Cannabis News DrugSense
  Drug Policy Reform Activists Suffer Defeat
Posted by CN Staff on June 29, 2006 at 06:58:05 PT
By Josh Richman, Staff Writer 
Source: Oakland Tribune 

medical California -- Drug-reform advocates took a one-two punch as state lawmakers changed the treatment-not-jail sentencing law for drug users and the House opposed an amendment to halt federal pot raids in states with medical marijuana laws.

State lawmakers late Tuesday night approved changes to the drug-treatment law — passed as Proposition 36 by 61 percent of voters in November 2000 — so judges now will be able to impose two to five days of jail time to punish drug-use relapses during treatment. Opponents say this "flash incarceration" does not make treatment more effective and dilutes the law's original intent.

Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the national Drug Policy Alliance, which helped pass Proposition 36, said he supposes advocates were "naive" to believe that evidence the original law cut costs, reduced the prison population and improved lives would persuade lawmakers to let it alone. "When push came to shove, the same law enforcement establishment that opposed Proposition 36 back in 2000 didn't let up," he said, vowing the law's advocates won't let up, either.

The changes approved Tuesday are "almost definitely unconstitutional" because they alter a voter-approved ballot measure without another popular vote, he said. "We are going to be in court on this issue. It ain't over yet."

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger predicated his Proposition 36 earmark in next year's state budget on these changes being made, so he'll almost surely sign the bill. The Drug Policy Alliance and other groups could sue by early next week, but the bill requires that it automatically be put on the ballot if a court strikes any part of it down.

On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted 259-163 against a budget amendment introduced for the fourth consecutive year by Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach, to bar use of federal funds to arrest and prosecute patients and providers in the 11 states, including California, with medical marijuana laws.

The amendment got two more votes Wednesday than it did last year, compared to 148 in 2004 and 152 in 2003 — progress, but still far short of the 218 it would need to pass.

"Basically, the Republicans managed to keep strong party discipline. ... They feel they can't break with the White House on this," Nadelmann said.

That is despite an unexpected show of support from Citizens Against Government Waste, a conservative fiscal watchdog group. The group issued a report Monday on the federal war on drugs, finding that "in this time of excessive waste and expanding deficits, Congress must start sending a signal that its priorities are in order."

Federal prosecution of medical marijuana use in states that have decided to allow it wastes "valuable resources and taxpayer dollars," the report said, urging the amendment's passage.

Marijuana Policy Project communications director Bruce Mirken said Wednesday advocates are "doing our best to see the glass as half full, knowing that this is an election year and politicians tend to run for cover in election years... But it's still dismaying how out of touch Congress is with the public...

"Virtually all of the debate from the other side had nothing to do with the amendment itself," Mirken said. "It was all about marijuana being bad for kids and a gateway drug... all of which has nothing to do with whether it should be allowed for patients with cancer or AIDS when their states decide it should be."

Caren Woodson, government affairs director of Americans for Safe Access, agreed the amendment wasn't about medical marijuana's merits but rather "was designed to support federal law enforcement" by letting the Justice Department "re-allocate valuable monies to our country's most pressing illicit drug control issues, instead of spending funds to arrest and prosecute seriously ill, state-certified cannabis patients."

A detailed roll call was unavailable early Wednesday; the only greater-Bay Area members of Congress who opposed the amendment in past years were Dennis Cardoza, D-Atwater, and Richard Pombo, R-Tracy.

The Proposition 36 rewrite first was put forth as SB 803 by state Sen. Denise Ducheny, D-San Diego. The Assembly Public Safety Committee — chaired by Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, a Proposition 36 supporter — held a public hearing on SB 803 last August but delayed its vote until last week; Ducheny then pulled her bill at the last minute and moved its language into SB 1137, the state budget trailer approved late Tuesday.

Note: Legislators oppose pot raid laws, back jail time for users.

