Cannabis News The November Coalition
  Reefer is Worth Getting Mad About
Posted by CN Staff on August 05, 2006 at 19:24:22 PT
By Antonio Maria Costa 
Source: Globe and Mail 

cannabis Vienna -- Supporters of the legalization of cannabis would have us believe that it is a gentle, harmless substance that gives you little more than a sense of mellow euphoria.

Sellers of the world's most popular illicit drug know better. Trawl through websites offering cannabis seeds for sale and you will find brand names such as Armageddon, AK-47 and White Widow. "This will put you in pieces, then reduce you to rubble -- maybe quicksand if you go too far," one seller boasts. This is much closer to the truth.

In Canada, as in most parts of the world, cannabis is by far the drug of choice. An estimated 4 per cent of the world's adult population -- that's about 162 million people -- consume cannabis at least once a year, more than all other illicit drugs combined.

Does that matter? I firmly believe it does, because the cannabis now in circulation (like Canada's BC Bud) is many times more powerful than the weed that today's aging baby boomers smoked in college. The characteristics of cannabis are no longer that different from those of other plant-based drugs, such as cocaine and heroin.

Evidence of the damage to mental health caused by cannabis use -- from loss of concentration to paranoia, aggressiveness and outright psychosis -- is mounting and cannot be ignored. Emergency room admissions involving cannabis are rising, as is demand for rehabilitation treatment. These health problems are increasingly being seen in young people.

North America is the world's largest cannabis market and most of its cannabis is homegrown. The U.S. market alone has been valued at more than $10-billion. As Canadians are starting to discover, a market that size inevitably attracts organized crime. So cannabis is a security threat as well as a health risk.

Amid all the libertarian talk about the right of the individual to engage in dangerous practices, provided no one else gets hurt, certain key facts are easily forgotten.

Firstly, cannabis is a dangerous drug, not just to the individuals who use it. People who drive under the influence of cannabis put others at risk. Would even the most ardent supporter of legalization want to fly in an aircraft whose pilot used cannabis?

Secondly, drug control works. More than a century of universally accepted restrictions on heroin and cocaine have prevented what would otherwise have been a pandemic. Global levels of drug addiction -- think of the opium dens of the 19th century -- have dropped dramatically in the past 100 years. In the past 10 years or so, they have remained stable.

Cannabis is the weakest link in the international effort to contain the global drugs problem. In theory, it's a controlled substance. In practice, it's running rampant. It grows under the most varied conditions in many countries, a high-yielding plant that can be grown indoors. This makes supply control difficult.

But we can tackle demand, particularly among the young. That need not mean sending them to jail. Young people caught in possession of cannabis could be treated in much the same way as those arrested for drunk driving: fined, required to attend classes on the dangers of drug use and threatened with loss of their driving licence for repeat offences. Prison would be a last resort. Schools and universities should apply zero tolerance.

National policies on cannabis vary and sometimes change from one year to the next. The experience of countries that were more tolerant of cannabis use is ambiguous and not persuasive. The distinction between "soft" and "hard" drugs is, at best, artificial, especially with such a damaging psycho-active substance as modern-day cannabis. Even some advocates of cannabis as a "soft" drug are now reconsidering as they observe the devastating health consequences of abuse.

Canada was a pioneer in introducing systematic anti-smoking policies, which are now being copied around the world. Their success demonstrates that preventive measures can help to change attitudes. Similar policies are needed to prevent cannabis use getting completely out of control.

Let's draw the right conclusions. Cannabis is dangerous. We ignore it at our peril.

Note: Today's marijuana isn't the stuff baby boomers toked, says the UN's Antonio Maria Costa. Pot's characteristics now aren't that different from other plant-based drugs -- like cocaine and heroin.

Antonio Maria Costa is executive director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Source: Globe and Mail (Canada)
Author: Antonio Maria Costa
Published: August 5, 2006
Copyright: 2006 The Globe and Mail Company
Contact: letters@globeandmail.ca
Website: http://www.globeandmail.ca/

CannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #182 posted by FoM on August 11, 2006 at 18:41:10 PT
Divorce and Republicans
When a person finally gets to a point that they know they want a divorce promises of change come pouring out of the offending person. Most people feel sorry and give them one more chance and in no time they are back being the way they are and it becomes too late to fix. That's how I see Republicans. They are afraid right now and will say they'll change. They say we'll be good. No they won't change.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #181 posted by Hope on August 11, 2006 at 18:19:21 PT
Comment 179 Good News, Indeed!
A "personality transplant"?

Bit late for that, probably. I certainly hope so.

How can he imagine that he's represented the people of Alaska?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #180 posted by FoM on August 11, 2006 at 11:52:17 PT
whig
Thank you for such excellent news.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #179 posted by whig on August 11, 2006 at 11:33:15 PT
OT: Murkowski losing
http://tinyurl.com/ng5xn

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #178 posted by FoM on August 11, 2006 at 11:04:45 PT
whig
Once again I agree with you.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #177 posted by whig on August 11, 2006 at 11:02:39 PT
FoM
People gay bash if they think they have some attraction to the same sex and they hate themselves for it. People always hate their own perceived weaknesses. People hate hippies and people like ourselves because they see us as disobedient, and they want to be disobedient too but they hate that tendency in themselves. They have been taught to hate since they were born, they have been taught to obey and to walk the straight and narrow path, and those who do not do so are clearly people giving in to evil temptation. They are following hate and think that hate is God, and God is hate.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #176 posted by FoM on August 11, 2006 at 06:28:11 PT
Islamic Fascist
They just showed Bush calling people Islamic Fascists on CNN and it has offended the Muslim community. How can Bush use the word Fascist? That's what they have made our country.

U.S. Muslim Group Irked by `Fascist' Term

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0608110164aug11,1,4477084.story

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #175 posted by Hope on August 11, 2006 at 06:19:46 PT
Remembering something else...
There was a lot of talk about "Propaganda" in the "shows".

I remember thinking at the time, when I grasped what "Propaganda" meant, that what I was watching was "Propaganda". I did learn to watch out for "Government Propaganda" because of those films and literature.

Ooooh...we "The People" have become as dangerous as some elite predicted to other elite.

We have the Bible. We have the right to arms. We are educated. We think.

How much more dangerous can the little people be than that?

:0)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #174 posted by FoM on August 11, 2006 at 06:03:22 PT
One More Comment
I want to mention how much I appreciate all of you and this thread. I had totally forgotten anything about communism being taught in school. Talking about it has brought some memories back to me. I don't remember fear of communism but being taught awareness of communism so it wouldn't slip in and take over our democracy. Just like in animal farm it has happened to us now in the USA. It doesn't have the name Communism but it is what the neo-cons are. It seems the ones that fear the pinko commie hippie types are the ones that have become what they thought we were. It's like people who gay bash. When I see people bash gays I wonder why.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #173 posted by Hope on August 11, 2006 at 04:54:40 PT
"The Red Threat"
Everything they warned us about turned around and got us all. Ony it wasn't Red. (Remember "Better Dead than Red"?)

We have everything they warned us against only it's all dressed up in Red, White, and Blue and it came rolling in under guise of the War on Drugs.

We got, in the War on Drugs, exactly what The Red Threat was supposed to be.

Exactly!

That Red Threat...it was more cunning than we thought.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #172 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 22:12:03 PT
Nite Ekim
I have two sisters and one has 7 children and the other has 8. The rhythm method didn't work very well. LOL! They all went to Catholic school. They were able to stay home with them which was nice. I know some moms couldn't but what we see now is it is almost expected that a woman works in a career.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #171 posted by ekim on August 10, 2006 at 22:03:34 PT
ya there were a lot of us kid to send too
my mom was a teacher and she filled in for the sick nuns all over town. my dad did not want her to work so she took the money out as payment for all six of us kids.

nite

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #170 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 21:47:36 PT
A Correction
Dare didn't exist at that time but when it started I recalled what you said. There I feel better.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #169 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 21:40:30 PT
Ekim
Now that you said that I can vaguely remember being told something like that too. I also thought of Dare. I guess I forgot. Something else I recall now is that mothers and fathers would have to work and the children would be taught in schools for them. I thought why would a mother leave her children and go to work when raising a child was the most important job she could possibly have.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #168 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 21:35:33 PT
ekim
You went to Catholic school too? I don't remember talking about Communism but we had to read Animal Farm.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #167 posted by ekim on August 10, 2006 at 21:30:55 PT
cant we just live together
I can recall the nuns telling us how communism would have the kids telling on there parents. I still remember that cause we were little kids when i heard it. and we have dare --for all to see-- how many kids were told the same. ratting is not a national trait

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #166 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 21:24:56 PT
Hope
Even when Kennedy got elected there was no push for him to become president by Catholics. It made Catholics feel proud when a Catholic was elected and that was a nice feeling but politics weren't talked about. Basically what will be will be was how we believed. They wanted us to have a strong moral value. To love God and humanity. To find our way in life and do the best we can with the talent God gave us. That was the purpose of school.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #165 posted by Hope on August 10, 2006 at 21:18:05 PT
Ah! That's the reason, right there!
"....money from the Government..."

Mine were public schools.

The only thing I can remember of them is something about somebody hiding behind a tree in a park and popping out to do the heinous deed of giving me some Communist literature.

That maybe wasn't in it at all...but that's all I seem to sort of recall...and of course, it never happened to me or anyone I knew so we pretty well ignored it all.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #164 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 21:10:50 PT
Hope
We were a private school and the nuns and priests were proud to tell us that because they refused to take any money from the Government they couldn't tell them how to teach us. I am glad we didn't have any government in our school.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #163 posted by Hope on August 10, 2006 at 21:08:03 PT
That would mean it stopped
around the time Kennedy was elected...I guess.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #162 posted by Hope on August 10, 2006 at 21:06:21 PT
Seems like it started in about the fifth
or sixth grade and went on through Junior High... or maybe just seventh grade and then it stopped. I don't remember such "assemblies" happening in high school.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #161 posted by Hope on August 10, 2006 at 21:02:51 PT
Guess the powers that were
didn't worry that the Catholic School children would be vulnerable to the hideous Red Threat.

Sometimes there was literature, too. Wish I'd kept some of that stuff.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #160 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 19:52:32 PT
Hope
This is what we were taught in school. This was my high school.

http://www.cchsbc.pvt.k12.pa.us/mission_and_vision_statement.htm

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #159 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 19:11:47 PT
Hope
We never talked about it in school. I went to Catholic school and they had missionary nuns in about every country. We never were taught that our country was better then any other country. Russia was mentioned but not often at home. I was told we were fighting communism by being in Vietnam. I didn't understand that either because they didn't seem like violent people just people trying to not be killed in their land by us.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #158 posted by Hope on August 10, 2006 at 18:59:05 PT
That's odd
"I never heard anything in school about communism that I can remember."

We had to go to the auditorium once or twice a year and hear about "The Red Threat".

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #157 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 17:34:03 PT
whig
That's good stuff you're saying.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #156 posted by whig on August 10, 2006 at 17:29:53 PT
FoM
The thing is I thought I was pretty smart. I knew everything about everything and that's precisely why I was so dumb because I didn't really know anything but what I'd been told. You just can't understand some things unless you've got some experience.

I think that's why most people are conservative, by the way. Lack of experience. People are afraid of the unknown and think they already know everything they need to know about it, and then speak with authority on it based on what they've been told. Drugs are bad, cannabis is a drug, therefore cannabis is bad. Follow the logical syllogism. Let your words think for you and you are quickly lost in the maze of logic. But the assumptions are unfounded, the words not representative of the truth, and the real understanding does not come without the experience.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #155 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 16:39:51 PT
whig
Conservative, stupid kid. That's hard for me to believe but I believe you. You see now with your eyes wide opened.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #154 posted by whig on August 10, 2006 at 16:26:33 PT
The '80s...
Those were my teenaged years, as well. I was a straight-arrow, conservative, stupid kid. I never smoked pot then. Not once. It passed me by, I would have believed it was as bad as they claim, or that I wanted to preserve my ability to say I had never used it if I wanted to run for office. I was very self-involved and self-conscious but so was everyone I knew.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #153 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 16:24:42 PT
rchandar
I understand. The 60s were the best and worst of times not at all unlike now. So even though you were born a little later you still will experience what is going to happen one more time. Getting back to the garden is necessary for our very survival I believe. This is really becoming a long strange trip but one that is also fascinating as we put things back together again. We are the world.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #152 posted by rchandar on August 10, 2006 at 16:16:44 PT:

FoM
no, quite often, especially in the 80s, "WHY?" was an important question. As in, "why wasn't I born into your generation instead of mine?"



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #151 posted by FoM on August 10, 2006 at 15:36:03 PT
rchandar
I can imagine that it was way different for you growing up. I was part of the generation that questioned so many things. I was born and my first word out of my mouth was probably WHY! Not really but I have always asked why.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #150 posted by Dankhank on August 10, 2006 at 15:20:01 PT
Ideas
Afterburner said:

"We need to have sit-ins, smoke-ins, love-ins, peace-ins, walk-outs, shut-downs, state stopping gatherings..."

Add to that "flash" gatherings by instant messaging, email and cell phone.

------------------

I wonder how useful it would be to emulate the organization called "Act Up?"

They were instrumental in making people hear about AIDS/HIV when no one wanted to hear ...

http://www.actupny.org/documents/CDdocuments/CDindex.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #149 posted by rchandar on August 09, 2006 at 21:39:50 PT:

FoM
at least you're not from such a cheesy generation as mine. My formative years were spent watching "Friday Night Video," Reagan, and the imaginative popular music such as the "South Florida Sound" which preached important essential values such as material wealth, mindless conformity, and promiscuous anti-artism.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #148 posted by FoM on August 09, 2006 at 15:41:03 PT
rchandar
I very seldom heard about Communism in my home when I was young. Russia was the one country that I was told was a concern but that's all. I was raised catholic and I never heard anything in school about communism that I can remember. If the draft comes back young people will get involved like my generation did. Sometimes it takes staring death in the face for something you don't think is right to wake a person up. The draft was the catalyst.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #147 posted by FoM on August 09, 2006 at 15:19:22 PT
A Great Song
One of the most prominent "message songs" was For What It's Worth by Buffalo Springfield. The song has been used in many documentaries and television specials that chronicle the 1960s. It is also on the soundtrack of two movies --- Forrest Gump and Born on the Fourth of July. The group included Steven Stills (who later formed Crosby, Stills, and Nash) as well as Neil Young (who frequently joined CSN and also formed the group Crazy Horse).

For What Its Worth

http://tinyurl.com/hldse

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #146 posted by rchandar on August 09, 2006 at 15:18:06 PT:

FoM
give the kids time, it's possible. Your generation had been inundated since childhood about Communism, for example. These kids have just begun to evaluate a complex world situation defined by a common enemy.

in some respects, though, you're right. Today's teens are, by and large, happy with American society. But the differences could promote action--yours was a generation at the beginning of Pax Americana, at the opening moment of American involvement with the world. Theirs is a generation of decline and eventually something will click beyond traditional or popular "liberal" avenues. And I'm real encouraged by the number of young adults at antiwar protests--I think it's something that may not expand much, yet remains constant and tenacious.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #145 posted by FoM on August 09, 2006 at 15:03:07 PT
Toker00
I will check later on tonight.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #144 posted by Toker00 on August 09, 2006 at 14:20:37 PT
Right on, JustGetnBy.
I figured it probably had to do with the size of the crowd. You are right to think they are making it harder. First I heard about not being able to leave the "Free Speech Zone" without being arrested, though. That is troubling. I'll see if I can stop that bill. lol. Bush had/has so much security for the same reason any criminal needs his "boys". They KNOW someone will get to them sooner or later, if they don't, so they try to be prepared.

FoM, I am going to e-mail you a very important message. It may not be there until later tonight, but it will be in your mail tonight. I look forward to meeting you just as much.

Absolutely, afterburner. I will talk to my organizers and see how we can incorporate "flash" gatherings in our area. Cool.

Toke.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #143 posted by JustGetnBy on August 09, 2006 at 11:51:47 PT
Free Speech Zones
Toker00

I'm sorry I guess I wasn't spcefic enough. Yes I was talking about demonstrations when Political Royalty visits your fair city. Pres, VP, Pres Candidates, etc, thats when the Feds pull out all the stops.

I don't think the felony law for leaving the area has been passed yet, but is in the process. They can and will arrest if you leave a free speech zone without their permission. I don't have any recent experience with protesting, but gathered this info from the web and newspapers.

You are spot on about making them respect us by sheer numbers and direct action, what I am saying is that they have rigged the game so that isn't likely to happen, but when it does I hope to participate.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #142 posted by afterburner on August 09, 2006 at 10:13:16 PT
Toker00 #139
"We need to have sit-ins, smoke-ins, love-ins, peace-ins, walk-outs, shut-downs, state stopping gatherings..."

Add to that "flash" gatherings by instant messaging, email and cell phone.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #141 posted by FoM on August 09, 2006 at 10:00:10 PT
Toker00
They put people in Free Speech Zones where the tv cameras could really show what is happening. They use the cages in New York City mostly where it is very congested. I am not sure about Washington, DC. The closer you get to a large volume of people and the closer to the politicians that's when you will have Free Speech Zones. They wanted the protests by the Mexicans shown so we would hate them.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #140 posted by FoM on August 09, 2006 at 09:55:37 PT
Toker00
I can't wait to meet you and hear what you have to say.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #139 posted by Toker00 on August 09, 2006 at 09:37:27 PT
JustGetinBy
I guess I just don't live where they have these FREE SPEECH ZONES. Every protest we have done has been walking on the sidewalks, through the streets, gathering directly across from Chimpking's Propaganda Social Security Bash at the UTMB medical branch in Galveston, (although once I left the area, they would NOT let me back in)where we had direct contact with the people attending this event. And we have always gathered right outside the halls which house the local governments, including the DEA in the Federal Building, downtown Houston. We have gotten very loud and visual. Are you saying, in your area, you cannot legally assemble where you can speak directly to Power? How can our protest laws be so different in different areas? Maybe that happens when there is a very large protest. Our numbers remain under four hundred for the most part. What about all the Mexican Immigrants who stormed our cities? Were they in a Free Speech Zone? No. What happens if a crowd outgrows the Free Speech Zone? Are protesters turned away? Just curious. I only know what we do in this part of the country has not been in any restrictive "zone", other than the prearranged (by us during the permit stage) parks, or city blocks. I know Bush's bash in DC had those zones. I thought there was something very, very wrong with that.

What needs to happen is, people need to lose the fear which these authoritarians have instilled in most of our society. We need to have massive SPONTANEOUS protests which really DO tie up traffic and get media attention. We need to have sit-ins, smoke-ins, love-ins, peace-ins, walk-outs, shut-downs, state stopping gatherings of, guess who? The American Workers. We have to come up with ingenious ways of stopping the operation of the state peacefully, but firmly. Do you think the people back in the seventies were not afraid when they saw the pigs coming with their billy clubs and tear gas? Those people were brave. That is what we are all going to have to do to stop the state. And I mean the STATE OF FASCISM in America.

I'll let you know if we run across any Free Speech Zones during our coming protests.

Wage peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITION NOW!



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #138 posted by FoM on August 09, 2006 at 09:26:43 PT
JustGetnBy
I know what you are saying. They really fear anyone or any group that are making waves. We as a youth culture back then helped change the direction we were going and they never want people to have that much impact again. That's why they hate the 60s. We wanted to change the world and make it a better place and that's just not on their agenda.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #137 posted by Hope on August 09, 2006 at 09:12:14 PT
JustGetnBy
"I'm not willing to step into the machine to be destroyed for naught."

Nor should you be.

That's what the problem is in the first place...all the people getting ground up in "the machine".

We've got to put a stop to it, somehow...not increase it...because it's wrong.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #136 posted by Hope on August 09, 2006 at 09:08:09 PT
The Rainbow and Law Enforcement video
rainbows defeat the Gestapo without guns or violence

Wow.

That's amazing.

I think I heard a Chihuahua barking in there.

Horse analyzing was fun, too.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #135 posted by JustGetnBy on August 09, 2006 at 08:56:14 PT
"Free Speech Zone"
PS: I might add , my fear of being ground up in their machine is exactly how the planned it

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #134 posted by JustGetnBy on August 09, 2006 at 08:49:13 PT
" Free Speech Zone"
The Feds learned a whole lot from the Vietnam demonstrations. They learned to tie you up in the justice system so badly that it would be a major problem in your life.

If you got arrested in in Veitnam ere you simply paid a fine ( a few hundred dollars) and you were on your way to the next demonstration.In todays orwellian justice system, you are put on probation, attending another demonstration or any encounter with police is a violation of probation. That violation is a new crime, with enhanced penalties, etc, etc.

During Vietnam protesters could demonstrate on the public sidewalk where the politician had to see and hear them. The demonstraters were also on the evening news, so all of America saw and heard their demonstration. Today the Feds have created "FREE SPEECH ZONES". They are chain link enclosures located blocks away from the person or event you wish to protest. Protesters will not be seen or heard by anyone but themselves and the thugs guarding them.

The Feds are working on legislation to make it a felony to leave a "Free Speech Zone" without permission.

Folks, it's gonna take a big event with a whole lot of people all at oncewilling to stand up to these bullies.A martyr I am not, but I have a lunch packed,and am ready to follow when I see my neighbors packing a lunch too..Our cause is worth fighting for, but I'm not willing to step into the machine to be destroyed for naught.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #133 posted by Hope on August 09, 2006 at 07:06:11 PT
Lol...gently....Ooohhh...gw
"i hope she is not a guy,"

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #132 posted by rchandar on August 08, 2006 at 20:25:51 PT:

ekim
anslinger was a real d#%khead. Let's see. He promoted criminalization with ideas such as "weed makes 'darkies' think they're as good as white people" and promoted the idea that cannabis was tantamount to murdering, psychosis, derangement, violence. Promoted the idea that cannabis was the by-product of "evil" jazz. Later he "apologized" and said, "I'm not saying marijuana is the product of black subversion against white people, but it makes people introspective. What if we have to fight a war and our young men are introspective?"

Later, in the 1950s, Harry supplied morphine--a good, fat "prescription" to Senator Joseph McCarthy. I hate him much more for the Singel Convention, though. Until then, lots of countries had not outlawed cannabis, you could go there and immerse yourself in a traditional culture and outlook.

JFK fired Anslinger the next year. Apparently he had decided to "legalize" marijuana in his second term. We never got that far. JFK may have had the right intentions, but then he didn't stop Anslinger from getting the UN to produce and endorse such a ridiculous document.

There are a lot of good websites that list the history of prohibition. It's a matter of poking around. One last thing; interestingly, America was "late" in the West in banning cannabis. UK, 1928. Netherlands (!!)1919. Italy, 1919. Germany, 1919. The last country to outlaw cannabis in the world was Nepal, 1973 (Nixon paid the Nepalese king $50 million).

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #131 posted by whig on August 08, 2006 at 16:18:22 PT
museman
Yeah, I understand. I'll keep you informed about what I know, and I expect I'll be talking about this festival alot here in the next few months.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #130 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 15:56:48 PT
g_w
I would enjoy that too.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #129 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 15:55:47 PT
whig
Well, here's what I mean;

In terms of playing in a band, one has to know the conditions of the gig; the relative size of the playing area, what eqipment is necessary to haul the distance, and what is not. If we actually manage to get a/the band all the way down there, it would be real disappointing to not get to play, I'd never hear the end of it.

Without committing the total energies of a band, it's fairly easy to be more open to whatever, but when I am managing (and that's what it would be) the equilibrium of multi- sensitive people (musicians) information saves a lot of grief.

I prefer the band. I have a lot more fun, and feel a lot more 'empowered' as an artist, but as I prefer live musicians over digital substitutes, the equipment it takes to stage a performance takes up more space. I've gotten my own stage down to what I can carry in my minivan, but I still can't carry all of the band members in the same vehicle as the equipment.

On the other hand, an acoustc setup fits in the trunk of my sons Honda.

So, I can't come down there and discuss it. My trip is going to hinge on what I can find out from here.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #128 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 15:42:03 PT
From me to SF
About 410 miles. Nine hours depending on road conditions, and weather. There is a longer but faster route down I-5, but the trade-off isn't worth it in this case.

Sure bears talking about with folks.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #127 posted by whig on August 08, 2006 at 15:37:46 PT
museman
Okay, I'm not in much of a position to tell you much more than I have because I've only been to the meeting last night which was basically a public outreach for volunteers, and I don't know exactly when or what I'll be doing with this. It's definitely something good and the people here are some that a lot would recognize their names but it's just friendly and non-heirarchical and nobody makes a big deal about who they are.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #126 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 15:31:36 PT
whig
I would like to play. I am a volunteer. As far as FAM -well I'd need to get some concise info and the connect to talk with about. I also play in another band too. And then there is always solo acoustic. I have to discuss it. Put me in the possibles.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #125 posted by global_warming on August 08, 2006 at 15:22:36 PT
is this the making of a gathering?
if i can get a new car, i would enjoy such a meet, maybe mbc might show up, i hope she is not a guy,

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #124 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 15:15:06 PT
Whig and Museman
How far is it to San Francisco from where Museman lives? I guess Museman should answer that one.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #123 posted by whig on August 08, 2006 at 15:12:32 PT
museman
October 28 and 29. 11am-7pm each day. San Francisco's Golden Gate Park at the Hall of Flowers near 9th and Lincoln.

2 stages of music, herbal consultants, medical consultants, forums & speakers, comedians, massage, cannabis culture, demonstrations, contests, glass gallery, history and human rights.

They want performers to come and play, too. I don't know what the timeslot situation is and whether they have an opening for you but I can ask and if Fam wanted to come down and play it might be doable. I do know there is no budget to pay performers, they are asking for people to play for free.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #122 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 14:51:48 PT
whig
Always interested, not always able. San Fran is a good days drive from here, but not undoable. When in Oct.?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #121 posted by whig on August 08, 2006 at 14:37:44 PT
museman
Any interest in coming to San Francisco for the Wonders of Cannabis Festival in October?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #120 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 14:34:07 PT
FoM
It's been there for a long long time. It's just that now it is getting so large and omnipresent that a lot of the insulation of American opulance is getting thinner. People came here to escape it originally, but we carry it within us, so there is no escape.

It is our fear. Fear of poverty, fear of dis-ease. Fear of loss. Fear of rejection. Fear and mistrust. Jeolousy.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #119 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 14:15:48 PT
museman
How did this much hate become the major factor in how our country functions? What happen to being able to dream and smile and have hope for the future. I use to like hearing America The Beautiful but when I hear it now on LWW I have to turn it off. It makes me feel really bad.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #118 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 14:10:19 PT
FoM #115
They learned everything we taught them about tactics. They don't have to shoot, they can taser you, then haul you off, and charge you with some violation or another which costs you much time and money, marks you so that you are the first to get 'picked up' again in any future actions, as well as being denied services and opportunities like a good job because of it.

Probation, urine testing. Court costs. Social stigma.

They can't make money off you when you're dead. If they think they can't make money off you at all, or it costs to much to allow you to continue to exist - accidents happen quite often.

The question is whether we are being policed by 'people' or by 'professionals.'

During VietNam they used the military as buffers to the protests, and a lot of those military were guys like me, who listened to the same music, in a lot of cases smoked pot together with the long hairs, and were of the same generation. VietNam was all about our generation. The military was as likely to switch sides as not.

Times have changed. Our domestic police force is better armed, better armored, and better trained, than the Armed Forces combat units currently in Iraq.

In such a confrontation, any violence could easily be later justified as 'provocation.'

We have professional, or MERCENARY forces as cops, BLM, and Homeland Security. We have to deal with them in some bold new ways.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #117 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 13:58:53 PT
museman
I believe that our country needs to be tolerant of people who aren't like what they think is normal. Normal is what is comfortable with different groups and individuals. We need to mend the great divide between the cultures or our country will self destruct from within. No outside force will be our downfall.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #116 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 13:54:55 PT
FoM
This is not to say that ALL people in the 'justice' system are corrupt, or 'bad' people, but the majority are empowered to be just that, so they are.

Near the end of my stay, a group of local sheriffs patrolled the gathering. As they were walking by, amidst the warning cries of "six-up" (which was our code this year for preparing folks for their presence) a group of folks called out, "We LO-OVE you!"

Amazingly, the small group of cops called back. "We love you too!"

A lot of humor, but enough sincerety to brighten ones day.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #115 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 13:45:57 PT
museman
What would happen if people marched on Washington like they did during Vietnam? Would they shoot people now?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #114 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 13:43:43 PT
FoM
There were over 1,000 law enforcement personnel on site and manning the road block. Every single one of them was armed, and armored.

This is our future unless we stand up in peace and firmness.

They had a small army capable (by their own reckoning) of subduing a population of up to 50,000 basicly un-armed citizens.

I drove by a caravan of 100s of LEO vehicles on the way in. Fortunately for us they were all going the other way, but it was a scary sight.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #113 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 13:31:56 PT
museman
Yes the language of the cameraman was angry. I have heard all those words before and he was just so angry he was blowing off steam but he probably is a very nice person. Those where big guns.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #112 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 13:23:00 PT
Fom
I made me kind of 'proud.' I believe in this kind of magic (maybe not the language of the camera-man) and to see it at work sends chills up my spine.

It's about reality, and deciding when enough is enough.

No one was shot because only one side had guns - and it was being videotaped. This was happening while I was debating even going or not. I believe that when those horses had to backup, along with the rest of the cops, a victory for the rainbow was won. Unfortunately that kind of solidarity of faith and belief (not ritual or religion) does not happen often in other places.

At least we know it can.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #111 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 13:11:09 PT
museman
It made me cry.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #110 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 13:07:43 PT
museman
I am watching it now. I am so afraid of guns. Oh my!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #109 posted by museman on August 08, 2006 at 12:53:56 PT
OT: American patriotism
This I think is an example of a power that a lot of people don't believe in, called "Standing up."

It also shows the real nature of the man.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #108 posted by FoM on August 08, 2006 at 09:54:48 PT
Hope
I think our speciality breeding of animals has weakened them. We have Quarter Horses that look like beef cattle but have tiny feet. We have Thorougbreds that are highly explosive and hot headed. Nature will weed out the weak and the strong will survive. Sometimes I think that Republicans think of people like the way that natural selection is a good thing in animals. If the weak can't survive then it's best that they don't. I don't believe that about human beings but it makes sense in animals.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #107 posted by Hope on August 08, 2006 at 08:22:12 PT
Hidalgo
was a wild mustang until caught and trained by a good and loving trainer.

There naturally would be an iffy lineage. An American Mustang could carry Arabian blood. Anything that escaped or wound up abandoned for one reason or another and left to breed in the wild with other horses in the same situation.

Obviously some good, hearty, fast...want to win blood.

Could be a Thoroughbred, Arabian, Morgan, Paso, Plow Horse, Wagon puller, Cow Horse, Mill Horse mix that came up a sturdy little "Full House".

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #106 posted by rchandar on August 08, 2006 at 04:05:49 PT:

Wayne
..that could be a bad thing as easily as a good thing. Seems absurd that it could, but I worry that the younger, less educated and more propaganda-brained politicals that will take up the charge may be more ruthless instead of more welcoming and reasonable. that's just a theory, borrowed from the history of Soviet Russia.

...let's hope it doesn't turn out that way.

--rchandar

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #105 posted by FoM on August 07, 2006 at 22:27:55 PT
afterburner
Ohio is the top protest song. That is the best song to me too.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #104 posted by afterburner on August 07, 2006 at 22:23:42 PT
FoM: OT: Q107 Top 5 Weekend
Q107 Top 5 Weekend Aug.4-7.2006 http://www.q107.com/features/top5_lists.cfm

I'm sending the lists in an email in case you can't access the website.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #103 posted by FoM on August 07, 2006 at 21:42:41 PT
WEEDS Now on MySpace.com
http://www.myspace.com/weedsonshowtime

Videos on YouTube.com

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=32B5E9E9BAAEB70D

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #102 posted by b4daylight on August 07, 2006 at 21:23:42 PT
123said
maybe he should try banning oil. In America we consume 400 million gallons of gas a day.

That is a toxic substance which his UN gives me to breathe.

Those cars they support kill 42,00 people a year USA..

get a clu and get my life back./



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #101 posted by FoM on August 07, 2006 at 21:20:22 PT
Hope
We missed the first half an hour so I didn't know it was based on a true story until the end. I found it interesting that it was in the middle east and mentioned Baghdad and Iraq. They are very dedicated to their breed. The Arabian is by far the strongest little horse in the world. It is the foundation stock for the Thoroughbred. They are classified as the most beautiful horse in the world. For the little pinto horse to win the race was remarkable.

http://www.arabianhorses.org/home/Gallery/Index.asp

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #100 posted by ekim on August 07, 2006 at 21:07:10 PT
--rchandar-- farout
do you mean that in 1961 what ol harry did wriledup ol jfk and he was the one to take the power away from asslinger.

someone wrote a book but i dont know anymore than that.

for a body of world leaders to sign a peice of paper saying that no human can have Cannabis anywhere on this earth is a disgrace to the human race. it is to go against every society that has been helped by this great plant.

oil is at 77 bucks------- here on Sept 20and 21 in Lansing a big Bio-fuel show will take place. These shows are being held all over the country. Cannabis will help in making ethanol now.



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #99 posted by Hope on August 07, 2006 at 20:54:05 PT
Comment 97
Glad you enjoyed it, FoM. It's one of my favorites.

While they obviously took a bit of license...it is a true story...or at least based on a true story.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #98 posted by Wayne on August 07, 2006 at 20:13:06 PT
reefer
I think the word 'reefer' needs to be expunged from our vocabulary. It's so outdated, anyone who uses it might just as well have "ignorant" tattooed on their forehead.

Marijuana IS worth getting angry about, but only when the long arm of the law wants to take away your freedom because of it. As for Mr. Costa, he most certainly is NOT worth getting angry about. He has officially had his 15 minutes, and he will be dead soon enough, along with all the other dinosaurs of his era. Costa, Walters, Bennett, Rumsfeld, Cheney... the whole lot of them, will soon pass into extinction.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #97 posted by FoM on August 07, 2006 at 19:44:09 PT
Off Topic: Hope
We just watched the movie Hidalgo. It was very good. Thank you for recommending it to me.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #96 posted by global_warming on August 07, 2006 at 17:32:16 PT
costa is a pig
and a brother and sister

in this troubled world

like you and me

who enjoy this creation, or world as some say,

gather and proclaim your place, your politics,

your food and water

your religion, do you have a soul?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #95 posted by rchandar on August 07, 2006 at 17:21:50 PT:

reply to global warming
i don't get it. a while ago, you called Costa "a pig". Now he loves his children? That he cares about the right path? It's good to teach peace rather than war, but a lot of people suffer for Costa's right to "care" about "the right path".

I despise these UN f@#kers. I want the whole bloody UN to be dissolved and never rear it's head again. No poem: the UN must be ended. Not destroyed, ended by unilateral agreement among free people. These people are horrible butchers, don't defend them. These are the men who raped and pillaged cities in Africa, violated women, stole relief food from the starving. Nothing excuses Mr. Costa or his henchmen. Nothing.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #94 posted by global_warming on August 07, 2006 at 17:12:29 PT
receive
Eternal Freedom

The One who has given his life

Liberty and Understanding

Died on that merciless hot day, on that disgusting cross,

To give light to our frightened souls



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #93 posted by global_warming on August 07, 2006 at 16:54:23 PT
you getting there
your hand is on the button



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #92 posted by global_warming on August 07, 2006 at 16:38:38 PT
cmon
just a little bit further on Monday Night,

do you feel trapped

has big government become in your peaceful soul?

We all will pass into the unknown

those portals of unforgiving

have ' W e those people an understanding?

terms and complex and so complete

you gettin there



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #91 posted by global_warming on August 07, 2006 at 16:10:02 PT
Costa is an old man
filled with genuine good feelings,

he is a child like you and me,

who try to find that path,

towards a good understanding,

There is so much more

In our green filled world,



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #90 posted by rchandar on August 07, 2006 at 14:57:27 PT:

one last thought...
...the biggest problem with Costa and the UN is that their "international treaties" essentially preclude world governments from adopting sensible social policies. Because of the UN treaties, there is not even one country in the world (not even the Netherlands) that doesn't, for some amount, for some stage of the issue, retain criminal penalties for either possession, cultivation, distribution. Holland, Italy, Germany, Britain, Belgium have simply depenalized use and instituted "tolerance" for either small-scale growing or dealing. But many people, even in these countries, caught up with cannabis merits criminal status. As for the US, many states have "decriminalized" pot, but for the Feds it is clearly written: criminal offense. Jamaica and Canada wanted to "decriminalize," but, according to the UN (with the US playing the UN card), it was impermissible. Mexico, too, and Vicente Fox had repeatedly come out in favor of legalization.

My problem with this: sovereign governments are responsible to the values and the wishes of the people who elected or entrusted them with the governance of the country. The UN should have no right to tell ANY government what they can and cannot do: it's absurd. Basically Anslinger got this Singel treaty document to the floor of the UN, and it was his personal mission to legislate marijuana as illegal forever, for everyone. That's his contribution, and none of the "representatives" at that august 1961 meeting dared to challenge him. It can never come up for a vote again since the "permanent" members on the UN Security Council--the US, Russia, China--are all strongly prohibitionist and maintain veto power.

So in some form or other, all advocates and constituencies favoring legalization fight against men like Mr. Costa. the countries of the EU have come a long way, but I know they would go a lot further if the UN wasn't cracking it's whip in anger against them. But the issue isn't Mr. Costa, it's this standard of "world government" which is meaningless except in upholding prohibition. In the US, Canada, Mexico, and Latin America, this treaty prevents, time after time, meaningful and just social policy changes. If the US Government isn't willing to legalize pot, it isn't just the building of the police state. It's that men such as our Presidents feel they have to take this treaty seriously.

But it's ridiculous. Where, indeed, does the UN represent the concerns of ordinary citizens in "free" countries? What voice do we have in the legislations they pass? Who are the people that "represent" us at this body? I can tell you, they are not people who have even had to campaign for our votes, who even superficially profess interest and concern for our daily lives. They are all appointees, divorced forever from public society.

It must end. And all indications are that a lot of Europeans feel this way; they may, at some point, withdraw from the Singel Convention. We should, too. Yet it is more than that. The issue is accountability; nothing in the UN is accountable, yet this issue is referred indefinitely to the UN's "international treaties". More importantly, there is no basis for retaining prohibition; Mr. Costa knows it. Marijuana was outlawed forty-five years ago at this convention mostly because almost nothing was known about it by Americans, that knowledge about properties and effects were explained at that time by "beatniks" such as William Burroughs.

A few years ago, a UNODC representative was asked why cannabis remained illegal. He replied, "we already have alcohol and tobacco legal, and cannot add to the list of legal drugs." Unbelievable as it sounds, it is true. For many peoples of the world--not minorities, whole societies--cannabis has been a traditional sacrament. Basically the rep's dictum was, it's ok for Muslims for whom scripture has forbidden alcohol to drink alcohol, and governments may comply, but it's not ok for cannabis, which has been in the Islamic tradition for millennia, to be allowed. These are absurd distortions of the idea of covenant.

Quit Singel Convention. End the War on Cannabis.

--rchandar

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #89 posted by Hope on August 07, 2006 at 10:45:42 PT
Another load of "crap"....
Rearranged. Put on a different platter. Same "cooks". Same "crap".

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1040/a08.html?397

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #88 posted by Hope on August 07, 2006 at 10:34:51 PT
Codfish Comment 63
That's good! I like it.

"They should all go hunting with Dick Cheney."



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #87 posted by Kozmo on August 07, 2006 at 09:00:19 PT
I don't even
have to read these articles anymore. Once I see the article title I know exactly what will be said in the body. Marijuana is way more potent that it used to be blah blah blah, lots of kids checking in to rehab blah blah blah, marijuana is dangerous blah blah blah, etc,etc,etc ..... we have no evidence to back up these assertions yada yada yada.

These distributed talking points are getting old folks.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #86 posted by FoM on August 07, 2006 at 06:33:23 PT
SystemGoneDown
Please don't threaten people. I am against violence and if you really believe in violence then this is the wrong web site for you. I try to think that you don't know how to express yourself without expressing angry comments. Are you on our side? Do you care about us here who really care and want those who read CNews to know we aren't mean and crazy people but concerned citizens? Self control is important for the sake of this very good community.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #85 posted by JR Bob Dobbs on August 07, 2006 at 04:46:43 PT
Truth to power
I agree - threats against anyone should have no place here. Speaking truth to power is a slow process, especially when the power in question has a vested interest in maintaining the lie. But how persuasive is a threat? A threat will only push someone away from your position, and closes their mind to any further persuasion. That's the last thing we need.

Back to the article... "Would even the most ardent supporter of legalization want to fly in an aircraft whose pilot used cannabis?" This is a complete non-argument. Pilots can get as falling down drunk as they want as often as they want, as long as they comply with the 24-hour bottle-to-throttle rule. Perhaps cannabist pilots should have a similar rule: "24 hours from lift-off to take-off"? Besides, a pilot would never be considered a criminal for merely having a liquor cabinet at home, unlike cannabis. Should it be served on airplane flights like liquor? Probably not the smoked variety, since the second-hand smoke could drift towards the cabin. However, most of the incidents of air-rage I've read about result from someone who's had too many drinks. Airports already have little well-ventilated rooms where tobacco smokers can go before the flight, and then they are forbidden from smoking during the flight. The same system could easily apply to cannabis.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #84 posted by Larryh on August 07, 2006 at 04:03:05 PT:

Don't stress
This idiot is a part of the UN... the UN , as everybody knows, is a collection of morons. I

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #83 posted by mayan on August 07, 2006 at 03:50:29 PT
Re: Comment #20
Global warming, if Lieberman loses (he's trailing by 10 pts. in latest polls) he says he will run as an independent in November. That would likely give that Senate seat to Republican nominee Alan Schlesinger, which would be fine by Lieberman as that seat would remain pro-bush and pro-war. Lieberman could possibly win as in independent if riggable Diebold or Triad electronic voting machines systems are used. He has the support of the military industrial complex and the Zionist lobby. Those folks can pull some serious strings.

If Lieberman loses this primary it could signal the beginning of the end of the PNAC agenda, on which the neo-cons have bet all of their marbles. It seems that the only thing that can salvage their sinister stranglehold is another "terror attack".

Conn. Race Could Be Democratic Watershed: Loss by Lieberman May Embolden Critics of War: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/05/AR2006080500963.html

False Flag News: Saving the world one drill at a time: http://falseflagnews.com/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #82 posted by Toker00 on August 07, 2006 at 03:45:12 PT
Whig and sgd
What sgd said is what many, and I mean many, of us feel. Yes even us here at C-News. But, we are not going to cross that threshold. There are other ways to beat the Prohibians.

It isn't cowardice that keeps us from striking back violently. It is committment to what we believe in. We believe in the good things in life. We resist the bad.

How long do you think it would take the Feds to round up enough of us "Jews" to convince the others to give up? We barely have a voice now, with millions on millions of us fighting.

Violence would end even that small voice. Which, by the way, is much louder than it was ten years ago.

Wage peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITITION NOW!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #81 posted by whig on August 06, 2006 at 23:09:24 PT
FoM
Another thought I had is that I think everything we say here is intended in some hopeful sense to be read even by the targets of our criticism. So if we are saying that we think someone is wrong we want them to know we think that. But if someone like Antonio Maria Costa were to read what SGD wrote he wouldn't think it was a criticism or a joke at all, and nobody deserves to be put in fear of being murdered by anyone here. I hope I'm not pushing you too hard on this but I really feel strongly that violent threats have no place here, even though I'm just a guest myself so it's just my opinion however strongly I may hold it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #80 posted by whig on August 06, 2006 at 22:57:12 PT
FoM
I understand and I don't think Mr Costa is being seriously threatened, but I can definitely see how our opponents could take something like SGD's comment and use it against us somehow, especially because it does name a particular person and talks about specific harmful acts. I think SGD is not someone we should welcome here any more unless he or she retracts that and stops the violent rhetoric. That's just my opinion.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #79 posted by FoM on August 06, 2006 at 22:43:48 PT
whig
I understand why it upsets you. I very seldom delete a comment. I don't like to do that. I believe that most people that read CNews know we as a group are non violent.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #78 posted by whig on August 06, 2006 at 22:37:30 PT
FoM
I'd like you to consider deleting message #64 as it contains a death threat and that is a very bad thing to have here. Thank you. You can delete this message too if you want to.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #77 posted by whig on August 06, 2006 at 22:33:15 PT
SystemGoneDown #64
I dislike your violent rhetoric. Please don't do that here. I'm not the person in charge, I just participate and I like being where people are peaceful. If you are going to talk about killing people and being violent then you are not someone I want to talk to. Also please keep in mind that threats like that, even made without any serious intention behind them, may be taken seriously by some people. We are being watched here all the time, this is not a private place but a public board, and what we say reflects on all of us and if you keep acting like a provocateur then I have to say you are putting us in unnecessary danger.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #76 posted by afterburner on August 06, 2006 at 22:27:32 PT
Sinsemilla Jones #70
Nice! Ram Dass is correct. Fundamentalism is like the shell of an egg, to protect the developing chick from outside reality until sHe is ready. When the chick pecks through the shell, sHe discovers a larger world outside the constraints of the shell. Fearfully clinging to the eggshell, "never straying too far from the sidewalk," stunts hir growth. Even Dr. Timothy Leary said, "I die so hard." Ego destruction precedes ego transcendence.

We must love our enemies to forgive them. We must listen to encourage them on their own journeys of self-discovery and merging with others into oneness. The planet Earth, or "Spaceship Earth," has a shell too, according to Buckminster Fuller. Inside the shell is the petroleum and other fossil fuels that have been used to develop our technology. As enlightened seekers peck through the shell of industrial society, they discover the future realities of renewable energy, ecology, co-operation, spiritual growth and outer/inner space exploration.

________________

Rosetta stone (legend), courtesy of Dr. Leary:

sHe = he or she

hir = him or her

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #75 posted by rchandar on August 06, 2006 at 22:16:19 PT:

observer
The part of Mr. Costa's reasoning that you quoted is unbelievable political rhetoric mired in Western certainty. It assumes that the entire world experiences the same prosperity and moral kindness earned in the prosperous West. I think Mr. Costa might visit some jails in Morocco, or Ghana, and try to stomach the kind of grisly humiliation and murder that he's encouraging. As for his comment about fining/education being a good solution, that's just pure hypocrisy designed to pacify us. Year after year, the UN has viciously criticized the governments of Europe for "experimenting" with "decriminalization," that it "sends a bad message to the world".

Why? Is there some moral right in locking first-timers up with murderers and rapists? Is it natural for human beings in desperately poor countries to give full allegiance and trust to obviously corrupt heads of state rather than to family, to tradition, to friends? What irks me most is that Mr.Costa, unlike even Mr. Bush, doesn't appear to have thought out what he is trying to say: he has no accountability for world social policy, and the document is an unmistakable fakehood. People today are so stupid--they ignore the very clear and obvious fact that for Third World countries, much more so than for us (though it is an issue for us)--this is a cornerstone issue of human rights and justice. And apparently the UN is bent on giving the blank check for injustices in countries where people do not have all the things we have.

But then, the UN's record on human rights was always dismal, their punitive ability to stop injustices always incredibly pale and weak. Yet we in the most prosperous countries still have to bow our heads to this stupid man's "international treaties," when in reality we--and they--could do just fine without his paternalizing help.

Quit UN. Simple.

--rchandar

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #74 posted by goneposthole on August 06, 2006 at 21:56:18 PT
another great day
"The U.S. market alone has been valued at more than $10-billion."

With the price of cannabis at 250 dollars per ounce, the market is booming.. Sixteen times two hundred fifty equals 4000 dollars per pound.

Ten billion divided by four thousand equals 2.5 million pounds of cannabis bought and sold each year in the US.

That's 1.25 thousand tons of cannabis each year that is available for smoking on a daily basis.

That's 100 hundred semi-truck trailer loads with 25,000 pounds of cannabis in each one.

The cannabis market is doing fine.

Mr. Costa worries too much. He should smoke a joint, get some sleep, and find something else to think about.

Like legalizing cannabis. That would be a good start.

The cannabis market just isn't going to go away. A nine thousand year history isn't going to go up in smoke. No way, no how, no nothin.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #73 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on August 06, 2006 at 21:45:58 PT
"And all cops are doctors, doncha know?"
That's catchy, afterburner, I feel a song coming on.....

---------------------------------------------------

I think Doctor Copper and I'm proud

I'm part of a fundamental crowd

And if you look around these days

There seems to be a Dr. Copper craze

I'm a Copper, he's a Copper, she's a Copper

Wouldn't you like to be a Doctor, too?

Be a Doctor, think like a Copper

Be a Copper, think like a Doctor

(repeat)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #72 posted by mayan on August 06, 2006 at 21:30:46 PT
U.N. Crooks
The characteristics of cannabis are no longer that different from those of other plant-based drugs, such as cocaine and heroin.

That's all I needed to read to know that Antonio Maria Costa has zero credibility.

The United Nations isn't uniting anything, it is dividing this world! The U.N. is a criminal organization which seeks to destroy the sovereignty of all nations.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #71 posted by FoM on August 06, 2006 at 21:26:18 PT
afterburner
That is really nice to read.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #70 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on August 06, 2006 at 21:20:46 PT
SystemGoneDown
...One concern of mine is the rise of fundamentalism in the world. To this Ram Dass replies, "Fundamentalism is one of the last stages of enlightenment." I am so surprised to hear this (from my own place of spiritual superiority). He explains: If one is in this place of rigid righteousness that is fundamentalism and then falls, it "is so terribly humbling that it breaks open and frees the soul." How should we respond to fundamentalism? "With our intuitive hearts," he says. "Pull ourselves out of our egos and our spiritual roles and listen with care and compassion." It is responding from this place that will begin to soften the hearts of the fundamentalists....

http://www.ramdasstapes.org/article%20the%20issue%20by%20alan%20davidson.htm

I found that while reseaching psychedelic therapy potential.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #69 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on August 06, 2006 at 20:53:08 PT
The theraputic potential of psychedelics....
....In one study in the late 1950's, Dr Humphry Osmond gave LSD to alcoholics in Alcoholics Anonymous who had failed to quit drinking. After one year, around 50% of the study group had not had a drink -- a success rate that has never been duplicated by any other means....

....(Dr. Timothy) Leary began conducting experiments with psilocybin in 1960 on himself and a number of Harvard graduate students after trying hallucinogenic mushrooms used in Native American religious rituals while visiting Mexico. His group began conducting experiments on state prisoners, where they claimed a 90% success rate preventing repeat offenses....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_LSD

....The use of peyote in a structured religious setting, with the guidance of a socially sanctioned healer, has been reported by some authors to be a powerful treatment for alcoholism among Native Americans and a way of bringing balance back into the lives of its participants.

Unfortunately, to date there have not been any controlled studies of the use of peyote in this setting to treat alcoholism or other addiction disorders. Most of the literature has consisted of anecdotal accounts of its effectiveness (Albaugh & Anderson,1974; Bergman, 1971; Pascarosa, & Futterman, 1976; Pascarosa, Futterman & Halsweig, 1976). The closest research that has been done in this area is with LSD back in the 50s and 60s. Virtually all double-blind controlled studies that have been done with LSD in the treatment of alcoholism have met mixed reviews by the scientific community. There has been short term or "afterglow" improvement in patients which diminishes with time (Halpern, 1996). It is important to note that most of these studies only measured drug effect with no appropriate clinical direction and support. (Smart & Strom, 1964; Hollister et al., 1969; Ludwig et al., 1969; Mottin, 1973).

The Native American Church, on the other hand, offers a combination of elements that used in conjunction with one another, form the basis of a holistic treatment model that takes the entire individual into account. Peyote is seen as a medicine by the native peoples who use it. They believe that the controlled religious use of this medicine will allow them to see the truth about their lives and that the peyote spirit is able to give them guidance and direction....

http://www.maps.org/news-letters/v07n4/07403mcc.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #68 posted by afterburner on August 06, 2006 at 20:42:11 PT
FoM #31
"I would love to sit around a campfire and share poems, prayers and promises and things that we believe in. Thank you John Denver."

I may have told you this before, but my daughter and I danced to that John Denver song at her wedding before the symbolic passing her to her husband.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #67 posted by afterburner on August 06, 2006 at 20:30:42 PT
Sinsemilla Jones #56
"And just what makes this guy a drug expert? Mr. Antonio Maria Costa (Italy) was appointed in May 2002 Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)"

In other words, he's a cop, an international cop. And all cops are doctors, doncha know? Except LEAP members, of course!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #66 posted by observer on August 06, 2006 at 19:56:54 PT
Would be? Who's Costa fooling?
But we can tackle demand, particularly among the young. That need not mean sending them to jail. Young people caught in possession of cannabis could be treated in much the same way as those arrested for drunk driving: fined, required to attend classes on the dangers of drug use and threatened with loss of their driving licence for repeat offences. Prison would be a last resort. Schools and universities should apply zero tolerance.

Could be?

Would be?

Prison would be a last resort?

I'm not sure what kind of dream-world Costa lives in, but here on planet earth where the prohibitionist USA is world-hegemon, jailing cannabis users is a growth industry for government at all levels.

Prison would be a last resort? Here in reality, the sole the purpose of government is to railroad pot smokers into jail, fining them, enslaving them, and brainwashing them. At one time, government was for other things, but these days, every part of government is preverted to the end of jailing the marijuana smoker and punishing him in every way possible for his disobedience.

Prison is the first resort in the USA for pot smokers. Especially ones that rock the boat and refuse to be cowed by lies.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #65 posted by ekim on August 06, 2006 at 19:48:19 PT
please resist --truth will win out with debate
allow speech dont be afraid

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #64 posted by SystemGoneDown on August 06, 2006 at 18:45:14 PT
Radical Article!!!
This is a discrace to any sane person reading it. It is a shame that anyone has to read it. If I saw this asshole in the street, I would'nt hesitate to beat his ass to a pulp, then urinate on him. There's the saying Ignorance is bliss. Well, with Orwellien prohibition advacates like this guy, he is defaming marijuana just to collect a paycheck. It's people like him that deserve to die. D-I-E. Pot smokers have always been the passive peaceful type. But I'm telling you C-news nation, if we don't start thinking radical, people like us will essentially be genocided from society. Free Thinkers are getting blown by wind slowly over time and we have no more time. It is 2006 and it is about time we forced our cause down THEIR throats for once.

Death to Antonio Maria Costa.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #63 posted by codfish4 on August 06, 2006 at 15:09:03 PT
DEA, FDA etc.
Get a real job, you are a big waste of time and money. All the while you have gotten killed or injured 40,000 american troops on the so called war on terror. It is not a war by definition. It is a police action. I am so sick of the conservative republican party judgements. Who do we believe? jhon ashcroft w/his kkk ties, tom delay,lol how about rush limbaugh. You should all go hunting with dick cheney for all the wisdom you have shown. also stay out of israel's business or we will get more natural distruction. You were told by many a pastor to stay outta of gaza but bush did not and 40 days later katrina hit. Jesus is for real.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #62 posted by codfish4 on August 06, 2006 at 14:52:43 PT:

mmj
The only harm proven from pot is the jail time behind it, we must isolate the conservative republican party so it can never come to power again. they are our own american taliban

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #61 posted by FoM on August 06, 2006 at 14:45:08 PT
Sinsemilla Jones
First I want to say sorry afterburner. I was going too fast.

I don't know if Cannabis could eliminate all those negative things but it might help. As far as the other substances I really don't know.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #60 posted by Sinsemilla Jones on August 06, 2006 at 14:34:55 PT
FoM, that was afterburner, but....
I wouldn't mind seeing a Joint Session, eithe