Court Restores Job Lost To Drug Test 

Court Restores Job Lost To Drug Test 
Posted by CN Staff on June 14, 2004 at 23:29:21 PT
By  Steve Patterson, Staff Reporter 
Source: Chicago Sun-Times 
Charmaine Garrido insists she's never used cocaine. So she was floored when told a random drug test came back positive and that she would lose her job as an investigator with the Cook County sheriff's department.But last week, the Illinois Court of Appeals ruled Garrido should not have lost her job in 2001 because the positive test result probably didn't come from cocaine, but instead from the tea she'd been drinking.
Garrido, the wife of a Chicago narcotics officer, said she drank "a significant amount" of the coca-tinged tea, which she got from Peru, just before her drug test.Though the sheriff's merit board didn't buy it -- and fired her -- the judges ruled the small traces of cocaine metabolites in Garrido's system were more likely to have come from tea than drugs.Cook County sheriff's spokesman Bill Cunningham, who also heads employee drug testing, said they are reviewing the decision and considering an appeal.But Garrido's attorney, Joseph V. Roddy, said the 39-year-old mother of two, who worked for the sheriff for 11 years, "had zero problems" until this incident.Garrido said she and her husband got the tea in question -- mate de coca -- while in Peru, where they were adopting a baby.She said a doctor gave the baby a watered-down version of the tea to settle her upset stomach, and she was assured then the tea had been "decocainized.""If I knew it had cocaine in it, I never would have given it to my daughter," she said from her Chicago home Friday afternoon.They brought boxes of it back home with them, she said, and court records indicate she took "a significant amount" of it while battling the flu in October 2000."Want some?" she joked on Friday. "I've still got two boxes here."The tea apparently is similar to green Asian tea, and often is given to South American tourists who have trouble adjusting to higher elevations.But it was also popular in the 1980s as a tea that helps ease drug cravings, as one Web site indicated "the average 'decocainized' tea bag contains 5 milligrams of cocaine."But Garrido's husband, John, showed how easy it is to obtain, as he effortlessly brought boxes of it through customs, then purchased more bags over the Internet.As of last week, users could purchase 120 tea bags for $45.But sheriff's officers said a zero-tolerance policy for drugs in the workplace must apply to those who ingest drugs even without knowing it, as Garrido claims.The court disagreed, even while recognizing some employees could now abuse drug test procedures."While it is true that an employee may lie about how an illegal drug got into his system, that does not mean it is unnecessary to address the question of what he knew or did not know or the circumstances surrounding the ingestion," the appellate judges wrote.Source: Chicago Sun-Times (IL)Author:  Steve Patterson, Staff Reporter Published: June 14, 2004Copyright: 2004 The Sun-Times Co.Contact: letters suntimes.comWebsite: Drug Testing Archives
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #5 posted by WolfgangWylde on June 15, 2004 at 17:00:13 PT
Uh huh....A Narc...
...and his wife didn't know enough to lay off the coca tea. Doesn't pass the smell test.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by cloud7 on June 15, 2004 at 07:42:52 PT
Exactly RasAric
"But Garrido's husband, John, showed how easy it is to obtain, as he effortlessly brought boxes of it through customs, then purchased more bags over the Internet."This man is clearly a dealer with intent to distribute and needs to be put away for a good long time. Making a statement doesnt cover the fact that he was importing milligrams of cocaine at a time.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by RasAric on June 15, 2004 at 06:15:53 PT
She should still be doing time
That woman did cocaine for Jesus Lord's Sakes!!!!It just doesn't matter if it was accidental or not. She has crossed over to the other Satan's Army!!! We cannot, as puritanical crusading christians, let this woman go unscathed in the name of the law. We must do something!!!! Goodness gracious what kind of message is this going to send our children? They'll think adults are immoral and week on drugs. If this gets out among the citizens there'll surely be rioting and looting in the streets...right? ...hello?...anyone? Doesn't Anybody care about the children?!!!!!????
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by billos on June 15, 2004 at 05:12:46 PT
The drug war nabs one of its own. I have been witness to false positives and usually they are considered collateral damage by the government. I guess this anti is going to fight it and win. This is a first for me. I never heard of anyone suceesfully winning over any positive test.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by BigDawg on June 15, 2004 at 05:09:32 PT
Don't ya just love it?
" the 39-year-old mother of two, who worked for the sheriff for 11 years, "had zero problems" until this incident."She had ZERO problems... until this incident.But drugs cause SO much trouble.If she was a druggie as the police dept suggests, why did she have no problems other than the positive UA?I can't count the number of military personel that I saw go from perfect evaluations to the poorest of evaluations... with the ONLY change being a positive UA. All of a sudden they couldn't even wear a uniform right according to post UA evals.As always in this war on some drugs, reality takes a back seat. Either drugs cause problems or they don't. Either she wasn't using drugs... or she was using them without problems. Either way... the prohibitionists are wrong.
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment