cannabisnews.com: LaWall, Romley Oppose Pot Initiative





LaWall, Romley Oppose Pot Initiative
Posted by CN Staff on August 27, 2002 at 08:27:59 PT
By Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services 
Source: Arizona Daily Star 
County prosecutors have kicked off their campaign to block further liberalization of state marijuana laws. In separate press conferences, Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall and Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley came out strongly against Proposition 203. That measure would allow those with a doctor's recommendation to have and use marijuana and decriminalize possession of small amounts of the drug for everyone else. 
Drug distribution can be linked to property crimes and violent crimes, LaWall said. She fears a "cottage industry" would develop in which doctors would offer the recommendations to more than their regular patients. Romley agreed, saying the initiative goes far beyond letting doctors prescribe otherwise illegal drugs, measures approved by voters in 1996 and ratified in 1998. "This is not about providing marijuana to the ill and dying," Romley said. "It's about legalization." Existing law permits doctors to prescribe marijuana to terminal and seriously ill patients. But doctors have balked after the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency threatened to revoke their prescription-writing privileges. This year's measure requires only a doctor's recommendation. But it goes beyond that, allowing anyone with such a note to get free marijuana from the Department of Public Safety's stash of seized drugs. "Our seniors don't get their drugs for free," noted Barnett Lotstein, an aide to Romley. Anyway, he said, there are no procedures for DPS to test the drugs to see if they are tainted with pesticides, leading to possible liability if someone who gets state-provided pot becomes ill. Those without a prescription could still have their drugs seized. But the maximum penalty for possession of two ounces or less would be $250. Romley said he would support the medical use of marijuana if it is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "I just don't think medicine should be decided at the ballot box," he said. Sam Vagenas, who is heading the pro-203 campaign, defended having the state provide the drug to those with a doctor's permission. He said it makes more sense than forcing these people to find it on the street. "What we're trying to do is try to reduce the harm," Vagenas said. "We think we'll actually free up law enforcement to investigate more serious kinds of crime." The events with LaWall and Romley also featured Joe Garagiola Jr., vice president and general manager of the Arizona Diamondbacks. Garagiola said he and Jerry Colangelo, managing partner of the team, are "concerned about anything that would make, in this case, marijuana more accessible, and specifically more accessible to kids." Garagiola said there is no mixed message in the Diamondbacks seeking to block medical use of marijuana and the fact that major league baseball allows its players to use androstenedione, banned by most other sports. The over-the-counter dietary supplement boosts testosterone levels. "Baseball has had a policy in place for many years, in the minor leagues, that allows for testing for a whole range of drugs," he said. Garagiola said owners have been pushing for "some version of that" in the majors, but the issue is tied up in contract negotiations with the players. The drug, known as "andro," remains permitted in baseball even though it is banned by the Olympics, the National Football League, professional tennis tours and the National College Athletic Association. * Star reporter Joseph Barrios contributed to this report. Source: Arizona Daily Star (AZ)Author: Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services Published: August 27, 2002Copyright: 2002 Pulitzer Publishing Co.Contact: letters azstarnet.comWebsite: http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/Related Articles:Officers, Officials Speak Out vs. Prop. 203http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread13898.shtmlMarijuana Initiative Foes Fight 'Lie' http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread13897.shtmlMarijuana Initiative Qualifies for Arizona Ballothttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread13727.shtml 
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #4 posted by JR Bob Dobbs on August 27, 2002 at 14:38:06 PT
LEGALIZE, not just decriminalize
>>Drug distribution can be linked to property crimes and violent crimes, LaWall said. She fears a "cottage industry" would develop in which doctors would offer the recommendations to more than their regular patients.  If cannabis is decriminalized - we stop arresting people for possession but continue the war on the supply - then yes, your fears are well founded. This author, myself, and Marc Emery all have something in common - we're against mere decrimimalization. However, the only way to un-link cannabis from property and violent crimes, and clear out the medical grey-areas, is to make it 100% LEGAL for everyone to own, grow, buy, sell, trade, and ingest it. Then nobody would have to steal, cheat, or harm others over the supply of cannabis. Wouldn't that be nice?
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #3 posted by Prop203 on August 27, 2002 at 13:08:36 PT:
More Polls
http://www.azfamily.com/news/local/KTVKLNews20020618.3e6d0cb2.htmlLocal AZ POLL!!78% YES on 203
19% No on 203
4% undecided
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by kaptinemo on August 27, 2002 at 13:05:56 PT:
They are CONSTANTLY forgetting something...
Namely, that they are public servants. To maintain at least the semblence of impartiality of government (which they are theoretically supposed to practice) they are not alloweded to use the cachet of their public offices, and especially appear in uniform, to act in a purely partisan political maneuver. To do any of that is to imply the sanction of the State against the democratic process...and that's part of the reason for the Hatch Act.Where are all the hungry lawyers? There's enough wrongdoing on the part of these civil-servants-who-would-be-civil-masters to justify an investigation...
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by observer on August 27, 2002 at 13:01:45 PT
''tainted''
"Our seniors don't get their drugs for free," noted Barnett Lotstein, an aide to Romley. Anyway, he said, there are no procedures for DPS to test the drugs to see if they are tainted with pesticides, leading to possible liability if someone who gets state-provided pot becomes ill.Therefore, throw them in jail if they disagree with you and want to use cannabis anyway. That makes sense. You're a prosecutor; and every problem in life may be solved by jailing people you don't like. (Besides, there's your career stats and that future as a Republican officeholder ahead of you, as a prosecutor.) If those uppity senior citizens want their cannabis despite your most loving advice and tender concern for their health, then hey: throw 'em in jail. (Oh goodness: did the kindly prosecutors and their highly truthful press mouthpieces accidently forget to mention JAIL again?)"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
-- Upton Sinclair, "The Jungle"
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment