Cannabis News DrugSense
  Another Soccer Mom's Take On The Drug War
Posted by CN Staff on July 07, 2006 at 13:12:54 PT
By Karen P. Tandy, Administrator, U.S. DEA 
Source: Denver Post 

DEA USA -- Jessica Peck Corry hopes her daughter will never smoke marijuana. Since that's the case, she should hope it remains illegal. The American Academy of Pediatrics opposes the legalization of marijuana, cautioning that "any change in the legal status of marijuana, even if limited to adults, could affect the prevalence of use among adolescents."

Marijuana is against the law because it's a dangerous, addictive drug.

This is a health issue. According to the American Lung Association, marijuana smoke contains 50 to 70 percent more cancer-causing material than cigarette smoke. A June United Nations report refers to cannabis use as a "pandemic," noting an increase in cannabis- related health damage. This might explain why more teens now enter treatment for marijuana dependency than for all other drugs combined, including alcohol.

Today's marijuana is at least eight times more potent than marijuana of the 1970s. Accordingly, thousands of adolescents, whose brains are still developing, suffer from depression, memory impairment and diminished judgment because of marijuana.

Under most legalization plans, drugs would remain illegal for those under 21. But nearly a third of current drug users are teens - so a black market would still exist to supply them.

You only need to look at Prohibition to see that criminalizing an activity suppresses it, and legalization increases it. During Prohibition, alcohol consumption fell almost 60 percent and related liver cirrhosis and deaths fell dramatically. Today, alcohol consumption is more than three times greater than during Prohibition, and is estimated to cost our country at least $184 billion a year in lost productivity, crime, and health-care costs.

In addition to directing the DEA, I'm a soccer mom, too. I'm doing everything possible to keep drugs away from my own children and everyone else's - not making drugs easier to get.

Note: Re: "One soccer mom's take on the drug war," June 28 Colorado Voices column.

Karen P. Tandy, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration

Source: Denver Post (CO)
Author: Karen P. Tandy
Published: July 7, 2006
Copyright: 2006 The Denver Post Corp
Website: http://www.denverpost.com/
Contact: openforum@denverpost.com

Related Article:

One Soccer Mom's Take on the Drug War
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21948.shtml

CannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #23 posted by Sam Adams on July 07, 2006 at 17:24:25 PT
prohibition
Interesting stats on Prohibition - I'd like to see the research studies. Did alchohol consumption really fall during Prohibition? I wonder how they measured all this, back in the 1920's with the limited capabilities of science in that day. Most of America was rural farmland or factories, how could they possibly track alcohol use out in the boonies at that time?

I know this stat is true: alcohol use by minors, and the murder rate among minors both increased during Prohibition. The alcohol gangs were fond of using kids to do their dirty work, just as the drug gangs are today.

Let's face it, a huge, multi-trillion dollar government can probably produce whatever statistics they want. They fund much of the scientific research in the US.

What people need to remember, more than ever, is common sense. We don't need Karen Tandy to tell us how to raise our kids. We certainly don't need the American Academy of Pediatrics. People have been raising kids for thousands of years, quite successfully, without these "experts". The Roman and Greek empires ruled the civilized world for thousands of years without the American Academy of Pediatrics, or a Drug Czar, for that matter.

Prohibiting consensual crimes, drugs, sex, gambling, NEVER works. The only people that benefit from these laws are the political class. Everyone else comes out a loser.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by FoM on July 07, 2006 at 17:16:59 PT
ACLU backs CA's Medical Marijuana Law

Audio: http://tinyurl.com/kj4lp

By Amy Isackson

KBS SAN DIEGO (2006-07-07)

The American Civil Liberties Union is stepping in to defend California's medical marijuana law in the wake of Thursday's raids of medical marijuana dispensaries in San Diego. The ACLU is asking the state court to force San Diego to comply with the state law. KPBS reporter Amy Isackson has details.

California voters passed Proposition 215 a decade ago. It allows sick and dying patients to grow and use marijuana for medical purposes.

Earlier this year, San Diego's County Board of Supervisors sued the state to overturn the law. They say federal law that prohibits medical marijuana trumps California's law which permits it.

ACLU executive director Kevin Keenan says when officers raided medical marijuana dispensaries recently, they violated state law. He says that's ironic.

Keenan: "The county is spending time focusing on prosecuting abuses when it could prevent abuses by having a better run system."

Law enforcement officials in San Diego say they support medical marijuana laws and went after dispensaries that abuse them. Amy Isackson, KPBS news.

Copyright 2006, KPBS

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by Had Enough on July 07, 2006 at 16:50:36 PT
issues
This is a health issue.

Words from her, she said it.

Ok. I’ll buy that.

That means it shouldn’t be a criminal issue.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by mayan on July 07, 2006 at 16:47:41 PT
Karen Tandy, She's a Dandy!
She could at least put one true statement in her little piece of propaganda just to give the impression that she has a speck of credibility. A third grader could dissect her mindless drivel. Amazing.

THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY IN...

LOOSE CHANGE CREATORS RECEIVE 4 PAGE SPREAD IN THIS MONTH'S VANITY FAIR: http://www.911blogger.com/2006/07/loose-change-creators-receive-4-page.html

Michael Wolsey Interviews The U.K.'s 9/11 Truth Chairman Ian Crane (mp3): http://visibility911.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=107855

Jim Fetzer and Kevin Barrett to Speak in Wisconsin - 7/9: http://www.mwsocialforum.org/node/589

Very Strange 9/11 Aircraft Registrations: http://infowars.com/articles/sept11/very_strange_markings_on_911_aircraft_registrations.htm

Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/index.html

Veterans for 9/11 Truth: http://www.v911t.org/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by WolfgangWylde on July 07, 2006 at 16:40:56 PT
Jessica Peck Corry......
... would change her mind right quick if her daughter ever got caught up in the legal system.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #18 posted by Taylor121 on July 07, 2006 at 16:01:11 PT
You would think
You would think Tandy would know that the black market for alcohol doesn't exist right now for teens. It is actually labeled a grey market because the original source of the product is from the legal market.

The same would apply for marijuana. The "dealer" would actually be buying from a legal source, but distributing to kids would be illegal.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by Had Enough on July 07, 2006 at 15:50:29 PT
PANAMA RED
PANAMA RED (PETER ROWAN)

CHORUS

PANAMA RED, PANAMA RED

HE'LL STEAL YOUR WOMAN, THEN HE'LL ROB YOUR HEAD

PANAMA RED, PANAMA RED

******

ON HIS WHITE HORSE, MESCALITO

HE COME BREEZIN' THROUGH TOWN

I'LL BET YOUR WOMAN'S UP IN BED WITH

PANAMA RED

*****

THE JUDGE DON'T KNOW WHEN RED'S IN TOWN

HE KEEPS WELL HIDDEN UNDERGROUND

BUT EVERYBODY'S ACTING LAZY

FALLING OUT AND HANGIN' 'ROUND

MY WOMAN SAID, "HEY PEDRO

YOU'RE ACTIN' CRAZY LIKE A CLOWN"

NOBODY FEELS LIKE WORKING

PANAMA RED IS BACK IN TOWN

*****

CHORUS

*******

EVERYBODY'S LOOKING OUT FOR HIM

'CAUSE THEY KNOW RED'S SATISFIES

LITTLE GIRLS LOVE TO LISTEN TO HIM

SING AND TELL SWEET LIES

BUT WHEN THINGS GET TOO CONFUSING, HONEY

YOU'RE BETTER OFF IN BED

AND I'LL BE SEARCHING ALL THE JOINTS IN TOWN FOR

PANAMA RED

*******

CHORUS

********

Appears on The Adventures of Panama Red

http://www.nrpsmusic.com/music/lyrics/panamared.html

New Riders of the Purple Sage Website

http://www.newridersofthepurplesage.com/new_riders.htm

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by Had Enough on July 07, 2006 at 15:39:53 PT
Confused: Six must be 9 by now
Today's marijuana is at least eight times more potent than marijuana of the 1970s.

I’m really confused here; I thought not long ago they were saying up to 30 times stronger than that of the 70’s. You know like Panama Red, Columbian Gold, Acapulco Gold.

Now it’s back to 8 times. Wonder what the figure will be next month? I wish they would make up their mind on which Hooey to throw at the wall. It seems they are having a hard time finding something that will stick.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by Had Enough on July 07, 2006 at 15:17:48 PT
Go figure
Today, alcohol consumption is more than three times greater than during Prohibition.

Well I’m not too sure about this either.

Does anybody know how much the population has increased since then.

What was her source for the figure of “3 times greater” come from.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by Toker00 on July 07, 2006 at 15:13:50 PT
Classic . The Blind leading the Blind.
Tandy - "Under most legalization plans, drugs would remain illegal for those under 21. But nearly a third of current drug users are teens - so a black market would still exist to supply them."

This is incredibly ignorant. Cannabis Legalization means: THE END OF THE BLACK MARKET FOR CANNABIS!!! Even if they sneak a joint from Mom or Dad, it's STILL better than being exposed to the Hard Drugs over the curiosity of Cannabis. WAKE UP, TANDY!! Cannabis will become so boring to kids. With all the arrest time gained from Cannabis Legalization, the LEOs will be able to control the Hard Drug Black Market better (Until you realize that what works for cannabis would work for ALL drugs), reducing even MORE the chances of children getting their hands on Dangerous Drugs. More time to catch the Alcohol Abusers and save even MORE children. More time to catch the Child Molesters and Murderers, saving even MORE children.

So, Tandy, save the children. Legalize Cannabis. Quit lieing for your paycheck.

Toke.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by Had Enough on July 07, 2006 at 15:11:35 PT
words
pandemic

marijuana dependency

Today's marijuana is at least eight times more potent than marijuana of the 1970s.

Look at her choice of words.

I really love the new twist "pandemic"

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by Had Enough on July 07, 2006 at 15:05:13 PT
might and will
A June United Nations report refers to cannabis use as a "pandemic," noting an increase in cannabis- related health damage. This might explain why more teens now enter treatment for marijuana dependency than for all other drugs combined, including alcohol.

Notice the word used is, “might”.

How about when a teen is asked weather they would like to be jailed, or sign up for forced treatment “will” explain why more teens now enter treatment for marijuana dependency than for all other drugs combined, including alcohol.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by global_warming on July 07, 2006 at 14:58:40 PT
that equals
alcohol consumption fell almost 60 percent and related liver cirrhosis and deaths fell dramatically = an equivilant rise in organized crime, bootleggers and corruption up to your mothers apron,..

go on Ms. Karen, hope you can look your face in the mirror..

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by Toker00 on July 07, 2006 at 14:51:27 PT
Sucker Mom.
Karen Tandy and everyone in the DEAth are Suckers. They have traded their very Souls for a steady Paycheck. Everyone knows Cannabis is Far Safer than alcohol. Everyone knows that LEGALIZING Cannabis would decrease alcohol Use and Dependency, helping with the problem of alcohol abuse, not adding another problem. The DEAth and Fools and Dumbasses Administration keep cures AWAY from disease, addictions, and mental illnesses. Then they approve medicines that CAUSE great Damage, even DEAth. And to top it off, they provide the very infrastructure (Drug Prohibition) to supply their own children and ours, with More Powerful and Unsafe Drugs. The Drug War has been Won alright. By Drugs!

I got a letter from Brother Jerry. He speaks of the Horrors of Prison. Humility. Disrespect. Predators. The only subject of discussion in there, TIME. Suffering through another day, and another day, and yet another. The time before prison, the time in prison, the time to come after prison. And the only light these men have is the light of our letters, and the contribution to their commissaries. There is no release in prison, only stress. Jerry needs every single one of us. He needs us now, and he'll need us until he gets home. He misses his Wife, he misses his Dogs, and he misses his Life. Please send this very good man a ray of hope. It's all they have to think about besides TIME.

NOTE THE CHANGES IN JERRY'S ADDRESS****

Letters:

Jerry Sisson #66424-065

FMC Devens

P.O.Box 879

Ayers, Ma. 01434-0879

Postal Money Orders:

Commissary

Federal Bureau of Prisons

Jerry Sisson #66424-065

P.O.Box 474701

Des moines, Iowa 50947-0001

Jerry says the most important thing to him is the compassion we are showing when we write to him. It is his only GOOD thing in there. Please pray and write.

Wage peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITION NOW!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by daksya on July 07, 2006 at 14:43:51 PT
Black market
Tandy - "Under most legalization plans, drugs would remain illegal for those under 21. But nearly a third of current drug users are teens - so a black market would still exist to supply them."

Just like the thriving black market that supplies alcohol to teens, right?

..right?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by observer on July 07, 2006 at 14:17:49 PT
analysis
[3] The American Academy of Pediatrics opposes the legalization of marijuana, cautioning that "any change in the legal status of marijuana, even if limited to adults, could affect the prevalence of use among adolescents."
(Sentence 3) re: "
American" - Prohibitionists assert that the survival of the community, society, the nation, the world, etc. are at stake. Only continued and increased punishments for drug users can be contemplated, because, say prohibitionists, society will otherwise fall apart. (Survival of Society (propaganda theme 3) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme3.htm#3 ) re: "legalization", "legalization of marijuana" - Any mention of lessening the harshness of drug laws is portrayed as a sinful "legalization". Only total prohibition (or more jailings) will be righteous. (Total Prohibition or Access (propaganda theme 7) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme7.htm#7 )
[4] Marijuana is against the law because it's a dangerous, addictive drug .
(Sentence 4) re: "
dangerous", "addictive" - Drugs, claim the prohibitionist, cause insanity, violence, and terrible sickness. (Madness,Crime,Violence,Illness (propaganda theme 2) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme2.htm#2 )
[6] According to the American Lung Association, marijuana smoke contains 50 to 70 percent more cancer-causing material than cigarette smoke .
(Sentence 6) re: "
cancer-causing" - It is prohibition, claim prohibitionists, that saves people from drug crazed, whacked out, high flying drug users. (Madness,Crime,Violence,Illness (propaganda theme 2) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme2.htm#2 ) re: "American" - The health of the "community" (read: government) is assured, prohibitionists explain, because drug users are punished. Jailing drug users is thus painted as upholding society. (Survival of Society (propaganda theme 3) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme3.htm#3 )
[7] A June United Nations report refers to cannabis use as a "pandemic," noting an increase in cannabis- related health damage .
(Sentence 7) re: "
cannabis use" - Prohibition propaganda claims that all use of any "drug" is abuse. (Use is Abuse (propaganda theme 4) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme4.htm#alluseisabuse ) re: "pandemic" - Unless the drug "war" is fought, claims the rhetoric of prohibition, an evil "epidemic" of drugs would be unleashed upon an unwitting public. (Demonize, War (propaganda theme 6) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme6.htm#6 )
[8] This might explain why more teens now enter treatment for marijuana dependency than for all other drugs combined, including alcohol .
(Sentence 8) re: "
teens" - Being a prohibitionist means you can never shed too many crocodile tears for the "children". (As you lustily jail or kill their parents for using drugs.) (Children Corrupted (propaganda theme 5) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme5.htm#5 )
[10] Accordingly, thousands of adolescents, whose brains are still developing, suffer from depression, memory impairment and diminished judgment because of marijuana .
(Sentence 10) re: "
impairment", "depression" - The rhetoric of prohibition asserts that insanity, crime, and violence are caused by drugs, or are controlled by prohibition. (Madness,Crime,Violence,Illness (propaganda theme 2) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme2.htm#2 )
[12] But nearly a third of current drug users are teens - so a black market would still exist to supply them .
(Sentence 12) re: "
drug users", "users" - The rhetoric of prohibition will try to use labeling and guilt by association to link drugs and drug users with hated groups. (Hated Groups (propaganda theme 1) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme1.htm#1 ) re: "drug users" - Prohibitionists try to hammer in the idea that 'all use is abuse.' The rhetoric of prohibition needs to deny that many people can use currently illegal drugs without abusing them. (Use is Abuse (propaganda theme 4) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme4.htm#alluseisabuse ) re: "teens" - "Nothing can so excite an adult population as can anything which appears to threaten their own children." [W.White,1979] (Children Corrupted (propaganda theme 5) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme5.htm#5 )
[13] You only need to look at Prohibition to see that criminalizing an activity suppresses it, and legalization increases it .
(Sentence 13) re: "
criminalizing" - Drugs, the prohibitionist explains, are a wicked bane on modern man. Why if not for the noble drug war (i.e. jailing drug users), exclaims the propagandist, then people will run amok, and violence, death, psychosis, and plague shall cover the land. (Madness,Crime,Violence,Illness (propaganda theme 2) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme2.htm#2 )
[15] Today, alcohol consumption is more than three times greater than during Prohibition, and is estimated to cost our country at least $184 billion a year in lost productivity, crime, and health-care costs .
(Sentence 15) re: "
crime" - Prohibitionist propaganda claims that horrible dangers are caused by "drugs." (Madness,Crime,Violence,Illness (propaganda theme 2) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme2.htm#2 ) re: "our country" - The survival of society is assured, -- says the propaganda of prohibition -- as long as drug users are punished (jailed). (Survival of Society (propaganda theme 3) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme3.htm#3 )
[17] I'm doing everything possible to keep drugs away from my own children and everyone else's - not making drugs easier to get .
(Sentence 17) re: "
children" - "Chemicals have long been inextricably linked in prohibitionist literature with the ... corruption of young people." [W.White,1979] (Children Corrupted (propaganda theme 5) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme5.htm#5 )
[18] Note: Re: "One soccer mom's take on the drug war," June 28 Colorado Voices column .
(Sentence 18) re: "
drug war" - Drug users are evil fiends which, save for the noble drug "war", would multiply as the "epidemic" of drug use engulfs an innocent people. (Demonize, War (propaganda theme 6) http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/propaganda/theme6.htm#6 )



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by whig on July 07, 2006 at 14:17:38 PT
What this means
We have Succeeded in equating Cannabis Prohibition with Alcohol Prohibition.

Even the US DEA Administrator agrees with us now.

She happens to think BOTH should be prohibited.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by whig on July 07, 2006 at 14:14:38 PT
Whoa
Karen P. Tandy wrote:
"You only need to look at Prohibition to see that criminalizing an activity suppresses it, and legalization increases it. During Prohibition, alcohol consumption fell almost 60 percent and related liver cirrhosis and deaths fell dramatically. Today, alcohol consumption is more than three times greater than during Prohibition, and is estimated to cost our country at least $184 billion a year in lost productivity, crime, and health-care costs."
She is saying that Alcohol Prohibition Worked, and that Alcohol Prohibition Is A Good Idea.

Do you think people can see through this yet? Do people want Alcohol to be Prohibited again?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by afterburner on July 07, 2006 at 13:52:55 PT
Karen Tandy, Out of Touch!
Karen P. Tandy obviously doesn't keep up with the research or she would know about the recent study that showed that even smoking cannabis does not promote cancer.

If cannabis is illegal because its "addictive," then why is coffee, which is more "addictive," still legal?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by dongenero on July 07, 2006 at 13:51:46 PT
oh boy, Karen Tandy
A dangerous addictive drug? I don't think so...my word against yours. I can back mine up with science.

Cancer? The most recent studies indicate no higher cncer rate than non-smokers. In fact, these recent studies indicate that cannabis is protective against cancer.

Eight times more potent? I don't think so, maybe they shouldn't be testing 30 year old cannabis evidence.

You argue against availability for adults because someone would still sell it to teens? I don't even know how to address this ridiculous attempt at logic.

Alcohol consumption is 3 times greater than during prohibition? So is the US population...duh. The difference is that we no longer have gang related violence related to the alcohol manufacturing and distribution industry as we had under prohibtion.

And no, minors should not use cannabis, but, neither should adults be arrested, jailed, their assets seized and their lives ruined by our government....all for a plant.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Dankhank on July 07, 2006 at 13:43:36 PT
OT
http://lifeandhealth.guardian.co.uk/fashion/story/0,,1815061,00.html

story about memory ... Brit style

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by FoM on July 07, 2006 at 13:21:45 PT
Another Question
How much alcohol can a person keep in their house until it would activate a Swat Team to bust down their door and take them to jail?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on July 07, 2006 at 13:19:18 PT
A Question
Why aren't people who drink alcohol locked away from their families and friends for having a drink? Double standards are something I was always told shouldn't be.

Excerpt: You only need to look at Prohibition to see that criminalizing an activity suppresses it, and legalization increases it. During Prohibition, alcohol consumption fell almost 60 percent and related liver cirrhosis and deaths fell dramatically. Today, alcohol consumption is more than three times greater than during Prohibition, and is estimated to cost our country at least $184 billion a year in lost productivity, crime, and health-care costs.



[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on July 07, 2006 at 13:12:54