Cannabis News Protecting Patients Access to Medical Marijuana
  Nelson, Others Cited for Drugs
Posted by CN Staff on September 19, 2006 at 12:01:12 PT
By Richard Burgess, Acadiana Bureau  
Source: Advocate 

cannabis Lafayette, LA -- Country music singer-songwriter Willie Nelson was cited on drug counts in St. Martin Parish after a traffic stop of his tour bus Monday allegedly yielded more than a pound of marijuana and a bag of psychedelic mushrooms.

Nelson, 73, and four others traveling with him face misdemeanor charges of possession of Schedule I drugs, State Police spokesman Trooper Willie Williams said.

Williams said officers found 1 1/2 pounds of marijuana and two-tenths of a pound of hallucinogenic mushrooms on the tour bus during a traffic stop for a commercial vehicle inspection on Interstate 10 westbound near Breaux Bridge.

“When the door was opened and the trooper began to speak to the driver, he smelled the strong odor of marijuana in the bus,” State Police said in a news release.

The amount of drugs allegedly found could have resulted in felony drug counts, but Williams said the marijuana was considered for personal use “because all of the people on the bus claimed possession of it.”

St. Martin Parish prosecutor Chester Cedars said the marijuana was allegedly found stashed in locations throughout the tour bus, giving credence to the Nelson entourage’s argument the drugs were only for personal use.

Asked if he was surprised to learn Monday morning about the notable traffic stop, Cedars said, “Nothing surprises me any more,” but added, “I don’t think anyone was surprised.”

Snipped:

Complete Article: http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/3950151.html

Source: Advocate, The (Baton Rouge, LA)
Author: Richard Burgess, Acadiana Bureau
Published: September 19, 2006
Copyright: 2006 The Advocate, Capital City Press
Contact: http://tinyurl.com/e7qlj
Website: http://www.theadvocate.com/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

NORML
http://www.norml.org/

Willie Nelson
http://www.willienelson.com/

Willie Nelson Cited for Marijuana Possession
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22174.shtml

CannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #43 posted by FoM on September 20, 2006 at 08:47:27 PT
New York Daily News: When High is a New Low
Celeb drug use can be a real bummer.

Septeber 20, 2006

We media folks have always had a terrible time figuring out exactly how funny we should find celebrity drug use. When Willie Nelson gets busted for marijuana, as he did Monday, it's a pure gift to late-night TV and morning radio shows.

Hosts like WFAN's Imus chuckle even before they begin, correctly pointing out that finding weed on Willie Nelson's bus is about as startling as finding olive oil in Rachael Ray's kitchen.

Everyone has a good laugh and we move on.

It's been years since anyone in the media expressed the slightest surprise about a Paul McCartney or Snoop Dogg popping up in a story about marijuana, because talking nice about pot and occasionally getting busted for it is one of the things they do, a part of their celebrity job description.

Snipped:

Complete Article: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/453881p-381938c.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #42 posted by Had Enough on September 20, 2006 at 08:35:15 PT
a rarity for Saint Martin Parish District Attorney
Having all five claim the drugs for themselves is a rarity for Saint Martin Parish District Attorney Chester Cedars. He says his office will decide whether to upgrade the charges to felonies or further downgrade them -- based on evidence provided by the trooper.

His office will decide weather to upgrade/downgrade the charges based on the evidence provided by the trooper.

Hhmm

The trooper has already provided the evidence. FoM has even posted a picture of it, and I’m sure others have posted that picture for the world to see.

This guy is spinning already.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #41 posted by FoM on September 20, 2006 at 08:35:12 PT
Had Enough
I agree if this goes to a jury trial it could really change the laws faster then the pace we are going. He is 73 years old so if he plea bargains I sure would understand.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #40 posted by Had Enough on September 20, 2006 at 08:22:03 PT
Showdown
Willie needs to go all the way with this.

The State Police know they stepped in something smelly here. They don’t want to let the genie out of the bottle, but I think they know that it might be too late.

No matter weather he is slapped on the wrist, or prosecuted to the max, the enforcers will not look good in the eye of the public. This might be the straw that breaks the camels back.

Now if they prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law, they will have a public relations issue, and if they just allow just a slap on the wrist with preferential preference, they will still face public scrutiny. They are between a rock and a hard place.

I’ll bet the Louisiana State Police, DA too, deep down inside wish this wouldn’t have happened, and would like it to just go away.

Willie has enough fame and fortune to deal with this. The laws could very well be changed soon if he handles this properly. This could be it, or at least accelerate the process.

Willie, Just do it.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #39 posted by BGreen on September 20, 2006 at 07:45:24 PT
Talk about political suicide
Willie Nelson is loved and adored by countless millions of people worldwide.

Lawyers are despised and distrusted by countless millions of people worldwide.

There's not a jury in this country that would convict Willie in a trial. Willie needs to demand a jury trial if they want to try and take away his freedom.

The Reverend Bud Green

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #38 posted by FoM on September 20, 2006 at 07:39:40 PT
Way To Go Again Stan White
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/19/AR2006091901549.html

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #37 posted by FoM on September 20, 2006 at 07:29:13 PT
Prosecutor: Nelson Case To Be Handled Like Others

September 20, 2006

ST. MARTINVILLE, La. -- Willie Nelson could receive more than misdemeanor drug charges from his run-in with Louisiana state police -- that is, if a local prosecutor finds reason to upgrade the charges.

Louisiana state police stopped Nelson's tour bus early Monday on Interstate Ten near Breaux (BROH') Bridge, Louisiana. Inside, a trooper allegedly found a pound-and-a-half of marijuana and two-tenths of a pound of psychedelic mushrooms, which are felony narcotics if pure.

Five people, including the 73-year-old Nelson, were issued misdemeanor simple possession charges for the drugs. That's after all five allegedly claimed the drugs were for personal use. None of those involved were arrested.

Having all five claim the drugs for themselves is a rarity for Saint Martin Parish District Attorney Chester Cedars. He says his office will decide whether to upgrade the charges to a felonies or further downgrade them -- based on evidence provided by the trooper.

Cedars says his office could be ready to move on the case within 30 to 45 days.

The 73-year-old Nelson performed in Montgomery Sunday during a birthday celebration for the late Hank Williams.

Copyright 2006 Associated Press

http://www.wtvm.com/Global/story.asp?S=5432826&nav=8fap

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #36 posted by FoM on September 20, 2006 at 07:21:37 PT
Willie
I don't like Toby Keith because he is a Bush type person. Anymore that is an instant turn off to me. I never heard any of his music except the song about smoking with Willie but I never listen to country and western type music either. I laughed during the interview but it did scare me because it was so straight forward. Maybe this Toby dude will change his thinking a little since BGreen says he is a friend of Willie Nelson.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #35 posted by Dankhank on September 20, 2006 at 07:09:13 PT
Willie
BGreen is right.

Toby "narcing" is accurate as far as it goes, but really not the issue. The "smoked with willie" song has been around for a while.

I harbor no ill will for that or the interview where he "outed" the bus.

It is indeed the heinous law that is the culprit.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #34 posted by goneposthole on September 20, 2006 at 06:41:31 PT
I sure hope
That the authorities return that pound and a half of the cannabis that was confiscated from Willie.

The IRS grabbed about sixteen million dollars from Willie a few years ago.

The US gubbermint can't find Osama, but they know where Willie hangs out.

They know where the money is too. Willie Sutton would be envious of the IRS.

He has paid his dues. Give him a break this time.

You know what they say: Dope in times of no money...

It makes no sense anymore. Sexual predators are placed in neighborhoods and that's ok.

Somebody who wants to enjoy some cannabis gets jail time.

Unbelievable.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #33 posted by BGreen on September 20, 2006 at 05:55:29 PT
I'm not a big Toby Keith fan
However, Toby is a friend of Willie's and since a friend of mine is also a friend of Willie's I have to weigh in.

Toby hasn't said anything about Willie that Willie didn't want him to. Toby wrote the song "Smoke Weed With Willie" which basically told the whole story.

Everybody knew Willie smoked cannabis and it doesn't take a genius to figure out that there was probably cannabis on his bus since he basically lives in it year round.

The thing is that most cops look the other way BECAUSE it's Willie Nelson. That kind of cannabis freedom isn't really fair to the rest of us and is probably a good reason why Willie isn't even more vocal about the devastating effects of cannabis prohibition on his friends and Family (and Mrs. Green and I are honorary Family members.)

Let's channel our righteous anger towards the correct target, which is the government and the law enforcement clowns.

The Reverend Bud Green

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #32 posted by mayan on September 20, 2006 at 05:53:51 PT
Misc.
Proponents of legal pot say foes blowing smoke: http://www.chieftain.com/metro/1158749624/21

Marijuana activist criticizes vote: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Sep-20-Wed-2006/news/9756474.html

Marijuana initiative faces heavy opposition, poll shows: http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060920/NEWS10/609200346/1016/NEWS



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #31 posted by Hope on September 19, 2006 at 21:45:24 PT
The Honeysuckle Rose
I wouldn't be surprised if they don't try to seize her yet.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #30 posted by Hope on September 19, 2006 at 21:44:01 PT
Guess now, Mark Souder
can pin a little nasty "narc" medal on Toby Keith's chest at some sort of sicko narco celebration.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #29 posted by nuevo mexican on September 19, 2006 at 21:32:51 PT
I caught that, when I watched the posted video!
Yes, Toby Keith narced on Willie, if you watch the video from the Colbert Report, he goes Waaaaay overboard, obviously oblivious to the fact that if you make a HUGE deal about Willies' being an out of the closet smoker, and go into major detail about the bus, something would likely happen!

And it did!

I do think it's for the best, as it exposes the danger of alcoholics' outing smokers, since they can drink gallons of 151, and stock cases of bud in their garages til the moon goes down.....with no consequences unless you're the drunk driver!

Minimize the harm of alcholhol, since we accept this as part of the sacrifice we make to indulge in enriching our special booze manufacturers, with societys' added glorification to take away the pain of all those deadly car accidents.... and people like Toby to make Cannabis look like the bad guy.

If Toby was a cannabis smoker, does anyone think he would've gone so far off the deep end making fun of Willie, and putting his right to privacy in jeopardy?

Looking forward to Tobys' Karmic return!

Redneck, bush licking, war loving Toby!

May Willies' record sales skyrocket, and Toby continue his Whiskey sloberin', good ole boy ways!

Right into the toilet Toby, like you didn't know you'd get him busted!

Maybe Stephen Colbert can point out where Tobys' favorite watering hole is, or next concert, so the boys in blue can stalk Toby knowing he's a drunk, looking for a shot after the show.

For some reason, you know THAT'S NOT going to happen.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #28 posted by Hope on September 19, 2006 at 21:25:11 PT
Toby Keith on Colbert Report.
I downloaded that thing from youtube yesterday and never got a chance to watch it all day, and just decided not to watch it before I went to bed since everyone thought it was arrogant and irritating anyway.

That's really something to be proud of, isn't it? Narcing, insulting, embarrassing, or busting Willie Nelson.

I'm thinking..."Arsenio, who?"

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #27 posted by Hope on September 19, 2006 at 21:21:28 PT
Comment 25
He was "breastfed"?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #26 posted by FoM on September 19, 2006 at 21:14:08 PT
Toby Keith
What Toby Keith said on the Colbert Report was funny but I also wondered if it could hurt Willie. Yes, he did Narc on Willie.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #25 posted by goneposthole on September 19, 2006 at 21:06:39 PT
Yellowstone
Haven't been there in twenty years. You gotta love it.

Rocky Mountain High... Colorado

Cannabis might as well be legal in Colorada, it is a groovy place.

Can't we all just get along?

Willie Nelson has written over seven hundred songs.

I don't think any of them has harmed anybody... ever.

It's time for the US government to face the music.

Cannabis prohibition can be over in a heartbeat. It's that simple. End it, the earth will breathe a sigh of relief.

It has all become too much. It has gone beyond the pale.

If you want real relief, smoke cannabis. All of those pharmaceuticals that are legal won't do it.

How surprised are the hapless Republicans going to be when the first Tuesday in November comes to an end?

If the election isn't rigged, the Republicans are toast.

Willie Nelson is a national treasure. If you remember, he smoked a joint on the roof of the White House while Carter was President. The last decent president the US gov had. He was also breast fed.

Old Faithful represents the American spirit moreso than the current crop of politicians that inhabit the District of Columbia.

If they would only be faithful to themselves and the Constitution, we'd have something worth having.

"To thine own self be true" - Socrates

Willie Nelson is. He's himself at all times. He can't pretend to be somebody else. Let him go, he ain't hurtin' nobody.

Don't feed the bears or the politicians in Washington. They never get enough.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #24 posted by Dankhank on September 19, 2006 at 20:52:41 PT
and ...
it refered to the show Toby did the other day, talking about Willie's bus ...

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #23 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 20:52:37 PT
Hope
Toby Keith was on Colbert last week, and he narc'ed Willie's bus on the air, so it wasn't even an accusation, just an observation. He did it and he thought it was funny, I guess. But it's one thing that everyone might suspect that Willie has pot on his bus, it's another thing for someone to come out and openly say so on national television, which made it notorious.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #22 posted by Dankhank on September 19, 2006 at 20:51:42 PT
Colbert
Colbert show was amazing tonight ...

yes he said Toby narked on Willie ...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by Hope on September 19, 2006 at 20:47:49 PT
Whig, Comment 19
Colbert really said that?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #20 posted by Hope on September 19, 2006 at 20:46:53 PT
"cure meanness"?
Goneposthole, comment 10.

"It was used by Hopi medicine men to cure meanness."

Wow!

I wonder if it "cured" them by killing them?

That would work, I guess.

If it didn't work that way, but actually healed something in the brain...they ought to be offering the tea in the prisons...and to some members of congress.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 20:42:32 PT
Colbert is right
Toby Keith really narc'ed on Willie's bus.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #18 posted by FoM on September 19, 2006 at 19:55:32 PT
CBS4 Denver News Report
Pot Supporters Want Initiative Passed Statewide

***

By Terry Jessup, Reporting

September 19, 2006

Supporters of the marijuana initiative took to the State Capitol to get more supporters and argue that pot is far less harmful than alcohol.

After the success of the Denver pot initiative, which surprised a lot of people, they figured they have a decent chance of getting this passed statewide. Amendment 44 would make it legal for people of drinking age to possess an ounce or less of pot.

"I can imagine what we look like," said Jessica Peck Corry. "We're probably the last group of people you would expect to be supporting marijuana legalization."

Article and Video: http://cbs4denver.com/politics/local_story_262221322.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by The GCW on September 19, 2006 at 18:24:25 PT
From Sensible Colorado <info@sensiblecolorado.org>
Check out Sensible Colorado on TV tonight! SensiCo's legal work on the I-100 "Test Case" of Damien LaGoy will be featured on Channel 4 News tonight (Tuesday the 19th) at 10pm. To read more about Sensible Colorado's groundbreaking advocacy on behalf of this victim of the War on Marijuana see:

http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_3656809

If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online.

Sensible Colorado

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by mayan on September 19, 2006 at 18:20:35 PT
Nevada
From the article FoM posted in comment #15...

In fact, the state sued to have Question 7 taken off the ballot earlier this year and Levine and his organization took them to court and won.

