Cannabis News Protecting Patients Access to Medical Marijuana
  Marijuana Bill Snuffed
Posted by CN Staff on March 09, 2007 at 06:23:00 PT
By Diana M. Alba, Santa Fe Bureau 
Source: Las Cruces Sun-News 

medical Santa Fe, NM -- All eyes in the House were fixed intently on a marquee as the votes slowly wracked up — for the second time in one night — on a measure legalizing marijuana for medical use.

"Yeas" at first outnumbered the "nays" during the 30-second span lawmakers had to cast a vote Thursday night, but were soon edged out, leaving the final tally 33-36: The bill had failed.

Just minutes earlier, a vote on the same bill had resulted in a tie, with three members absent from the House chambers.

Through a procedural move, Majority Floor Leader Ken Martinez, D-Grants brought the measure back for a second consideration.

Round two saw three members flip-flop: Rep. Thomas Swisstack, D-Rio Rancho, voted yes after previously voting no, while Rep. Richard Vigil, D-Ribera, and Rep. Thomas Garcia, D-Ocate, voted no after previously voting yes.

The three lawmakers absent in the first round made an appearance for the second. Two cast votes against the bill, while one was in favor.

The unusual episode was a fitting wrap-up to a debate that featured the unusual circumstance of lawmakers throwing party lines to the wind. Some Democrats spoke against medical marijuana use because it could send a negative message to children, while some Republicans argued in favor of the bill because it could alleviate pain for sufferers of serious illness.

Rep. Debbie Rodella, D-Ohkay Owingeh, was among those against the measure. Illegal drug use is a problem in her community, she said.

"I don't think there's anyone in my community that hasn't been affected by the drug problem we face," she said. "I think the bottom line is if we vote yes, we do send the wrong message to our children — that pot is medicine, and it's not."

An outspoken supporter was Minority Whip Dan Foley, R-Roswell, who said he doubted an approval would lead to a spike in illegal marijuana use among children. He backed the measure because it could help people suffering from disease, he said.

"If someone is dying and someone is in pain, who are we in this body to say no?" he said.

Rep. Antonio Lujan, D-Las Cruces, favored the bill.

"People should have a choice," he said. "If a person chooses that path as a treatment, they should have that choice."

Rep. Dianne Miller Hamilton, R-Silver City, objected to the measure because of the impact medical marijuana use might have on members of a patient's household.

"I'm worried about the second-hand effects on family members," she said.

Conditions that would have been treatable with marijuana included cancer, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, epilepsy and AIDs, under the legislation. Patients would have had to seek approval from the state and carry a registration card in order to use medical marijuana.

The bill would have created an advisory board of doctors under the health department to approve and deny requests by patients.

Some lawmakers, including Rep. Bill Rehm, R-Albuquerque, spoke against the bill because it could have led to trouble with the federal government, which has ignored state laws allowing marijuana use for medical purposes and has continued to prosecute possession of marijuana in those instances.

The bill is Senate Bill 238.

Source: Las Cruces Sun-News (NM)
Author: Diana M. Alba, Santa Fe Bureau
Published: March 9, 2007
Copyright: 2007 by Mid-States Newspapers Inc.
Contact: editorlcsn@zianet.com
Website: http://www.lcsun-news.com/

Related Articles:

Medical Marijuana Measure Clears Senate Again
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22612.shtml

Senate OKs Medical Marijuana Bill
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22611.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #6 posted by dongenero on March 09, 2007 at 08:50:57 PT
vote 'em out
Take names and vote 'em out.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by doc james on March 09, 2007 at 08:05:55 PT
Same old song and dance
along with their hide your head in the sand. I pray some of them get cancer and chemo makes em gag up their meds they will then be sending their grandsons to the streets in search of this miracle drug. Hopefully they won't get ripped off by the corner dealer.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on March 09, 2007 at 07:08:23 PT
Graehstone
I wonder if history will record the war of wars waged against it's citizens over a beneficial plant?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Graehstone on March 09, 2007 at 07:01:16 PT
OT: (sort of) Morocco's war on Cannabis
Like this will ever happen, lol. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6426799.stm

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on March 09, 2007 at 06:46:56 PT
potpal
I don't understand why New Mexico has had so much trouble understanding. Is it because they are next to Mexico and have seen the problems with drug smuggling? I sometimes think it becomes a blur to states near the southern border. They can't seem to get the fact that drug smuggling will stop if people can grow their own medical cannabis. No one will need any marijuana from any place outside the USA. It will be all made (grown) in the USA so the money won't be a driving factor. That's just my thoughts as I try to figure out why.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by potpal on March 09, 2007 at 06:36:23 PT
Meet the Prohibitionists
Rep. Debbie Rodella, D-Ohkay Owingeh Rep. Bill Rehm, R-Albuquerque Rep. Dianne Miller Hamilton, R-Silver City Rep. Richard Vigil, D-Ribera Rep. Thomas Garcia, D-Ocate

I'm worried about the second-hand effects on family members...what a crock of merda.



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on March 09, 2007 at 06:23:00