Cannabis News Media Awareness Project
  Medicinal Marijuana Backers Make Point
Posted by CN Staff on August 30, 2004 at 18:23:58 PT
By Gita Sitaramiah, Pioneer Press 
Source: Pioneer Press  

medical Supporters of amending the Minneapolis City Charter to include a provision for a medical marijuana distribution system submitted 690 more signatures today in hopes of making their petition valid.

Jason Samuels of Citizens Organized for Harm Reduction said his group has taken the step even though the Minneapolis City Council has rejected putting the measure on the November ballot.

Backers of the proposal had gathered the signatures of more than 7,000 registered voters on a petition in favor of adding a city charter amendment for a medicinal marijuana distribution system if and when medicinal marijuana becomes legal. But their petition needed the signatures of about 200 more registered voters to be valid.

The charter amendment would have taken effect if medicinal marijuana ever became legal at the state and federal level. City Council members who opposed the amendment said it does not fit in with the city charter's mission.

Samuels wouldn’t comment on the group’s next step.

A spokesman for the Washington, D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project -- http://www.mpp.org/ -- said his group is preparing to take legal action against the city for rejecting the charter amendment.

Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press (MN)
Author: Gita Sitaramiah, Pioneer Press
Published: Monday, August 30, 2004
Copyright: 2004 St. Paul Pioneer Press
Contact: letters@pioneerpress.com
Website: http://www.pioneerplanet.com/

Related Articles & Web Site:

COHR
http://www.cohr.org/

Medical Marijuana is Off Ballot
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19370.shtml

Minneapolis Marijuana Issue Gets No Support
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19352.shtml

Marijuana Backers Try To Get on Ballot
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread19317.shtml

Medical Marijuana in Minneapolis
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread17894.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #25 posted by Max Flowers on August 31, 2004 at 23:33:18 PT
GCW and siege
Thanks, I'm already there with the hydrogenated oil, believe me---it's a major issue to me. It *is* out of my life. I can't get my mom to change her diet though, she doesn't have the will at her age and the doctor lets her think everything is "manageable." Meanwhile I'm not even a doctor and I can see that letting diabetes continue is a bad thing.

She even admits that she's still eating the junk store cookies loaded with sugar and hydrogenated oils. It really frustrates me. As a child I had to comply with her eating rules, and now, she won't listen to me even though it's life-and-death stuff!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #24 posted by FoM on August 31, 2004 at 16:42:02 PT
siege
I am for life but against laws keeping women from making up their own mind. I remember hearing all the horror stories about how it was before abortion was legalized.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #23 posted by FoM on August 31, 2004 at 16:33:48 PT
I Just Saw This On MSNBC
I turned off my music and turned on Hardball on MSNBC. Someone just stormed the stage and he was wrestled to the floor and of course they broke away to the inside of the convention. Don't want the world to see any unhappy people I suppose.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #22 posted by siege on August 31, 2004 at 16:23:01 PT
Bush and women rights
During the Republican National Convention, Bush and his anti–choice cohorts will hide his anti–choice record of the last four years. They'll spin and skew, all in the hopes that American voters, especially women, won't notice that their rights - not just their votes - are what George Bush is really after.

If you think American voters deserve the truth.

In the 2000 election, 22 million registered women voters could have changed the course of history and avoided four years of the most anti–choice president in history - only they never made it to the polls

https://secure.ga3.org/02/september2/n511x0e71GaQv

Here Comes The U.N. - Again! http://www.newswithviews.com/Lamb/henry49.htm by Henry Lamb

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #21 posted by Sam Adams on August 31, 2004 at 14:06:09 PT
FYI
Just got this through an email alert:

At a noon press conference today at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Kazi Toure, co-director of the Criminal Justice Program for the American Friends Service Committee New England Regional Office, asserted that he has been placed under intense surveillance by police agents because of his work to change prison conditions.  For the past two weeks, up to 10 unidentified agents in unmarked cars, and occasionally helicopters, have intimidated his Dorchester neighborhood, and followed Mr. Toure on his daily work routine to and from the AFSC Cambridge office.  Last Friday, four unmarked cars with a helicopter followed him from home to work, where upon arrival they photographed the entire staff who had joined outside to welcome Mr. Toure to the safety of the office.  Several AFSC staff were present at the press conference and verified the Friday incident.  Earlier in the week he was followed as he journeyed to a MA prison and also to an upstate NY prison to visit a friend. 

