Cannabis News Media Awareness Project
  Principal Resigns Over School Drug Raid
Posted by CN Staff on January 05, 2004 at 17:25:20 PT
By The Associated Press  
Source: Associated Press  

justice Moncks Corner, S.C. -- The principal of a high school where police drew their guns on students and ordered them to the floor during a drug raid announced his resignation Monday.

``I realized it is in the best interest of Stratford High School and of my students for me to make a change,'' George McCrackin said in a statement. McCrackin had asked Goose Creek police to come to the school after receiving reports of marijuana sales.

Police said dogs sniffed drug residue on 12 book bags during the Nov. 5 sweep but found no drugs. No one was arrested, but some students were handcuffed for a time.

The raid led to allegations of excessive force and racism because many of the students at the school during the early morning raid were black. Police have said they felt the tactics were needed to ensure the safety of the officers and students.

Berkeley County District Superintendent J. Chester Floyd told reporters Monday that McCrackin will be reassigned within the district. McCrackin probably will spend the coming weeks preparing for two federal lawsuits filed by students, he added.

McCrackin did not immediately return a phone call from The Associated Press seeking further comment.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson led hundreds through the streets of nearby North Charleston last month in protest. The civil rights leader, a South Carolina native, said McCrackin helped orchestrate the raid.

``It's obvious he was encouraged to step down because he has lost his moral authority to direct the parents and children,'' Jackson said Monday. ``He cannot be a scapegoat, however. He is just one actor in this scheme that humiliated and violated the children.''

State Attorney General Henry McMaster was at the school Monday as part of an investigation into the police actions. A state prosecutor earlier said he could not determine whether police violated any laws.

``We'll move as quickly as we can, but it takes time.'' McMaster said.

Source: Associated Press
Published: Monday, January 5, 2004
Copyright: 2004 The Associated Press

Related Articles & Web Site:

ACLU
http://www.aclu.org/

Stop Pointing Guns at Our Kids
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread17946.shtml

Raid At School Leads To Racial Divide
http://cannabisnews.com/news/thread17944.shtml


Home    Comment    Email    Register    Recent Comments    Help

 
Comment #7 posted by fearfull on January 06, 2004 at 06:26:20 PT
Police don't tell you the whole story
""Police said dogs sniffed drug residue on 12 book bags during the Nov. 5 sweep""

A very large percentage of US currency has been shown to have cocaine residue on it. So if any of these students had money in their book bags, they could have been one of these 12.

Imagine, the very thought of bringing money to school!

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #6 posted by kaptinemo on January 06, 2004 at 05:00:32 PT:

Uh, folks...he'll be 'reassigned'. He's not gone.
Read it again. Reassigned does not mean fired. We haven't quite won yet.

McCracken must be treated like a leper everywhere he goes because of this. The School Board is going to reassign him elsewhere - presumably to a less politically 'sensitive' district. That means that he will probably feel safe in a few months, depending upon how these lawsuits go, to try this stunt again as a way of trying to vindicate himself that he was right to begin with.

He hasn't learned, and neither has the School Board.

They have to be hammered into splinters and the splinters ground into dust. The School Board must be made to 'bleed green' to the point that they choose to fire him publicly rather than face losing their entire budget in legal defense fees.

I used to work for a school board, and read much of what they posted on their own internal BBS's. Many of you have no idea of just how political a School Board is; many of those aspiring to public office get their first taste of power in that 'nursery'. Needless to say, partisan politics are rife. Dems and Reps slug it out ideologically behind the scenes...with childrens' futures in the balance of the outcome.

The bureaucrats within it are aware of how their futures can change in a heartbeat by ruffling one action's feathers over another, and are absolutely terrified of controversy, and quickly apply the 'hoof and mouth' remedy to anyone who even contemplates 'rocking the boat'.

And said bureaucrats are jealously protective of their little satrapies, and will do anything to avoid raising the public's ire. I've seen the beast from the inside, and kicked at its' intestines for ruining kid's futures with their inanities until it decided to s**t me out. Don't take my word for anything; attend one of their public meetings, and you can see for yourself how much a tightrope is walked. You'll be able to see within minutes who belongs to which party, which factions, etc. And we wonder at the 'dumbing down' of our kids, and why we have to import technical workers from overseas, because our students are hostage to politics.

I sincerely hope that the NAACP realizes what an opportunity they've been handed to speak out against the drug laws of this country which led to the incident to begin with. Because it will also illustrate just how much beetle tracking and BS America's kids are subjected to by these sycophants.

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #5 posted by OverwhelmSam on January 06, 2004 at 03:59:11 PT:

Yet Another Drug War Casualty
Now we are hitting them where it hurts. Every time we get a principal fired, a police officer on charges, or an elected official impeached because of their enforcement of the ridiculous drug laws, we move a step closer to legalization.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #4 posted by DeVoHawk on January 05, 2004 at 20:44:16 PT
McCrackin - quotes
"I don't think it was an overreaction," he said. "Anytime you have qualified information regarding drugs and large amounts of money, there's a reasonable assumption weapons are involved."

McCrackin says he didn't know police would draw their guns -- and police were just doing their jobs

"I'm sure it was an inconvenience to those individuals who were on that hallway. But I think there's a valuable experience there."

So McCrackin expected weapons to be involved but did not think the police would draw their guns. Are we to assume that you are stupid or you care more about the safety of police than the children you are intrusted to safeguard.

But what is really sad about this event is that people backed McCrackin after the raid. I am not afraid of these Nazi's who follow orders, they have always existed and they eventually turn around when it is their turn to be taken away by the police.



[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #3 posted by Patrick on January 05, 2004 at 20:17:21 PT
McDrug war notes...
So McCrackin quit his job cause a crackin down on kids with a nazi raid and the State Attorney General McMaster shows up to be master of ceremonies. Attorney General Ash-croft hates cannabis smokers. And we have both a Bush and a Dick in the white house. Fiction couldn't be any McSadder than this cast of freaks. McCollum was exposed on CBS last night for his vile pro position to cage humans for using a plant. His McView is basically to cage all of us or we'll have even more! McMe think not. McMe thinks McVoters will McOust his ass.

[ Post Comment ]
 
Comment #2 posted by Virgil on January 05, 2004 at 18:57:25 PT
Toronto Globe & Mail pulls slick one
The people paying property taxes are going to feel the direct cost of the drug war. The lawyers are already collecting money and there will be out-of-site damages.

The Toronto Globe and Mail disappeared a poll when the NDP was ahead. The NDP and Jack Layton are the party that Marc Emery support because they are vocal about making Cannabis Free For Everyone. There is a Canadian link mentioned in the thread starter on the subject- http://www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=25&t=000533

From http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php

On Friday, Toronto's Globe & Mail - Canada's "paper of record", editorially establishment conservative - ran an online poll asking the question, "If a Canadian election is held in 2004, how will you vote?" Total votes numbered 31,089.

The results were:

Bloc Quebecois- 585 votes (2%)

Conservative Party- 9477 votes (30%)

Liberal Party- 8584 votes (28%)

NDP- 9624 votes (31%)

Other- 2819 votes (9%)

[ Post Comment ]

 
Comment #1 posted by FoM on January 05, 2004 at 17:27:34 PT
Here's An AP Article
I was waiting in hopes of an article other then an AP but I figured I should get this posted and maybe tomorrow there will be one with more details. Until then! Here's one.

[ Post Comment ]

  Post Comment
Name:        Password:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comment:   [Please refrain from using profanity in your message]

Link URL:
Link Title:


Return to Main Menu


So everyone may enjoy this service and to keep it running, here are some guidelines: NO spamming, NO commercial advertising, NO flamming, NO illegal activity, and NO sexually explicit materials. Lastly, we reserve the right to remove any message for any reason!

This web page and related elements are for informative purposes only and thus the use of any of this information is at your risk! We do not own nor are responsible for visitor comments. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 and The Berne Convention on Literary and Artistic Works, Article 10, news clippings on this site are made available without profit for research and educational purposes. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names used on this site are the property of their respective owners. Page updated on January 05, 2004 at 17:25:20