Cannabis News The November Coalition
  NORML's Weekly News Bulletin - September 28, 2006
Posted by CN Staff on September 28, 2006 at 18:45:57 PT
Weekly Press Release 
Source: NORML  

NORML Study Finds No Casual Link Between Marijuana Use And Depression

September 28, 2006 - Baltimore, MD, USA

Baltimore, MD: Marijuana use by adults is not a statistically significant predictor of depression, according to the results of an ongoing longitudinal study to be published in the October issue of the journal Addiction.

Investigators at John Hopkins University in Baltimore and at the Bloomberg School of Public Health in Santa Monica assessed the association between self-reported marijuana use and current depression in 8,759 adults (age range 29-37 years) over a 17-year period. Investigators concluded, "After adjusting carefully for baseline differences between adults who subsequently use marijuana and those who abstain, the significant associations that are initially present between ongoing marijuana use and depression are substantially reduced, if not eliminated."

They added, "The findings reported in this paper suggest that the associations observed between marijuana use and subsequent depression status may be attributable not to continued marijuana use, per se, but to third (common) factors associated with both the decision to use marijuana and to depression."

A separate study co-authored by NORML Advisory Board Member Dr. Mitch Earleywine and published last year in the journal Addictive Behaviors determined that adults who use cannabis report suffering from less severe incidents and/or symptoms of depression than non-users.

"Despite comparable ranges of scores on all depression subscales, those [respondents] who used cannabis once per week or less had less depressed mood, more positive affect, and fewer somatic (physical) complaints than non-users," authors wrote. "These data suggest that adults apparently do not increase their risk for depression by using marijuana."

Commenting on the most recent study, Earleywine said, "This new data is actually markedly stronger than my earlier work because the investigators utilized a large, representative sample and conducted long-term follow up research. If marijuana use caused depression, this design model would have revealed it by showing the development of symptoms in users. There's simply no support for the idea."

For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Senior Policy Analyst, at (202) 483-5500. Full text of the study, "Marijuana use and depression among adults: testing for causal association," appears in the October issue of Addiction. To listen to an interview with Dr. Mitch Earleywine about the study, please download the September 27, 2006 edition of the NORML Audiostash.

DL: http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7059


Oral Pot Spray Aids Glaucoma Patients, Study Says

September 28, 2006 - Oxford, United Kingdom

Oxford, United Kingdom: The oromucosal administration of natural THC extracts temporarily reduces ocular hypertension in glaucoma patients, according to the findings of a pilot study to be published in the October issue of the Journal of Glaucoma.

Six patients diagnosed with ocular hypertension or early primary open angle glaucoma participated in the randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Investigators measured the impact of THC, CBD (cannabidiol), or placebo on patients' intraocular pressure (IOP) following single dose administration. Elevated IOP can cause damage to the optic nerve and is considered to be a leading risk factor for glaucoma.

"Two hours after sublingual administration of 5 mg [of] delta-9-THC, [patients'] IOP was significantly lower than after placebo," investigators found. "[Patients'] IOP returned to baseline level after the 4-hour IOP measurement."

Investigators further reported that a single dosage of CBD had no impact on IOP in low doses (20 mg) while elevating patients' IOP at high doses (40 mg).

Clinical trials performed at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1971 first reported that inhaled cannabis temporarily reduces ocular tension.

An estimated three million Americans suffer from glaucoma, which leads to blindness if left untreated.

For more information, please contact Paul Armentano, NORML Senior Policy Analyst, at (202) 483-5500. Full text of the study, "Effect of sublingual application of cannabinoids on intraocular pressure: a pilot study," appears in the October issue of the Journal of Glaucoma.

DL: http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7060


Canadian Parliament Cuts Medical Marijuana Research Funding

September 28, 2006 - Ottawa, Ontario

Ottawa, Ontario: Federal funding that had been earmarked to pay for clinical research on the therapeutic use of cannabis will no longer be available to investigators, under budget cuts announced this week by Canadian government officials.

The $7.5 million dollar Medical Marijuana Research Program (MMRP) , initially established in 1999, was axed as part of a government proposal to eliminate $2 billion in federal programs. A separate Health Canada program that oversees the production and distribution of medical cannabis to federally authorized patients will remain in place, at least temporarily, despite the cuts. Fewer than 300 Canadian patients are estimated to use cannabis provided by Health Canada due to its reportedly poor quality.

Despite earmarking funding for cannabis research, only one clinical trial investigating marijuana's therapeutic potential was ever approved by Canadian health regulators. That study, which seeks to assess the safety and efficacy of smoked cannabis in chronic pain patients, remains ongoing.

For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director, or Paul Armentano, NORML Senior Policy Analyst, at (202) 483-5500.

DL: http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7061

Source: NORML Foundation (DC)
Published: September 28, 2006
Copyright: 2006 NORML
Contact: norml@norml.org
Website: http://www.norml.org/

CannabisNews NORML Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/NORML.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #27 posted by Hope on September 30, 2006 at 05:32:03 PT
:0) Sensimilla Jones
You're on a roll!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #26 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on September 29, 2006 at 22:14:49 PT
Hope, FoM - Please, no applause....

...just throw money.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #25 posted by Hope on September 29, 2006 at 20:18:10 PT
I think about it...
and I laugh again.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #24 posted by Hope on September 29, 2006 at 20:17:10 PT
Thou shalt have no chocolate before me.
That is hilareous.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #23 posted by FoM on September 29, 2006 at 10:20:45 PT
Sinsemilla Jones
Thou shalt have no chocolate before me. Too much!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #22 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on September 29, 2006 at 09:37:09 PT
FoM - "idol calories" - lol
Sugar, ah, honey, honey

You are my candy girl

And you got me wanting you

(to think of all the good lyrics I've thought of posting...)

Anyway, I think it's in Deuteronomy, "Thou shalt have no chocolate before me," which just means God gets the first bite. Um, maybe that's Deuterwonkamy.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by Wayne on September 29, 2006 at 05:31:24 PT
what is the world coming to??
Why are we bickering about trans-fat? There are so many harmful substances in food today, we couldn't begin to eliminate them even if we wanted to. Let's ban red dye #40, saccharin, and high-fructose corn syrup while we're at it. Maybe we could put all those food manufacturers in jail with the poor cannabis users, and let more burglars and rapists go free. Oops, maybe I should keep it down...we don't want anyone in power getting any ideas.

It's funny that the feds would have the audacity to create legislation regarding trans fat, when we haven't even cured AIDS and cancer yet. Yet again, education is the way to go on this, not legislation. Let's quit making stupid laws, people, and start using our brains...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by mayan on September 29, 2006 at 04:00:42 PT
Nanny State
Federal trans-fat plan best: Officials http://tinyurl.com/m2zzj

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #19 posted by whig on September 28, 2006 at 23:58:42 PT
Goodnight
Goodnight FoM

Goodnight Hope

Goodnight Moon

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 22:34:55 PT
:0)
Goodnight, FoM.

Goodnight, Whig.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 22:33:29 PT
I'll run over to Cannablog
and see what he says before I shut down.

I can't eat much sugar or carbs at all. They make me swell up. I don't mean just fat either. It's weird.

Ah...this hasn't posted yet. I tried to make a coherant post over at Cannablog...but I finally gave up. Perhaps tomorrow or tomorrow evening I can respond. I'd like to post the driving studies...but am just too tired to find them. You'll probably get that done before I get back online.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by FoM on September 28, 2006 at 22:22:50 PT
Hope, Whig and Everyone
I'm calling it a day too. Talk with you tomorrow if God is willin' and the creek don't rise.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #15 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 22:17:11 PT
Didn't mean to troll through with a twinkie...
but I have to hit the sack. Got a big day tomorrow so I better get some rest.

Good night, friends.

Tasty Kakes are good...so are Hostess cupcakes...but those marshmallowy covered things...Snowballs....ooohhh...they feel so creepy, like they're alive or something.

:0)

Goodnight, anyway.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by whig on September 28, 2006 at 22:16:52 PT
Hope
There's more from Dr. Tam but it was in moderation and I just noticed it and approved it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #13 posted by FoM on September 28, 2006 at 22:16:46 PT
Whig and Hope
I like Hostess too. We can't get Tastkakes out here. We can't get Philly Cheese Steaks either. Maybe it's best we moved from Pa or I probably would have eaten myself into oblivion with food like that around.

Hope, All kidding aside sugar in large amounts isn't good. It has so many idol calories too.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 22:13:07 PT
Actually...
my twinkie was no ordinary twinkie.

It was a red velvet twinkie. Ran on to them accidentally in the grocery store yesterday. Couldn't resist giving it a try. Wasn't overly sweet actually.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 22:10:32 PT
I'm not a sugar fan...
my children still give me hassles about how I deprived them of sugar because I was a health food nut.

It all just gives me the feeling of a dangerous Nanny State closing in.

Of course, no one's ready to put kids into rehab programs over sugar consumption...I hope...but who knows what's next.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by whig on September 28, 2006 at 22:07:19 PT
FoM
I liked Hostess Cup Cakes.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on September 28, 2006 at 22:06:31 PT
Twinkie
I never understood what was so good about a Twinkie. I grew up on Tastykakes. Those were to die for! LOL!

http://www.tastykake.com/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by whig on September 28, 2006 at 22:04:50 PT
Summarized
http://cannablog.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/cannabis-treats-depression/

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 22:03:41 PT
Maybe, though...
it will just be full sugar soft drinks that are banned.

Ooops...they're already doing that in schools though.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on September 28, 2006 at 22:03:22 PT
Hope
That's interesting.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 21:56:11 PT
Must have been that
Twinkie.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 21:54:58 PT
Sorry
Should have visited Tiny URL. Didn't notice in time.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Hope on September 28, 2006 at 21:53:47 PT
Sugar linked with mental problems in Norway study
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=healthNews&storyid=2006-09-28T204517Z_01_N28374556_RTRUKOC_0_US-SUGAR.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

Sugar Prohibition next?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by whig on September 28, 2006 at 21:30:52 PT
typo in press release
"Casual" should be "Causal"

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by ekim on September 28, 2006 at 19:37:16 PT
tax and regulate
that will more then make up for the

The $7.5 million dollar Medical Marijuana Research Program (MMRP)

Canada o Canada you have been growing Hemp since 96 ---

Our Ex. Cia Dir. James Woolsey has said that the new Tech in Cellulose Ethanol is here and you in Canada will have its first Plant up and running.

Just last week on our History Ch here in the USA we heard from our National Renewable Energy Lab. In Golden CO. where the develoment of these new feed stocks have been taking place. The researcher said that one acre of SwitchGrass will yeild 1,150 gals. of Ethanol. With the cost of the enzymes at 25 cents a gal.

Canada how many tons of Hemp do you grow, how does that match up with the N.R.E.L figures for switchgrass and how many tons per acre are they counting.

Canada you are using Hemp for car parts -- food-- feed stock -- plastic -- soon Ethanol --- \

Dont let your most needy go with out medicen only to have to Buy a spray that you must import.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on September 28, 2006 at 18:45:57