Cannabis News Protecting Patients Access to Medical Marijuana
  Votes Make Pot ID Cards Free in Butte
Posted by CN Staff on November 09, 2005 at 14:57:29 PT
By Roger H. Aylworth - Staff Writer  
Source: Chico Enterprise-Record  

medical Oroville, CA -- Medical marijuana ID cards will be free in Butte County, and the process could cost the county thousands of dollars. Tuesday the Board of Supervisors turned down a request by the county Department of Public Health to establish a $56 fee for people applying for the pot cards.

However, turning down the fee request didn't mean the cards wouldn't be issued. It means the county - and by reference the taxpayers - will be picking up the bill.

Under a state law that became effective in 2004, the county is mandated to accept and process applications from people seeking a state-issued medical marijuana identification card.

Prior to Tuesday's meeting, Phyllis Murdock, director of the Department of Public Health, told the Enterprise-Record the ID applicant would bring in the required physician's "recommendation" for medical marijuana, and the county would certify the document was legitimate. The information would then be forwarded to the state, which would also certify the recommendation.

If the document is certified, the county is required to issue the card.

"We don't expect an inordinate number of cards out on the street. We expect 100 to 120 (applications a year)," Murdock told the board.

The department estimated the processing of 100 applications would cost the county $4,383. On top of that, a $13 fee has to go to the state. That made the expected total expense $5,683 a year, according to figures produced by the Health Department.

Murdock said the $56 fee was designed to just cover the expense.

Representatives for the District Attorney's Office and the Sheriff's Office told the supervisors they supported the cards.

Chief deputy district attorney Poncho Zarate and sheriff's Capt. Jerry Smith said the cards will save officers time.

They explained that standardized tamper-proof identification cards will allow law enforcement officers to rapidly determine if someone in possession of marijuana has it legitimately.

However, the lone voice to speak negatively about the proposal objected to the cost.

Tom Horchler, who described himself as a medical marijuana user and "100 percent disabled veteran" from Cherokee, claimed the card fee will strike at the poor and disabled.

"This fee, I've got to point out to you, is going to pull more than $20 a month out of disabled veterans who by our own government's definition are low-income people. It will cost us $21 a month just to qualify to now find our medicine," he said.

While the proposed county fee was to be $56 a year, the state law requires a medical marijuana user to get a new recommendation each year as well.

"I have to come back every year to my doctor and pay him $200 a year to prove that I haven't had a miracle in my life and been cured, as do all other disabled veterans.

"Before you go jacking the price up on this, think about that, what it is costing the people that really, really need the medicine," he said.

The fee for the marijuana cards was part of a larger package of Health Department fee increases for a whole range of services.

Chico Supervisor Jane Dolan made a motion asking the board to approve the entire package of fees, including the marijuana ID cards. However, that motion died for lack of a second.

Apparently feeling the motion failed because of the marijuana card item, Paul McIntosh, the county's administrative officer, pointed out the lack of a fee would not block the cards.

"We are going to be issuing cards. That's the state law. This is simply the ability to recoup our costs of doing that, complying with the law," said McIntosh.

Murdock tried to underscore that point. "The Public Health Department will be absorbing the costs of issuing the cards."

Beyond the county's actual costs, without a fee, the $13 required by the state would also come from the county coffers.

Oroville Supervisor Bill Connelly offered a motion approving all of the fee increases, with the exclusion of the marijuana ID card item.

On a 3-2 vote, his proposal was approved. Connelly was joined by Dolan and Supervisor Mary Anne Houx, also of Chico, in support of the action.

Supervisor Curt Josiassen, who represents the southwest part of the county, and board Chairman Kim Yamaguchi of Paradise voted against the measure.

BACKGROUND: State law requires that the county accept, review and approve or reject applications for medical marijuana identification cards.

WHAT'S NEW: Tuesday the Board of Supervisors rejected a proposed $56 fee to cover the cost of the process.

THE RESULT: Regardless of the vote, the county is required to issue the cards. Without the fee, Butte County will have to eat the expense.

Source: Chico Enterprise-Record (CA)
Author: Roger H. Aylworth - Staff Writer
Published: November 9, 2005
Copyright: 2005 The Media News Group
Contact: letters@chicoer.com
Website: http://www.chicoer.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

Medicinal Cannabis Research Links
http://freedomtoexhale.com/research.htm

New Clinic Sparks More Concerns
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread20104.shtml

Medical Pot Clinic Will Open in Chico This Week
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread20087.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on November 09, 2005 at 17:18:35 PT
So Much is Happening Now
I think we can honestly say that no matter what the current issue is in trying to reform the laws surrounding Cannabis we are making progress. I think people are angry that they have had to fight the system so hard and are doing something about it.

[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on November 09, 2005 at 14:57:29