Mr. Toure has been involved in prison reform issues for over ten years, and recently has helped make the direct connection between army personnel being held responsible for the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and their non-army training as corrections officers in Massachusetts and other states.

The New York Daily News and the Boston Herald carried reports last week from an unnamed NYPD officer that Mr. Toure had been identified as a person who was fomenting violent protest at the Republican National Convention.  No evidence was proffered by the police, nor was any required by the two newspapers in order to publish the derogatory information. 

It is important that all citizens be aware of and resist efforts to intimidate others because of peacable expression of thought, and that we stand in solidarity with Kazi Toure.  Calls to the federal government asking that tax dollars be more wisely spent would be appropriate, as would complaints to the US Dept. of Justice. 

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #20 posted by FoM on August 31, 2004 at 13:42:59 PT
Off Topic: News Article from The Associated Press
McGreevey, Lawmakers Agree to Craft Needle Exchange Legislation

August 31, 2004

TRENTON, N.J. -- Gov. James E. McGreevey has told legislators and state health officials to design a program that offers drug users clean needles to slow the spread of AIDS and hepatitis C.

Health Commissioner Clifton Lacy was to meet with legislators Tuesday afternoon to work out details of the program, McGreevey spokesman Micah Rasmussen said.

McGreevey met with legislative leaders last week and discussed the issue, Rasmussen said. He told them he wants a proposal by the end of this week and expects the measure to clear the Legislature this fall.

"They all agreed to work on it together and get it done," Rasmussen said.

New Jersey is one of two states with neither a legal needle exchange program nor a law allowing nonprescription sales of needles and syringes.

Critics object to having the government supply the means by which users of heroin and other illegal drugs can inject them. Supporters argue that addicts will shoot up anyway, and that allowing them to do so with dirty needles leads to more infections.

A panel convened several years ago by former Gov. Christie Whitman recommended needle exchanges to curb the spread of HIV and AIDS, but Whitman rejected the recommendation, insisting it would send the wrong message about drug use.

Copyright: 2004, The Associated Press

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/ny-bc-nj--needleexchange0831aug31,0,1391415.story?coll=ny-ap-regional-wire

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #19 posted by siege on August 31, 2004 at 13:37:15 PT
GCW
this is aug.31, 2004 not aug.28,2oo4 :) :)

and for the hydrogentated scum.. It has been gone for 2 years. the Dr. can't find out why my blood pressure and cholesterol have drop. I won't tell him. every 6 mo I get tested. a couple of points down every mo.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #18 posted by FoM on August 31, 2004 at 13:36:46 PT
The GCW
Thank you for the links and mentioning that CNews was mentioned. That's nice.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #17 posted by siege on August 31, 2004 at 13:12:59 PT
Vioxx
FRIDAY, Aug. 27 (HealthDayNews) -- A new study linking high doses of Vioxx to an increased risk of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths has re-ignited a running debate about the safety of the arthritis drug.

The study of 40,500 people enrolled in Kaiser Permanente, the nation's largest health management organization, found that heart attack rates and sudden cardiac deaths were tripled in patients taking Vioxx in doses higher than 25 milligrams a day compared to those taking a competing drug, Celebrex.

http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/health/feeds/hscout/2004/08/27/hscout520918.html

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #16 posted by The GCW on August 31, 2004 at 12:44:00 PT
siege & Max Flowers,
1st be sure to get rid of all the partially hydrogentated scum in Your home. That is part of getting rid of the bad oils. Check the labels.

