Cannabis News DrugSense
  California City Lightens Up On Marijuana Users
Posted by CN Staff on June 21, 2006 at 08:43:53 PT
By Zachary Slobig  
Source: Agence France-Presse 

cannabis West Hollywood, United States -- Marijuana users in West Hollywood were breathing easier after the city passed a resolution to deprioritize policing of pot infractions.

"This is just another nail in the coffin of marijuana prohibition," Bruce Margolin, a pioneer in pro-marijuana legislation, told AFP. "Now the police can go after the guy robbing people on the street, rather than looking for harmless pot smokers."


Late Monday the city council of West Hollywood, which is sandwiched between Hollywood and Beverly Hills in Los Angeles county, voted to instruct police to not target adults "who consume this drug in private and who pose no danger to the community".

The council noted its existing endorsement of the medicinal use of marijuana as it advised the Los Angeles county police, who handle West Hollywood law enforcement, to focus their energies on more serious narcotics problems and other crimes like child and elderly abuse, burglary, and identity theft.

"This sends a message that the City of West Hollywood has an enlightened approach to its law enforcement," Don Duncan, manager of two local medical marijuana dispensaries, told AFP.

The move gave a boost to the campaign in California to permit sufferers from cancer and other debilitating afflictions to consume marijuana freely, despite federal laws banning the practice.

On Tuesday a steady stream of patients walked through the doors of Alternative Herbal Health Services, a West Hollywood dispensary where the product line runs from marijuana seeds to dwarf plants to harvested ganja bearing names like "Hollywood High" and "Train Wreck," all displayed neatly in glass jars.

Patients also can select between varieties of hashish, and "edibles" from chocolate-covered peanut butter cups to cannabis-laced banana bread.

Dispensary operators like Nichols feel the ordinance validates their work to provide organic medicine.

"God bless the city of West Hollywood for this kind of pat on the back," she said. "I've got cancer patients who come through here who simply can't eat without this medicine."

Nichols hopes the resolution will end what she believes is police harassment of legitimately needy patients.

"I've been hassled and given citations a few times by the police just walking from the front door of the dispensary to my car," said Tracy, a patient who asked that only her first name be used.

"Now I feel like I don't have to be so anxious," she said as she peered through the barred windows to the street.

Another patient who asked to be called Brian comes to the dispensary specifically for its high quality "edibles" to alleviate his insomnia and arthritis.

"The doctor prescribed me Ambien, but I hate the way that makes me feel the next day," he said.

With the new city resolution, Brian feels the pressure has lifted. "Now I don't have to wait around in cars and hope the police won't show up," he said.

Local physicians also praised the decision. "This is an important step towards sane adult use of marijuana," Dr. Craig Cohen told AFP. "I see patients everyday who greatly benefit from marijuana prescriptions to alleviate their pain and suffering and I know that they will be grateful for this new resolution."

California passed legislation in 1996 making small quantities of marijuana legal for medical use, laws that conflict with those of the US federal government.

Since then medical pot clinics have operated openly. San Francisco and Oakland both have policies in place similar to West Hollywood's.

Because the resolution does not actually effect legislation, it is unclear how it will impact law enforcement practices.

"We will continue to comply with proposition 215 (California's medical marijuana law)," Officer Robert McMahon of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department told AFP.

Source: Agence France-Presse (France Wire)
Author: Zachary Slobig
Published: June 21, 2006
Copyright: 2006 Agence France-Presse

Related Articles:

West Hollywood Wants To Legalize Pot Use
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21925.shtml

Leaders Vote To Leave The Pot Smokers Alone
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread21922.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #24 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 12:12:53 PT
Hope
We just finished painting our soon to be new living room. I am looking for trim today online. I think fixing and putting cast stone on our chimney will be the next thing we tackle this year. It really never ending work but it's fun too.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #23 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 12:01:59 PT
I wonder if the Burn Ban is still on....
Maybe I'd feel better if I could do a little "effigy" burning.

Nah. Got too much to do as it is.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 12:00:40 PT
aaargghhh.....Coulter
She's accomplished her goal if it's to be offensive.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 11:51:57 PT
observer
You say goodbye and I say hello.

That's what Ann does.

That's why I don't like people in politics. They speak out of both sides of their mouth.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by observer on June 21, 2006 at 11:44:27 PT
Coulter Troll
I know. She just likes to make people angry. That's what's made her rich I think.

Yes, that's it exactly. She acts like a dressed-up troll.

http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+troll

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 11:37:27 PT
observer
I know. She just likes to make people angry. That's what's made her rich I think.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #18 posted by observer on June 21, 2006 at 11:24:22 PT
Coulter
Don't Do Drug Legalization

Posted by FoM on September 29, 2000 at 06:32:52 PT

By Ann Coulter

Source: Jewish World Review

http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/7/thread7192.shtml

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #17 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 11:00:42 PT
From The Hill
What a Long, Strange Fundraiser It’s Been

***

May 26, 2006

“I really don’t like fundraisers, but I like fun parties,” Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) said Tuesday night.

He got both at the Renaissance Hotel as he rolled out a caravan of hippie nostalgia for a performance by ex-Grateful Dead members Bob Weir and Mickey Hart, backed by the Flying Other Brothers and the New Riders of the Purple Sage.

Introducing Leahy, Dead historian and publicist Dennis McNally recalled always seeing Leahy in a suit until he finally “came to a Grateful Dead concert wearing the rowdiest tie-dye I have ever seen and a pair of shorts. And when I saw him dancing I knew he was our senator.”

The event drew some 500 Leahy/Dead supporters, some unlikelier than others, such as Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police. “It’s a target-rich environment,” he joked.

He didn’t know the half of it. As Hart and Weir — who flew in from California specially for the event — worked the crowd at the pre-show reception, McNally came to usher them backstage so the music could begin. To which Hart abruptly cut off his conversation by saying, “OK, I gotta go smoke some pot.” No, he didn’t really say it; it would be too obvious. OK, yes he did.

By night’s end, about half of the crowd was in possession of a “Deadheads for Leahy 2006” tie-dye ($20 to Leahy’s PAC) and sipping Vermont’s own Magic Hat beer ($4 to Leahy’s PAC).

Aides even passed out glow sticks and ’60s-style concert posters for the crowd.

The only thing missing (besides maybe a tapers’ section) was Jammin’ Jim McDermott. But, it turns out, the Seattle Democrat was only delayed by the evening’s votes, and he arrived just in time for Weir and Hart’s set.

No bad trips were reported.

http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/UndertheDome/052506.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 10:45:33 PT
Hypocritical
Isn't it?

They know better, and yet, aren't trying to save the lives of people like Jerry?

That's hard.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 10:38:42 PT
Deadhead Information
You can see a picture of Ann Coulter at a show here:

http://deadnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/ann-coulter-mentions-dead.html

Another conservative deadhead is Tucker Carlson:

http://deadnews.blogspot.com/2005/10/tucker-carlson-fan-of-dead-lesh.html

And Patrick Leahy is a deadhead politician:

http://deadnews.blogspot.com/2005/09/patrick-leahy-outed-as-deadhead.html



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 10:31:31 PT
Coulter
I can recognize that she's a "performer", just like Rush Limbaugh and Beck and the rest of them. Carlson, too. His bow-tie was his attention getting costume for his performance. It worked. Having Lucianne for a mom didn't hurt, probably.

These people have gained the power to have a voice and they could do so much good. Why don't they?

I admired Coulter at one time. But her and their performances are getting old and they aren't helping at all, but feeding the polarity so prevalent in this country that it's about to break in half.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 10:28:12 PT
Max Flowers
I was watching a tv show about Hippies the other day and Ann Coulter said that people don't know she was a Deadhead.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 10:26:49 PT
NYT: Deadhead Article
I Saw a Deadhead Sticker on a Bentley

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/06/09/business/09hedge600.1.jpg

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/09/business/09hedge.html?ex=1151035200&en=412381b999a794b7&ei=5070

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by Max Flowers on June 21, 2006 at 10:18:59 PT
Carlson/Coulter
Well it was news to me... and I still don't really get how anyone can support cannabis use and at the same time in any way support a corrupt political system. The two things seem mutually exclusive to me. Probably the main thing being that to publicly come out in favor of pot use is to publicly spit in the face of the administration's war-on-drugs policy, and I find it amazing that a shill like Carlson is doing that. Nevertheless, I won't complain; we will take any help we can get, from anywhere it comes.

FoM, what you just revealed about Ann Coulter is also mind-blowing... if true, I think it would damage her right-wing reputation, which would be highly desirable. If she is a former deadhead and has turned into whatever it is she has turned into, then she needs to be exposed. She is one of the most disgusting human beings ever. She and that other evil creature Michelle Malkin should do the world a favor and hold hands and jump off a cliff. If there is one thing I can't stand, it's skinny women lecturing the world about why war is good. Why don't they grab a an M-16 and join the fun in Iraq? Why aren't they in combat if they think it's so cool? No one should ever advocate making war if they have not fought and seen friends die in war (because once they have, they rarely advocate war after that).

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 10:15:13 PT
Ann Coulter
Hope, she is more bluff then real. How can a Deadhead not believe Cannabis should be legal?

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 10:11:57 PT
Hope
Before CNews I was a regular on MSNBC and CNN news chat. They watched the chat and commented in the chat and we had a private way of talking. I had my comments on the air on CNN TalkBack Live almost everyday. It was really cool. Even John Gibson agreed with me when he was on MSNBC. I loved those early days on the Internet.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 10:07:41 PT
Coulter
Hmmm. Maybe she's not just "evil stick woman".

Maybe she's got more sense and compassion and reasonable understanding than she appears to sometimes.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 10:05:49 PT
Wow, FoM!
Coulter signed the guest book? You've communicated with her?

Uh oh. This could be news for the right person who wanted to go after Coulter...and a lot of people despise her.

It's a sad fact that agreeing with us could give someone a "reason" to go after her...but we know that's all too true.

Sticky wicket, eh?

One thing we have all been a part of accomplishing....people can talk about the drug war now...and disagree with it openly.

That freedom didn't exist ten years ago when we forced our way on to the internet scene and started writing to newspapers enmasse, and calling call in shows, and just started talking and talking and talking...until it got easier for other people to talk.

And finally now...it's ok to talk about it! Conversation is the beginning of the unraveling of the hideous tangle of barbed wire that the WoD is.

I think we've changed the atmosphere enough that she would be safe in coming out against the war on cannabis at least.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by Taylor121 on June 21, 2006 at 10:03:45 PT
Tucker
As far as I know, Tucker as always been for legalizing marijuana.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on June 21, 2006 at 09:56:55 PT
Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson is a conservative but is changing. He's got rid of that ugly bow tie and loosened his collar the last time I saw him. I watch body language more then what they say most times. I like Joe Scarborough. I judge conservatives by their comments on the news. Joe loves CSNY and Neil Young and wants to be more liberal but is stuck I think with the label republican. I have hope that he will change. He is very disillusioned with the Republican Party.

Early on Ann Coulter signed CNews guestbook and it was private. I talked with her privately one time in an MSNBC news chat years ago and she said she agreed with me. She was a Deadhead. Weird but true.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by Hope on June 21, 2006 at 09:41:21 PT
Tucker Carlson waking up?
Cool.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by Max Flowers on June 21, 2006 at 09:36:00 PT
Tucker Carlson says private pot is okay!?
I was watching "The Situation" with Tucker Carlson last night---not because I am a fan (though I may be becoming one), but only because one of his little subject headers said "marijuana" and I wanted to see what he was going to say.

I was blown away... being that he is such a conservative, I expected him to say nasty things about pot users, and to my amazement, both he and his columnist guy Max Kellerman stood up for the right to use cannabis, saying that if people want to use it in the privacy of their own homes, that it's none of the government's or the police's business! He went up about five notches in my book! Better yet, Kellerman brought up the very cogent point that Carlson's concept of "private use should be ignored, but sellers of it should still go to jail" doesn't explain where all the people using it privately would get it. Then Carlson signed off Kellerman by saying he was the "unflappable champion of marijuana causes" or something like that! It was great.

I am starting to believe things may be changing when I see something like *that* on a very conservative TV station...

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by mayan on June 21, 2006 at 09:12:23 PT
Another Nail in the Coffin
Now, if only the San Diego supervisors would get a clue. I imagine they are probably feeling pretty cowardly about right now. Way to go, West Hollywood!

THE WAY OUT...

Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/200606scientificanalysis.htm

9/11 Vendetta ( video): http://youtube.com/watch?v=AJ7uFA8RwpQ&search=Vendetta%20911

9/11 Truth Flyer: http://www.freewebs.com/alexcarson/911%2Dflyer.gif

American Scholars Symposium: 9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda - June 24-25 - Los Angeles: http://www.americanscholarssymposium.org/media/press_release_061606.htm

Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.st911.org/

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by dongenero on June 21, 2006 at 08:54:06 PT
who's in charge?
Of the people, by the people and for the people.

The state and federal governments should get used to the idea once again.

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on June 21, 2006 at 08:43:53