Cannabis News NORML - It's Time for a Change!
  Group Key Backer of Marijuana Ballot Question
Posted by CN Staff on October 23, 2006 at 06:32:05 PT
By Ed Vogel, Review-Journal Capital Bureau 
Source: Las Vegas Review-Journal 

cannabis Nevada -- Almost $900,000 of the funds for the ballot question to allow adult Nevadans to possess up to an ounce of marijuana was funneled to the state by the Marijuana Policy Project, a national organization whose goal is to legalize marijuana nationwide.

That angers opponents of Question 7, who say Nevada is being used as a "launching pad" for the group's national goals.

[snip]

Source: Las Vegas Review-Journal (NV)
Author: Ed Vogel, Review-Journal Capital Bureau
Published: October 23, 2006
Copyright: 2006 Las Vegas Review-Journal
Contact: letters@reviewjournal.com
Website: http://www.reviewjournal.com

Related Articles & Web Sites:

Marijuana Policy Project
http://www.mpp.org/

Regulate and Control Marijuana
http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/

Nevadans To Vote on Legalizing Marijuana
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22294.shtml

Drug Czar Visits Two States To Slam Pot Initiative
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22277.shtml

Clergy Supports Effort To Legalize Marijuana
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22235.shtml

Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #3 posted by Celaya on October 23, 2006 at 16:04:20 PT
Bigots Look Toward the Feds
Marijuana remains against federal law and Raybuck expects the government will press upon the state to prevent Nevada from becoming a sanctuary for the reefer culture.

Oh, no! The insidious r-e-e-f-e-r c-u-l-t-u-r-e !!!! Never mind about the alcohol culture.

"The federal government won't allow it," he said. "They (Question 7 proponents) are misleading people into thinking they can get legal marijuana. They are promising something that isn't going to happen."

It'll be interesting to see how they try to stop it. Perhaps they won't dare. This is a change whose time has come.

---------------------

Nice letter, Paul.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by whig on October 23, 2006 at 12:08:41 PT
what's todd's damage?
"When they can't get it from pot shops, they will have to get it illegally," Raybuck said.

Which is different from now how?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by paul armentano on October 23, 2006 at 09:07:11 PT
LVRJ: Let Nevada voters decide pot issueLVRJ:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Oct-17-Tue-2006/opinion/10263994.html

Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

LETTERS: Let Nevada voters decide pot issue

To the editor:

Hats off to the Review-Journal for rightly criticizing Drug Czar John Walters' decision to use taxpayers' funds to campaign against Nevada's Question 7 ("Mr. Walters goes to Nevada," Oct. 14). Regardless of whether one favors or disapproves of Question 7, state voters deserve the opportunity to decide this issue free from undue, federally sponsored interference.

John Walters' primary duty, according to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy Web site, is to "evaluate, coordinate, and oversee both the international and domestic anti-drug efforts" of federal agencies, such as the Drug Enforcement Administration. Nowhere is it written in Walters' job description that he is authorized to make criminal law or influence state drug policy.

That duty ought to be left to Nevada's voters and the Legislature, where it belongs.

Paul Armentano

Washington, D.C.

The author is the senior policy analyst of the Washington, D.C.-based National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on October 23, 2006 at 06:32:05