Cannabis News DrugSense
  Is Pot a Real Bummer? Study Doesn't Think So
Posted by CN Staff on November 18, 2005 at 07:28:11 PT
By Kenneth Aaron, Staff Writer  
Source: Times Union  

cannabis Albany -- Why the long face? Not smoking pot, perhaps?

University at Albany psychology professor Mitchell Earleywine and Thomas F. Denson, of the University of Southern California, recently completed a study finding that people who smoke marijuana are less depressed than those who never smoke.

The respondents were in three categories: those who have never smoked, daily smokers and weekly smokers. Both daily and regular uses said they were less depressed.

The online study, which involved 4,400 people, was supported by a grant from the Marijuana Policy Project, a group that supports legalizing and regulating the drug. The findings are to be published in the journal Addictive Behaviors.

The findings surprised Earleywine.

"I expected that depression would be even, that the groups wouldn't differ at all," Earleywine said. "I never thought the users would be less depressed."

Federal drug officials said Earleywine's work was biased. A policy analyst for the White House's Office of National Drug Control Policy said the UAlbany professor is a committed pot-advocacy researcher whose survey was suspect because too many hard-core users responded to it.

Earleywine co-authored a study in September showing that marijuana use among teenagers falls in states that allow medical marijuana. And, indeed, his latest work flies in the face of other work that has linked marijuana to depression.

Snipped:

Complete Article: http://www.freedomtoexhale.com/nobummer.htm

Source: Times Union (Albany, NY)
Author: Kenneth Aaron, Staff Writer
Published: Friday, November 18, 2005
Copyright: 2005 Capital Newspapers
Contact: tuletters@timesunion.com
Website: http://www.timesunion.com/

CannabisNews -- Cannabis Archives
http://cannabisnews.com/news/list/cannabis.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #28 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 18:34:49 PT
Growing Concern Over Growing 'Bible'

November 18, 2005

Here's a debate about what's appropriate and what's not sparked by one woman's trip to a Valley bookstore.

She's shocked by some literature she came across, namely a book about some questionable horticulture.

It's a guide to growing marijuana and it's for retail sale on bookshelves. Nothing illegal about it, though it's enough to raise one woman's brow.

Growing marijuana is illegal. Selling marijuana is illegal. Smoking marijuana is illegal. But Ginger Cochran is angry.

"Outrage," she says. "And I called my mom to throw a fit about it."

A fit about being able to read about marijuana, something she discovered at a recent trip to her local Books-A-Million.

"I stopped in to do a little browsing and was in the gardening section actually looking for a container gardening book," she explains. "Right smack dab in the middle of the shelf was "The Cannabis Grow Bible. Sure enough it was a book on how to grow pot for recreational and medicinal uses."

We stopped in to check it out. And on the gardening aisle, "The Cannabis Grow Bible," just in front a title called "Marijuana Growers Guide."

"Anybody's teenager can walk in there and pick that up," she says. "There's no restriction on the selling of the book."

We called Books-A-Million corporate and were told the person we need to speak with travels from one store to another and the best way to reach her was by e-mail. We did that. As of this publication, we're awaiting word back. Ginger also called. She had more luck.

"She did state to me also that they deliberately didn't carry certain magazines that promoted growing pot or that lifestyle," she says. "And I appreciated her telling me that."

Ginger says she was also told that those books must've ended up on the shelves on accident--placed there after someone ordered the books on-line but never actually picked them up.

Copyright 2000 - 2005 WorldNow and WAFF

http://www.waff.com/Global/story.asp?S=4140482

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #27 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 18:30:45 PT
Growing Concern Over Growing 'Bible'
Growing Concern Over Growing 'Bible'

November 18, 2005

Here's a debate about what's appropriate and what's not sparked by one woman's trip to a Valley bookstore.

She's shocked by some literature she came across, namely a book about some questionable horticulture.

It's a guide to growing marijuana and it's for retail sale on bookshelves. Nothing illegal about it, though it's enough to raise one woman's brow.

Growing marijuana is illegal. Selling marijuana is illegal. Smoking marijuana is illegal. But Ginger Cochran is angry.

"Outrage," she says. "And I called my mom to throw a fit about it."

A fit about being able to read about marijuana, something she discovered at a recent trip to her local Books-A-Million.

