Cops Against The Drug War

Cops Against The Drug War
Posted by CN Staff on August 12, 2003 at 21:55:37 PT
By Nina Shapiro
Source: Seattle Weekly 
They were two white guys cruising through the black part of Patterson, N.J., back in the 1970s. One was an undercover police officer named Jack Cole, the other an informant known as Fast Eddy. Posing as heroin buyers, they ran into trouble with three thugs who tried to rip them off and who slashed Fast Eddy's hand with a knife before being chased off. Luckily, Cole recalls, a Good Samaritan came out into the road. He was a young black man who was going to college to get out of the ghetto. He said he didn't approve of drugs but felt bad about the white guys getting roughed up in the neighborhood. 
He went into his house to get bandages for Fast Eddy and then, since Cole continued to pretend like he needed a fix, brought them to a supplier who wouldn't take advantage of them. Back at the precinct, Cole felt he had no choice but to include the Good Samaritan's name in his report. The Good Samaritan was duly charged with conspiracy to distribute heroin, a charge that carried the same penalty as distribution: up to seven years in jail. Cole was at the station when the Good Samaritan was brought in. He looked Cole in the eye and said, "Man, I was trying to be your friend." "So yeah, that got to me," Cole says now, his voice seeming to break and going quiet. Speaking by phone from his current home of Boston, the 64-year-old Cole is explaining why he ultimately turned against the war on drugs. He says he came to realize that he liked many of the people he was turning in—liked them better than some of the people he was working for—and that his betrayal of them, rather than drugs, was what destroyed their lives. "You can get over an addiction, but you can never get over a conviction," he likes to say. Now retired after a 26-year career with the New Jersey State Police, Cole is leading a new group of current and former law-enforcement officials who are similarly disillusioned with the war on drugs. Called Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, or LEAP, this nationwide organization takes as its premise that the war on drugs is, as Cole puts it, "a total and abject failure." "After three decades of fueling the U.S. war on drugs with half a trillion tax dollars and increasingly punitive policies, illicit drugs are easier to get, cheaper, and more potent than they were 30 years ago," reads a LEAP statement.See: More heretical still, considering the source, the group advocates legalization of all drugs. That, it says, is the only way drugs can really become "controlled substances," subject to the kind of age and safety regulations that are imposed on alcohol and tobacco. Cole, its executive director, is in Seattle this week to speak at Hempfest and to various service clubs, his typical audience. He says the year-old LEAP has between 400 and 500 members, including several based in the Seattle area. Modeled on Vietnam Veterans Against the War, with what it hopes is the same kind of credibility, the group includes not just police officers but judges, federal agents, and prosecutors and parole, probation, and corrections officers. Because of the possible professional sanctions posed by coming out against the drug war, LEAP takes care to say that membership can be kept confidential. The emergence of LEAP seems like confirmation of a profound cultural shift away from the zero-tolerance, throw-the-book-at-them drug policy that has long been at the center of our criminal justice system. Roger Goodman, director of a long-running project studying drug policy spearheaded by the King County Bar Association, puts it this way: "The news story is not that the war on drugs has failed, it's who's saying it now." When cops are joining in, you know that the movement for drug-law reform is becoming mainstream. Says Goodman, "It's not like it's a front for fringy, pony-tailed pot smokers." That mainstreaming has been particularly evident in Washington. The bar association's project, done in conjunction with other professional organizations including the state medical and pharmaceutical associations, has generated a huge amount of involvement and served as a model for similar studies around the country. It issued a report in 2001 that portrayed the war on drugs as misguided—saying we need to shift from a focus on criminal justice to one on public health—and is now discussing how to do that. With the bar behind it, the state Legislature last year shortened prison terms for drug users and low- level dealers and prescribed mandatory treatment for them. Testifying in favor of the reform was King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng, a Republican. Cole is a particularly persuasive spokesperson. He worked in narcotics enforcement for 14 of his 26 years on the force. While he rose to a level that enabled him to direct a three-year investigation of a Colombia cocaine-trafficking ring, his revelations about his work on the street are the most damning. Joining the drug war at its inception in the early '70s, Cole says his bosses were clear about how they wanted cops to generate the arrests that would justify massive new funding in law enforcement: "lie a lot." Drugs actually weren't much of a problem in the early days, Cole says, but he and his colleagues made it look like they were by claiming that users were dealers, a label applied, say, to a young person collecting drugs for a group of friends. Cole and other cops also lied about the quantity of drugs they found in someone's house. "What we did is we looked around for what we could call a cutting agent—lactose, quinine, baby powder, almost anything," Cole says. Then the cops mixed together the drugs and the "cutting agent" and turned the mixture into state labs, which called a substance a drug no matter the proportion of that drug that was in it. Voilà: One ounce of cocaine became 4 pounds. Eventually, Cole says, cops didn't have to exaggerate the drug problem anymore; it was bad enough on its own. Yet he and others in LEAP argue that the prohibition on drugs, like the one on alcohol decades ago, has made matters worse by creating an underground industry ruled by organized criminals. "Eighty-five percent of the crime associated with drugs is not associated with people using drugs. It has to do with the marketplace," says Peter Christ, a former police officer in New York state who originated the idea of LEAP. Turf wars, smuggling, violent bill collection—all are typical drug-related crimes that are not the result of being high. Moreover, LEAP argues, the illegality of drugs has inflated their value to a point where addicts have to steal to get their fix. "If we put 50-gallon drums out on every street corner in America filled with drugs, we wouldn't have the problems we have today," Christ says. At the same time, LEAP argues that the prohibition has kept society from regulating drugs in a way that keeps them out of the hands of children, for whom it's easier to buy cocaine than it is to buy beer. As in the alcohol industry, LEAP says, legalization would also allow the government to license and monitor businesses that sell drugs and to set product standards that would prevent most overdoses. Says Christ, "When you go to buy a bottle of Jack Daniels, you don't have to wonder if there's a quart of antifreeze in it or rat poison." Legalization would further allow the government to tax this billion-dollar industry and use the proceeds for drug treatment programs. Cole, the executive director, goes one step further and suggests that the government ought to distribute free maintenance doses of drugs to those who want them, thereby taking the profit motive out of the business. "Would greater availability lead to more addiction?" wonders state Sen. Adam Kline, a sponsor of the drug-law reform bill that reduced local sentences. That's the big question around LEAP's proposals. LEAP and others point to Switzerland, where government-run clinics distribute free heroin to addicts while offering treatment—and addiction appears to have gone down. But whatever the alternative to the current system, it's noteworthy enough that many of those who are supposed to be upholding it have had enough. Says LEAP member Jonathan Wender, a Mountlake Terrace police officer, "I'm tired of putting myself in harm's way for a losing cause." Note: Some law-enforcement veterans like Jack Cole believe we're fighting for a lost cause. Hempfest: Fun for The Whole Family: Report: The Drug Issue - Seattle WeeklySource: Seattle Weekly (WA)Author: Nina ShapiroPublished: August 13 - 19, 2003Copyright: 2003 Seattle WeeklyContact: letters seattleweekly.comWebsite: Articles & Web Site:LEAP Bud Report Another Pot Shot Narc's Neighborhood Bong Blues
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help

Comment #8 posted by goneposthole on August 14, 2003 at 06:48:48 PT
Barfly- a great movie
Well worth watching.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #7 posted by goneposthole on August 14, 2003 at 06:46:12 PT
"a total and abject failure."
No, it isn't. It is a cash cow nonpareil. It is a huge success. Failure is success. It is Orwellian like none other.The war on Drugs is peace for you and you and you and you.War is peace. Smart is dumb, ya know, hey.Can't argue with that. Have a good day.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #6 posted by Lehder on August 13, 2003 at 14:29:15 PT
"Life of a Bum: Against the Work Ethic"
by Anis Shivani supports his thesis with quotes from Charles Bukowski. If you have not seen the movie "Barfly" about Bukowsi's (Micky Rourke) life you've missed a good one.more good reasons to refuse work:
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #5 posted by E_Johnson on August 13, 2003 at 12:24:38 PT
Virgil, Nixon got a pardon
See, it can be done.;)
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #4 posted by Virgil on August 13, 2003 at 08:02:29 PT
That is a great line
"You can get over an addiction, but you can never get over a conviction," It would make a great bumpersticker.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #3 posted by E_Johnson on August 13, 2003 at 07:48:46 PT
An economic obstacle to ending the war
America has had a problem employing blue collar labor. The Drug War has served as a partial solution to that problem, by giving some displaced blue collar workers jobs in drug enforcement, while other displaced blue collar workers get jobs being prison inmates. Police and prison inmate are jobs that can't be shipped overseas. perhaps that is one reason why the Drug War industry has become so dominant in American politics.It's kind of how the Soviet GULag functioned. It played an important role in Stalinist economics in many ways, by employing people and soaking up potentially unemployed people in the cheapest way possible.
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #2 posted by freedom fighter on August 12, 2003 at 22:52:32 PT
Another LEAP LTE....
DRUG PROHIBITION A CASH COW FOR POLICE AGENCIES Of course we in law enforcement lie about the number of drug users, etc. ( Editorial, Aug. 6 ). How else to force politicians to give us more money, which means more cops, which means more promotions to sergeant or lieutenant? As a retired police officer and a member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, I know drug prohibition is a cash cow for those in police work and they have milked this baby for 30 years, even though we have never eliminated one drug job as a result. All drug dealers arrested or killed are quickly replaced. Prohibition, you gotta love it. Howard J. Wooldridge Keller, Texas
[ Post Comment ]

Comment #1 posted by FoM on August 12, 2003 at 21:58:11 PT
Five Article Series from The Seattle Weekly
 Cops Against The Drug War: Bud Report: Another Pot Shot: Narc's Neighborhood: Bong Blues: 
[ Post Comment ]

Post Comment