The Clark County Commission has stepped way out of bounds! They are using the Nevada taxpayer's money to illegally tell those taxpayer's what they can and can't vote on? This will backfire also.

THE WAY OUT...

Five Years Later: The Official Story Falls Apart: http://911blogger.com/node/3027

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by FoM on September 19, 2006 at 17:51:36 PT
Nevada: Article from WorldNow and KLAS
Legalizing Marijuana in Nevada Just Became More Complicated

***

By Ashanti Blaize, Reporter

September 19, 2006

The Clark County Commission is now facing legal action after voting Tuesday to oppose a November ballot question involving the decriminalization of marijuana.

The Committee to Regulate and Control Marijuana announced the legal action at the Clark County Commission meeting. The organization says the county commissioners are violating state law just by talking about that ballot question, let alone voting on it.

In the next 24 hours, the organization says the attorney general's office will hear about it.

For the last 3-and-a-half years, Neal Levine has been fighting the state of Nevada with one goal in mind.

Levine said, "Our laws are a complete failure. They do not work. Anyone who wants to smoke marijuana currently can. So, are we going to keep ignoring that and funding the activities of violent gangs and drug dealers, or are we going to be sensible about it and put some sensible safeguards on the sale of marijuana."

Levine thought his organization, the Committee to Regulate & Control Marijuana, was finally seeing some progress in its battle in the form of a ballot question.

"Question 7 is an initiative on the ballot this November that would pull marijuana out of the criminal market and put it into a tightly regulated controlled and taxed market" said Levine.

That progress hit a wall when Levine and his organization learned the Clark County Commission would discuss and vote on question 7, and whether they believed it should even be on the November ballot.

Levine, backed by dozens of supporters and armed with a lesson in Nevada state law, decided to show up at county commissioner meeting.

During the meeting, Levine told the commissioners "to continue what you are doing here today certainly flies in the face of Nevada law."

Levine continued, "The only exception for a public official on the public dime supporting or closing a ballot initiative is in a debate setting where both sides are equally represented and that most certainly wasn't that."

Now Levine will take his battle all the way to the attorney general's office, hoping voters, rather than the County Commission have the final say on whether Levine wins his battle to legalize marijuana.

The Clark County Commission's attorney says she doesn't believe the commissioners broke any law by voting on ballot question 7, and neither did any of the commissioners, but Levine says he's taken legal action against the state before in a similar case.

In fact, the state sued to have Question 7 taken off the ballot earlier this year and Levine and his organization took them to court and won.

Send feedback to reporter Ashanti Blaize at ablaize@klastv.com

Copyright 2000 - 2006 WorldNow and KLAS

http://www.klas-tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=5430730

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by FoM on September 19, 2006 at 17:34:07 PT
Whig
Most states don't allow Cannabis at all. I would never recommend it for that reason. What we say can be used against us or someone else. Trying to change the laws won't get anyone in trouble at least until they make a law that working for change is illegal. Hopefully that won't happen.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #13 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 17:28:15 PT
FoM
Can I recommend cannabis if it is illegal?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 17:24:13 PT
goneposthole
Socrates was given hemlock to drink, to kill him. It is a powerful poison.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #11 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 17:21:15 PT
FoM
Sorry, I wasn't trying to endorse it, but I do think we should be able to say something about it in defense of people like Willie who could be jailed for possession of mushrooms too. I am focused on cannabis, but I believe that no plant should be criminalized.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #10 posted by goneposthole on September 19, 2006 at 17:15:18 PT
that's right
Do not use Jimson Weed without knowledge of what to do.

It will kill you. Although, one person who tried it ingested an amount that I was aghast as to how much it was. I was taken aback that they didn't have some sort of near death experience.

It was used by Hopi medicine men to cure meanness.

A very powerful medicine, indeed.

