cannabisnews.com: Half of All Cannabis Possibly Grown at Home 





Half of All Cannabis Possibly Grown at Home 
Posted by CN Staff on April 13, 2003 at 22:27:29 PT
By Jimmy Burns, Social Affairs Correspondent 
Source: Financial Times 
Home cultivation of cannabis is now so widespread that it may now account for as much as half of all consumption in Britain, according to a report published today.The report, commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the independent social research body, says that people who grow their own cannabis should escape with a police warning if they cultivate the drug only on a small scale. It says police forces already differ in how they deal with cannabis cultivators. Some offenders are cautioned, while others are charged under the Misuse of Drugs Act.
Based on research by South Bank University's criminal policy unit and the national addiction centre at King's College, London, the report suggests the tendency towards "home-grown" cultivation has led to cannabis users becoming less dependent on the international drugs trade. Those involved do so as a hobby and as a way of avoiding contact with dealers.Under the act, production offences are defined as trafficking, and offenders can be liable to asset confiscation, and, on a third conviction, to a mandatory seven-year prison sentence, although some police forces charge offenders under a lesser offence of cultivation.David Blunkett, the home secretary, has announced a proposal to reclassify cannabis as a Class-C drug, treating its possession as a less serious offence than it has been until now.While the criminal justice bill, currently passing through parliament, includes provision to make possession of any Class-C drug an arrestable offence, several police forces are developing a policy whereby officers give only on-the-spot warnings while clamping down on dealers and sales to young people.The report argues that a more careful distinction in law between social and commercial cultivation of cannabis "could serve to drive a wedge between a significant proportion of users and the criminally sophisticated suppliers who might otherwise sell them cannabis and other drugs".It also favours the Canadian system, whereby individuals can obtain authorisation to possess cannabis for medical purposes and can obtain a licence to grow a specified amount. The report concludes that changing the law so that small-scale cultivation of cannabis is treated in the same way as possession would not contravene the UN drug conventions to which the UK is a signatory.Instead it would bring the UK closer into line with countries such as the Netherlands and Switzerland, where enforcement policy seeks to draw cannabis users away from criminal suppliers who may also sell harder drugs such as heroin and cocaine.JRF: Domestic Cultivation of Cannabis: http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialpolicy/423.asp Source: Financial Times (UK)Author: Jimmy Burns, Social Affairs Correspondent Published: April 14 2003Copyright: The Financial Times Limited 2003Website: http://www.ft.com/Contact: letters.editor ft.com Related Articles & Web Sites:Joseph Rowntree Foundationhttp://www.jrf.org.uk/Drugs Uncovered: Observer Special http://freedomtoexhale.com/dc.htmHome-Grown Cannabis 'is Lesser Crime'http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread15951.shtmlHome-Grown Cannabis Outstrips Imports http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread15739.shtmlCannabis Economy Brings in £11bn http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread15353.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #4 posted by freedom fighter on April 14, 2003 at 17:54:17 PT
Prohibition DOES kill
Bob, thanks for the article. Reminds me of Pubelo Colorado when they passed that stupid smoking law, there were this gentleman who do frequent to this bar and when he was told he could'nt smoke cigarettes anymore, he dumped his lit cigarette on a recently installed brand new carpet. This is very minor but a death because of a prohibition. Wow.Only thing that needs to be prohibit is the prohibition itself.pazff
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by Whirrlin on April 14, 2003 at 06:41:13 PT:
If Only!
Now if only the U.S. would follow this lead. Can somebody come over here and explain it to our officals, as soon as possible, Please!
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by lag on April 14, 2003 at 06:37:44 PT
This gets me
Politicians can put a ban on something that is relatively easy to avoid...if you smell cigs go to a different restaurant, or move away from the smoker, find a non-smoking bar...but politicians constantly fail to uphold decent standards when it comes to polluting the air, ground, water, food...on and on, stuff we really have no control over. I am a non-tobacco smoker.It's as if they think that the modern day rise of cancer, is it really all that new of a phenomenon, is created by the amount of herb, whether cannabis or tobacco, that is floating around the places we hang at.I don't know...but this sorta regulation doesn't seem to matter unless we can stop the mass pollution that affects everyone.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by JR Bob Dobbs on April 14, 2003 at 04:08:44 PT
Prohibition kills
Prohibition has been blamed for another death in New York. What's different, this time, is the prohibited substance...
Bouncer stabbed enforcing smoking ban in NYC
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment