cannabisnews.com: Reining in Rumors About Drug Reform in N.M. 





Reining in Rumors About Drug Reform in N.M. 
Posted by FoM on February 01, 2002 at 11:56:51 PT
By Katharine A. Huffman
Source: Albuquerque Tribune 
Rumors are flying about what drug policy reform would mean for New Mexico. With six bills coming up before the Legislature this session, people's concerns are understandable.Are we heading towards legalization? Is New Mexico moving too fast? Would reform mean easier access to drugs? Would the proposed legislation undermine drug courts? Is Gov. Gary Johnson behind all of this?
In a word, the answer to each of these questions is no.None of the proposed legislation would legalize drugs. Rather, the six drug policy reform bills before the Legislature would allow for:Treatment, instead of incarceration for nonviolent drug possession offenders.Medical marijuana for patients suffering from diseases such as cancer and AIDS.Protection for innocent property owners through civil asset forfeiture reform.Judicial discretion instead of mandatory sentencing.Civil penalties instead of criminal penalties for simple marijuana possession.Letting those who have completed drug sentences apply for federal benefits to get back on their feet.It might seem like New Mexico is moving fast on these, but we are actually behind other states when it comes to enacting more cost-effective and compassionate drug policies.For example, Arizona and California have both passed laws allowing for treatment instead of jail for first- and second-time nonviolent drug possession offenders.In fact, the Arizona Supreme Court recently issued a report on their law's progress, finding that it saved taxpayers more than $6.7 million during fiscal year 1999 and that 62 percent of probationers had successfully completed treatment.In Arkansas, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Washington, voters have passed civil asset forfeiture reform bills. Nine states have passed voter ballot initiatives or legislation authorizing the medicinal use of marijuana under state law; and nine already have fines, instead of potential jail time, for possession of an ounce or less of marijuana.Twenty-nine states have opted out of limiting federal benefits for drug offenders who have successfully completed their sentences.As far as making drugs more readily available in New Mexico, nothing would do that more than maintaining our current drug policies. Although we spend billions of federal, state and local taxpayer dollars each year fighting the drug war, drugs are cheaper, purer and more readily available than ever before.The many states that have passed reforms such as those before the New Mexico legislature this year have not experienced a rise in drug availability or drug use as a result. Rather, they have saved lives, money and law enforcement resources.Regarding drug courts, the proposed legislation would work with them, not against them. Drug courts are - and should be - an important part of the continuum of treatment services available in New Mexico.By adding supervised community-based treatment to that continuum, drug courts can focus their attention on cases that most need their comprehensive services. Taxpayers' dollars would be used more effectively, and more people who need help would be able to get it.Lastly, while these reform proposals are supported by Governor Johnson, they also have the support of many Democratic and Republican legislators, along with treatment providers, medical doctors, law enforcement officials and public health professionals.For example, among those legislators who introduced the bills are: Sen. Manny Aragon, an Albuquerque Democrat; Sen. Roman Maes, a Santa Fe Democrat; Rep. Patsy Trujillo-Knauer, a Santa Fe Democrat; Rep. Ken Martinez, a Grants Democrat; Rep. Gail Beam, an Albuquerque Democrat; and Rep. Joe Thompson, an Albuquerque Republican.Most importantly, these sensible reforms have the support of the majority of New Mexico voters - the ones that our elected officials are representing up in Santa Fe.It's time to stop spending taxpayer dollars on drug policies that don't work.Our law enforcement resources are too precious to waste on locking up nonviolent drug offenders, many of whom are struggling with addiction. Instead, we need to reserve these resources for violent offenders, and prioritize drug treatment, prevention and family education.We all worry about drugs when it comes to our children, our families and our communities. These policies will make things better, instead of worse, as they are now.This is not about politics. It's about common sense. Note: New Mexico's proposed drug policy reforms aren't radical, today's writer argues. It's actually behind other states in developing more compassionate and practical laws.Huffman is director of the New Mexico Drug Policy Project.Source: Albuquerque Tribune (NM)Author: Katharine A. HuffmanPublished: February 01, 2002Copyright: 2002 The Albuquerque TribuneContact: letters abqtrib.comWebsite: http://www.abqtrib.com/Related Articles & Web Site:The Drug Policy Alliancehttp://www.lindesmith.org/Medicinal Pot Law Might Face Challengehttp://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11896.shtmlLegislative Roundup - Letter To Asa Hutchinson http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread11895.shtml
Home Comment Email Register Recent Comments Help




Comment #3 posted by Jose Melendez on February 01, 2002 at 15:14:32 PT:
I think...
What is that mantra that P4Me is always saying?
I thought it was "Buy someone you love a vaporizer."
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #2 posted by Sam Adams on February 01, 2002 at 13:52:22 PT
very true and encouraging
Yes, even in conservative NM there has been some great media coverage.That's one definite positive effect of Gov. Johnson's support - even though the stodgy, craven legislators may not pass any of his bills, at least the issue has been debated in the media and "legitimized".In my state, we had almost every one of these bills in the legislature last year, and there was a virtual media blackout on the issue.  Somehow we've got to get the attention of the liberal, bleeding-heart types that have the ear of the media. Seriously, last week in the local paper, on MLK day, they had a front-page article on how minorities no longer want to be called "minorities" because it's offensive to them. That was their nod to the MLK legacy. Damn fools. Do you think MLK would have cared more about that, or the fact that minorities in my state are 80 times more likely that whites to go to jail for drug offenses? 
[ Post Comment ]


Comment #1 posted by Ethan Russo MD on February 01, 2002 at 12:59:58 PT:
Another Vote that Will Not Be Heeded
Increasingly, there are good editorial comments reflecting public opinion. The politicians fail to listen. What is that mantra that P4Me is always saying?
[ Post Comment ]


Post Comment