cannabisnews.com: The Trial of Ed Rosenthal





The Trial of Ed Rosenthal
Posted by CN Staff on January 17, 2003 at 18:48:14 PT
By Ann Harrison, AlterNet
Source: AlterNet
A federal judge in San Francisco is blocking a jury from hearing evidence that could exculpate an outspoken medical marijuana activist. Ed Rosenthal, who is facing 20 years in prison on federal drug charges, believed himself to be immune from prosecution when he was deputized by the nearby city of Oakland in 1998 to cultivate cannabis for chronically ill patients. Rosenthal's case is a challenge by federal prosecutors to California's Compassionate Use Act (Prop. 215), a 1996 voter referendum that made the cultivation, possession and consumption of medical marijuana legal in California with a doctor's recommendation. 
Since the act did not provide for the distribution of medical cannabis, several California cities, including Oakland, have passed ordinances that authorize growers and distributors to meet this need. Rosenthal, who has written or edited more than a dozen books on marijuana cultivation and social policy, seemed like a good choice as cultivator of Oakland's Medical Marijuana Program. But last February, he became one of the first people indicted by the U.S. Justice Department for providing marijuana to patients in the San Francisco Bay Area. Rosenthal, 58, is now facing charges of cultivating more than 1,000 marijuana plants at a San Francisco medical marijuana club, conspiracy to grow marijuana, and maintaining a place to grow marijuana at an Oakland warehouse. The warehouse reportedly contained several thousand tiny starter plants that Rosenthal says were intended for distribution to medical marijuana patients who want to grow their own cannabis. George Bevan Jr., the government's lead prosecutor, had no comment on the proceedings. But Rosenthal says the outcome of his case will determine the government's future approach to medical marijuana, considered by activists to be a sharp wedge in the larger fight against the U.S. government's war on drugs. ''If they win this battle, then I think that the dispensaries in the nine states that have legal medical marijuana are going to be in for a tough time from the federal government,'' says Rosenthal. ''If we win this, it's like taking several bricks out of the bottom of a wall, it weakens the wall so much that it will eventually implode.'' Prop. 215 passed with 68 percent in San Francisco. Many area residents are aware of the ongoing conflict between Prop. 215 and the federal Controlled Substances Act. Richard Meyer, spokesman for the DEA San Francisco field division, notes that under the Controlled Substances Act, marijuana is classified as a Schedule One substance with no medicinal value and a high potential for abuse. Federal agencies have blocked nearly all attempts to conduct scientific studies on medical marijuana. When U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer asked prospective jurors in Rosenthal's case if they could set aside their potential support for Prop. 215 and enforce possible criminal drug penalties under the Controlled Substances Act, many rebelled. Over half the 77 prospective jurors refused to acknowledge the supremacy of federal law and were excused from the case. ''I feel it is very frustrating when voters in the state of California make a statement on medical marijuana and the government prosecutes," said a juror from Napa, Calif. who was later disqualified. ''I think it should not be a political fight but we should go into the science and figure it out.'' The judge's questions regarding Prop. 215 alerted potential jurors that medical cannabis is an issue in the case. But it's uncertain how much specific information about medical cannabis the judge will permit jurors, or whether jurors will nullify by entering a verdict contrary to the instruction of the court. Jurors who convicted another medical marijuana grower two months ago were outraged when they later learned that their vote had sent him to prison for 10 years. ''It is not the court that placed marijuana in Schedule One; the court is simply following the law,'' said Judge Breyer.  A Bitter Legal Struggle During two weeks of hearings prior to jury selection, Rosenthal's lawyers engaged in a bitter legal struggle with Judge Breyer, who sought to block Rosenthal from using Prop. 215 as a defense against federal charges. Breyer denied defense motions to dismiss the charges based on selective prosecution, lack of jurisdiction, official immunity, and 9th and 10th Amendment arguments. The defense also argued that the charges should be dismissed on due process grounds because the government's prosecution is a form of entrapment by estoppel. This argument applies when a government agent tells the defendant that certain conduct is legal and the defendant believes the official. ''I was following 215 in good faith,'' argues Rosenthal. ''I had been made an officer of the city and been immunized, and the whole question is whether in spite of all this, the federal government can come in and arbitrarily choose one person to persecute.'' Rosenthal's attorneys presented evidence that the DEA gave assurances to local medical marijuana activists that they would respect California's medical marijuana laws. Several Oakland city officials, including the city attorney and the former head of the Oakland Police Department's Narcotics Division, also testified in pre-trial hearings that they were never told told by the DEA that they were violating federal law and could be subject to federal prosecution. The City of Oakland sought to protect medical marijuana providers using a provision in the Controlled Substances Act which allows local municipalities to deputize agents of the city and immunize them from civil and criminal liability. This legal exception, known as 885(d), protects law enforcement agents who possess, buy or sell drugs in the course of their duties. Judge Breyer rejected the estoppel argument asserting that DEA assurances not to prosecute were hearsay. He also ruled that Oakland city officials were not authorized to relay such assurances and that lack of swift enforcement action by federal law enforcement did not imply consent. On Jan. 16, Rosenthal's defense team took the unusual step of going over the judge's head by filing a writ with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals asking them to rule on the entrapment by estoppel defense. ''If this writ were granted, we should ask the judge to pick a new jury because he informed this present jury panel that there was no way to harmonize state law and federal law,'' said Bill Simpich, one of Rosenthal's attorneys. ''We believe that the City of Oakland harmonized state law with federal law by immunizing Ed.'' Rosenthal's trial is now set to begin on Tuesday, Jan. 21. It is still unclear whether he will take the stand in his own defense, or what the judge will permit him to say. If Rosenthal cannot testify about his state of mind at the time of the alleged crime, he cannot convince the jury that that he had no intent to break the law  which is normally required for conviction. Judge Breyer is eager to try the Rosenthal case swiftly with little fanfare, but activists are registering their outrage over what they considered a muzzled trial. Outside the San Francisco federal building on the day that prospective jurors were assembling, five demonstrators stood mute with their mouths gagged. They held signs showing a marijuana leaf which read, ''This is my medicine.'' People excused from the jury said they were aware of the demonstrators. The question now is how much the remaining jurors know about Rosenthal's medical marijuana crop. Ann Harrison is a San Francisco based science journalist. Source: AlterNetAuthor: Ann Harrison, AlterNetPublished: January 17, 2003Copyright: 2003 Independent Media InstituteContact: info alternet.org Website: http://www.alternet.org/DL: http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14973Related Articles & Web Site:Medicinal Cannabis Research Linkshttp://freedomtoexhale.com/research.htmThe Right To Not Be in Pain http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread15205.shtmlMedical Issues, City Law Disallowed in Pot Trial http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread15200.shtmlSelection of Jury in Pot Case Moved Up http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread15169.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #7 posted by FoM on January 20, 2003 at 17:48:59 PT
'SUPPORT ED' RALLY - TUES 12:30 PM 
    
 Support Ed Rosenthal!12:30 PM 1/21 Support Ed Rally!Music, puppets, and fun! (Lunch provided)Our friend Ed has given so much to the community, through his tireless advocacy, his research, and his writings. He needs OUR help! Please show 
your support. He has and would do it for us! Call 510-486-8083 if you need a ride!All events at Federal Court House 450 Golden Gate, San FranciscoWEEK ONE:Tuesday, January 21st8:30 AM Court support needed!Bring a friend and wear your Sunday Best!12:30 PM Support Ed Rally!Music, puppets, and fun! (Lunch provided)1:30 PM Press ConferenceWednesday, January 22nd- Thursday, January 23rd7:00 AM - 8:30 AM Support Vigil8:30 AM -Court support needed!Bring a friend and wear your Sunday Best!WEEK TWO:Tuesday, January 28th -Thursday, January 30th7:00 AM - 8:30 AM Support Vigil8:30 AM -Court support needed!Bring a friend and wear your Sunday Best!http://www.SafeAccessNow.orgFor more information contact American For Safe Access at 510-486-8083 or info safeaccessnow.orgHilary McQuie, Campaign CoordinatorAmericans for Safe Access1678 Shattuck Ave. #317Berkeley, CA 94709Phone: 510-486-8083Fax: 510-486-8090http://www.safeaccessnow.org"The best political, social, and spiritual work we can do is to withdraw the projection of our shadow onto others."~Carl Jung