Don't try it for grins and giggles, it's not that kind of plant.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on September 19, 2006 at 17:07:51 PT
Whig
We shouldn't recommend illegal substances on a public forum. If someone takes a substance and something would happen to them that would be very bad. We really are here to help change the laws on cannabis.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 17:05:18 PT
goneposthole
Jimson weed is very toxic, and I would not recommend it for anyone. I am not saying this to be disagreeable, but to warn others who may read your description as a recommendation.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by goneposthole on September 19, 2006 at 17:02:35 PT
whig
Have you ever tasted absinthe leaves? Very bitter, acrid taste. You can't stomach the taste.

Also, there is a plant called water hemlock. It has a flanged petiole like celery. They have a taste that isn't offensive. It looks similar to a celery stalk. If you eat a few leaves or the stalk, you will be dead in a couple of hours.

It grows everywhere. You must be careful of what you eat. Some of God's plants will kill you.

Just for your edification.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on September 19, 2006 at 17:00:28 PT
Mushrooms
Back in the 70s we tried mushrooms one time and never again. They were milder then LSD but once was enough. Cannabis is way different. Cannabis doesn't pack that type of a wallop.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 16:56:16 PT
Also
Mushrooms are sacred to me too.

So are other things, whether or not I use them.

Peyote is sacred.

Probably a lot of things. Don't condemn what God provides.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by goneposthole on September 19, 2006 at 16:50:39 PT
just don't like them
It has been more than thirty years ago now when I first tried mushrooms.

They were very dry. I didn't really understand why someone would try a 'substance' that didn't taste very good, was difficult to ingest, and even more difficult to digest. They also made me nauseous.

I have never had any desire to try mushrooms since then.

Maybe they were just bad. I don't know, but I just didn't like them. I didn't feel in control.

I have tried Jimson Weed, an extremely powerful alkaloid, and I felt more in control of my being.

Not everybody likes mushrooms or must.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by whig on September 19, 2006 at 16:46:10 PT
mushrooms
Very nice, painkillers too. Real good ones. Take a dose once a week, and you're fine.

Bit of a strong experience for me and too distorting, or at least it was, but I was in a lot of pain then, much more than I am now. Cannabis wouldn't have been enough, never was when I tried it. Psilocybian mushrooms (or P. mexicana sclerotia) were the best of the best of all painkillers I've ever seen.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by Max Flowers on September 19, 2006 at 16:32:13 PT
goneposthole
I'm curious as to why you say you "hate" mushrooms. That is a very strong statement. It sounds like you must have had a very bad experience with them, which basically means that you had a bad experience with your own mind. Psychedelics usually only give people a bad experience if they are unprepared to see what the psychedelic experience shows them. They basically just magnify what is already there.

I'll try to help you understand why people want to use them. To start with, humans have craved psychedelic experiences since the dawn of time. It's actually the same thing that you crave when you smoke cannabis, but cannabis gives a much less intense version. To suspend the ego for a short while and have a feeling of bliss and oneness with the universe (kooky as that may sound) is a pretty darn strong draw. Temporarily removing the filter of day-to-day consciousness with its attendant neuroses and fears is a pretty special thing also. For a lot of people, it is a form of religious experience (me included). But it is only very infrequently that I go there, I'd even say very rarely. For Willie and the crew, it sounds like it is more of a recreational thing, which I don't recommend or believe in, but oh well (although we can't actually know this for sure---they may take it very seriously for all we know).

If you're willing to share, it would be interesting to hear what happened that caused you to come to hate them. I also wonder whether someone didn't give you something really toxic and dissociative like Amanita muscaria and tell you they were "shrooms." Are you quite sure they were psilocybes?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by goneposthole on September 19, 2006 at 13:05:05 PT
What a surprise!
What surprises even a dullard like me is that this silly bidness of arresting cannabis imbibers continues to this day.

Leave cannabis alone. Leave cannabis imbibers alone.

I hate psychedelic mushrooms and never could understand why people want to use them. I tried them once and never again.

I'd rather eat worms.

Smoke cannabis instead.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on September 19, 2006 at 12:01:12