Cannabis News Cannabis TV
  Cannabis: A Token Issue No Longer
Posted by CN Staff on November 14, 2006 at 06:51:28 PT
By Joseph Ruchalaski, Columnist 
Source: Daily Reveille  

cannabis USA -- This past Tuesday was sort of depressing, not because of the election results; but studying for two exams the following day meant I could not participate in any planned election night drinking hijinks or dull my pain each time CNN saw fit to "check in on the bloggers." Adding to that pain was the major media outlets' coverage of Amendment 44 in Colorado, Question 7 in Nevada and Initiative 4 in South Dakota which with the usual array of bad puns and metaphors: they went up in smoke, voters just say "no," a hazy issue, a pipe dream, etc.

These ballot initiatives asked voters to legalize the possession of marijuana in some way. South Dakotans were asked to decide whether they should become the 12th state in the Union to allow medical marijuana. That amendment failed to pass by four percent. Colorado sought to fully decriminalize possession of 1 oz. or less by individuals over the age of 21 in a state where simple possession already garners a petty fine. That amendment failed by a much wider 20 percent margin. The most ambitious of the amendments was Nevada's, asking voters to not only decriminalize but fully regulate and tax the sale of marijuana like alcohol or tobacco. That question failed as well by 12 percent. Clearly, it was a defeat all around for marijuana advocates and their grass-roots campaigns this year at the ballot box.

The media's tone of coverage effectively pigeonholes an important issue affecting all Americans today. Patients, researchers and ordinary citizens are all deprived of meanginful discussion involving the historical, philosophical and scientific perspectives that surround this issue.

But that doesn't mean advocates are not gaining traction with the public and lawmakers. Since the 1970s, decriminalization and medical marijuana efforts have made a lot of progress, given America's culture of prohibition and the political forces that shaped it in the 1920s and '30s.

Harry J. Anslinger, the nation's first "drug czar," wrote for the American Magazine, using gory, unsubstantiated tales of marijuana-induced murders and racial rhetoric of "colored students partying with [white] female students, smoking marijuana and getting their sympathy with stories of racial persecution" to successfully spearhead the enactment of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Its overriding purpose was not generating revenue, instead it enacted harsh federal penalties for failure to obtain a tax stamp for an already illegal substance. The use of "marihuana" by Mexican migrants, who were flooding the Depression-era job market with cheap labor, allowed southern states to fast-track their deportation on counts of tax evasion.

After professor Timothy Leary, a noted LSD advocate and counterculture icon, successfully challenged the tax act on fifth amendment constitutional grounds, Congress crafted the Controlled Substance Act (CSA) of 1970. In classifying narcotics in a tiered fashion, placed in certain "schedules," substances would be evaluated on their potential for abuse, possible medical applications and general safety in a scientific way. For the most part, this system has worked. Substances such as cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine are correctly placed in the first two, most restrictive schedules for their high potential of abuse, highly physically addictive nature and ease of overdose. But when substances such as MDMA (ecstasy), cannabis and psilocybin are included in the first schedule, it casts doubt on the integrity of the entire system by placing politics before science.

Efforts to reschedule cannabis have been ongoing since 1972, when the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) petitioned the Drug Enforcement Administration to move the substance out of Schedule I so physicians could legally prescribe it. Sixteen years later, the hearings were complete, and then DEA Chief Administrative Law Judge Francis L. Young ruled marijuana no longer qualified as a Schedule I drug. After declaring cannabis to be "one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man," he was roundly ignored by John Law, then-DEA administrator, and overruled.

Despite a multitude of scientific studies showing cannabis's lack of physically addictive properties, medical applications and non-carcinogenic delivery methods such as vaporization, the DEA has clearly shown a staggering lack of movement in properly scheduling this substance. While the agency's official rationale relied on abiding by international treaties and legal acrobatics in parsing the CSA's three criteria for classification, the actual reason likely has to do with increased budgetary appropriations from asset seizures and job expansion for bureaucrats. Whatever the case, the national media failed to address, credit or discredit any such claim.

A sound framework to control narcotics-including marijuana-is already in place. All that needs to done is for the DEA, the Department of Health and Human Services and Congress to put science before politics. On April 3, 2003, the DEA accepted the latest petition to appropriately reschedule cannabis. If all the science is to be acknowledged, the only correct course of action would be to move marijuana to Schedule V, alongside most over-the-counter medications, or remove it from scheduling all together. In the meantime, the media can do a better job informing the public without all the cliches.

Source: Daily Reveille (LA Edu)
Author: Joseph Ruchalaski, Columnist
Published: November 14, 2006
Copyright: 2006, Daily Reveille
Contact: editor@lsureveille.com
Website: http://www.lsureveille.com/

NORML
http://www.norml.org/

CannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #33 posted by global_warming on November 16, 2006 at 05:03:53 PT
re:comment 31
Ok, no strife...

Ocean is a free collection of the World's Religious literature managed by a unique book-centered research engine. http://www.bahai-education.org/ocean/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #32 posted by whig on November 15, 2006 at 17:55:52 PT
Bread
Since this is on-topic of cannabis, I will say that I have made two loaves so far, and a third will be made tonight or tomorrow. It might be twins.

It is on-topic because this is cannabis bread, and I still encourage everyone to make and share their own.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #31 posted by whig on November 15, 2006 at 17:53:50 PT
gw
I want very much to reply to you but I cannot. Please don't be condemnatory to Jews. I do not want religious strife.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #30 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 16:55:54 PT
When you fall asleep
perchance to dream

when you wake up in the morning

can you see?

your place?

Freedom is about Cannabis

Freedom is about the S tars



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #29 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 16:28:25 PT
re: pressing buttons
Buttons so many buttons

There is 1 true freedom

It belongs to the stars

Freedom is the Son of Man'

It is that portal to Eternity



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #28 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 16:22:36 PT
It Is Time
To press some button

To press that button

When you can breathe freely



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #27 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 16:04:33 PT
Hey Whigger
You must be busy baking bread

Filled with yeast and leaven

That you are bringing

To that Table



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #26 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 15:57:55 PT
re: a graceful and defusing answer.
Did not Hope show her face and open the last door?

There is not enough alcohol or cannabis

That can hide from your good eye



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #25 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 15:42:34 PT
You Cannot Type
Or use that typewriter unless you have something to say, lets start with right now.

How many people are in prison for using Cannabis?

Why is it so?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #24 posted by Hope on November 15, 2006 at 15:40:23 PT
gw
What a graceful and defusing answer.

Hat tip to you, my friend.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 15:35:35 PT
Can I Guess ?
Everybody is busy pressing buttons

On that clicker

In that meantime

Do you know anybody in prison?

Do you know anybody who has offended God?

Do you believe in God?

Do you have a Soul?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by global_warming on November 15, 2006 at 15:03:15 PT
Hi Whig
Re: "I will warn you now, if you are going to start with condemning Judaism, I will defend."

Consider me warned.

What aspect of that article bothered you the most?

http://rense.com/general74/conssp.htm



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by afterburner on November 14, 2006 at 21:31:15 PT
Safer, Safest, Benign
then DEA Chief Administrative Law Judge Francis L. Young ruled marijuana no longer qualified as a Schedule I drug. After declaring cannabis to be "one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man,"

Cannabis, "one of the safest"

Even the DEA sometimes speaks the truth.

Rarely, though.

Cannabis, benign!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by BGreen on November 14, 2006 at 21:27:44 PT
Israel has leaders as bad or worse than the USA
Therefore, anybody who supports the illegal and barbarous actions of their leaders is equally guilty of those crimes.

Unfortunately, there are many who cry "anti-semite" whenever somebody criticizes the actions of the State of Israel, but that is inherently untrue and unfair.

There are good and evil people in every race and every religion, but a blanket support of the lies and murder perpetrated by the leaders of Israel can't be allowed, any more than we can continue to allow it in our own country.

The Reverend Bud Green

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by whig on November 14, 2006 at 21:05:35 PT
gw
I will warn you now, if you are going to start with condemning Judaism, I will defend. I was raised as a Reform Jew and if I am a Christian now, it is only a further reformation.

Do not blame the Jews for what the Romans did. The Romans who built churches and pretended to be Christians.

Or if you don't want me to go that way, you should be careful.

The truth is, and this is an important truth, ALL religions are true and perverted depending on the perspective. ALL religions are metaphors for things that are true if understood, or false if misunderstood, and perverted if the false (mis)understanding is taught as true.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by Wayne on November 14, 2006 at 21:04:12 PT
re: FoM #13
Maybe I could enlighten you a bit on coca and poppies...

The only thing I can see that is harmless about them is their relationship to cocaine and heroin. I have smoked raw opium before, and I must say I thought it was VERY pleasant. Opium may have addictive properties for all I know, but I can't imagine it would be nearly as bad as processed heroin. So there you have it. I've only had the chance to try it once, but I REALLY liked it. For me, it was every bit as pleasant as cannabis, but just a different kind of effect. If I had to compare the two, it would be something like this: Cannabis felt like taking off in a helicopter, and opium felt like a smooth landing on a 767. If any of you are curious and get the opportunity, I highly recommend it.

As for coca, I've never tried that one...but my sister has. She is one of the most conservative, loving, God-fearing persons that I know, and has never tried (any other) drugs ever, to my knowledge. But she and her husband went on a mission trip to Peru twice a few years back, and in the morning they would drink coca tea. They were up in very high altitudes, and needed a little 'help' first thing in the morning. She said coca is a more pleasant kick-start than caffeine, but roughly the same effect.

So that's my two cents... and I agree with everyone else whole-heartedly. Based on personal experience, cannabis, coca leaves, and raw opium seem to me to be relatively benign. It's anything man-made (i.e., cocaine, crack, heroin, pharma-poisons) that you need to beware of.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by global_warming on November 14, 2006 at 15:02:34 PT
re: Cindy Sheehan
God Bless Cindy Sheehan,...

"The crowd by the White House gates also included activist Cindy Sheehan and her supporters who were demonstrating nearby and had gathered to observe the incident between “V” and the Secret Service. They let out a cheer as the SS agent stood down and returned the plastic knives."

It aint over folks, it is just beginning.

To "V" http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTP2/UPDATES/Update2006-11-11.htm

If you like dandelions

http://rense.com/general74/DANDI.HTM

Judaism: Conspiracy Against Jews, Humanity?

http://rense.com/general74/conssp.htm

It is happening and it Is Time.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by Toker00 on November 14, 2006 at 10:11:08 PT
#14 Skull and Bones Lip Shake.
Gag. Sorry. Couldn't help it.

This pic needs to be hanging in every Dem's office.

Toke.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by whig on November 14, 2006 at 09:36:33 PT
Lieberman
There will be an accounting, but I could not compose my own thoughts on such a serious matter while still on vacation.

I'd rather listen to music until I am home.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by nuevo mexican on November 14, 2006 at 09:05:49 PT
Victory in Canada!
Found this at Rawstory.com, not typical of their articles, but they posted this great news!

Canada profs win right to smoke pot: http://rawstory.com/showoutarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2006%2FWORLD%2Famericas%2F11%2F13%2Fcanada.professors.reut%2Findex.html

Great news on the elections, time to pressure the Dems to impeach, as that is what it took to impeach Nixon, here is the story on Democracy Now.

The Democrats will respond to overwhelming pressure, as evidence grows and is accumulated on bushcos' murderous criminal cabal of terror, the facts will bear this out, and the Dems will NOT be able to go against the will of the people! If they do, they are history too, and that could well be the case if they turn into 'republican lite' wanna-bes, which they seem to have done since Clinton paved the way, and Hillary continues to do. I will NEVER vote for her, she loves Israel, and is the Repubs favorite, as they know she will do their bidding. Bad Scorpio, her and Pat Buchanan.

Coalition Launches Campaign to Impeach Bush A coalition of anti-war and veterans groups met in Philadelphia on Saturday to announce plans to mobilize a national movement to impeach President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney. A national Impeachment Day has been called for December 10th. Activists are urging grass roots groups to set up impeachment lobbying offices in every congressional district. Speakers on Saturday included Cindy Sheehan whose son Casey died in Iraq.

* Cindy Sheehan: "Right now, at this minute, we have to start calling the offices of John Conyers, Nancy Pelosi, Henry Waxman, Stanley Hoyer, Harry Reid, your congressperson, and start saying, 'We want accountability."

Sheehan criticized the Democratic leadership for saying impeachment is off the table. Meanwhile a new poll from Newsweek has found that President Bush's approval rating has dropped to a new low of 31 percent. democracynow.org

We just had a referendum on bush and the war more than anything else, (other that 'corruption', which both parties are guilty of, such as Joe Lieberman, who I think is a potential predator/pedophile/closet case in love with bush, perhaps he did a sleepover in the White House, anyone know about Joes' 'pecadillos' out there? Jeff Gannon and Joe? He needs to be outed, if he is, remember the bush kiss? That is what I'm thinkin too)!