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #6 posted by charmed quark on January 18, 2003 at 06:46:21 PT:
Hey, Dr. Ganj
Hey, Dr. Ganj. American justice is a sorry thing, no? I wonder if this type of information suppression could happen in Canada.My migraines are still doing great thanks to your help from nearly 3 years ago!-Pete
The East Coast
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #5 posted by greek_philosophizer on January 18, 2003 at 03:42:43 PT:
The Kubby Neighborhood
 It seems as though the
jury selection process and
the inhibition of the defense
arguments are going to decide
the outcome of the case.  It may be time for Steve Kubby
to see if there are any houses in
his neighborhood that are available
for rent.  Its a shame Peter McWilliams and
Todd McCormick did
not take that route.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #4 posted by p4me on January 18, 2003 at 00:48:53 PT
Alexa Cannabisnews rating
Cannabisnews was rated 47,857 by Alexa just a few minutes ago. It was 48,868 last week on February 10th. If their is one journalist that people should follow it would be Greg Palast, the American investigative reporter exiled to the UK. In this recent work he speaks of Busch's $50,000 salary for being on the board of a Carlyle subsidiary that went bust. It is something I had not heard. Isn't it funny how you don't have to submit a resume to run for President? Greg Palast is the man and I highly recommend his recent work. I was particularly drawn to what he said about his former employer, The New York Times. It would be a different world if everyone read his work. You can readily see why the Empire cannot have him working in this country. If you cannot read all his works at least read this and tell your friends- http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=181&row=1The border patrol is shooting at people at the Rio Grande to protect our lives from the evil weed. Kill the trees to save the forest. Go to war to prevent a war. Now kill people to save lives. Is this 1984 doublespeak or what? http://www.delrionewsherald.com/report.lasso?wcd=3679
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by Dr Ganj on January 18, 2003 at 00:05:05 PT
Feds Against Growing A Wonderful Plant
There is a lot at stake here, and Ed sure has courage!
Because this trial is in San Francisco, it is possible the jury could rebel and vote to nullify all charges. 
What makes this really frustrating, is how the prosecutors dismiss anyone who is pro Prop 215. This to me, is simply jury manipulation, and should not be allowed. Rather, to get a fair trial, a jury pool should be picked by random- either by computer, or by drawing.
The real problem here of course, is that if Ed's jury is instructed by the judge to totally disregard all of the medicinal aspects of cannabis, and only focus on its schedule I status- and the jury listens, then like all other federal medical marijuana cases before this, another conviction will occur.
The other problem here is that the jurors will never be informed that Ed is facing around 20 years in prison, which really amounts to a death sentence for growing beautiful plants that help people. 
I admire what Ed is trying to do for so many, and maybe he feels at 58 he is getting old, and is willing to sacrifice his life for a noble cause. 
I guess if someone were dying of AIDS, or cancer, that would make is easier to go to trial against the federal government. As to Ed, maybe this is his last stand, but I hope for all of us the jury smells something foul, and sends him back to his garden(s).See you all in court on Tuesday. I will be there handing out free medicine, as usual.Dr. Ganj    
http://www.aclu.org
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by BGreen on January 17, 2003 at 19:10:51 PT
I Find The Court System In Contempt!
When U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer asked prospective jurors in Rosenthal's case if they could set aside their potential support for Prop. 215 and enforce possible criminal drug penalties under the Controlled Substances Act, many rebelled. Over half the 77 prospective jurors refused to acknowledge the supremacy of federal law and were excused from the case.We're guaranteed a trial by a jury of our peers. Over half of Ed's peers were excused. They should be required to take the first 12 people as the jury, period. Then let the debate take place.I have NO respect for the legal system in this country. It's not a trial by our peers, it's a trial by a jury of pee-ers.
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by Truth on January 17, 2003 at 19:07:50 PT
You go Ed.
God bless Ed Rossenthal
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment