Cannabis News Students for Sensible Drug Policy
  'Weeds' Grows an Alluring Plot
Posted by CN Staff on August 14, 2006 at 07:41:28 PT
By Chuck Barney  
Source: Contra Costa Times 

cannabis California -- The Partnership for a Drug-Free America will never place its stamp of approval on "Weeds," Showtime's dark suburban satire about a pot-dealing soccer mom. But no matter. There are some of us who recognize an extraordinary TV effort when we see one and are eager to embrace another season of reefer madness.

Over its initial 10-episode offering, "Weeds" steadily evolved from a jaw-dropping curiosity into a hilarious, full-blooded show, pulling off a remarkable feat in the process. It delivered to viewers an outlandish plot device -- desperate widow Nancy Botwin (Mary-Louise Parker) peddles baggies of dope to support her two boys -- and a flawed lead character worthy of some scorn.

But instead of turning our backs on Nancy, we sympathize with, and even relate to, her. That we do is testament to some clever writing and Parker's nimble performance. With those wide, expressive eyes, toothy grin and subtly playful demeanor, she somehow manages to be amoral, yet appealing.

When we last saw Nancy, she was trying (and failing) to squelch her growing attraction to single dad Peter (Martin Donovan), her new boyfriend.

After having sex with him at his place, she made the startling discovery that he's a Drug Enforcement Administration agent and, quite understandably, she freaked out.

Through the first few episodes of Season 2, that relationship takes some fun and unexpected twists. Meanwhile, Nancy's formerly modest start-up business is blooming into a full-bodied partnership with several male potheads in their lifeless town of ticky-tacky boxes.

The burgeoning enterprise not only raises the stakes for Nancy, it presents viewers with a thorny dilemma. In her devastating early stages of widowhood, we could condone some small-scale transgressions. But now, rather than being manipulated by circumstances, Nancy is doing the manipulating -- while also possibly putting her children at risk. Thus, it becomes increasingly difficult to see her through sympathetic eyes.

To their credit, the show's writers don't let her off the hook so easily. When, for example, Nancy admonishes her older son after he experiments with Ecstasy for the first time, he rips into her and calls her a "big hypocrite." The remark leaves Nancy reeling, mainly because she knows she has no defense.

Of course, "Weeds" wouldn't be such a triumph if it were only about the drugs. More significant is the wide array of resonant life experiences it presents: the daily hardships and challenges of parenting, the agonizing recovery from the death of a spouse, the awkward re-entry into the world of dating. The show, bolstered by a wonderful cast that includes Emmy nominee Elizabeth Perkins and Kevin Nealon, deftly delves into all of this and more with insight and humor.

Along the way, it continues to serve up a stinging indictment of American materialism. After all, the weary and conflicted Nancy easily could have chosen to downsize her life or even hawk Mary Kay cosmetics. Instead, she's dealing the green in a reckless effort to generate higher profits and hang onto her stucco McMansion, her cranky maid and that gleaming SUV.

Now, if there were only a successful 12-step program to deal with that kind of addiction.

Chuck Barney is the Times TV critic.

SEASON DEBUT

• WHAT: "Weeds"

• WHEN: 10 tonight (with multiple plays during the week)

• WHERE: Showtime

• GRADE: B+

Source: Contra Costa Times (CA)
Author: Chuck Barney
Published: August 14, 2006
Copyright: 2006 Knight Ridder
Contact: letters@cctimes.com
Website: http://www.contracostatimes.com/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

Showtime's Weeds
http://www.sho.com/site/weeds/

Weeds Music
http://www.sho.com/site/weeds/music.do

Weeds on MySpace.com
http://www.myspace.com/weedsonshowtime

Find a Way To Watch Showtime's 'Weeds'
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22066.shtml

Wild Doings in Gated America
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread22065.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #47 posted by greenmed on August 14, 2006 at 16:16:45 PT
whig
What is the status of medical cannabis ID cards in CA these days? Are all cities and counties free to decide for themselves whether to issue cards, or are they required by state law to issue them (and then possibly wiggle out of that some how)?

Also, do you have a feel for how your fellow activists, patients and caregivers would accept a state-wide ID card?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #46 posted by rchandar on August 14, 2006 at 15:58:39 PT:

g_w
it's alright--

only about 100 million people in this country share your status. what I wonder about is, when they decide to lock up all 100 million, what rhetoric they will use in calling this a "democracy" with "freedom."



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #45 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 15:38:01 PT
g_w
I been 'illegal' for so long, I laugh at the concept.

from a song of mine "Dead Religions"

"...what fool clings to blindness once he's been allowed to see?"

peace be to you bro.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #44 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 15:30:39 PT
hey mm
you know praying in public is illegal,

I love You and may God Love You,

In Eternity and Forever.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #43 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 15:20:47 PT
a couple more numbers
#6. All of the above (we are all in this together)

or

#7. None of the above (I don't subscrine to those points of view)

maybe

#8. na..that's enough.

Yes, I tend to agree that the next manifestation of 'messianic presence' will be of the collective, and certainly those who have erroneously claimed to have possesed it (the religions and the 'church.' There are many religions that worship all manner of falseness, let us not be confused) will undoubtedly be surprised to learn the truth, and it will undoubtedly come at high cost, just as it is currently being 'waged'.

Ah it is terrible to concieve, and the rank darkness and ignorance that is prevalent in the current collective consciousness, is unbearable to see in contrast to the embryonic possiblities of another way. The constant tramp of the war drum in every waking moment is a truly angering thing. Makes one want to go to war it does.

That is the purpose of the rythm, and the grand distractions - to push the masses in any direction exccept the one they need to go.

That redneck down the street that would shoot me just 'cause of my hair desn't need my anger, though without understanding I would hate the man, and all he stands for - just like he does me. But though it's hard to do, (and it's nice to have such a forum as this to intelligently vent my angeer and frustration) it must be done. My teeth are getting loose from gritting them, from biting down on the bitterness of this world, my gut sore from swallowing sh-t because somehow we've all agreed to do it, and it's the 'acceptable, respectable' thing to do.

But still I know that war breeds only destruction, and anger unchecked, and unbridled is war. Therefore I tolerate the slowness of the tribe -directly proportunate to the slowest member. That slowness manifests in darkness and ignorance, and in character perpetuates it as well. The pain of tolerating ignorance, and slow spiritual awakening is one that must be taken, and must be embraced with wisdom and discernment, if any substantial change of any necessary import is to come about.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #42 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 15:18:09 PT
you cant say
all this war and confusion

has anything to do with salvation

salvation? what us salvation?

can you fill your belly and not wonder

how this world enjoys the goodness

that has belonged to every breath

of Light and Understanding

It5 is Time

'We look around

It is Time to use the good hand of Kindness

That Hand of Understanding

That Choice in your Heart and Mind

Your Soul

Peace and Understanding



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #41 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 15:03:33 PT
hey lombar
when that tired old carpenter returns

he will only be one person

one simple man

can reach into the guts of civilization

and bring out the good fruits



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #40 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 14:54:35 PT
they can have my dead body
for my life beats to a different drum

I can hear the music of indifference i can see all this destruction all this hatred and fear

how can anyone be so sure

you got it right

over and over again

you got it right



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #39 posted by lombar on August 14, 2006 at 14:43:44 PT
Anger
...gets more done than grief.

We can look at the suffering of the world in few ways,

1) that it is separate from ourselves and we can do something (engaged in solving problems)

2) that it is separate from ourselves and we cant do anything (fatalistic)

3) its all in our minds and we can do something (its our own personal problem, divisive)

4) its all in our minds and we can do nothing (we really are screwed)

5) have not given it any thought (98% of the population) (when is Friends coming on?)

If you believe either of 2 or 4 then grief can be the only consistent response. Disempowerment wrt the problems of the world and those that manipulate us count on this, this apathy is dragging our nations down.

If you believe in 1, then once you see how deep the rabbit hole really goes, it is near impossible to not go ballistic. Lies, damn lies, and government press releases, state run mass media, our lives nothing more than commodities. Life is illegal outside the narrow bounds set forth by our oh so caring leaders...

If you believe its 3 then perhaps retirement to a nice monestary might be a suitable life...

So don't take my expression of anger as being enraged and smashing stuff, oh no. It's the kind of fire in your belly that says, enough is enough time to fight back all the harder against the freedom stealing apparatus that has been constructed in the USA and is being exported to us. {insert expletive here}

Come election time, it will be time to volunteer again in a close riding for whoever has a chance against the conservative...

The tears of human suffering are greater than all the water in the seas, now we face a tidal wave. My personal belief is the should ole JC return, it will not be in the personage of one human, but millions. One person could and would be nailed to the cross.. again. Millions or billions cannot be controlled so easily.

Two shall be working at the loom, one will be taken... about 50% of the population will put spiritual above the material, thus many will in their compassion be 'children of God' whether or not they have any belief in any religon. When a critical mass is reached, the PTB will either have to kill the masses or knuckle under because they are outnumbered 10000-1. Just a belief.. easier to swallow than being 'snatched up into the air' to be with Jesus just for their sunday church attendance... but then I am not on TV creating delusions for people to believe in and send me money for..

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #38 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 14:42:00 PT
Museman
I probably will notice them now. Horses are great. I used them to travel to friends houses since we lived in the country and that was the easiest way to visit friends. We put each others horses in our barns when we were visiting. I even did my part of sassing back to my Mom when I was on a horse and galloped away and waited to come home until I knew she cooled off. LOL!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #37 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 14:37:17 PT
FoM
Well, you know how it is... you're probably gonna see 'em now, sorry about that!

Horses are cool. An obvious alternative to a lot of polluting technology. I've not had tremendous opportunity to get to know brother horse, but we've traveled a few miles together.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #36 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 14:32:19 PT
museman
Nope I never saw them but I never look at cars. They are just a blur when we are driving down the road.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #35 posted by Genthirdday on August 14, 2006 at 14:30:04 PT
global_warming..........#17....maybe "It Is Time&
to publish your amazing poetry. LEO's would take a close look at you and we do not need added persecution to our lives but in times past, many patriots published under pen names.

Ben Franklin very frequently wrote and published anonymously and people reacted strongly and took action. Many still do not read via the Internet but do purchase books.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #34 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 14:25:50 PT
you see
Y'shua said to some of his disciples;

"You are fishers of the sea. Come with me and I will make you fishers of men."



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #33 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 14:23:00 PT
FoM
You never have seen the fish? I am amazed. They are usually right next to the "I support the troops" ribbons.

They just don't make the ones with the hook in the mouth - that's the one I want.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #32 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 14:19:29 PT
museman
Gosh I never bothered looking at cars since I prefer horses so I missed it. We had a couple new cars but they just weren't a horse. I really was born in the wrong time. LOL!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #31 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 14:14:38 PT
FoM
I always wanted one of those metal 'fish' symbols you see on so many Cadillacs (and Lincolns,and Mercedes, and a few Chevy's) with a hook in it's mouth... but they don't make 'em.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #30 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 14:09:53 PT
whig
Sometime before the gun in the face I have reached a state of intolerance, but usually I manage.

There is an element of 'in your face' which has become a part of our daily lives. The lines of acceptabilty -for me - are in two places; the public, and the home.

What I tolerate in public, a whole lot of it, is not 'acceptable' (or tolerated if I get half a chance) in my home. In public, I usually have the option to walk away - which in my experience usually means a very deliberate avoidance of going there in the first place.

In my home I have executive powers over every TV show, every internet site. I have the powers of on and off. But my home is this little manufactured 'home' from the '70s and it's sanctity is an illusion that could be shattered at any time by the standard issue boot. Therefore that is a potential violation of my only space on this planet, and is not to be tolerated. I agree to not blow smoke in my neighbors face - at home or in public, but I cannnot tolerate them telling me what I can or cannot do behind my flimsy little walls called 'home.'

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #29 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 14:02:05 PT
An Idea For a Sign
As far as a marijuana protest sign I thought this might be good. Not hateful from us to them but make them acknowledge they hate people who use Cannabis because they are different.

You don't hate this (then have a pretty pot leaf) you hate us.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #28 posted by whig on August 14, 2006 at 13:56:46 PT
museman
How do you tolerate intolerance, and how far do you tolerate it?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #27 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 13:55:07 PT
museman
I am not tolerant of anything that this administration has done to us as a country. The way it feels to me is peaceful protests will make them pay attention. When one group is done protesting another one should get with it and do it. Over and over again until the news will have to pay attention. Use legitimate arguments in forming a protest and keep it real and keep it peaceful and we will win. We did once before.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #26 posted by rchandar on August 14, 2006 at 13:49:46 PT:

Wayne
another problem with our society is that once someone uses the word "drugs," an immediate shame and concern tag attaches to a person's mind.