A

L

S

O

The DARE SHOOTOUT SET FOR AUG. 28

Winners of the fun shoots win the "pot,"

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1202/a02.html?131369

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #15 posted by Sam Adams on August 31, 2004 at 12:42:45 PT
Vioxx
Someone told me recently that Vioxx may get pulled - it's caused some serious heart problems. I was warned not to take it.

It will be interesting, this is a billion-dollar drug.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #14 posted by siege on August 31, 2004 at 11:49:51 PT
blasphemy Sorry E_J
The thiazolidinediones are famous for causing liver cancer. One of them, Rezulin, was approved in the USA through devious political infighting, but failed to get approval in the UK because it was known to cause liver cancer. The doctor who had responsibility to approve it at the FDA refused to do so. It was only after he was replaced by a more compliant official that Rezulin gained approval by the FDA. It went on to kill well over 100 diabetes patients and cripple many others before the fight to get it off the market was finally won. Rezulin was designed to stimulate the uptake of glucose from the bloodstream by the peripheral cells and to inhibit the normal secretion of glucose by the liver. The politics of why this drug ever came onto market, and then remained in the market for such an unexplainable length of time with regulatory agency approval, is not clear. As of April 2000, lawsuits commenced to clarify this situation.

It has matured into a religion. And, like all religions, it depends heavily upon the faith of the believer. So successful has it become that it verges on blasphemy to suggest that, in most cases, the kindly high priest with the stethoscope draped prominently around his neck is a charlatan and a fraud. In the large majority of cases, he has never cured a single case of diabetes in his entire medical career. The financial and political influence of this medical community has almost totally subverted the original intent of our regulatory agencies. They routinely approve death-dealing, ineffective drugs with insufficient testing. Former commissioner of the FDA, Dr Herbert Ley, in testimony before a US Senate hearing, commented: "People think the FDA is protecting them.(( It isn't.)) What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing are as different as night and day. The financial and political influence of this medical community dominates our entire medical insurance industry. Although this is beginning to change, in America it is still difficult to find employer group medical insurance to cover effective alternative medical treatments. Orthodox coverage is standard in all states. Alternative medicine is not. For example, there are only 1,400 licensed naturopaths in 11 states compared to over 3.4 million orthodox licensees in 50 states.3 Generally, only approved treatments from licensed, credentialled practitioners are insurable. This, in effect, neatly creates a special kind of money that can only be spent within the orthodox medical and drug industry. No other industry in the world has been able to manage the politics of convincing people to accept so large a part of their pay in a form that often does not allow them to spend it as they see fit. The financial and political influence of this medical community completely controls virtually every diabetes publication in the country. Many diabetes publications are subsidised by ads for diabetes supplies. No diabetes editor is going to allow the truth to be printed in his magazine. This is why the diabetic only pays about one-quarter to one-third of the cost of printing the magazine he depends upon for accurate information. The rest is subsidised by diabetes manufacturers with a vested commercial interest in preventing diabetics from curing their diabetes.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #13 posted by siege on August 31, 2004 at 11:37:24 PT
Max Flowers
make her a Gift of some of beneficial fats and oils and glycaemic tables, hemp oil, flax oil, fish oil and occasionally cod liver oil. And get of the bad oils in the home. hemp seed , flax seed can be ground to flour or past for cooking

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #12 posted by Max Flowers on August 31, 2004 at 09:58:26 PT
thanks siege
That was a great excerpt, I believe what it says 100%. I sent it to my mom who is diabetic and believes her idiot doctor when he tells her "once you have diabetes there is no reversal, only management." She won't believe the article, however, because it came from the internet.

What a CROCK, and his lies (or criminally negligent malpractice, whichever it is) are going to steal years from her life because she believes him and not me. Naturally, because he's the DOCTOR and knows what he's doing, right? (WRONG)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #11 posted by BigDawg on August 31, 2004 at 09:53:22 PT
Sorry to offend you E_J
But my first career was medical in nature... and I learned alot about the business. And where pharmaceuticals are concerned, they are among the worst.

Look into the problem of anti-biotics.

We are on the brink of not having ANY that work (talk to any Dr.), but the pharms are not interested in spending R&D money on a drug that CURES. Take a close look at the drugs that have been coming out for anything lately. They are all intended to be taken contiuously.

Regardless of where a Ph.D.'s heart is when in school, fact is if they work for a big corporation... they do what they are told for a paycheck. And they are not asked to find CURES.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #10 posted by Max Flowers on August 31, 2004 at 09:33:15 PT
EJ sorry but it's true and it is hard to get up
I don't think he directs his comment at the people who nobly undertake to study science, but sadly, what happens is that just above that level, the pharm corps take it from there and they're the ones who are only interested in selling drugs.

There are lots of good, noble people out there including scientists but they are NOT the ones in charge of things. A good friend of mine is a PhD working on a drug for Alzheimer's and he describes the same thing; their research is not directed at finding a cure, it's directed at finding a pharmaceutical treatment that would be administered over the course of years. He tells me that he would have liked to first do years more of foundational research geared toward understanding the disease more thoroughly, but he has no say because the money that funds the drug research comes from grants by---you guessed it---the feds, and because of that, in a very real way the feds control the agenda of the research. There is no money in simply understanding a disease scientifically; the money is in "treating" it pharmaceutically. This frustrates him greatly and makes him feel like a pawn, and he is a briillant biochemist. However, he does not have tens of millions of dollars to fund research so he cannot control squat. Who has the $$$, controls the agenda.

You are right EJ that there are a lot of good and altruistic doctors and scientists out there, but BigDawg is right that they *aren't* the ones who call the real shots at the higher levels.

Don't you see how the circle is laid out?

Gov't grants ---> pharm research ---> research yields drug ---> FDA grants approval ---> Big Pharm sells drug ---> doctors get kickbacks and other $ benefits for prescribing the drug(s) ---> Big Pharm makes millions to billions ---> Big Pharm lobbyists cozy up to legislators and $ changes hands ---> legislators influence their "colleagues" at FDA ---> FDA talks to the agencies who approve grants

It's enough to make you sick



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #9 posted by FoM on August 31, 2004 at 08:49:58 PT
Just a Note
I'm looking for news but I haven't found any to post. I'll keep looking.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #8 posted by E_Johnson on August 31, 2004 at 08:17:43 PT
Sounds kind of childish to me
Sorry BigDawg but that is horrifically insulting to all the people who take the trouble to get a Ph.D. in science and go to work on new medicines because they sincerelty want to help the world.

I guess the people here are just so much better than the rest of the world, it's hard to believe.

Everyone else in the world is just 100% corrupt, stupid and evil?

If things are that bad, why do we even get up in the morning?

Do you ever at any time believe that there are HUMANS in the world other than yourself?

I just don't think so.

If they are not human then how you know we are?



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #7 posted by BigDawg on August 31, 2004 at 08:08:28 PT
Pharmaceuticals and Cures
Pharms are NOT interested in cures.

The goal of pharms is to create drugs that need to be taken for ones entire LIFE.

A cure means that you eventually don't need their product any more. And they don't want THAT!

Pharms are no diff than any other corp. PROFIT RULES.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by siege on August 31, 2004 at 05:47:06 PT
Off topic, Diabetes: It's Cause and Cure
If you are an American diabetic, your physician will never tell you that most cases of diabetes are curable. In fact, if you even mention the "cure" word around him, he will likely become upset and irrational. Your physician will also never tell you that, at one time, strokes, both ischaemic and haemorrhagic, heart failure due to neuropathy as well as both ischaemic and haemorrhagic coronary events, obesity, atherosclerosis, elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, impotence, retinopathy, renal failure, liver failure, polycystic ovary syndrome, elevated blood sugar, systemic candida, impaired carbohydrate metabolism, poor wound healing, impaired fat metabolism, peripheral neuropathy as well as many more of today's disgraceful epidemic disorders were once well understood often to be but symptoms of diabetes. They promoted the use of margarine as heart healthy, long after it was well understood that margarine causes diabetes and promotes heart failure. The first step to curing diabetes is to stop believing the lie that the disease is incurable. None of these medical strategies is designed to normalise the cellular uptake of glucose by the cells that need it to power their activity. The prognosis with this orthodox treatment is increasing disability and early death from heart or kidney failure or the failure of some other vital organ. Repair the faulty blood sugar control system. This is done simply by substituting clean, healthy, beneficial fats and oils in the diet for the pristine-looking but toxic trans-isomer mix found in attractive plastic containers on supermarket shelves.

Consume only hemp oil, flax oil, fish oil and occasionally cod liver oil until blood sugar starts to stabilise. Then add back healthy oils such as butter, coconut oil, olive oil and clean animal fat. Read labels; refuse to consume cheap junk oils when they appear in processed food or on restaurant menus. Diabetics are chronically short of minerals; they need to add a good-quality, broad-spectrum mineral supplement to the diet. .. Control blood sugar manually during the recovery cycle. Under medical supervision, gradually discontinue all oral hypoglycaemic agents along with any additional drugs given to counteract their side effects. Develop natural blood-sugar control by the use of glycaemic tables, by consuming frequent small meals (including fibre-rich foods), by regular post-prandial exercise, and by the complete avoidance of all sugars along with the judicious use of only non-toxic sweeteners... Avoid alcohol until blood sugar stabilises in the normal range. Keep score by using a pinprick-type glucose meter. Keep track of everything you do with a medical diary. Restore a proper balance of healthy fats and oils when the blood sugar controller again works. Permanently remove from the diet all cheap, toxic, junk fats and oils as well as the processed and restaurant foods that contain them. When the blood sugar controller again starts to work correctly, gradually introduce additional healthy foods to the diet.

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/DiabetesDeception.html



[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #5 posted by The GCW on August 31, 2004 at 04:48:09 PT
3 good points and mention of CNews.
US WI: PUB LTE: Marijuana Debate: Cannabis Used Elsewhere

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1232/a07.html?397

MARIJUANA DEBATE: CANNABIS USED ELSEWHERE

It is inaccurate for John Kojis ( "Letter: Marijuana's Illegal" Aug. 24, 2004 ), to assume, the overwhelming population doesn't support legalizing marijuana use for medical purposes." Nationally, citizens do support allowing use of Cannabis for medicinal use, in fact every recent referendum placed before the voter has passed.

Just because the culture of corporations, persecute Cannabis users in America doesn't make it right. In other parts of the world, cultures accept Cannabis, one example is the Ford Motor Company near Pretoria, South Africa. ( http://cannabisnews.com/news/12/thread12948.shtml ) However the best argument for re-legalizing cannabis is because Christ God Our Father told us that he created all the seed bearing plants and said they were all good. If that's not clear enough, he even told us that on the very first page of the Bible.

Biblically, cannabis prohibition is "illegal."

Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1207/a02.html

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #4 posted by FoM on August 30, 2004 at 21:32:27 PT
Thanks EJ
I watched them sing. It was very good.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #3 posted by E_Johnson on August 30, 2004 at 20:05:32 PT
Heads up -- Jay Leno alert
Toots and the Maytals on Jay Leno tonight.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #2 posted by Dave in Florida on August 30, 2004 at 19:58:29 PT
Off topic, but very interesting
Guess what receptors they block?

http://my.webmd.com/content/article/93/102335.htm?z=1728_00000_1000_nb_02

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #1 posted by The GCW on August 30, 2004 at 18:35:52 PT
"Baker Piston 04-2," 's Make Point
Philippines: RP, US Troops Start Anti-Drugs Training

http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n1230/a04.html?397

[ Post Comment ]


  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on August 30, 2004 at 18:23:58