the versions of the initiative that would allow a 15-percent excise tax on the sale of marijuana. “The lines have been clearly set now on the division of cannabis reform policy in Colorado,” says a press release from Legalize 2012. “The MPP/DPA/Sensible/SAFER initiative has chosen to ignore any local efforts for a real legalization ballot initiative in favor of writing an initiative that appeals to law enforcement.”However, Tvert thinks the versions of the legalization initiative that were filed have the best possible language to achieve the goal of legalizing marijuana. He said while he might not agree with everything in the eight versions of the initiative, the language has been studied by lawyers, has taken into consideration the feedback of thousands of people and has a good chance of making it onto the ballot in 2012.“It’s unfortunate that (Legalize 2012) is spending its time and energy fracturing the marijuana reform movement and not working to build support for legalization instead,” said Tvert. “It’s easier to tear something down than it is to build something up.”Tvert is confident that their legalization initiative could pass even without the support of groups like Legalize 2012. He pointed to polls that were issued this year that found approximately 50 percent of Coloradans support legalizing marijuana. SAFER ran a legalization effort in 2006 that failed on a 61-38 percent vote, but Tvert believes more people have become in favor of legalization since then.However, Legalize 2012 is less sure that the coalition’s initiative will pass if it does not have the entire marijuana community’s support.“This unilateral move by MMP/DPA/Sensible/SAFER cast doubts that any cannabis law reform ballot initiative in Colorado would be successful,” the group says in a press release.Note: Divisions within industry come into the open.Source: Denver Daily News (CO)Author: Gene Davis, DDN Staff WriterPublished: May 23, 2011Copyright: 2011 Denver Daily NewsContact: editor thedenverdailynews.comURL:  -- Cannabis Archives 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help 

Comment #4 posted by FoM on May 24, 2011 at 07:21:33 PT
OT: Happy 70th Birthday Bob Dylan
I love this song.Bob Dylan - Things Have Changed URL:
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by CropReport on May 24, 2011 at 04:52:04 PT
Who the heck is Laura Kriho?
I've never heard of her until now. I have, however, heard of Mason Tvert. In fact Mason has been showing the draft of his language to everyone and anyone in the CO MMJ industry since mid-April, and like he states he's been asking for our input.Tvert is without compare the most experienced citizen we have when it comes to marijuana voter initiatives. He has communicated his plans clearly all along and he would be my choice for getting this done.Calling him out in the press this way, is both disrespectful to the man and counter-productive to our common cause.Whatever your point, Kriho, step aside and let Tvert do his job. You've just shown how inexperienced and clumsy you are in the press. Don't let your ego get in the way of your common sense.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by The GCW on May 23, 2011 at 22:20:24 PT
Tvert and kriho
Kriho means well but it is in the movement's interest to communicate privately with Tvert and that group about disagreements. I don't believe Kriho's public disagreement moves us forward and so I ask why is she doing this in the media?Tvert is very good for the movement. 
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by runruff on May 23, 2011 at 19:38:14 PT
Cannabis is already legal!
According to the creator, and our constitution [both implied and explicit]Cannabis is already legal, we need to force the feds to stop pretending it isn't!They need to understand that they have no real authority in this matter!Consent by deception is no real authority.Compliance by gun point is no real authority.Saying it is so with empty oaths, slogans and declarations does not reality make! 
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment