|Questions for The Drug Czar|
Posted by CN Staff on December 10, 2010 at 07:06:47 PT|
By Sasha Abramsky
USA -- Sasha Abramsky recently spoke by phone with Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, about prospects for drug reform in America.
There is a lot of discussion about the spiraling cost of the drug war and a lot of evidence that attitudes on the issue are changing. Where is the American discourse on drugs heading?
We have to help people understand there are very cost-effective, basic strategies that can be effective. We don't have to throw up our hands and say the war on drugs has failed and therefore we have to go for legalization. We should look at these other prevention and treatment issues. There's the president's budget request for additional funding for prevention: science-based, evidence-based practices, additional funds for treatment. Talking about addiction as a disease. Recognizing that treatment is a part of primary healthcare.
How do you bring conservative critics along for this ride?
Some conservative critics are already there. They recognize and will tell you that merely trying to make arrests, make seizures, trying to incarcerate, is not a particularly smart way of addressing the drug problem. Every state is looking at how to reduce their prison population, their criminal justice costs, and at the same time keep their communities safe.
What programs do you think are particularly effective, and how can they become better integrated into the criminal justice system?
Just like all bureaucracies, the criminal justice system can move slowly. But drug courts have proved effective—they started with one twenty-one years ago, and there're now about 2,500 around the country. Intensive supervision of people who have been arrested and are out on bond or on parole or probation. The Drug Market Initiative, being tested in [nearly thirty] cities, led by John Jay College, is worth looking at, although that is still to be evaluated. It's a pre-arrest diversion: rather than arrest someone and take them out of their neighborhood in the back seat of a police car, they are asked to come to a voluntary meeting where the prosecutor and the police show evidence and ask the person to make a choice about whether they'd like to get help.
As you expand these programs, what is your measure of success?
Reducing the number of deaths and the number of people who come into emergency rooms as a result of drugs is important. It's not only very high; it's very costly. And we've set some pretty ambitious goals over the next five years for decreasing the number of young people who engage in drug use. That'll be important. Then, of course, there are the other, more intangible things, because the drug issue is so intertwined with dropout rates from school, healthcare costs, and a prepared and educated workforce.
You can also read the full transcript or listen to a podcast of the conversation.
Complete Transcript: http://drugsense.org/url/Jyltm9Us
This article appeared in the December 27, 2010 edition of The Nation.
Source: Nation, The (US)
CannabisNews Justice Archives
|Comment #1 posted by runruff on December 10, 2010 at 08:31:03 PT|
|A badge among successful bureaucrats. |
Elemination of the ONDCP would mean the end of certain sycophantics. The troll at the DEA would be suddenly feeling used as she realized she was only recruited to close down the DEA and not so much to leed it?-[useful idiot]
[ Post Comment ]