For most people, it's enough to hear someone loudly talk about "drugs" to feel this shame. It's much harder to resist official doctrine because so much money and time and ideology has been poured into making "drugs" a kind of sin, a shameful thing that betrays a lack of character, honesty, and self-control.

So a lot of kids adopt the drugs tag as tantamount to a rebellion, living a life where they "don't care" about family, friends, or society. In the past twenty years of being close to users, I can say that most youths don't generally adopt the "values" and "social critique" strongly enough: it's enough to think you're bad, being bad is "cool."

Teaching peace, love and understanding is always difficult. It's much easier to blame someone else, to dream of eliminating people you don't like, to suppress your understanding and acceptance of that which is different. Teachers and parents, in my opinion, don't always do the best job either.

Then again, there are a lot of parents who teach their kids to evaluate, to think realistically, to be critical, and that's good. I just think that the "drugs" tag is a magic sinkhole to defer all one's problems and angers.

--rchandar

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #25 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 13:45:41 PT
but...
as you also said;

"I am angry at what this administration has done to our country."

And neither you nor I, or anyone (in my opinion) in their right mind is really willing to tolerate such things in their lives - if they have any choice in the matter.

How much choice do we have really?

How much of the choices of this world are forced decisions between the 'lesser of evils?'

Can we really address the source of those 'evils?'

These are questions that (to me, anyway) represent the core of the issues.

There are very real sources that are held in very real hands, and wielded like very real swords in the conquest of planet earth. There are identifiable conditions and 'marks' which allow the observant to see - if they know what they are looking for. Those conditions and marks have been described to us from ages past, there is no 'new revelation' on that subject.

The question is how to succeed where no generation has succeeded before. How to displace the lip-service of social/political posturing with actuality.

Lets not legislate or negotiate freedom, lets take our own inherent, natural understanding of the gift, and live it.

How to do that is a question that truly interests me.

The spread of actual tolerant attitudes, within boundaries described as acceptable in a loving act and intention, could only be a well-needed positive pardigm shift. I hope we do it.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #24 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 13:40:39 PT
Wayne
You don't have to like something in order to tolerate it.

I agree.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by Wayne on August 14, 2006 at 13:37:41 PT
Tolerance
The problem these days is that the Republicans and the media have blurred the distinction between 'liking' something and 'tolerating' something. What Bush has done with his 'with us or against us' mantra is, besides misleading many of us, he has destroyed that critical distinction. Despite what he tells us, you can despise terrorism and still be against war. Despite what the drug czar says year in and year out, you can choose not to use drugs and still leave those who do alone.

You don't have to like something in order to tolerate it. I don't like paying $3 a gallon for gas, but I'm not about to torch the local convenience store. I don't want to see drugs and guns in school, but I also think pointing guns at children and kicking them out of school is also counter-productive.

Zero-tolerance will get us exactly that = Zero.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 13:34:00 PT
museman
Thank you. I believe tolerance is how I have always overcome my anger. Then I live in peace. I can live in my own la la land and at the same time be totally aware of the hell that is raging around us if this makes sense.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #21 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 13:23:57 PT
FoM
"I am tolerant because tolerance is the only way to peace."

I couldn't have put it any better. Tolerance may just be the cure for anger. It's an active thing that takes constant participation.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 13:18:56 PT
Anger
I am angry at what this administration has done to our country. I am happy that people are waking up and paying a little more attention to how we are viewed in the world. I am tolerant because tolerance is the only way to peace. I can be tolerant when I see excesses but in turn I want to be tolerated too. I believes in conservation and living with less.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #19 posted by museman on August 14, 2006 at 13:10:21 PT
anger
It is an angry time. Anger can serve to focus, it can also serve to derail.

Where does one put that anger? You just can't keep it inside.

This struggle with that justifiable, real-sourced anger is getting more prevalent in everyones consciousness I think. World events as macrocosmic representation seem to support that notion.

I've been pondering on the balance between tolerance, and acceptabilty - how far to allow lattitude in all the differing perspectives, and still draw the line on acceptability. Some of it is obvious, but when it comes to beliefs, and the fine lines of personal understanding, I find I have to do a quick juggling act in my mind to make a decision as to whether the pointing out of (what is to me an obvious) error is worth the possible struggle of ego to arrive at some kind of agreement.

The only thing that makes sense to me, is unconditional tolerance in the world, but in my home, I do have a serious hand in making the 'house rules.' I must tolerate all of my neighbors follies, until they intrude into my home sanctity, then I get angry and intolerant.

In the world however is extreem INTOLERANCE, supported by the various wealth-empowered organizations and institutions that were created for just those purposes of control and indoctrination. There is a carefully painted picture of the 'acceptable' modes of being, and surprise! they have some rather large conditions of wealth and propriety attached to their validation.

The vicious circle must be broken.

God and Nature are going to take care of whatever we fail to address in the short time left, but what can be saved?

What of our accomplishments is worth saving?

Is the concept of 'posterity' just an attempt to extend the ego beyond the grave?

Is the adamant stance of holding to your understanding, like a rock in the flood of chaos, a violation of tolerance?

I think not.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 12:53:15 PT
whigger
It is time for peace

and understandinf

and an end to this confusion

Hallelujah

can this corparate corpalism

be placed in some eternal grave,

from which the commen man is not exposed

the flowers of youth and this world

sing about this horrible disease

it is time to bring this disease

to the ends of the world



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 12:39:51 PT
It is Time
To grab your place,

Who can answer Eternity,

I'm so angry and my mind is filled with so much disgrace

I have not forgotten all this sickness

I cannot forget all this disease,

All this anger and war

Over and over again

We cull our enimies

Whitout ever saying Hello

Whitout ever knowing

How close 'we are so close

I can bend my knee

For as child under the Eternal Stars

I so much saver

A good Night



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by whig on August 14, 2006 at 12:28:13 PT
gw
It is time for peace.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #15 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 12:26:10 PT
It Is Tme
for a war on ignorance,

a war on greed,

a war that is revelating



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by whig on August 14, 2006 at 12:25:21 PT
gw
I cross posted my previous comment to the cannablog.

There are so many of us but we are hiding, and we are angry because we are frightened. That is why I am saying we need to have solidarity. A few of us standing out beyond the ramparts all alone are vulnerable. Solidarity means standing together, in a defensible position. We have to have some courage to start.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 11:56:27 PT
whigger
there are too many of us who use the blessed herb, and even more who support liberalization, and when you add up all those who been screwed by this prohibition, you have a very angry group of human beings.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by lombar on August 14, 2006 at 11:54:21 PT
When they can't win the argument
... they resort to ad hominem attacks. It's a constant pattern, consistent throughout the anti-truth 'messages' of the media. When facts cannot be answered we are a 'well funded gang of drug dealers wanting to get their children hooked on drugs'. Or pinko-hippie-commies, or stupid stoners,.. crazy conspiracy theorist..

I had the misfortune of having a discussion with an RCMP officer that made me really angry. The gist of his support of the current conflict in Israel was that 'police and military personel' count as more than civilians so Israel was somehow justified in their 'response'. Because it was 'police or military' they count their lives as worth more than ours and that was chilling. And totaly unacceptable attitude for so-called servants of the public. I mentioned the media bias in one topic then he attacked me with my 'listening to the media'. Every point I made was only answered with some question about my conduct/attitude rather than answering the points with counter points.. because there are none, they are wrong. So it was about then I posed the rhetorical question here "How can the good prevail when the evil is willing to kill, lie, to continue to wreak havoc in the world?"... because about then I starting thinking that the police and their political involvement is EVIL and muyst be completly eliminated. We pay police for protection, not advice and definately not to curtail our freedom to make it easier for them to sit around and eat donuts. I have been really POd ever since.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 11:48:26 PT
How Much Does It Cost?
Aerial Marijuana Surveillance Underway

By Tom Banse

http://tinyurl.com/okqbz

SEATTLE, WA 2006-08-14 Cherries and apples have a season, and so does marijuana farming . Correspondent Tom Banse reports that sheriff's deputies in Oregon and Washington are getting a lift in National Guard helicopters to find illegal plants.

-----------

A sure sign that pot season is underway is a big bust. This past week, deputies uprooted 1,500 marijuana plants growing in a remote canyon northeast of Wenatchee, Washington.

The hidden plants were spotted from a National Guard helicopter.

Chief Clyde Foreman of the Columbia River Drug Task Force says the existence of aerial surveillance is no secret. Yet large numbers of pot plants keep turning up in the woods.

Clyde Foreman: "The profit margin is so tremendous that the drug trafficking organizations that are from Mexico that we see in California, Oregon, and Washington are going to continue utilizing the Forest Service lands, and DNR lands, and the parks for some time. We're pretty convinced of that. That's the trend we're seeing."

It costs local sheriffs nothing to put a spotter on a National Guard chopper. The federal drug control budget covers the full cost. But flight time is tightly scheduled.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by whig on August 14, 2006 at 11:47:20 PT
gw
We need to have solidarity with one another. I was thinking about the risks of the California approach with medical marijuana recipients getting county-issued ID cards. The idea is it is supposed to protect the holder and also the care providers, but there are people who fear that by registering for that ID we would be putting ourself at risk of being rounded up.

Here's the thing. We are a lot more numerous than they can round up that way if the public supports medical marijuana. We couldn't win without public support -- that is what underpins everything. But we are already supported on the MMJ issue so strongly everywhere that a crack down on patients would only be feasible if it is a small number of them.

The catch is that if there are only a small number of people with the ID cards, they could be rounded up quickly, before the public could even react. So the first people to get these cards are going out on a limb, because they understand that if enough of us step forward and hold together in solidarity we are too many to be made victims.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 11:27:34 PT
whig
What I noticed over the years is that Republicans look for issues to trip up their competition. It doesn't matter about fighting fairly for the good of the people but what could get the right leaning people angry. The Democrats aren't wishy washy as much as they are afraid to fight because they don't like to fight dirty like the Republicans do. I know it would make me feel like I was stooping to their level and I wouldn't want to do that.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by global_warming on August 14, 2006 at 11:20:13 PT
hey whigger
When will it happen? When will all this madness and ignorance end?

Sometimes I wonder how many good people live secretly for fear of our government, how many would more easily come out and stand up for the Light of Truth?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by whig on August 14, 2006 at 09:53:57 PT
lombar
Well said. I'm really hopeful reading the progressive blogs because there seems to be very strong support for our issue informally, but it is still too hot politically for them to touch publicly if they are running candidates for office. The brainwashing has been laid on too thick for too long to reverse it in the course of a would-be successful political campaign, too many people buy the lies so if a candidate were to run on the basis of the truth he would be disbelieved by many and he would be attacked and savaged in the press and by every state and federal official that wants to keep the current prohibition in place. They feel like they can't talk about it and still be elected.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #6 posted by lombar on August 14, 2006 at 09:14:47 PT
OT - Evil thought?
In my mailbox today was a card soliciting my sister for a donation to the UN regarding the current crisis in Lebanon. My first thought was 'when you stop demonizing me and pursuing a worldwide war against me I *might* send a donation. Since your 'war on drugs' hyperinflates the cost of my cannabis by a factor of 20, I just don't have any money left over.'

As much as I hate the current BS, I find myself despising the UN now. I guess that is what happens when you believe in something then find out that what you believe in, peace, is not what the UN is really about. Especially when they are pursuing a war of aggression against people like me. Complete with lies. There is a huge credibility problem with all the western governments, the sooner the people 'get' that, the better.

Our knowledge of the drug war makes it no surprise to me anyway that the state is lying about a GREAT DEAL. Making a lie into the truth worked so well for the drug war which allowed the militarization of police, deployment of too many police, and the erosion of privacy and civil rights, that now its time to up the stakes... but I think it is backfiring on them this time... time for some indictments at the HIGHEST levels.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 09:02:22 PT
More Weeds
It’s a Doobie — er, Doozy of a Show

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/flipside/flipside.php?story=dispatch/2006/08/14/20060814-B8-00.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 09:00:47 PT
More On Weeds
'Weeds' Stands Tall in Drought Year

http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060814/LIFE/608140342/1005

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Hope on August 14, 2006 at 08:30:54 PT
Mr. White has made several worthy comments
on different posts at Grits.

http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by Hope on August 14, 2006 at 08:29:14 PT
A must read!
Check out what Rusty White, LEAP speaker, has to say at Grits.

http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8597101&postID=115543240427740306

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on August 14, 2006 at 07:53:37 PT
More About Weeds
A Growing Success: Showtime’s Cheerfully Dark ‘Weeds’ Opens Its 2nd Season

http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060814/ART18/60814001

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 14, 2006 at 07:41:28