Try not to gag! http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=bush%2C+lieberman+kiss&btnG=Search+Images bush, lieberman kiss - Google Image Search

Did Lieberman know (like bush), that he would be guaranteed to be re-elected? $400,000 unaccounted for, spent on....what? Read it at Bradblog, in the comments on the article as well as the article itself!

Elections Say the Darndest Things: Lieberman Senate Opponents Receive Exact Same Number of Votes in 2006 as in 2000…

www.bradblog.com Scroll 5 or 6 stories down

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by FoM on November 14, 2006 at 08:47:34 PT
thestales
When it comes to coca or poppies I don't know anything about them. I think that the approach to changing the laws on cannabis because of it being a plant and plants are legal gets stopped because of the coca and poppy issue. No plants should be illegal. They are not made by man or a pharmaceutical company.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by thestales on November 14, 2006 at 08:38:11 PT
I agree with FOM
There is something unholy about restricting peoples access to plants. It is as bad as the salt tax in India that Ghandi took care. If you want to put marinol, morphine and cocaine in schedules, fine. People have a right to plants. Prohibiting access to cannabis, poppy flowers, and coca plants is just insane. maybe potatoes should be next?

In strict medical terms, marijuana is far safer than many of the foods we commonly consume. For example, eating ten raw potatoes can result in a toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough marijuana to induce death.

-- DEA Administrative Law Judge Francis L. Young, 1988

I can't be the only one that sees this hipocracy.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by jasgrave333 on November 14, 2006 at 08:26:06 PT:

Whig; 555 - thanks :D
...cool dat whig; http://cannablog.org/2006/11/13/hurricane-saturn/

left mi thoughts there sah!

" Dat da universal eye-of-the-storm... helluva ting there.

Did you say 555 btw?

I wrote a blog about that; http://jasgrave333.blogspot.com

It turns out that the 5th book, 5th chapter, 5th verse and 5th word of a JW bible is Jehovah - 'I shall prove to be that' 'YHWH'.

Deuteronomy 5:1-33 another CLUe;

http://numerology-in-goverment-555.blogspot.com/2006/11/33.html

The truth is in the numbers, they don't lie... [hifff]

new NEW5

peace and 1 Love whig!

Ja'Son "

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #10 posted by whig on November 14, 2006 at 08:11:21 PT
jasgrave333
Did you see post #555 on cannablog? I know that number meant something to you.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by jasgrave333 on November 14, 2006 at 08:10:16 PT:

Why would they cling to a lie so tenatiously?
For $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$'s greed.

It's a straight cash crop. Up till 1880, taxes in the USA could be paid in ounces and pounds of cannabis.

Money; the substitute for the original green.

Working to free the plant, the herb and Ja's healing cure for nations angst...

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by whig on November 14, 2006 at 08:09:47 PT
Oops
I should have addressed that to FoM.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by whig on November 14, 2006 at 08:09:24 PT
Hope
And then there is Datura, jimsonweed. Perfectly legal. Stupid to play with, perhaps, but there you have it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on November 14, 2006 at 08:01:13 PT
Herbs
Cannabis is an herb, a weed, a flower, a natural substance and since herbs are legal I have never understood how they can make one herb, or weed or flower illegal. We know that poison ivy is well poison but it's legal. Pennyroyal will cause a woman to abort but it's legal. I can understand if it was addicting but it isn't.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by Hope on November 14, 2006 at 07:54:35 PT
Oh no!
Prescription?

No.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by whig on November 14, 2006 at 07:40:28 PT
Schedule V?
I would be glad to see rescheduling as a step along the way, but this would make cannabis still a prescription (not an over-the-counter) pharmaceutical, contrary to the implication of the article.

Cannabis is not a pharmaceutical at all, so this is still an absurdity.

It's a plant.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Hope on November 14, 2006 at 07:26:17 PT
A wonderful and realistic improvement
it would be!

It should have been rescheduled long ago. The government "schedules" are ridiculous and unrealistic as is.

Why would they cling to a lie so tenatiously?

Oh... right... money in their pockets.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on November 14, 2006 at 07:03:35 PT
potpal
I agree!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by potpal on November 14, 2006 at 06:59:49 PT
Schedule V
I'll second that.

Let the truth be told.



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on November 14, 2006 at 06:51:28