Complete Title: Drug Policy Reform Activists Suffer State, Federal Defeats

Final Vote Results For Roll Call 333: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll333.xml

Newshawk: Mayan
Source: Oakland Tribune, The (CA)
Author: Josh Richman, Staff Writer
Published: June 29, 2006
Copyright: 2006 MediaNews Group, Inc. and ANG Newspapers
Contact: triblet@angnewspapers.com
Website: http://www.oaklandtribune.com/

Related Articles & Web Sites:

Drug Policy Alliance
http://www.drugpolicy.org/

Marijuana Policy Project
http://www.mpp.org/

Americans For Safe Access
http://www.safeaccessnow.org/

House OKs Medical Pot Prosecutions
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21951.shtml

CAGW Report Calls Drug Policies a Waste
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21943.shtml

Support States' Rights -- OK Medical Pot
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21940.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #36 posted by FoM on June 29, 2006 at 16:30:54 PT
Whig
I'm sorry I didn't answer you but we went to pick out furniture today. I'm not sure I understand what you want to do but I don't know anything really about blogs.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #35 posted by global_warming on June 29, 2006 at 16:27:45 PT
Do they have a fourth of July in Canada?
They have prisons, forged in the deepest immorality of the drug war, a war on people who use and abuse drugs, who abuse plants, who abuse and refuse to accept the world view and system, you have to learn to accept the system, even Jesus cannot help you, when you are in the court of Justice,

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #34 posted by potpal on June 29, 2006 at 16:14:25 PT
says it all
This Daily Show clip pretty much explains our sorry state of affairs...

http://www.comedycentral.com/sitewide/media_player/play.jhtml?itemId=70892

Enjoy the weekend, try to believe in freedom on the fourth...peace.

Do they have a fourth of July in Canada?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #33 posted by lombar on June 29, 2006 at 15:49:04 PT
UN means UNgood,UNuseful,UNnecessary,UNpeaceful.
Some 200 million people, or 5 percent of the global population age 15-64, have used illicit drugs at least once in the last 12 months. Among this population are people from almost every country on earth.

and the UN supports arbitrarily suspending their rights and crafts propanganda to justify doing so.

More people are involved in the production and trafficking of illicit drugs and still more are touched by the devastating social and economic costs of this problem.

The costs are far lower than for already legal drugs and consist mostly of societies treatment of drug users via prohibition and the resulting overinflation of the prices of currently illegal drugs rather than resulting from the usage of the drugs themselves. Does an alcoholic beating his spouse count as a 'social cost' when the wife uses the police, courts, and a womans shelter? Oh yeah, those shelters get their funding cut so cost nothing at all right?

Partially a consequence of its pervasiveness and partially a consequence of the illicit and hidden nature of the problem, reliable analysis and statistics on the production, trafficking and use of illicit drugs are rare.

Wholly a consequence of PROHIBITION which this statement says without saying. Never tell the truth when a lie will do.

The World Drug Report 2006 endeavours to fill this gap. It provides one of the most comprehensive overviews of illicit drug trends at the international level.

Perhaps if I ask nicely they will send me a printed copy, then it can fill the gap between my stove and the counter.. or perhaps I could shred it and it could fill the gap between my cats litter box and her little but...

In the previous sentence they say its rare to find a 'reliable analysis' and now they claim they have done one yet the spokespersosn compares cannabis to opiates and cocaine. Not at all credible and unlikely to be accurate since the narcs just don't how much drugs there really is or gets used.

In addition, it presents a special thematic chapter on cannabis, by far the most widely produced, trafficked and used drug in the world.

Not even a drug, its a herb, a plant with many good properties that is denied us because of racism and lies.

The analysis of trends, some going back 10 years or more, is presented in Volume 1. Detailed statistics are presented in Volume 2. Taken together, these volumes provide the most up-to-date view of today's illicit drug situation.

Which must be pretty out of whack since the focus is totally on Cannabis. The worldwide increase of cannabis narco-fascism is in an expansion mode. It is becoming intolerable.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #32 posted by OverwhelmSam on June 29, 2006 at 15:22:22 PT
Congressional Election In Four Months
Instead of campaigning to get the current federal and state legislatures to change the law, let's shift gears now and start campaigning against the prohibitionist legislators. There not going to do a damn thing until a few of them get burnt.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #31 posted by mayan on June 29, 2006 at 15:07:52 PT
Prop. 36
State lawmakers late Tuesday night approved changes to the drug-treatment law — passed as Proposition 36 by 61 percent of voters in November 2000 — so judges now will be able to impose two to five days of jail time to punish drug-use relapses during treatment.

So this will go to the courts and then back to the people who will return Prop. 36 to it's original form. That will be a great day when the people pass it by an even greater margin!

THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY IN...

BLINK 182 SINGER JOINS 9/11 DOUBTERS: http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=15887

Viewpoint: New York Times and neocons bury 9/11 truth movement: http://www.rockrivertimes.com/index.pl?cmd=viewstory&cat=4&id=13567

The Man Who Thought He Knew Too Much: http://citypages.com/databank/27/1334/article14475.asp

Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/index.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #30 posted by Had Enough on June 29, 2006 at 14:17:25 PT
and
This was in the body of the e-mail they sent.

*******

"You won't believe today's news unless you actually read it.

In an unprecedented power grab, the FDA has declared that all drug companies are now immune to lawsuits on any drug that has been granted FDA approval.

It's the biggest handout to drug companies ever, and the action further establishes the FDA as a rogue agency acting to protect Big Pharma, with no respect for the laws of the land or the safety of health consumers."

http://www.newstarget.com/019497.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #29 posted by Had Enough on June 29, 2006 at 14:11:27 PT
more from link
The FDA, through its willful negligence, is indirectly responsible for the deaths of more Americans than all terrorists, murderers and drunk drivers combined. As the deaths continue to mount, and drug companies become even more aggressive with outlandish disease mongering and advertising efforts, the FDA rears up to unleash a new wave of corporate terrorism upon the American people by emboldening drug companies to care even less about the safety of their synthetic chemical products, most of which cause harm by their very nature of being foreign to the human body.

http://www.newstarget.com/019497.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #28 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 14:00:38 PT
Blog Name?
Cannabis Opinions?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #27 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:56:07 PT
lombar
Better -- We link it up to the whole progressive blogosphere.

We don't need to e-mail it or print it or do anything but publish it online, link it to other sites and invite people to come over and chat with us like they do here on CNews. It's how I came to be part of this conversation, and presumably the same with most of us here.

But instead of the subject being the article from this or that newspaper, we'd be writing our own articles. We'd be a resource that other sites could link to.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #26 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:51:02 PT
Holy crap
Here's another:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_944.shtml

"We think that if your company complies with the FDA processes, if you bring forward the benefits and risks of your drug, and let your information be judged through a process with highly trained scientists, you should not be second-guessed by state courts that don't have the same scientific knowledge," said FDA Deputy Commissioner on Medical and Scientific Affairs Scott Gottlieb.


[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #25 posted by lombar on June 29, 2006 at 13:49:04 PT
Like a Newsletter collective...
Then we could submit them in alternative forums for wide dissemination? Or via email?

Choose a topic, discuss for 2-3 days, write it into a clear format with set goals/points... We do get a very wide array of views on things here.

2 heads are better than one they say, how about 20? ;)

"They stab it with their steely knives but they just can't kill the beast."

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #24 posted by Had Enough on June 29, 2006 at 13:36:41 PT
The lawlessness of the FDA, Big Pharma immunity,
The lawlessness of the FDA, Big Pharma immunity, and crimes against humanity (opinion)

June 30, 2006 is a day that will be long remembered as a dark milestone in the history of FDA and its campaign against health consumers. On June 30, an FDA "Final Rule" goes into effect, establishing a regulatory power grab of such scale and scope that it attempts to bypass all laws, the will of Congress and fundamental protections for consumers. This "Final Rule," which may as well be called a "Final Solution" for drug consumers, claims that consumers can no longer sue drug companies for the harm caused by any FDA-approved drug, even if the drug's manufacturer intentionally misled the FDA by hiding or fabricating clinical trial data.

and... http://www.newstarget.com/019497.html

Not sure of accuracy of this website. Somehow I ended up on their mailing list, and they keep sending me stuff.

But anyways, here it is.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:28:43 PT
lombar
Could you use this one?

iygckozl@trashmail.net

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:27:12 PT
FoM
This is starting to crystalize for me as a really interesting idea.

What would you think about if we set up a Sister Blog to CNews where we can collaborate on discussing content and posting our own opinion articles?

I can probably manage to set that up.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by lombar on June 29, 2006 at 13:23:26 PT
whig
Sure... the last email address I had for you was a hushmail and it said was not existant. If you still have my email on record send me an email, Ill send you a link.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #20 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:20:40 PT
lombar
This could turn into a really neat project...

A CNews Newsletter

Participants on the list here can write articles and we can put them into a proper site and talk about them with each other and edit them into shape for public consumption, then post them.

What do you think?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by lombar on June 29, 2006 at 13:19:14 PT
Thanks..
I am still writing the war portion. It is hard to be ultra critical of the actions of the government of the USA without offending its people. As well, if it was a healthy republic, the state would actually be an extension of the peoples will instead of the enforcement of the current 'way of things', corporate oligarchic hirearchy and the will of few ultra elites.

When I re-read that I thought boy o boy did you step in it. Comes back to the use of language... what is 'rogue'? Is that like 'international law' which seems to exist for drugs but not for war? I guess I am still fuming about that UN thing...



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:16:35 PT
lombar
Amen.

Would you allow me to help by editing or proofreading what you are writing?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by whig on June 29, 2006 at 13:09:38 PT
Hope #14
You said that well.

You aren't really a Democrat after all. You're something better. You're a progressive.

I now understand what that word means.

And I am a progressive too.

There are three choices, three parties, really. That's part of the problem with there being a two party system. One party is always shut out.

The three parties are: Progressive, Status Quo, and Regressive.

The "Status Quo" party is the classical conservative position. The Democratic Party has lately been (since Bill Clinton at least) the "Status Quo" (conservative) party, and the Republican Party has been the Regressive Party.

Progressives have been shut out for awhile. And they are now emerging into the Democratic Party so that's good. Though people like me will stay outside, I'll certainly appreciate to see the Progressive Era resume, this time without prohibition. That was a relic of the last Progressive Era and it is what destroyed them. But it is no longer Progressive to support prohibition. It was tried and it failed and it is now only Status Quo and Regressive to maintain it.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by dongenero on June 29, 2006 at 12:54:43 PT
lombar
Your War On Drugs position statement is great.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #15 posted by lombar on June 29, 2006 at 12:12:10 PT
Writing webpage.
I am writing a personal webpage and have just written a short blurb on the war on drugs.

- I have to include a note about the DISTORTIONS of the calculated use of manipulative language that keeps the double standards going.

I realized a few days ago that I have a few books worth of writings, collected letters to editors (some of them pretty critical) both published and unpublished. I probably have another book or two worth of comments here. There are a few I will be mining for inclusion, I seem to remember some clear dharma writings, about metta (loving kindness) that I posted here a few monthes ago.

I just turned 40 a few days ago and the temporal nature of reality makes me want to gather together what I have written which is really all I have been doing for years now, compile it because I believe it would be worthwhile. Time to really stand up and start taking the fight to the enemy. The weapons of peace are reason, persistence, and compassion. The depression I have been experiencing has been arising from the feeling I am not doing enough to battle the creeping(rushing) fascism.

All my LTEs are signed, the PTB know who I am ... it is fear that stops many but it is fear itself that is the weapon used against us. When I finish the framework, I will post a link but I have not made all the main pages yet. I am all over the place as far as HTML goes but its just educational, the content can always be reformatted.

Thanks Sam, I'll have to have a 'propaganda' blurb.

War

War is completely immoral except in defense. To train people to kill, send them to kill other people, to further some ideology, insure some strategic or economic goal, invariably springs from someones greed. Greed is a deadly sin for many religions, and the major source of conflict in our world. Greed and lack of compassion. No matter what religion I have studied, killing is wrong. However, in our world, governments monopolize the use of violence and reserve it for its exclusive use, and use it. The war on Afganhistan and Iraq have arisen from decpeption and manipulation. They represent the utter corruption of the western countries, murder, theft, deception, are being normalized in an culture that cultivates criminality to justify further encroachment upon the rights of the citizenry. If we can't trust the state with money, consider politicians the biggest liars in society, how could we possibly trust it with the power of life and death? The US is currently a rogue nation.

War On Drugs

War is immoral. A war upon the tastes of citizens is ludichrist. Yet we are faced with neanderthals and their 'lock 'em up and throw away the key' mentality as if that simplistic solution would solve the stated problems. Over the course of my life, despite the so-called war on drugs, drugs of all kinds have become cheap and ubiquitous. If the stated goal to insure a 'drug free america' (forgetting the utter hypocrisy that the Drug Free America Foundations biggest contributors are alcohol, tobacco, pharmacueticals, and the media or that the deaths result from the use of legal 'approved' drugs dwarf those caused by illicit drugs) it is an abysmal failure. Not only that but we are constantly being lied to by authorities to continue to justify this bottomless money-pit and justify the loss of civil liberties and privacy. We can't stop drugs in prisons, how could we ever stop it in the wild? Immoral, inneffective, Idiotic.... unless of course you profit from it. Police(power, budgets), lawyers(endless work), judges(endless work), drug testers(sales), drug dealers(sales), prison guards(job security), prison builders(sales), politicians(appear to do something, create a hated group), legal drug makers(reduced competition), all profit from maintaining the status quo which is primarily a war against people who smoke pot. Even the UN now has proven it is a just a useless mouthpiece of the puritanical US drug policies, an organ of hypocrisy that furthers a global eternal war despite its founding principles. If the US just ignoring the UN is not enough for the world to see how USELESS it has become, then it releasing a report comparing cannabis to cocaine should be.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by Hope on June 29, 2006 at 11:57:48 PT
"progress"
I haven't seen any of that in civilization for years and years. It's like the the big corporations and governments don't want any progress at all about anything. It seems pretty clear. Don't touch the status quo and don't even think about progress.

Modernity, advancement, and progress are concepts of the past.

It's about preserving the big guys hands stuck deeply into our pockets and holding the keys to the cell doors.

Reform and progress are the absolute last things they want.

They're making money the way it is...no matter it who it hurts...and they don't want anybody to alter that situation.

The power mongers and greedy folk of today aren't about to have their bottom line hurt by anything like progress. No way!

They work hard to head off progress at every path it takes.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by Sam Adams on June 29, 2006 at 11:11:31 PT
so-called medicine
Strange, I've never heard these words applied to Vioxx, poisoner and killer of thousands. Propaganda is SO important when it comes to cannabis.

Just saw another article today on Vioxx - a medical journal published a study saying that people only needed to take Vioxx for a few months for it to cause heart attack or stroke, not 18 months, as Merck's lawyers have been claiming in court.

But I guess the sneering derision only gets published when the subject is natural plants. Tells you a lot about technology and its role in oppression. We're all slaves of "progress", willing or not. Accept the wonderful blessings of "progress" or we'll throw you in jail.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #12 posted by Hope on June 29, 2006 at 10:36:10 PT
"electronic voting machines"
And apparently, the government is forcing those machines on everyone. We've used paper ballots successfully here all my life. But we are being forced to buy into the electronic systme. Our huge paper ballot days are numbered.

I don't trust them at all.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by afterburner on June 29, 2006 at 10:32:38 PT
De-feat? Ha!
We still have *feet*! And legs. And we won't back down!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #10 posted by zandor on June 29, 2006 at 09:58:10 PT:

anybody else have the sick feeling about November?
I fear now that the Republicans will use the electronic voting machines to steal another election from the American people. My fear is the actual vote will only count if you vote for their candidate and if you oppose them your vote will be changed by the software in voting machine. Most election officials are not allowed to test their machines with out having a rep from the company who installed the software perform the test.

The fox is in the hen house.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by Hope on June 29, 2006 at 09:47:28 PT
Should have put more in the first quote
"The Hinchey- Rohrabacher amendment would have prohibited the U.S. Department of Justice (including the DEA) from allocating funds to enforce federal drug laws in states that have legalized marijuana for so- called medical purposes."

That's just not true!

Drug Free America, the organization is a deluding influence. They hold delusions near and dear, and contaminate others at ever opportunity.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #8 posted by Hope on June 29, 2006 at 09:43:47 PT
Comment 5 Lying, obfuscating, prevaricating!
Not true: "from allocating funds to enforce federal drug laws in states that have legalized marijuana for so- called medical purposes."

"so-called medicine" used twice...in the first two paragraphs.

Not true: "This victory indicates an end to the medical marijuana scam," says Calvina Fay,..."

Not true: "Despite the drug legalizers' dogged efforts to influence Congress, they failed. Although the pro-drug lobby touts biased polls that create an illusion that the majority of people are for marijuana as so-called medicine, the facts show that our legislators listen to their constituents and not the drug pushers. Legislators wisely considered the scientific evidence that dispels claims of marijuana being a legitimate medicine."

Not true: "Drug Free America Foundation is dedicated to fighting drug use, drug addiction and drug trafficking and to promoting effective, sound drug policies, education and prevention. It is equally committed to exposing and refuting the drug legalization advocates and their deceptive tactics."

"Sound drug policies"? I don't think so. "Deceptive tactics"...that would be them and not us...so that's not true.

How bout that? A lie in every single paragraph of this hideously slanted...but of course, it would be...press release from the Drug Free America Foundation.

Any affiliate of that organization, including Calvina, needs to be tattooed "Drug Free" so that medical assistance in the form of "Drugs" is totally denied them. Don't want to ever accidentally contaminate these "pure" souls with any drugs!

Medicine Free America! That's what they mean and they should get what they want...for themselves, and butt out of everybody else's lives.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by Toker00 on June 29, 2006 at 09:40:23 PT
Yeah, but...
"Despite the drug legalizers' dogged efforts to influence Congress, they failed."

Wait until November.

Wage peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITION NOW!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by dongenero on June 29, 2006 at 09:10:29 PT
vote 'em out !
"Basically, the Republicans managed to keep strong party discipline. ... They feel they can't break with the White House on this," Nadelmann said.

That is despite an unexpected show of support from Citizens Against Government Waste, a conservative fiscal watchdog group. The group issued a report Monday on the federal war on drugs, finding that "in this time of excessive waste and expanding deficits, Congress must start sending a signal that its priorities are in order."

Fine, let's show these contemptuous a**holes the door.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on June 29, 2006 at 08:51:26 PT
Press Release from U.S. Newswire
Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment Squashed in Congress; Yet Another Victory in Drug Policy, Proclaims Drug Free America Foundation

****

June 29, 2006

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla., June 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The Hinchey- Rohrabacher amendment would have prohibited the U.S. Department of Justice (including the DEA) from allocating funds to enforce federal drug laws in states that have legalized marijuana for so- called medical purposes. This amendment was soundly defeated in Congress by a vote of 259 to 163.

Despite the drug legalizers' dogged efforts to influence Congress, they failed. Although the pro-drug lobby touts biased polls that create an illusion that the majority of people are for marijuana as so-called medicine, the facts show that our legislators listen to their constituents and not the drug pushers. Legislators wisely considered the scientific evidence that dispels claims of marijuana being a legitimate medicine.

"This victory indicates an end to the medical marijuana scam," says Calvina Fay, Executive Director of Drug Free America Foundation, Inc. "Last year in the Raich v. Gonzales Supreme Court Case, the justices ruled in our favor against smoked marijuana as medicine. Then on April 20, 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a statement concluding that they continue to support marijuana's placement as a Schedule I drug and agree that there is sound evidence that smoked marijuana is harmful. This reaffirms that medicine by popular vote is a dangerous process that bypasses the FDA, reduces consumer protections and jeopardizes sick patients."

Drug Free America Foundation is dedicated to fighting drug use, drug addiction and drug trafficking and to promoting effective, sound drug policies, education and prevention. It is equally committed to exposing and refuting the drug legalization advocates and their deceptive tactics.

If you would like to set up an interview regarding this issue with Calvina Fay or several other drug policy and prevention experts, please contact Lana Beck, Director of Communications, at 727-828-0211 or 727-403-7571.

Copyright: 2006 U.S. Newswire

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=68509

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by Sam Adams on June 29, 2006 at 08:21:23 PT
One more note
Message to MPP: you just spent 2 years pouring thousands of dollars and staff time into the Hinchey amendment, with the result of standing still. I don't think there were any more Yes votes this year than there were 2 years ago.

Now, isn't it time to go back to the states? Let's put that money toward medical MJ referendums in ALL the remaining states that have referendum processes. This is the low-hanging fruit of reform, let's pick all the apples within reach before we start trying to the climb to the top of the tree, eh?

Yes, it will mean paying your money to outside companies to gather signatures, instead of paying your MPP employees and friends in Washington. But do you think the feds will still attack when 20 or 30 states have legalized medical MJ? I think not.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Hope on June 29, 2006 at 08:18:23 PT
Defeat?
We're quite accustomed to this sort of "road block" and "set-back"...but "Defeat" isn't the right word. It's a disappointing set-back.

Defeated? As a variation on an expression my dad used to use.

"Not, "No"...but, "Heavens no!" (Heavens wasn't the word he used.)

We aren't "defeated" until we give up.

Just another...albeit it heartbreakingly sad and morally and fiscally wrong, it's just another set-back.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by Sam Adams on June 29, 2006 at 08:17:21 PT
out of touch? Hardly
"But it's still dismaying how out of touch Congress is with the public..."

No, I'd say they're quite IN touch with the public. Sending their armed thugs out to beat down your grandmother, father, sister, brother, etc, for being sick & using herbal medicine. The Congressmen might as well be riding in the back seat of the huge, taxpayer-purchased SUV that rolls up on another field of medicine, intent on beating the public right into the ground and kneeling on their back. Or breaking their face, or shoulder, as they did in California recently.

On another note, I read in the Business section this week that Annheuser Busch signed an contract with the NFL and ABC to be the "exclusive alcohol sponsor" of the Superbowl through 2012. Isn't that swell?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on June 29, 2006 at 07:04:45 PT
A Question
Is there an organization that is not basically Republican that cares about Cannabis Laws or is everyone a Republican? We desperately need people in the Democratic Party to help us.

How about an organization called Democrats for Cannabis Law Reform.

I like that. I have absolutely no use for anyone that is a Republican. I am patient and always want to believe that our elected officials care about serious social issues but yesterdays vote has forever changed my mind.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on June 29, 2006 at 06:58:05