"I stopped in to do a little browsing and was in the gardening section actually looking for a container gardening book," she explains. "Right smack dab in the middle of the shelf was "The Cannabis Grow Bible. Sure enough it was a book on how to grow pot for recreational and medicinal uses."

We stopped in to check it out. And on the gardening aisle, "The Cannabis Grow Bible," just in front a title called "Marijuana Growers Guide."

"Anybody's teenager can walk in there and pick that up," she says. "There's no restriction on the selling of the book."

We called Books-A-Million corporate and were told the person we need to speak with travels from one store to another and the best way to reach her was by e-mail. We did that. As of this publication, we're awaiting word back. Ginger also called. She had more luck.

"She did state to me also that they deliberately didn't carry certain magazines that promoted growing pot or that lifestyle," she says. "And I appreciated her telling me that."

Ginger says she was also told that those books must've ended up on the shelves on accident--placed there after someone ordered the books on-line but never actually picked them up. Growing concern over growing 'bible' Nov 18, 2005, 07:37 PM EST Here's a debate about what's appropriate and what's not sparked by one woman's trip to a Valley bookstore.

She's shocked by some literature she came across, namely a book about some questionable horticulture.

It's a guide to growing marijuana and it's for retail sale on bookshelves. Nothing illegal about it, though it's enough to raise one woman's brow.

Growing marijuana is illegal. Selling marijuana is illegal. Smoking marijuana is illegal. But Ginger Cochran is angry.

"Outrage," she says. "And I called my mom to throw a fit about it."

A fit about being able to read about marijuana, something she discovered at a recent trip to her local Books-A-Million.

"I stopped in to do a little browsing and was in the gardening section actually looking for a container gardening book," she explains. "Right smack dab in the middle of the shelf was "The Cannabis Grow Bible. Sure enough it was a book on how to grow pot for recreational and medicinal uses."

We stopped in to check it out. And on the gardening aisle, "The Cannabis Grow Bible," just in front a title called "Marijuana Growers Guide."

"Anybody's teenager can walk in there and pick that up," she says. "There's no restriction on the selling of the book."

We called Books-A-Million corporate and were told the person we need to speak with travels from one store to another and the best way to reach her was by e-mail. We did that. As of this publication, we're awaiting word back. Ginger also called. She had more luck.

"She did state to me also that they deliberately didn't carry certain magazines that promoted growing pot or that lifestyle," she says. "And I appreciated her telling me that."

Ginger says she was also told that those books must've ended up on the shelves on accident--placed there after someone ordered the books on-line but never actually picked them up.

Copyright 2000 - 2005 WorldNow and WAFF

http://www.waff.com/Global/story.asp?S=4140482

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #26 posted by mayan on November 18, 2005 at 18:22:41 PT
My Prediction
Bush will appear to get nailed for the crimes of 9/11 but remember...he is merely a puppet. The fact that Professor Steve Jones was allowed on Tucker Carlson's show is indicitave that the fix is in. The folks who really orchestrated 9/11 will just install another puppet to pick up where Bush left off. Bush is damaged goods and can't garner any more support for further wars to advance the PNAC agenda. He is now just a "useless idiot".

We have 14 PERMANENT military bases in Iraq. They aren't going anywhere. The neo-cons have already committed to their agenda and there is no turning back for them now. What country lies between Afghanistan and Iraq? Iran. Syria is on the list also. The grand prize will be Saudi Arabia and all of their oil.

If the neo-cons and globalists don't get what they want they will attempt to take everyone else down with them. The sh*t will soon hit the fan.

Perle says out with the Saudis: http://tinyurl.com/botn2

THE WAY OUT IS THE WAY IN...

Tucker Carlson, PNAC & 9/11 - Another PNAC 9/11 Connection: http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=193

Prof. Jones "Bows Out of Limelight;" Talks To Arctic Beacon In What He Says Will Be His Last Media Appearance: http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/37516.htm

Believe 9/11 Was an Inside Job? Leave the Country! http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=125

Crooked Cops and 9/11: http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/crooked-cops-and-9-11.html

Time to Denounce 9/11 Junk Science: http://www.wingtv.net/thornarticles/911junkscience.html

REOPEN911.org & TvNewsLIES.org Working Together: http://tvnewslies.org/html/tvnl___reopen911_org.html

Follow the money.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #25 posted by global_warming on November 18, 2005 at 17:43:58 PT
Hope and faith
Do you have a soul?

Who? owns Eternity?

It is 'not he human landlord,



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #24 posted by Jim Lunsford on November 18, 2005 at 16:55:47 PT
Hope
In response to your question as to what qualifies as "shortly", a few months ago I offered our friend Jose a prediction of this year. Of course, I'm not a psychic, but I can see patterns in the newspapers as well as anyone else. Riots in France, multi-fuel vehicles from Brazil, loads of newspaper coverage from even the major players about the medical benefits of Cannabis, global warming concerns, environmentalism, the upcoming impeachment of the president, etc. So many little whirlwinds of discontent on a global scale.

I could be wrong, of course. We could choose to have the CSA take precedent over Religious Freedom (and every other freaking right we have), and we could continue to allow so much more that we don't want, but I am an optimist. I believe our species can move through this chaos of change and transform itself into something worth being a part of.

As it stands, we humans are a pretty pathetic bunch. We've always chosen war over peace, since time immemorial. I am what they call a triple-veteran, and I hate war for different reasons than most. I believe that the concept of war is outdated. That a truly free country would set such a standard for prosperity and compassion, it would spend it's time helping other nations achieve their own state of abundance.

Scarcity economics is also an outdated phenomenon, in my opinion anyway. The pie is ever-expanding if it is not wasted. Or hoarded. Or marketed to death in the form of fads delivered to the consumer zombies of the TV world.

But then again, I did say I am an optimist. So I will naturally find the good in most situations. Peace to all, Rev Jim

Rev Jim Lunsford

First Cannabist Church

Value hierarchy demonstrates the inadequacies of the simplistic model of good and evil.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #23 posted by observer on November 18, 2005 at 14:28:49 PT
self-reporting is bad, now?
"I'm not at all surprised that people who are daily smokers self-report that they feel pretty good," said David Murray, a policy analyst with the White House drug office. Marijuana alters users' body chemistry so they get miserable after they stop, he said.

Chuckle. So, Mr Propaganda, when people "self-report" it is suspect - if the self-reporting conflicts with the party line?

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind." - George Orwell

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #22 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 12:12:15 PT
Nuevo Mexican
I hope you are right about the war. It wasn't a war as much as an invasion of a nation that never attacked us. Anyone remember who Bin Laden is or was? He was the one that needed to be caught and punished but because of the way we go and bomb and bomb only Mothers, Fathers and Children die.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #21 posted by siege on November 18, 2005 at 12:05:05 PT
O T OFFSPRIN DIED RATS ATE GENETICALLY ENGINEEREDG
he Russian scientist planned a simple experiment to see if eating genetically modified (GM) soy might influence offspring. What she got, however, was an astounding result that may threaten a multi-billion dollar industry.

With billions of dollars invested in GM foods, no adverse finding has yet been sufficient to reverse the industry’s growth in the US. It may take some dramatic, indisputable, and life-threatening discovery. That is why Ermakova’s findings are so important. If the study holds up, it may topple the GM food industry.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Smith/jeffrey8.htm

http://www.seedsofdeception.com/utility/showArticle/?objectID=298

http://www.seedsofdeception.com/utility/showArticle/?objectID=296

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by nuevo mexican on November 18, 2005 at 11:55:22 PT
Hope: Six Months and we're gone!
And the pullout should begin Jan. 1st, possibly even sooner, pre-Christmas, 12/15, (huge full moon with Pluto conjunct, War is OVer!)as the heat is on, can you say 'John Murtha!'

Contact your reps, and congress-critters, and support those calling for withdrawal, and email war-supporting pols that you are done with America being a spin-off of bushes Hitlerian fantasy!

The war on terror, is really the a bushwellian Victory of Fear, and should be called such.

Bush is the world's biggest terrorist, and the Repugs AND the media should be held accountable, and will!

The uni-verse ALWAYS has the last word, just look at the current landscape, and reflect on the fact the Saturn, the Taskmaster is on Bushes 11 degree Leo Rising, and will take him even further down, the question is, how far will he take us with him?

Thank you Saturn, Father Time, Lord of KARMA! You go, guy!

Love is all you need! J. Lennon

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 11:40:54 PT
Siege
Thanks!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #18 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 11:37:16 PT
kaptinemo
I guess you can tell I have never travel outside the USA because I thought a person needed a passport to go anywhere outside the states.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #17 posted by siege on November 18, 2005 at 11:26:50 PT
O T,, FEC Rules Bloggers Are Journalists
The Federal Election Commission today issued an advisory opinion that finds the Fired Up network of blogs qualifies for the "press exemption" to federal campaign finance laws. The press exemption, as defined by Congress, is meant to assure "the unfettered right of the newspapers, TV networks, and other media to cover and comment on political campaigns." The full ruling is available at the FEC site. A noteworthy passage: "...an entity otherwise eligible for the press exception would not lose its eligibility merely because of a lack of objectivity..."

http://www.lot49.com/2005/11/fec_rules_bloggers_are_journal.shtml

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #16 posted by kaptinemo on November 18, 2005 at 11:25:48 PT:

OT: Why the Canuck border will not be closed
I've been saying why the prohibs threat to close the Canadian border to punish Canada for 'liberalizing' its' cannabis laws is just empty talk, for economic reasons alone. Now, here's an oblique confirmation:

Passports to hurt trade and tourism http://tinyurl.com/9ru8f

If they're in a tiff over passports, what do you think a full-on bottleneck at the border would do to their precious profits? They mention the "just-in-time" business practice of not maintaining warehousing to save on costs as being the primary reason for not doing this kind of border slowdown...just as has been mentioned here, again and again.

Keep running your yaps, prohibs; the support of the business people who give money to you is only about as long as their patience at losing profits thanks to harebrained schemes like border bottlenecks to punish another nation for rationalizing their drug laws. Shutdown the border? Squeeze those fat, politically connected businessmen who have the ear of their bought-and-paid-for pols? Suuuuuure they will. Suuure.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 11:07:52 PT
Hope
Glad you liked it.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #14 posted by Hope on November 18, 2005 at 10:21:57 PT
I guessed it was that!
Friend of Marijuana! I've thought that was what it might stand for.

Cool.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 10:11:16 PT
Hope
I had a hard time trying to figure out something to use as a name long ago and Friend of Marijuana came to mind so I guess that's what it stands for.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by Hope on November 18, 2005 at 10:05:49 PT
Nuevo Mexican
Can you elaborate on "shortly"? "Shortly" in six months or "shortly" in three years?

I'm very curious about your prediction. I haven't seen one in a long time, people have naturally become leery of it, and I'm kind of "hungry" for one.

:0)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by Hope on November 18, 2005 at 10:02:25 PT
Nuevo Mexican comment 9 and FoM
I don't take much stock in predictions...but I sure hope you're right.

"Cannabis goes legal, and the War comes to an end shortly! Divine Timing!"

"shortly!" That part is the part I like the most.

FoM is the Grand Dame of Cannabis law reform, no doubt.

FoM, may I ask you something...of course you don't have to answer. What does FoM stand for?

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 09:55:16 PT
Nuevo Mexican
That was so very kind of you. You're special to me too. It's good to know you read and care. That's what really matters.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #9 posted by nuevo mexican on November 18, 2005 at 09:50:39 PT
FOM! Tell Stick we Love you!
maybe not the way he does, but you are the best! I don't post much, as the tide has turned and the writing is on the wall! Cannabis goes legal, and the War comes to an end shortly! Divine Timing! I love your passion, your integrity, and just being there for all of us, all of the time! Peace! NM

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 09:33:15 PT
Toker00
That's wonderful news. It isn't what Party is in power or what a politician says or doesn't say but it's the PEOPLE that will make the difference. When the voices of WE THE PEOPLE get loud enough laws and bad policies will change!

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #7 posted by Toker00 on November 18, 2005 at 09:28:51 PT
FoM
Houston, Texas, Sat. Nov. 19, 2005. Gather at Market Square Park, march (yes, we finally obtained a marching permit!) to City Hall. Protest and Rally. Be there if you can, Texas C-newsers. This is the one Rita blew out of town when it was originally scheduled. 25 Groups will be participating. Bring signs and banners, folks. Let's get the kids and the men and women back home! Defend Democracy, not Capitalism!

Wage peace on war. END CANNABIS PROHIBITION NOW!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 08:53:27 PT
One More Off Topic Post
I am so against war because war makes some people very rich at the expense of our young men and women who are in the armed services. I thought this was interesting.

***

Withdrawal is Not Retreat

http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2005/11/withdrawal_is_n.html

I wish we had learned something from Vietnam.

I-Feel-Like-I'm-Fixin'-to-Die Rag: http://www.countryjoe.com/col9.ram

Cakewalk to Baghdad: http://www.countryjoe.com/cakewalk.ram

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 08:39:13 PT
Off Topic: I Hope Our Troops Come Home Soon
Iraq Turning Point?

***

By Howard Kurtz, Washington Post Staff Writer

Friday, November 18, 2005

John Murtha is now off the reservation.

If I had to pick one of the least likely candidates to demand an immediate pullout from Iraq, the Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania would be right up there. Vietnam veteran, big Pentagon supporter, rarely makes waves on the Hill. We're not talking Ted Kennedy here. He supported the Gulf war and the Iraq war. And yet the guy holds a news conference yesterday and says it's time to go because "our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2005/11/18/BL2005111800493.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 08:10:00 PT
Why is This Happening?
When I was young I liked to spin in circles until I got high. Nothing bad like what you posted EJ.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by E_Johnson on November 18, 2005 at 08:07:14 PT
Thrill seeking kids turn to choking instead of pot
There is a horribly sad story that appeared in today's LA Times: parents found their daughter choked herself to death as part of a self-asphyxiation game that seems to be spreading among teenagers these days. Here is the kicker -- they do it to get high!

This paragraph I found chilling:

"These are typically not kids who are using drugs, but they're doing it for the same reason that kids use substances," explains Julie Rosenbluth of the American Council for Drug Education. "It's an opportunity to get high that doesn't have the stigma [of drugs] attached to it."

OMigosh, choking yourself doesn't have the stigma of drugs??? Maybe then we've put too much stigma on drugs and not enough stigma on others ways kids can get some thrills from taking risks.

This is so sad and horrible. I'll bet the parents wished she smoked pot instead. How do you prevent something like this? At least pot you can smell. How do you tell whether your thirteen year old is upstairs quietly choking herself into unconsciousness in her closet?

What a nightmare. I hope they find a way to stop this before it kills more kids.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by runderwo on November 18, 2005 at 07:56:51 PT
earleywine
"Federal drug officials said Earleywine's work was biased. A policy analyst for the White House's Office of National Drug Control Policy said the UAlbany professor is a committed pot-advocacy researcher whose survey was suspect because too many hard-core users responded to it."

Note that the methodology is not attacked, just the person.

I would think hard-core users responding would be what the government wants, since they have always maintained that heavy cannabis use causes depression, schizophrenia, etc?

Reactionary distrust of science, while entertaining, is very tedious.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on November 18, 2005 at 07:43:59 PT
AP: MMJ Bill Planned for Next Session
Medical Marijuana Bill Planned for Next Session

***

The Associated Press

Friday, November 18, 2005

LITTLE ROCK — A legislative committee heard testimony Thursday from backers of legal use of marijuana as a medicine for suffering patients.

Rep. Lindsley Smith, D-Fayetteville, said she may file a bill during the 2007 session to make medical marijuana legal in Arkansas. The bill would make the drug available to patients who are terminally ill, allowing them to grow and distribute marijuana among themselves for medical use.

Dr. Phillip A. Denney of Carmichael, Calif., testified that since 1996 he has been prescribing marijuana for patients with chronic pain and those who are terminally. California legalized the practice in 1996. Denny said patients using the drug should not be forced to register because that could lead to harassment or arrest.

Nine states have legalized the practice, legislators were told, and medical marijuana is legal in Canada.

Cancer patient Debbie Carter of Little Rock, who has a brain tumor, testified the drug helped her while she underwent chemotherapy. She said using marijuana enabled her to overcome nausea and eat.

Mike Feehan, attorney for the Bureau of Legislative Research, said federal law bans the use of marijuana, a law that has been upheld in federal court. Feehan noted that the high court has reviewed the California law but did not invalidate it.

Past attempts at passing a medical marijuana bill have failed in Arkansas.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on November 18, 2005 at 07:28:11