Cannabis News The November Coalition
  Smoking Ballots
Posted by CN Staff on October 30, 2006 at 10:21:02 PT
By Nicholas Otis 
Source: Rebel Yell  

cannabis Nevada -- The subject of marijuana has become an issue for public debate in recent years, though its use is not necessarily a recent occurrence. In 2004, 771,605 people were arrested in marijuana-related situations, and many feel that these cases waste law enforcement agents' time that could be spent seeking out more "serious" criminals.

Because of this, politically minded individuals have placed initiatives on ballots to alleviate the situation either by legalizing or regulating it with the government's oversight.

Question 7 attempts to address the problem by regulating the sale of marijuana to persons 21 years of age or older. If passed, marijuana retailers and wholesalers will be required to acquire a license from the Nevada Department of Taxation, and half of the tax revenue earned will be allocated to fund programs that fight alcoholism, tobacco and drug use, while the other half will go into a general fund.

People 21 years of age or older will be legally allowed to possess up to 1 ounce of the substance, and the penalties for operating vehicles while under the influence of marijuana, as well as penalties for the distribution of the drug to a minor, will be increased.

Those in support of the ballot initiative say very bluntly, "Our marijuana laws do not work." The Nevada 2006 ballot guide cites 10,000 marijuana-related arrests in the past three years, and it says that despite state laws, the drug still seems to proliferate.

Supporters advocate a system of regulation and taxation that they see as a "sensible alternative" to the "free-for-all" that the marijuana market is now.

Matthew Hagen, executive director of the UNLV Young Democrats, reinforces this argument saying, "We (Nevadans) spend billions of dollars fighting marijuana use, and it's not worth the money."

He supports Question 7, even though he has stated that he is not a smoker himself. He admits that it is probably "a loss issue between Democrats" as there are different sides on the issue within the party.

President of the UNLV College Republicans, Ciara Turns, said of Question 7, "on the surface, it seems harmless." She agreed that, "obviously the Republican party is encouraging people to vote no," somewhat exemplifying the party penetrating issues involved in Question 7.

The opposition to Question 7 says in the ballot guide, "Nevada police made 460,000 arrests in the last three years; only 2 percent of those were for marijuana," in an effort to counter the argument that state law enforcement programs are wasted.

Their main argument revolves around use by minors, asserting that, "many experts believe legalizing marijuana for adults will likely result in children smoking marijuana as a sign of growing up believing it as a 'badge of adulthood,' much like alcohol and tobacco are today." They reinforce this by providing statistics about the 11 million minors who drink alcohol and the 50 percent of students who have used tobacco products.

They also have said that, "marijuana was involved in more than 215,000 emergency department visits nationwide," and call attention to its health effects, stating, "marijuana contains 50 to 70 percent more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke" and "smoking three to four joints per day causes as much harm to the respiratory system as smoking a full pack of cigarettes a day." Their argument also touches on marijuana users' statistical performance in the workplace, in that their absenteeism and probability for on-the-job accidents is higher than the normal worker.

Those in support claim that marijuana is much safer than already legalized alcohol. The ballot guide reads, "It appears no fatal overdoses from marijuana have ever been recorded, yet alcohol overdoses kill nearly 20,000 Americans annually."

Question 7's opposition says, "claims that we should eliminate marijuana because people use the drug is like saying we should remove laws for theft because people steal." This contrasts Matthew Hagen, who said, "Even Prohibition didn't work."

Many students have admitted that the campaign in support of Question 7 has been run well, and there is a good possibility of passage. Even with that, Ariel Xaubet, a sophomore economics major, said, "If it doesn't pass, something like it will be on the next ballot until it finally passes."

Source: Rebel Yell (Las Vegas, NV Edu)
Author: Nicholas Otis
Published: October 30, 2006
Copyright: 2006 Rebel Yell
Contact: http://tinyurl.com/mnqy2
Website: http://www.unlvrebelyell.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Regulate and Control Marijuana
http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/

Nevadans To Vote on Legalizing Marijuana
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22294.shtml

Mr. Walters Goes To Nevada
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22284.shtml

Clergy Supports Effort To Legalize Marijuana
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22235.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #14 posted by Hope on October 31, 2006 at 09:25:43 PT
Mayan
"We will never give up. NEVER."

Right on!

People should not be abused because they choose to use a plant.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by mayan on October 31, 2006 at 04:06:53 PT
A Matter Of Time
Many students have admitted that the campaign in support of Question 7 has been run well, and there is a good possibility of passage. Even with that, Ariel Xaubet, a sophomore economics major, said, "If it doesn't pass, something like it will be on the next ballot until it finally passes."

We will never give up. NEVER. We will continue the fight to free the most versatile plant on earth until every last square inch of this country has laws which protect those who choose to use cannabis. The prohibitionists are merely wasting time and money and they are slowly beginning to realize that. It is only a matter of time until the world recognizes the infinite potential of the cannabis plant.

THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY IN...

George Bush Admits Demolitions!! http://www.supportthetruth.com/hill.php

Backers hail 9/11 theorist's speech: http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_4572518?source=email

9/11 theorists are either silly or shrewd: http://www.denverpost.com/lifestyles/ci_4543650

Rockefeller Predicted "Event" To Trigger War Eleven Months Before 9/11: http://tinyurl.com/y7rsrm

Dutch News Piece on 9/11 Inside Job (video): http://prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/301006_b_Dutch.htm

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by Hope on October 31, 2006 at 00:38:27 PT
....Uh....
That would be comment 10.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by Hope on October 31, 2006 at 00:37:31 PT
Whig, comment 20
Art lessons.

Sounds like a good deal.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by whig on October 31, 2006 at 00:34:58 PT
Why Berkeley is great
I just found out tonight that I can take art classes at the City College for $20 next year.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by Nausicaa on October 30, 2006 at 23:20:34 PT
Are people so stupid?
"Question 7's opposition says, "claims that we should eliminate marijuana because people use the drug is like saying we should remove laws for theft because people steal." This contrasts Matthew Hagen, who said, "Even Prohibition didn't work." "

Are people really so dimwitted as to not notice the difference between smoking cannabis in the privacy of your own home and the theft of another person's property? It is a laughably idiotic comparison, and one I don't feel I need to explain to the fine folks here who are probably so used to hearing it.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by FoM on October 30, 2006 at 21:38:20 PT
Celaya
The way I see it anymore is the law must be changed on the federal level. I hope we win.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by Celaya on October 30, 2006 at 21:33:23 PT
Then....?
I miss that I'm out of the TV loop - mostly because of Weeds and Bill Maher. I'm just waiting until they release season 2 on DVD. Hopefully, they'll do it for Christmas!

"If passed, marijuana retailers and wholesalers will be required to acquire a license from the Nevada Department of Taxation,"

I hate to be pessimistic, but don't you think that shortly after they register for a license, the DEA will use the license book to schedule their "clean-up" of Nevada?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by Dankhank on October 30, 2006 at 21:04:54 PT
yes ..........
Serious stuff to have to wait for ...

Perhaps they will start it in early 2007

I'll check SHO then turn in ...

Whatta show ...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on October 30, 2006 at 19:26:38 PT
Weeds
I'm going to miss Weeds. It has been a good second season. This last episode was really serious.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on October 30, 2006 at 19:23:56 PT
Dankhank
Wow what an ending. I guess it's coming back for a third season.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Dankhank on October 30, 2006 at 19:21:39 PT
Weeds 2007
Gonna start off with a bang ...

family will win out in the end, I'm sure ...

had my root beer and ice cream, too ...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by Dankhank on October 30, 2006 at 19:06:38 PT
Weeds ...
Gettin' crazy ...

they're mudder funking snakes on the mudder funking plane ...



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by Truth on October 30, 2006 at 13:14:19 PT
"If it doesn't pass, something like it will be on
"If it doesn't pass, something like it will be on the next ballot until it finally passes."

What she said.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on October 30, 2006 at 10:21:02